Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

2010 Turbo Build: a.k.a. "Project JETS3T 8"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-03-2011, 07:01 PM
  #151  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,531
Received 1,494 Likes on 842 Posts
Originally Posted by rg1977
Dang, I've got an idea...completely remove the bulky center insert and weld maybe a 1/4" thick divider to the actual exhaust manifold so that it protrudes outward and into the center port, effectively acting as a divider, but a much leaner one. I think I might just try that, need to talk to Elliot about this.
Thx Brettus for bringing the center exhaust sleeve issue to light!
Awesome - would love to have tried some ideas on that myself . In some ways it's a pity you have so many other mods and could not explore this in isolation .
Old 01-03-2011, 07:29 PM
  #152  
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Nemesis8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I still think four exhaust ports is the way to go, but the idea of welding the divider to the exhaust manifold is a great, but not new I believe, idea. Didn't we see that on an early NA header by somebody?

Hope you don't mind me nabbing your "removed sleeve" pic from your album.




edit: uploaded my center insert pic from renny #1 at 86K mileage all NA attached
Attached Thumbnails 2010 Turbo Build: a.k.a. "Project JETS3T 8"-img_0286web.jpg   2010 Turbo Build: a.k.a. "Project JETS3T 8"-img_0285web.jpg  

Last edited by Nemesis8; 01-03-2011 at 08:52 PM.
Old 01-03-2011, 07:34 PM
  #153  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,531
Received 1,494 Likes on 842 Posts
Originally Posted by Nemesis8
I still think four exhaust ports is the way to go, but the idea of welding the divider to the exhaust manifold is a great, but not new I believe, idea. Didn't we see that on an early NA header by somebody?
Yes - but not with the sleeve removed .

Last edited by Brettus; 01-03-2011 at 07:44 PM.
Old 01-03-2011, 07:38 PM
  #154  
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Nemesis8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
So all the sleeves are only meant to retain heat for emissions only?
Old 01-03-2011, 07:43 PM
  #155  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,531
Received 1,494 Likes on 842 Posts
Originally Posted by Nemesis8
So all the sleeves are only meant to retain heat for emissions only?
Well - it has to help retain heat for spinning up the turbo and preventing too much heat from being picked up by the surrounding water .


If I was going to try something I think I'd leave the sleeve in and just remove the divider . Then weld material to the housing so as to create a radius that covers about 1/2 the port . I think the deflection of gases would be enough to prevent any damage to the opposite rotor .
Old 01-03-2011, 09:34 PM
  #156  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
JETS3T8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 305
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Brettus
Well - it has to help retain heat for spinning up the turbo and preventing too much heat from being picked up by the surrounding water .


If I was going to try something I think I'd leave the sleeve in and just remove the divider . Then weld material to the housing so as to create a radius that covers about 1/2 the port . I think the deflection of gases would be enough to prevent any damage to the opposite rotor .
The roles of the exhaust sleeves have definitely shifted since the days of the peripheral exhaust ports in the aluminum rotor housings. They definitely served as more of a thermal barrier to protect the aluminum and coolant temps but also served as a medium to transfer/retain heat for emissions. But now that the exhaust ports have been moved to the cast iron side housings, they serve more as a medium to retain and transfer the heat rather than to mainly protect the housings and coolant temps. It really does make a lot of sense. Plus they did include this concept in an official SAE paper. (Keep in mind though, I wouldn't do this without adding additional countermeasures such as larger more efficient (or additional) radiator, high flow water pump, etc.)

