Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Renesis OIL PRESSURE Discussion with Dealer Tech

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-29-2009, 02:07 AM
  #426  
Registered User
 
madcows's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: michigan
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mazmart
There's nothing wrong with some increase in oil pressure but make sure we all know why we seek it prior to doing it.

Paul.

If oil pressure is not going above 72 psi, then the motor will never achieve the "10-psi per 1k RPM" rule of thumb. Of course, as it has been stated numerous times, it's the flow rate that we really want, so technically 20psi could be sufficient if the rest of the system was designed for it - but it wasn't, correct?

Paul, is it safe to say that we want higher pressure because we are seeing excessive bearing wear, and that "low" oil pressure may be the culprit?
Old 10-29-2009, 08:25 AM
  #427  
Registered
 
PhillipM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by olddragger
Not much i can do about the idle pressure except upping the viscosity as I have done.
OD
That's not really the sort of increase you want, that's just extra pressure because the oil is resisting flow, not extra pressure generated by more flow.
Old 10-29-2009, 08:46 AM
  #428  
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Mazmart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,792
Received 63 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by madcows
If oil pressure is not going above 72 psi, then the motor will never achieve the "10-psi per 1k RPM" rule of thumb. Of course, as it has been stated numerous times, it's the flow rate that we really want, so technically 20psi could be sufficient if the rest of the system was designed for it - but it wasn't, correct?

Paul, is it safe to say that we want higher pressure because we are seeing excessive bearing wear, and that "low" oil pressure may be the culprit?
I'm not against some increase although it is totally un-necessary for the average person.

Pressure is not typically an issue with the rotary cars and it is not the issue with the bearing wear. We've seen it on a number of engines including those that do not see the highest rpms. It is simply a lubrication issue related to lack of protective barrier between the parts and the effects of contaminants (Debris in suspension) wearing away at the layers of bearing material in combination with normal loads. Too low of a viscosity is the culprit.

One of the advantages of the higher pressure can be more cooling from the oil.

Paul.
Old 10-29-2009, 08:51 AM
  #429  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
Very true --- but speaking generally since I cant increase the flow, at least I can increase the film strenght of my oil.
The ONLY ways to increase flow is with a larger volumne pump/system or to fully utilize the pumps capacity which would increase the force the oil is being pumped through the system---NOT the resistance to the pumping.
OD
Old 10-29-2009, 08:54 AM
  #430  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by Mazmart
I'm not against some increase although it is totally un-necessary for the average person.

Pressure is not typically an issue with the rotary cars and it is not the issue with the bearing wear. We've seen it on a number of engines including those that do not see the highest rpms. It is simply a lubrication issue related to lack of protective barrier between the parts and the effects of contaminants (Debris in suspension) wearing away at the layers of bearing material in combination with normal loads. Too low of a viscosity is the culprit.

One of the advantages of the higher pressure can be more cooling from the oil.

Paul.
Thank you Paul.

*I hug my 15w50 oil even when Im sleeping*
Old 10-29-2009, 09:08 AM
  #431  
Ayrton Senna Forever
 
ayrton012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Mazmart

One of the advantages of the higher pressure can be more cooling from the oil.

Paul.
But temperature is relating to thickness of the oil. Cooler is thicker, so higher pressure is working for longevity, as in the S2. ???
Old 10-29-2009, 09:11 AM
  #432  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
longpath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 629
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mazmart
I'm not against some increase although it is totally un-necessary for the average person.

Pressure is not typically an issue with the rotary cars and it is not the issue with the bearing wear. We've seen it on a number of engines including those that do not see the highest rpms. It is simply a lubrication issue related to lack of protective barrier between the parts and the effects of contaminants (Debris in suspension) wearing away at the layers of bearing material in combination with normal loads. Too low of a viscosity is the culprit.

One of the advantages of the higher pressure can be more cooling from the oil.

Paul.
Have you a hypothesis as to what sort of remedy might be appropriate (0W-50?)?

Is the filter inadequate to clear out debris? Would a larger filter, perhaps for the RX-2 or something similar, be better?

