Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Pettit Super Charger Owners

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-23-2010, 04:06 PM
  #8301  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
hornbm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bothell, WA
Posts: 503
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
That vid is a 20B not a 13B.
Old 12-23-2010, 04:12 PM
  #8302  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
zenrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by marsredr100
This is my anti-spoogh modification since I purchased the car in 2006. It vents any type of moisture and keeps debris from getting inside the oil fill tube. Also, my blower vents into the oil fill line and thus far I haven't seen any oil spooghing out of the oil fill cap vent. I don't run a catch can neither.

Total cost @ $6 (breather material and silicone to keep the material it in place).
Moon did something similar on mine to allow water vapor to exit the oil fill hose. A little more blingy but effective.
Old 12-23-2010, 04:13 PM
  #8303  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
zenrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hornbm
That vid is a 20B not a 13B.
Yeah. Ain't she sweet
Old 12-23-2010, 07:56 PM
  #8304  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
marsredr100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hornbm
That vid is a 20B not a 13B.
I stand corrected, thank you.

6.84 at 201 mph on a 13B Rican Style

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9AaR..._order&list=UL
Old 12-24-2010, 09:56 AM
  #8305  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
Sum bitch!
OD
Old 12-24-2010, 12:47 PM
  #8306  
100% baller (finally!)
iTrader: (7)
 
dondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,383
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by marsredr100
Dude

I'm just giving you advice of what works for me and you do as you wish with your nipples.

I think I answered your spring question earlier but just in case.

1. Spring on (softest spring you can get) for smooth high rpm to idle transition for everyday driving.

2. Spring off for competition driving.

The bypass valve functions (open/close) .00000000001 seconds faster without the spring while shifting gears in "Drive It Like You Stole It Mode" but has nothing to do with proper sealing unless you have a bad bypass o-ring or stock valve plunger. Hence my suggestion of using vaseline for internal bypass valve lubrication.

BTW, I'm just letting you know what works for me without getting too technical cuz what works on paper or NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory type computers does NOT always works in real life applications.

Now watch the video link below a try to figure out how can you squeeze a 6.7 seconds 1/4 mile time on a crapy drag strip out of a 1.3 liter engine. It is call Rican Style "trial and error" and not computer/pocket protector R&D.

So use one, two, one hundred nipples. No spring, soft spring, coilover spring. Vaseline, KY or **** lube. Just letting you know what works for me and my 330 whp SC RX8. The rest is up to you.

Just Saying!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBZ6T53Gfg8
ok so you're saying you dont use the stock spring at all.. where do you get another spring like this?

Originally Posted by zenrx8
A couple of considerations here. There is no baseline dyno with no blower; not practical; all this gives is a relative idea of performance with the blower installed on your engine. There is the second consideration: the condition of your engine. Low compression/leaky seals will lower your peak power.

The AFRs are another thing entirely and indicate the map needs tweaking; you're pig rich, and your know what that does to power. The 6K rpm thing makes me think of intake resonance; I don't remember what Charles fabbed for your intake, but you may be creating a standing wave at the 6K area.

8 to 9 lbs is the most boost you'll see with the large crank pulley. You want more than that, get Cam to help you straighten out this map and then follow Juan's lead to the smaller crank pulley.

One last thing: Seattle is famous for humidity. High humidity is less 02 in the intake charge. I don't see atmospheric info on the dyno chart, but dry air will give you more power and leaner AFRs.
i understand and am just trying to compare to what you guys are experiencing.

there's no dyno for the motor without blower because it's brand new from mazda. i know what the last motor did NA but that's rather useless now, yes?

remember the logged afrs here are off. the intake is a reasonable idea though. can anyone suggest a way to test that?

the large crank pulley is supposed to be more boost (12s according to CAM). isn't that what others are seeing?

this was done in portland; i have no idea how humid it was though.
Old 12-24-2010, 12:59 PM
  #8307  
Official Post Whore
iTrader: (2)
 
pdxhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 10,462
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts
FWIW a stock R3 pulled 164 on the exact dyno as dondo. Obviously not apples to apples but we have all seen enough dyno runs to know the range our cars fall into.

Last edited by pdxhak; 12-24-2010 at 01:45 PM.
Old 12-24-2010, 01:08 PM
  #8308  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by marsredr100
It is call Rican Style "trial and error" and not computer/pocket protector R&D.
Which, if you have the time to waste through T&E to get to a result that R&D can produce in a fraction of the time, is awesome.

Originally Posted by zenrx8
One last thing: Seattle is famous for humidity. High humidity is less 02 in the intake charge. I don't see atmospheric info on the dyno chart, but dry air will give you more power and leaner AFRs.
Not true. The humidity will displace some oxygen, but the greater evaporation effect on the cooling apparatus will produce more than an offset.
Humidity has no effect on resultant AFRs in a MAF-based EFI system.
Old 12-25-2010, 07:07 AM
  #8309  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
HiFlite999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 2,254
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac

Not true. The humidity will displace some oxygen, but the greater evaporation effect on the cooling apparatus will produce more than an offset.
Humidity has no effect on resultant AFRs in a MAF-based EFI system.
? Humidity is water vapor, not water liquid, in the air; it's already evaporated. There might be some tiny effect due to a slight change in the level of heat conduction of humid vs dry air over the MAF wire, but your conclusion remains correct imho.
Old 12-25-2010, 09:28 AM
  #8310  
Modulated Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
dannobre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Smallville
Posts: 13,718
Received 334 Likes on 289 Posts
Big difference in water vapor and steam
Old 12-25-2010, 04:13 PM
  #8311  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
zenrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Which, if you have the time to waste through T&E to get to a result that R&D can produce in a fraction of the time, is awesome.