4.2. Retaining Heat of the Exhaust Gas
In order to retain heat of the exhaust gas from the
combustion chamber to the catalyst, two measures were
taken: The exhaust port has a stainless thin-walled
insert (made of heat resisting stainless alloy) and the
exhaust manifold has two layers of air layer for heat
insulation and small volume thin-wall inner tube. This
allows for the retention of exhaust gas heat from
combustion chamber to the catalyst. Because of the
heat retention, gas temperature at a catalyst upstream
could increase about 140 degree C in the USA LA-4
mode drive, improving catalyst’s conversion capability.
Fig. 24 shows structure of the exhaust port insert and
exhaust manifold.
Old 01-03-2011, 09:53 PM
  #157  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,531
Received 1,494 Likes on 842 Posts
/\I hear ya . But I have seen dynos of an NA renesis with headers on and the centre tube glows red hot . With a turbo it has to be even hotter than NA . Seems like you would want to keep that away from the coolant .
Old 01-03-2011, 10:07 PM
  #158  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
JETS3T8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 305
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Brettus
/\I hear ya . But I have seen dynos of an NA renesis with headers on and the centre tube glows red hot . With a turbo it has to be even hotter than NA . Seems like you would want to keep that away from the coolant .
Yeah, very true...this video comes to mind when I think of it...just another reason why I'm going methanol...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uO1782B6RZw
Old 01-04-2011, 12:29 AM
  #159  
Registered
 
glassman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another satisfied NRS customer
Old 01-04-2011, 01:18 AM
  #160  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
JETS3T8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 305
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by glassman
Another satisfied NRS customer
Really!? That's rad!
That car was a work of art, I heard they're already rebuilding and getting ready to take another stab at the record.
Btw-I sent you an email about some corner seals...
Old 01-05-2011, 12:06 PM
  #161  
Bat Mobile Driver
 
ELI063's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: From Florida back to my home lands in MIchigan
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rg1977
IC piping progress. The dual 50mm Tial Blow-0ff valves will go on each side of the IC just before entering the engine bay. Air-filter will go next to the cold side inlet pipe.


man where did you get that heat shield???
Old 01-05-2011, 05:50 PM
  #162  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
JETS3T8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 305
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by ELI063
man where did you get that heat shield???
Talk to this guy...Elliot from turblown.net
aka "1Revvin7" here on the club.
Old 01-05-2011, 07:35 PM
  #163  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,756
Received 2,025 Likes on 1,649 Posts
Originally Posted by Brettus
That is not the point - the loss of the divider was not a factor when it blew. There was no sign of any damage from crossover .
No, that's not the point. It won't suddenly blow your engine, but blasting the side seal, corner seal, and rotor side is going to greatly shorten the effective engine life particularly on long duration WOT runs

Last edited by TeamRX8; 01-05-2011 at 07:40 PM.
Old 01-05-2011, 08:37 PM
  #164  
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Nemesis8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by rg1977
4.2. Retaining Heat of the Exhaust Gas
You forgot the Figure 24
Attached Thumbnails 2010 Turbo Build: a.k.a. "Project JETS3T 8"-fig-24.jpg  
Old 01-05-2011, 08:41 PM
  #165  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,531
Received 1,494 Likes on 842 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
No, that's not the point. It won't suddenly blow your engine, but blasting the side seal, corner seal, and rotor side is going to greatly shorten the effective engine life particularly on long duration WOT runs
Agreed . I still think the deflection of gas idea might work as opposed to a full divider - least line of resistance and all that .....
Old 01-06-2011, 03:19 PM
  #166  
Bat Mobile Driver
 
ELI063's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: From Florida back to my home lands in MIchigan
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rg1977
Talk to this guy...Elliot from turblown.net
aka "1Revvin7" here on the club.
Thanks man
Old 01-06-2011, 06:23 PM
  #167  
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Nemesis8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Brettus
Then weld material to the housing so as to create a radius that covers about 1/2 the port.
iron or housing or manifold? don't you mean iron?

What about using the air injection ports as more exhaust area also?
Old 01-06-2011, 06:41 PM
  #168  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,531
Received 1,494 Likes on 842 Posts
Originally Posted by Nemesis8
iron or housing or manifold? don't you mean iron?
?
Yes -Iron . Got my terminology screwed up there .

Originally Posted by Nemesis8
What about using the air injection ports as more exhaust area also?
doubt that 1/2" hole will do a lot to help but who knows ....
Old 01-06-2011, 06:49 PM
  #169  
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Nemesis8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
well, there are three of them. Have a cutaway view of them?

can you drill them larger?