Would an increase in pressure at higher rpm and load be beneficial at all, if only as a bandaid?

Last edited by longpath; 10-29-2009 at 09:21 AM.
Old 10-29-2009, 09:33 AM
  #433  
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Mazmart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,792
Received 63 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by ayrton012
But temperature is relating to thickness of the oil. Cooler is thicker, so higher pressure is working for longevity, as in the S2. ???
Actually the lower viscosity oils run cooler and use less hp. I have proper research to do yet on S2 yet although I believe it is superior in some ways from what I've seen.

Paul.
Old 10-29-2009, 09:44 AM
  #434  
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Mazmart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,792
Received 63 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by longpath
Have you a hypothesis as to what sort of remedy might be appropriate (0W-50?)?

Is the filter inadequate to clear out debris? Would a larger filter, perhaps for the RX-2 or something similar, be better?

Would an increase in pressure at higher rpm and load be beneficial at all, if only as a bandaid?
XW30 to XW50 would be my vote. The thicker film will keep the contaminants from doing their part of damage for the most part. We always liked to use some of the larger filters with the correct specifications when they can fit. I use the JEY0-14-302 on my 02 Protege5 and on my 05 RX8 when I had it. The recommended filter for both is the B6Y1-14-302.

The higher pressure should be sought by those who REALLY put the punishment to their 8 (Track time, turbos etc).

Paul.
Old 10-29-2009, 09:53 AM
  #435  
#50
 
bse50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Caput Mundi
Posts: 7,521
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Mazmart
XW30 to XW50 would be my vote. The thicker film will keep the contaminants from doing their part of damage for the most part. We always liked to use some of the larger filters with the correct specifications when they can fit. I use the JEY0-14-302 on my 02 Protege5 and on my 05 RX8 when I had it. The recommended filter for both is the B6Y1-14-302.

The higher pressure should be sought by those who REALLY put the punishment to their 8 (Track time, turbos etc).

Paul.
Paul,
can you tell how to easily achieve this to the stupid people? (yes, look at me )
Old 10-29-2009, 09:55 AM
  #436  
Ayrton Senna Forever
 
ayrton012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Mazmart
I have proper research to do yet on S2 yet although I believe it is superior in some ways from what I've seen.

Paul.
Waiting for it (impatiently)!
Old 10-29-2009, 10:21 AM
  #437  
Registered
 
PhillipM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mazmart
I'm not against some increase although it is totally un-necessary for the average person.

Pressure is not typically an issue with the rotary cars and it is not the issue with the bearing wear. We've seen it on a number of engines including those that do not see the highest rpms. It is simply a lubrication issue related to lack of protective barrier between the parts and the effects of contaminants (Debris in suspension) wearing away at the layers of bearing material in combination with normal loads. Too low of a viscosity is the culprit.

One of the advantages of the higher pressure can be more cooling from the oil.

Paul.

More flow should help with a thicker film in the bearings and removal of the debris faster though, so not a bad thing.
I wonder if part of the reason for so many problems is that the RX8 is much more of an everyday car than the -7 was, it's being used for short trips to the shops, running the kids to school, etc, whereas the -7 would generally be a weekend car or taken out for long runs by enthusiasts.

I'm tempted to use the S2 oil filter as that's quite a lot larger than the S1 as it is, are those part numbers you gave even bigger?
Old 10-29-2009, 10:28 AM
  #438  
The Angry Wheelchair
iTrader: (14)
 
Vlaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: In da woodz, lurking after you
Posts: 1,865
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Mazmart
I'm not against some increase although it is totally un-necessary for the average person.

Pressure is not typically an issue with the rotary cars and it is not the issue with the bearing wear. We've seen it on a number of engines including those that do not see the highest rpms. It is simply a lubrication issue related to lack of protective barrier between the parts and the effects of contaminants (Debris in suspension) wearing away at the layers of bearing material in combination with normal loads. Too low of a viscosity is the culprit.

One of the advantages of the higher pressure can be more cooling from the oil.

