Renesis 2
#402
I'll bet it doesn't go far. As long as you keep this priced under $35K, it'll probably work. Under $30K would be best. If you top that, it won't sell well. At least not at first. You don't just come out with a new car and engine, turbo it, price it high and hope it sells. It's got to be out for a while to judge potential sales before you start pulling a Corvette like strategy. This is what happened with the RX-7. If you price it with a Corvette and make it perform like a Corvette, you'll lose all of your sales to Corvette. American cars are king in the U.S.
p.s. it's my first post. hi forum..
#403
Power!!
Competing with the Corvette may not be a good idea, but what about a low production, expensive, exotic, rotary "halo" car ala the Ford GT? They may take a hit on the car, but it would boost Mazda's brand recognition, bring people into the showrooms, and raise people's confidence in rotary engines.
p.s. it's my first post. hi forum..
p.s. it's my first post. hi forum..
Welcome to the forum. I think that would be pretty cool. Although I think they'd have to launch a new upper class line like Toyota/Lexus and Honda/Acura. I don't think people would go for the 80K-100K Mazda just due to brand niche. The Skyline GTR not withstanding. The American guys can get away over here but the Japaneese and Europeans have not been able to ala VW Phaeton.
#404
I got nothing good to say
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tysons Corner, VA
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They did almost try that - it was called Amati back in the 90's. I don't think Mazda is big enough o support the "halo" brand like Nissan/Toyota/Honda.
I'm with the people that say there's room for the 8 and a $40-45k 2-seat sports car (whether it's called a 7 or whatever) that goes like stink!
I'm with the people that say there's room for the 8 and a $40-45k 2-seat sports car (whether it's called a 7 or whatever) that goes like stink!
#405
Registered
They did almost try that - it was called Amati back in the 90's. I don't think Mazda is big enough o support the "halo" brand like Nissan/Toyota/Honda.
I'm with the people that say there's room for the 8 and a $40-45k 2-seat sports car (whether it's called a 7 or whatever) that goes like stink!
I'm with the people that say there's room for the 8 and a $40-45k 2-seat sports car (whether it's called a 7 or whatever) that goes like stink!
#406
Been a few days but to clarify my points. Every manufacturer wants their cars to be mass market; it means more money which is why they are in business to begin with. Why is the RX8 a 4 door coupe? It’s an attempt to have our cake and eat it too (which I think it does well otherwise why would I have bought it).
Oil level indicator: its the same as gasoline, we have a gas gauge to tell us to add fuel, why not an oil gauge to tell us we need oil?
Weights of other cars I’ve mentioned, the Camaro and Mustang will be heavier of course, I would think under 3,600 lbs however. The 135 is 3,200, BMW lists 75kg for driver and 7kg for luggage as well as 90% full tank and not everyone measures their cars in the same manor.
Unless Mazda makes a dedicated 2 seat rotary I don’t see them hitting 2,600lbs. They could have done this already with a rotary version of the MX-5.
If Mazda keeps the RX8 as a 4 place rotary (which I hope they do), and they want to sell more of them than they have then some changes will need to be made. There can be no risk of flooding in a car. The fact that oil will need to be added already is one strike against it (they can at least make it as easy as possible); not for an enthusiast but from your normal sports/sporty car buying public.
A rotary is completely different from every other engine manufactured today. That makes a lot people worry and a few people intrigued. The automotive public doesn’t go with an unknown they go with tried and true (see Toyota/Honda).
Manufacturers will make niche cars but only when they are off platforms that are in use for other purposes. Changing some body panels and making a few tweaks allows for economy of scale. You don’t build a niche car on a dedicated platform, its cost prohibitive unless you charge large sums of money.
Oil level indicator: its the same as gasoline, we have a gas gauge to tell us to add fuel, why not an oil gauge to tell us we need oil?
Weights of other cars I’ve mentioned, the Camaro and Mustang will be heavier of course, I would think under 3,600 lbs however. The 135 is 3,200, BMW lists 75kg for driver and 7kg for luggage as well as 90% full tank and not everyone measures their cars in the same manor.
