Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

RX-7 confirmed. Hallelujah!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-02-2012, 01:49 PM
  #126  
Gold Wheels FTW
iTrader: (1)
 
reddozen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,116
Received 49 Likes on 35 Posts
One thing to keep in mind though Kevin is that there's not an actual car with real stats on the table. Just a confirmation that the raw base block for the 16x is currently capable of 300HP. A turbo could easily push that into a 400HP range, and who knows what other advances they may have in the next 3 years before they have to finalize the production specs.

I think that it will all be pure speculation for the next 3 years till there's something tangible that can be sat in and evaluated as a "prototype". I'm sure that Mazda is well aware that they can't expect to sell an RX8 level car at a premium of a 370Z level car regardless of what year it may be released in.

Last edited by reddozen; 11-02-2012 at 01:52 PM.
Old 11-02-2012, 01:59 PM
  #127  
Phone Booth'd
iTrader: (4)
 
fuztupnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Cincinnasty
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's why i'm asking what it's going to compete with? If it's going to be priced higher than the 370z, it's going to need to beat it in every category possible. I'm excited to see that the rotary isn't going to be dead, but this car will have to be a world beater to be in the price range mentioned in that article. It's not like the RX-8 left a great taste in consumer's mouths, and mazda will need more than just rotards buying it for it to be worth the effort.
Old 11-02-2012, 02:07 PM
  #128  
Gold Wheels FTW
iTrader: (1)
 
reddozen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,116
Received 49 Likes on 35 Posts
I agree 100%, and I'm confident that they'll deliver, and if they don't, I'll take the money I was going to spend on it, and go buy another FC... LOL
Old 11-02-2012, 03:56 PM
  #129  
tjb
 
tjbourgoyne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 877
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
1. Well under 40K.
2. Reliability/ quality
3. Performance that one ups the RX8 in every aspect.
4. Creative cost cutting measures; No radio, CD, NAV...(7 years I've never used any of this stuff) anything that can keep cost down without disrupting the first 3 needs to be pursued agressively.

Do this and it will be a success. Miss any of these points and it will fail. And it matters not how many seats...2,3 ,4....I don't care!

I will buy this car.

Last edited by tjbourgoyne; 11-02-2012 at 04:10 PM.
Old 11-02-2012, 04:17 PM
  #130  
Super Moderator
 
ASH8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 10,868
Received 317 Likes on 226 Posts
Originally Posted by tjbourgoyne
1. Well under 40K.
2. Reliability/ quality
3. Performance that one ups the RX8 in every aspect.
4. Creative cost cutting measures; No radio, CD, NAV...(7 years I've never used any of this stuff) anything that can keep cost down without disrupting the first 3 needs to be pursued agressively.

Do this and it will be a success. Miss any of these points and it will fail. And it matters not how many seats...2,3 ,4....I don't care!

I will buy this car.
Hey, I had to smile at your comment about not using the Sat, Nav, Radio, CD, etc...
I am the same, never used either in the Miata or 8, don't get me wrong I like sound, but not in these cars, how the hell anyone can have sound on when your human senses and car make a fantastic track that I am NEVER bored with.
Old 11-02-2012, 04:24 PM
  #131  
weeeeeeeeee
iTrader: (12)
 
ShellDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Outside Philadelphia
Posts: 4,200
Received 229 Likes on 153 Posts
you guys just need louder exhausts
Old 11-02-2012, 04:48 PM
  #132  
tjb
 
tjbourgoyne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 877
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ASH8
Hey, I had to smile at your comment about not using the Sat, Nav, Radio, CD, etc...
I am the same, never used either in the Miata or 8, don't get me wrong I like sound, but not in these cars, how the hell anyone can have sound on when your human senses and car make a fantastic track that I am NEVER bored with.
That and this stuff is not needed. A phone can do all these things. The spare tire/fix a flat crap for the RX8 was also a big waste of R&D. Ditch it. I keep a plug kit and compressor in the trunk. If that can't get it then I'll call a wrecker. There are a lot of ways to press the cost down considerably. Barney style this car. Make it fast, reliable, fun. That's all most RX8 owners want anyway.