Paul.
Paul could you clarify some things? When people say pressure they can mean two different things, pressure increase due to a thicker oil or pressure increase from the pump or AP bumping it up. I think some people are confused thinking when you state pressure increase as a good thing, that it means a thicker oil is good thing helping to cool the engine which I have a hard time believing.

If you meant it in regards to a thicker oil, how can a thicker oil result in more cooling? In theory and from what other research shows, thicker oil makes it more difficult to move the oil with the same pump and resistance thus the higher pressure and increases engine temperature. If it cooled the engine then I would think anyone in a hot environment or racing environment would be using thicker oil to "cool" the engine instead of running a lower weight which is not so. I'm pretty sure you're not referring to this definition, please clarify thanks
Old 10-29-2009, 10:41 AM
  #439  
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Mazmart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,792
Received 63 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by bse50
Paul,
can you tell how to easily achieve this to the stupid people? (yes, look at me )
Upgrade the rear regulator and shim the front.

Paul.
Old 10-29-2009, 11:06 AM
  #440  
#50
 
bse50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Caput Mundi
Posts: 7,521
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Mazmart
Upgrade the rear regulator and shim the front.

Paul.
So there's really no way of doing it without some serious work, right? Might be looking into it when i rebuild my motor.
Thanks!

G
Old 10-29-2009, 11:40 AM
  #441  
Lubricious
 
Nubo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SF Bay Area, California
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Mazmart
Pressure is not typically an issue with the rotary cars and it is not the issue with the bearing wear. We've seen it on a number of engines including those that do not see the highest rpms. It is simply a lubrication issue related to lack of protective barrier between the parts and the effects of contaminants (Debris in suspension) wearing away at the layers of bearing material in combination with normal loads. Too low of a viscosity is the culprit.
Paul, in your opinion, does this argue for the use of something like a bypass filter? Leaving so much dirty oil in the system has always bugged me a bit, and it's undeniably something that sets this engine apart from most in terms of oil.
Old 10-29-2009, 11:53 AM
  #442  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
thats the point i made earier.
during normal every day driving with heavier wgt oil at 4K there is a good chance that we are in the range of the rear bypass limit. Thereby not filtering all the oil.
get a magnet on the filter may help some as Ash pointed out and I also have done.

The mod on the rear bypass and front bypass is not hard to do if you have been working on cars some. Make SURE you keep things as clean as you possibily can. Drop the pan, remove the rear and front regulators/bypass, do the crush with a hydrolic press, or have a machine shop do it--or buy a new one (93-95) from MazdaTrix for $31, then add 2 shims --total 1/8 inch to the front bypass, then use the 09 filter(for its own increased bypass pressure) or something like a Fram hp2-6. Hell--even a Pure One Purolater has a filter that will fit and is twice as big as the oem although I am not sure of its bypass pressure.
Reinstall (careful with the pan bolts) CLEANLY and refill with a diesel oil or whatever you want to do and thats it.
Should take maybe 2 hrs?
OD
Old 10-29-2009, 12:01 PM
  #443  
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
 
ASH8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 10,868
Received 317 Likes on 226 Posts
Originally Posted by nycgps
Thank you Paul.

*I hug my 15w50 oil even when Im sleeping*
Yeah, Sure....we know what you are huggin when you are sleeping!!
Old 10-29-2009, 12:02 PM
  #444  
#50
 
bse50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Caput Mundi
Posts: 7,521
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by olddragger
thats the point i made earier.
during normal every day driving with heavier wgt oil at 4K there is a good chance that we are in the range of the rear bypass limit. Thereby not filtering all the oil.
get a magnet on the filter may help some as Ash pointed out and I also have done.