Not true. The humidity will displace some oxygen, but the greater evaporation effect on the cooling apparatus will produce more than an offset.
Humidity has no effect on resultant AFRs in a MAF-based EFI system.
http://wahiduddin.net/calc/calc_hp_dp.htm

Humidity affects aerodynamic lift, ballistic path calculations, and how many T-shirts you go through diggin a ditch, I can't see where it doesn't have an effect on hp. If you're trying to say the volume of steam from the water vapor in the air offsets the lacke of oxygen for optimal combustion, I'll have to disagree until I can find a better resource.
I will grant, however, of all the variables, humidity has the least likely effect.
Old 12-25-2010, 11:49 PM
  #8312  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by zenrx8
I can't see where it doesn't have an effect on hp.
I didn't say it has no effect on HP. I said it has no effect on resultant lambda calculations.
Its effect on HP (from displaced oxygen in the intake charge) is negated by its effect on charge temperature and cooling outside the system.
Old 12-26-2010, 07:18 AM
  #8313  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
HiFlite999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 2,254
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
A very nice write up on the subject of humidity vs density is here:

http://www.racecarbook.com/articles/humidity.shtml

(I'll have to admit though, it's the first time I've seen MAF expressed in units of grains/minute.)
Old 12-28-2010, 01:24 PM
  #8314  
100% baller (finally!)
iTrader: (7)
 
dondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,383
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ok so i cleaned the entire intake system, maf, etc. and set up the bypass valve signal from post blower with no spring. are you guys positioning the short tube of the bypass valve on top? and where do you buy more of those springs in different strengths?

Last edited by dondo; 12-28-2010 at 01:45 PM.
Old 12-28-2010, 01:29 PM
  #8315  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by HiFlite999
(I'll have to admit though, it's the first time I've seen MAF expressed in units of grains/minute.)
1 g/sec = 15.4 gr/sec

That article negates the effect of relative humidity on the MAF itself and only looks at the net power loss from the loss of oxygen density. So, it isn't totally relevant to this discussion.
Old 12-28-2010, 01:44 PM
  #8316  
100% baller (finally!)
iTrader: (7)
 
dondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,383
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
hey jeff did you get my email requesting the idle to be raised a bit?
Old 12-28-2010, 02:13 PM
  #8317  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by dondo
hey jeff did you get my email requesting the idle to be raised a bit?
I dunno. Did you send it as a regular submission with your 11 Qs and a copy of your calibration? If not, it'll probably get dumped.
Old 12-28-2010, 04:22 PM
  #8318  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
i have my valve with the nipple (sigh) on the bottom--sorta reminds me offff-------nevermind.
OD
Old 12-28-2010, 04:44 PM
  #8319  
100% baller (finally!)
iTrader: (7)
 
dondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,383
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ok that's how mine is.
Old 12-31-2010, 10:21 AM
  #8320  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
I am beginning to understand what some others have been saying about tuning etc. I do appreciate their patience with my learning curve.
Motor going in this w/e--lots of little stuff to do --working on better oil pan vaccum, better ignition, repositioning my water meth nozzle, repositioning my intake temp sensor, trying to get an oil temp sensor on the hot side, and I will use 4 blue fuel injectors and replace the reds with yellows.
Little hint---when I was monitoring the intake temp using the old Pettit site for the IAT --the sensor would not reach far enough inside to be exposed to the air cleanly. So I redid that--i now use the Pettit Vaccum plug site for the temp sensor.
Also inside the Pettit UIM toward the rear rotor, the is a "bump" where the sensor site was casted- it really needs smoothing out and filing down. I did that too.
I have always not liked how slow the oil goes into the engine from the fill site so I am also addressing that.
Another thing--the TB coolant hose that a lot of people cap off? I am going to reuse that--remove my cap and install a free flowing hose back to the thermostat housing.
I am dressing the engine bay up a little at the same time cleaning up--rewiring gauges more neatly etc.
Should be up and running in the next wk or two
God willing and the creek dont rise.
Happy New Year all--stay safe.
OD
Old 12-31-2010, 01:13 PM
  #8321  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by olddragger
Another thing--the TB coolant hose that a lot of people cap off? I am going to reuse that--remove my cap and install a free flowing hose back to the thermostat housing.
People cap that off? Ooh, that is a baaaad idea.
If the coolant lines to the TB are bypassed, they need to be bypassed - not blocked/capped.
Old 12-31-2010, 03:13 PM
  #8322  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
Why do you say that?
That little tube doesnt have much capacity and people have been doing this since 2004?
Some racers also dont even use the heater core exit?.
OD
Old 12-31-2010, 06:19 PM
  #8323  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Look at a rear iron (on the inside) and you'll understand why.
Old 12-31-2010, 09:39 PM
  #8324  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
ok--i can do that.
OD
Old 12-31-2010, 10:10 PM
  #8325  
I don't remember
 
Galen Darkmoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't look Ethel


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: Pettit Super Charger Owners



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:02 PM.