Last edited by tjbourgoyne; 11-02-2012 at 04:55 PM.
Old 11-02-2012, 05:54 PM
  #133  
#50
 
bse50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Caput Mundi
Posts: 7,521
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
a MR layout rotary with 300hp...
Just an Ipod plug as a sound system and 2 neodiumium magnet speakers...

That's the path mazda should take. The se3p was too much GT too little sports car despite its handling, the FD was too much super car and too little super car at the same time (great concept but it didn't do well here).
Halo car that's as pure as it comes to keep the rotary alive as a flagship... If you need room for 4 the dealership might as well introduce you to cars that fit 5 and are comfy and quiet. the Diesel cx5 and mazda 6.
Old 11-02-2012, 06:09 PM
  #134  
Super Moderator
 
ASH8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 10,868
Received 317 Likes on 226 Posts
Discontinuation of Tool (Jack and Wheel Brace)

Originally Posted by tjbourgoyne
That and this stuff is not needed. A phone can do all these things. The spare tire/fix a flat crap for the RX8 was also a big waste of R&D. Ditch it. I keep a plug kit and compressor in the trunk. If that can't get it then I'll call a wrecker. There are a lot of ways to press the cost down considerably. Barney style this car. Make it fast, reliable, fun. That's all most RX8 owners want anyway.
Here is an coincidence...

Mazda (for Europe) has just added a TSB ''Discontinued the Jack and Wheel Brace'', because they are fitted with the 'emergency flat tyre repair kit' (same as RX-8).

TSB applies to Miata, Mazda ,2,3,5.
Attached Files
Old 11-02-2012, 06:59 PM
  #135  
tjb
 
tjbourgoyne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 877
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Emergency flat tire repair kit = glorified can of fix a flat. I still have that waste of space for for the 8 in the garage along with the spare tire.
Old 11-03-2012, 05:50 AM
  #136  
Wiseguy
 
MattMPS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,084
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by ASH8

TSB applies to Miata, Mazda ,2,3,5.
new6 have also a tyre repair kit as standard, at least in Western Europe.
Old 11-03-2012, 08:56 AM
  #137  
Wheels, not rims!!
iTrader: (8)
 
SayNoToPistons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: LA
Posts: 6,527
Received 67 Likes on 56 Posts
I much rather have a spare than those damn run flats they put on BMW's.

Last edited by SayNoToPistons; 11-03-2012 at 10:24 AM.
Old 11-03-2012, 09:21 AM
  #138  
tjb
 
tjbourgoyne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 877
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by SayNoToPistons
I much rather had a spare than those damn run flats they put on BMW's.
I hated those run flats. Nothing but trouble. Found out later there was a recall on the tires but the wife forgot to tell me.
Old 11-03-2012, 09:41 AM
  #139  
Registered
 
thunderberk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mazda fight againts emission rules why they are going to bring back Rx-7 ? Rx-7's big room for 2 seats.. also 4 seat spec's heaven..

In my opinion Mazda need Roadster Rotary new sports car... Like s2000. If they passes emissions with 16x then they must be produce 4 seats and enough room for great quality sports car like what GTR 35 did..

Maybe it is called to be Rx-9 !

Last edited by thunderberk; 11-03-2012 at 09:52 AM.
Old 11-03-2012, 09:55 AM
  #140  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
heck in 5 years we may all be running diesal anyway.....

Hey Paul my friend!!
Dont exclue a 3 rotor design so quickly.

Last edited by olddragger; 11-04-2012 at 10:28 AM.
Old 11-03-2012, 10:46 AM
  #141  
Wiseguy
 
MattMPS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,084
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by SayNoToPistons
I much rather have a spare than those damn run flats they put on BMW's.
+1.

run flats sucks. also in EU.
Old 11-03-2012, 12:47 PM
  #142  
Flame On!
iTrader: (4)
 
1.3_LittersOfFurry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Orleans, La
Posts: 1,897
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by thunderberk
Mazda fight againts emission rules why they are going to bring back Rx-7 ? Rx-7's big room for 2 seats.. also 4 seat spec's heaven..

