Notices
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension

Will It Fit Thread

Thread Tools
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old Oct 5, 2012 | 09:33 AM
  #8851  
J8635621's Avatar
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 128
From: Waco
9" go with 245/40. I assume street driving.

What was said about the 9.5" is correct. 245/40 is a bit more stretch than I'd like. I don't know about you. I ran that setup for a while though
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2012 | 09:55 PM
  #8852  
LifeAfterRx8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 782
Likes: 2
From: Florida
Originally Posted by Mr_Pieper
Those offsets are close enough to not really make a difference. That tire size is okay but with a +35 you can fit a lot more. It may look a little goofy at stock height, though.
Originally Posted by J8635621
9" go with 245/40. I assume street driving.

What was said about the 9.5" is correct. 245/40 is a bit more stretch than I'd like. I don't know about you. I ran that setup for a while though
Any rubbing issues with the front?
Will I need to roll the fenders on stock height?
I spoke with someone on the phone and he said it's not common with the 8 to run a 9.5, mostly 9?

The wheels I'm looking at right now are Kiwami's in 18x9.5, same size all around. I know there's the newer deep concave wheels with an 18x10 but I'm guessing that's too wide of a wheel?

Also, would a +30 be too aggressive or just stick to +38?

Last edited by LifeAfterRx8; Oct 5, 2012 at 09:57 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2012 | 07:53 AM
  #8853  
J8635621's Avatar
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 128
From: Waco
Stock height sucks. 9.5 isn't uncommon at all. It isn't too wide. +30 is great if you are lowered. The lower the car, the lower offset you can run and it not look stupid. If you are going to stay stock height then +38 is even a little too low of an offset IMO.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2012 | 09:15 AM
  #8854  
Danmn858's Avatar
Danny Rotstein
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by J8635621
Stock height sucks. 9.5 isn't uncommon at all. It isn't too wide. +30 is great if you are lowered. The lower the car, the lower offset you can run and it not look stupid. If you are going to stay stock height then +38 is even a little too low of an offset IMO.
100% agree
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2012 | 11:34 AM
  #8855  
Darth Rex's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
18”
Front: 8.0j ET30 225/40/18
rear : 9.5j ET26 255/35/18

still stock height, will be lowered 40mm in the near future.
Help me make my decision...
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2012 | 11:37 AM
  #8856  
J8635621's Avatar
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 128
From: Waco
No. Staggered is whack and lower the car first
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2012 | 12:53 PM
  #8857  
Danmn858's Avatar
Danny Rotstein
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by J8635621
No. Staggered is whack and lower the car first
the car is rwd, staggered is fine.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2012 | 01:02 PM
  #8858  
JCrane82's Avatar
Trust Me, I'm an Engineer
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 621
Likes: 7
From: Elkhorn, WI
Originally Posted by Danmn858
the car is rwd, staggered is fine.
Disagree. The RX-8 doesn't have enough power to justify a staggered setup. If you are FI, then go staggered if you want. I suggest just going with 265's all around on 9.5" wheels.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2012 | 01:06 PM
  #8859  
Danmn858's Avatar
Danny Rotstein
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by JCrane82
Disagree. The RX-8 doesn't have enough power to justify a staggered setup. If you are FI, then go staggered if you want. I suggest just going with 265's all around on 9.5" wheels.
If he's going for track setup maybe... which I highly doubt.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2012 | 01:07 PM
  #8860  
J8635621's Avatar
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 128
From: Waco
Originally Posted by Danmn858
the car is rwd, staggered is fine.
Benefit to going staggered?
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2012 | 01:11 PM
  #8861  
JCrane82's Avatar
Trust Me, I'm an Engineer
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 621
Likes: 7
From: Elkhorn, WI
Originally Posted by Danmn858
If he's going for track setup maybe... which I highly doubt.
Very possible. I won't deny that some huge wheels look sweet on the rear of the RX-8, I just wonder why you wouldn't put those big wheels and tires up front as well.

But you are right......staggered isn't a really a issue unless you want to maintain the handling for track.