The mod on the rear bypass and front bypass is not hard to do if you have been working on cars some. Make SURE you keep things as clean as you possibily can. Drop the pan, remove the rear and front regulators/bypass, do the crush with a hydrolic press, or have a machine shop do it--or buy a new one (93-95) from MazdaTrix for $31, then add 2 shims --total 1/8 inch to the front bypass, then use the 09 filter(for its own increased bypass pressure) or something like a Fram hp2-6. Hell--even a Pure One Purolater has a filter that will fit and is twice as big as the oem although I am not sure of its bypass pressure.
Reinstall (careful with the pan bolts) CLEANLY and refill with a diesel oil or whatever you want to do and thats it.
Should take maybe 2 hrs?
OD
Perhaps maybe more like 3hrs or so, definitely a weekend project if you consider all the things involved. The fact is that the cost vs benefit may be right for somebody with all-around increased needs, like a FI car. In my case (4000mi\year, around 1000 of which are track miles) it may not be an urge considering the amount of stress the engine faces and that other little mods can be of enough help.
I'll probably do it during this summer's routine maintenance :p

Oil bypass over 4k rpm shouldn't be a big issue if we stay in some weight range. The problem is to determine which the right range is!

G
Old 10-29-2009, 12:15 PM
  #445  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
True--cost benefit is always a thought!!!
remember that anytime you car has a oil pressure above 71psi--then you are not filtering all your oil.
this is proabaly much more important for me because I have put forced induction on my car.

By the way my motor mounts are working out nicely---wish i could send you a set!
What is the cost to ship to you I wonder?
OD
Old 10-29-2009, 12:17 PM
  #446  
#50
 
bse50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Caput Mundi
Posts: 7,521
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
I agree with the unfiltered oil issue, especially when tracking we would be filtering just a part of the oil for hours
What's the s2 filter set pressure before the bypass occurs?
Old 10-29-2009, 12:40 PM
  #447  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
the s2 oil filter bypass is approx 22 psi or so, but that is not the bypass that is causing this. Its the rear. If the pressure is over 71-72 psi the rear bleeds off oil back to the oil pan to reduce the pressure. That oil is not filtered before it is picked up again by the pump.
OD
Old 10-29-2009, 12:42 PM
  #448  
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
 
ASH8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 10,868
Received 317 Likes on 226 Posts
Some FACTS, not thought's...FACTS.....
And I happen to agree with Mazmart on Oil Viscosity....BUT...

As I have stated a 1000 times...the Oil Pumping system used in the S1 RX-8 is a 24 Year Old PLUS design...that is the Pump, and all the valves are designed for and from the NA FC and earlier rotaries which the recommended oil was a 'thick' 20W50.

The ONLY difference in the Oil Pumping System is that Mazda Changed the Front Oil Pump Pressure Valve "Spring" by part number, but NONE of us know why and in which way, stronger or weaker...higher or lower pressure.

So if pressure is not an issue, why the change?

BUT, even more 'interesting' Mazda did not alter the REAR VALVE at all, it is directly from the FC, in fact from a 13B RX-4,5 of 1975.

Which is normally a no no, change the front O Pump BY Pass Relief Pressure, you change the rear also?. Mazda have not done this.

I will say it again, I don't think the O Pressure is quite right and the Rec Viscosity Just Don't Cut it....I said this 3-4 years ago.

And in my time Bearing failure was NOT common at all...in fact it was very rare.
And I was selling $6000 a month of Rotary Parts when Rotor Housings were $140.00 each...
Old 10-29-2009, 12:52 PM
  #449  
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
 
ASH8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 10,868
Received 317 Likes on 226 Posts
Originally Posted by bse50
I agree with the unfiltered oil issue, especially when tracking we would be filtering just a part of the oil for hours
What's the s2 filter set pressure before the bypass occurs?
S2 OF is 20-26 PSI, but the OIL Filter Does not BY Pass Oil unless it is blocked or restricted..like all Mazda 100% Full Flow Filters.

And the huge difference in Series II is that ALL the Oil is Filtered before it goes into the engine or EMOP's...
Again this is the first time Mazda Has done this...which is a good move.

Attached Thumbnails Renesis OIL PRESSURE Discussion with Dealer Tech-2.jpg  

Last edited by ASH8; 10-29-2009 at 12:56 PM.
Old 10-29-2009, 01:13 PM
  #450  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 453 Likes on 367 Posts
Are aftermarket oil filters full flow?


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: Renesis OIL PRESSURE Discussion with Dealer Tech



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45 AM.