In my opinion Mazda need Roadster Rotary new sports car... Like s2000. If they passes emissions with 16x then they must be produce 4 seats and enough room for great quality sports car like what GTR 35 did..

Maybe it is called to be Rx-9 !
No no no, we want a SPORTS CAR, not another GT.. If you need rear seats buy a sedan.
Old 11-03-2012, 01:04 PM
  #143  
Rockie Mountain Newbie
 
Bladecutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,601
Received 28 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by 1.3_LittersOfFurry
No no no, we want a SPORTS CAR, not another GT.. If you need rear seats buy a sedan.
Screw that, we want both cars.
Build both the RX-7 and the RX-8 at the same time.

That would reduce the costs of both cars, and of the new rotary engines.
Not to mention appease both markets of the rotary engined vehicles.

BC.
Old 11-03-2012, 02:17 PM
  #144  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Mazmart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,792
Received 63 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by Bladecutter
Screw that, we want both cars.
Build both the RX-7 and the RX-8 at the same time.

That would reduce the costs of both cars, and of the new rotary engines.
Not to mention appease both markets of the rotary engined vehicles.

BC.
I like the way you think .

Paul.
Old 11-03-2012, 03:41 PM
  #145  
Flame On!
iTrader: (4)
 
1.3_LittersOfFurry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Orleans, La
Posts: 1,897
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Bladecutter
Screw that, we want both cars.
Build both the RX-7 and the RX-8 at the same time.

That would reduce the costs of both cars, and of the new rotary engines.
Not to mention appease both markets of the rotary engined vehicles.

BC.
There would be no way they could be on the same platform, ever had a 2+2 Rx-7? Those back seats were totally useless, I slept in my back seat one time... Well, it wasn't really sleeping, I was basically in a alcohol coma and thrown back there with my feet hanging out the window... Friends still crack jokes at me about it..
Old 11-03-2012, 05:02 PM
  #146  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Mazmart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,792
Received 63 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by 1.3_LittersOfFurry
There would be no way they could be on the same platform, ever had a 2+2 Rx-7? Those back seats were totally useless, I slept in my back seat one time... Well, it wasn't really sleeping, I was basically in a alcohol coma and thrown back there with my feet hanging out the window... Friends still crack jokes at me about it..
It would be what we call the same 'architecture' not platform. The NC MX-5 and the FE (SE3P) RX-8 are built off the same architecture and they can do it again.

Paul.
Old 11-03-2012, 07:20 PM
  #147  
Un-Registered User
 
Slidin8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NZ Brahhhhh
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
everyone here should just buy mustangs.....................
Old 11-03-2012, 07:36 PM
  #148  
Rockie Mountain Newbie
 
Bladecutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,601
Received 28 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by Slidin8
everyone here should just buy mustangs.....................
You pay for it, and I'll take one.
But I'm not spending my own hard earned money on one.

BC.
Old 11-03-2012, 07:36 PM
  #149  
European livin n ohio
 
blazenblue63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: canton ohio
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Slidin8
everyone here should just buy mustangs.....................
Id rather drive a prius.... It'll be a cold day in hell before i buy an American made car. Built as cheap as possible with the cheapest materials and lowest standards. No thank you. Even though many Japanese cars are built here in the states they're still built using Japanese standards and with better materials. Simple guideline to go by, can't afford German? Buy Japanese. Can't afford Japanese? Don't buy. But that is just my preference. I like the look of the new mustang especially the tail lights but it's not my cup of tea.
Old 11-03-2012, 07:58 PM
  #150  
Rockie Mountain Newbie
 
Bladecutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,601
Received 28 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by Mazmart
It would be what we call the same 'architecture' not platform. The NC MX-5 and the FE (SE3P) RX-8 are built off the same architecture and they can do it again.

Paul.
And with Mazda building a new Miata in another pair of years, and using it to build Alfa Romeo's, this is the perfect time to use that same architecture to make both the RX-7 and RX-8.

Think of the savings having 4 limited production performance vehicles built off of the same architecture. Mazda would be foolish to let this opportunity go by, unexplored.

Like I said earlier, I'd buy a new RX-8 in a heartbeat.

BC.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: RX-7 confirmed. Hallelujah!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21 PM.