Last edited by Nemesis8; 01-06-2011 at 06:55 PM.
Old 01-07-2011, 12:26 AM
  #170  
Registered
 
rotarenvy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: QLD .au
Posts: 1,802
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
do you really want more area/volume in the exhaust? enlarging the pipes will drop the velocity.

the side port area is larger than the peripheral exhaust port. it is the duration of the port that has been reduced. makes me think more duration is the key to more exhaust flow.
Old 01-07-2011, 10:28 AM
  #171  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
JETS3T8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 305
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by rotarenvy
do you really want more area/volume in the exhaust? enlarging the pipes will drop the velocity.

the side port area is larger than the peripheral exhaust port. it is the duration of the port that has been reduced. makes me think more duration is the key to more exhaust flow.
Good way of looking at it, but again, it depends on application, in my case yes, I'm looking for as much reasonably attainable exhaust volume to help offset the the smaller duration. Better/more top-end flow, and probably still a "satisfactory" (to me) bottom-end and decent mid-range.
Old 01-07-2011, 01:00 PM
  #172  
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Nemesis8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Actually, Figure 9 from the paper shows these better.
Attached Thumbnails 2010 Turbo Build: a.k.a. "Project JETS3T 8"-figure-9.jpg  
Old 01-07-2011, 01:39 PM
  #173  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
JETS3T8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 305
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Nemesis8
Actually, Figure 9 from the paper shows these better.
This is a great photo too, I do like Fig. 24 because it actually shows the function of the inserts acting as a medium to transfer heat to the exhaust manifold. Fig. 9 does give you a better overall idea of the inserts in general though.
Thx Nemesis.

Last edited by JETS3T8; 01-07-2011 at 01:49 PM.
Old 01-07-2011, 01:46 PM
  #174  
Modulated Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
dannobre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Smallville
Posts: 13,718
Received 335 Likes on 290 Posts
There is no way that that insert isn't designed to lessen heat transfer to the iron and hense the coolant. That small air gap allows more heat to be expelled into the exhaust and evens out the instantaneous pulse temps that the iron and the opposite rotor would see if it wasn't there.

I can't see how there will be a viable option with that removed completely...

I wish someone had data for the flow volumes through the 2 exhaust ports...I would thingk more goes to the outside ports,,,and much less through the center ports.
Old 01-07-2011, 02:17 PM
  #175  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
JETS3T8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 305
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by dannobre
There is no way that that insert isn't designed to lessen heat transfer to the iron and hense the coolant. That small air gap allows more heat to be expelled into the exhaust and evens out the instantaneous pulse temps that the iron and the opposite rotor would see if it wasn't there.

I can't see how there will be a viable option with that removed completely...

I wish someone had data for the flow volumes through the 2 exhaust ports...I would think more goes to the outside ports,,,and much less through the center ports.
You're right, its design is two-fold, to lessen heat transfer AND act as a medium to transfer heat to the manifold for "improving catalyst's conversion capability", but remember what I said earlier?
Originally Posted by rg1977
The roles of the exhaust sleeves have definitely shifted since the days of the peripheral exhaust ports in the aluminum rotor housings. They definitely served as more of a thermal barrier to protect the aluminum and coolant temps but also served as a medium to transfer/retain heat for emissions. But now that the exhaust ports have been moved to the cast iron side housings, they serve more as a medium to retain and transfer the heat rather than to mainly protect the housings and coolant temps. It really does make a lot of sense. Plus they did include this concept in an official SAE paper. (Keep in mind though, I wouldn't do this without adding additional countermeasures such as larger more efficient (or additional) radiator, high flow water pump, etc.)
I agree that combustion gases are most likely taking the path of least resistance toward the outer ports as well because their overall volume (in the runner itself) is much larger, less restrictive. So the idea is to remove the restrictive center sleeve and just weld a plate to the center port of the exhaust manifold that protrudes into the center exhaust port so it now serves as the divider. The port now has much more volume and can now flow more of the overall combustion gases from the chamber.

Last edited by JETS3T8; 01-07-2011 at 02:22 PM.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: 2010 Turbo Build: a.k.a. "Project JETS3T 8"



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:56 AM.