An alternative to a staggered setup is to run some spacers on the rear. Then you have the look, but still keep a square setup for handling and rotations.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2012 | 05:14 PM
  #8862  
R80MAV's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
From: U.K
Im currently running 9j lm reps et 39 all round (3mm spacers) the next step up would be 25mm spacers to clear the factory studs. will i rub with stock fenders and stock profile tyre (225/45/18)? the overall offset will be et17 :o.

ive noticed the tabs are pretty large in rear arches does this make it difficult to roll them?
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2012 | 06:33 AM
  #8863  
RX8 Nutta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Hi All,

I'm pretty new to this whole after market wheel thing but have been doing heaps of reading through the forum but haven't been able to find an answer to my question.

Looking at getting a set of Enkei RP-03 18x8.5 +35 or 18x8.5 +30.

Tyre wise I'm looking at the Bridgestone S001 in 235/40/18

Car is lowered on Koni Yellows and Eibach Pro springs. Eibach springs drop ~1.5" and the Koni's seem to drop it a little more.

Will these fit without needing to roll the guards?

Thanks
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2012 | 06:48 AM
  #8864  
J8635621's Avatar
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 128
From: Waco
They look much better in the 9.5 width. Your choices shouldn't need fenders rolled and I would suggest 245/40 tires
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2012 | 09:31 AM
  #8865  
RX8 Nutta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Thanks J,

The 9.5" do look good, but the car is mainly a DD so didn't see the need to go that wide.

I was more concerned about the +30 fitting as the +35 for these are getting harder to find down here in Australia.

I'll check out prices on the 245's tomorrow.

Thanks again!
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2012 | 09:33 AM
  #8866  
J8635621's Avatar
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 128
From: Waco
Mine was a DD too and I still got the 9.5" rp03.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2012 | 09:56 AM
  #8867  
RX8 Nutta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
What offset did you have on those? And how much work did you do to fit them?

245 would be pretty stretched on a 9.5 I would have thought?
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2012 | 10:05 AM
  #8868  
Mr_Pieper's Avatar
Legend In My Own Mind
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 3
From: The Lou
I have a 245 on a 9.75 and the stretch isn't too bad. Still wish I hadn't been so paranoid and should have gone wider.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2012 | 10:13 AM
  #8869  
Mr_Pieper's Avatar
Legend In My Own Mind
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 3
From: The Lou
Here is the best picture example I had of mine on hand.

Name:  SAM_0946_zpsdc254418.jpg
Views: 422
Size:  219.4 KB
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2012 | 11:04 AM
  #8870  
J8635621's Avatar
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 128
From: Waco
One moment and I'll show my old pictures. 245s on a 9.5 or 9.75 is more stretch than I'd like. I'd say go with 265/35 on the 9.5s to be honest. That's what I have now.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/j863562...7611482633008/ 245/40 18x9.5 +38 lowered about an inch all around with no work needed at all
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2012 | 07:27 PM
  #8871  
RX8 Nutta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Thanks guys,

Looks good J. It will come down to what I can actually get my hands on down here.

Seems like they are getting harder to come by for whatever reason.

Thanks again.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2012 | 07:12 AM
  #8872  
freewire's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
geometry/alignment 20mm Spacers

Just looking for a bit of advice really, does anyone know if an adjustment to the geometry needs to be made with 20mm spacers on S1 or S2, and considering whether it has been lowered or not?? Any help here would be appreciated.

Regards
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2012 | 07:44 AM
  #8873  
J8635621's Avatar
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 128
From: Waco
Just spacers requires nothing else. I don't really understand your question though
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2012 | 08:24 AM
  #8874  
Mr_Pieper's Avatar
Legend In My Own Mind
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 3
From: The Lou
The adjustment of your isosceles needs to be equal to the sine of the angle perpendicular to your rhombus alignment.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2012 | 09:51 AM
  #8875  
freewire's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by J8635621
Just spacers requires nothing else. I don't really understand your question though
Thanks and sorry I meant alignment.. regards.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:16 PM.