Unless Mazda makes a dedicated 2 seat rotary I don’t see them hitting 2,600lbs. They could have done this already with a rotary version of the MX-5.
If Mazda keeps the RX8 as a 4 place rotary (which I hope they do), and they want to sell more of them than they have then some changes will need to be made. There can be no risk of flooding in a car. The fact that oil will need to be added already is one strike against it (they can at least make it as easy as possible); not for an enthusiast but from your normal sports/sporty car buying public.
A rotary is completely different from every other engine manufactured today. That makes a lot people worry and a few people intrigued. The automotive public doesn’t go with an unknown they go with tried and true (see Toyota/Honda).
Manufacturers will make niche cars but only when they are off platforms that are in use for other purposes. Changing some body panels and making a few tweaks allows for economy of scale. You don’t build a niche car on a dedicated platform, its cost prohibitive unless you charge large sums of money.
#407
Registered
Thread Starter
I don't forsee 2600 lbs being hit but I do see 2800 lbs being possible as long as it's a 2 seater. It's not saying 2600 lbs isn't possible. I just don't see it.
If you want NO risk of flooding then you can't put a rotary in it. Period.
If you want NO risk of flooding then you can't put a rotary in it. Period.
#408
Administrator
your forgetting fred that the current MX-5 even in power retractable hard top trim only weighs 2610. it would be quite easy for them to make a true 2 seat hard top coupe come in at that weight on this chassis.
#409
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=Design1stCode2nd;2090725]
Weights of other cars I’ve mentioned, the Camaro and Mustang will be heavier of course, I would think under 3,600 lbs however. The 135 is 3,200, BMW lists 75kg for driver and 7kg for luggage as well as 90% full tank and not everyone measures their cars in the same manor.QUOTE]
Correction, the 135i will weigh 3440. There have been numerous updates to the original thoughts that it would only weigh 3200.
Weights of other cars I’ve mentioned, the Camaro and Mustang will be heavier of course, I would think under 3,600 lbs however. The 135 is 3,200, BMW lists 75kg for driver and 7kg for luggage as well as 90% full tank and not everyone measures their cars in the same manor.QUOTE]
Correction, the 135i will weigh 3440. There have been numerous updates to the original thoughts that it would only weigh 3200.
#411
[QUOTE=Endgame;2090877]
As with the price I guess we will see soon enough.
Weights of other cars I’ve mentioned, the Camaro and Mustang will be heavier of course, I would think under 3,600 lbs however. The 135 is 3,200, BMW lists 75kg for driver and 7kg for luggage as well as 90% full tank and not everyone measures their cars in the same manor.QUOTE]
Correction, the 135i will weigh 3440. There have been numerous updates to the original thoughts that it would only weigh 3200.
Correction, the 135i will weigh 3440. There have been numerous updates to the original thoughts that it would only weigh 3200.
#412
If Mazda can't remove flooding and having to have your car warmed and run at 3k RPM for X number of seconds then it will forever be a niche car.
When you have to provide specific instruction on how to properly run a car to anyone who uses it or any shop mechanic (average car user doesn't do their own work) then you are going to lose customers.
Keep in mind most anyone on this board would qualify as an enthusiast to one degree or another. Any owner knows the RX8 needs a little extra TLC but if you want to sell alot of something you can't have these caveats.
Now if Mazda was going to do 2-3 more cars off the platform with say a turbo 4, convertible, 2 door coupe, hatch/sportback then sure a niche low volume car wouldn’t be a problem as cost is spread among the models.
#414
Registered
Thread Starter
Someone call Mitsubishi and make fun of them for building turbo econoboxes that weight 600 lbs more!
#415
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#416
Rotary , eh?
iTrader: (1)
Wouldn't an electric assist motor be enough to spin out extra fuel?
If Mazda can't remove flooding and having to have your car warmed and run at 3k RPM for X number of seconds then it will forever be a niche car.
When you have to provide specific instruction on how to properly run a car to anyone who uses it or any shop mechanic (average car user doesn't do their own work) then you are going to lose customers.
Keep in mind most anyone on this board would qualify as an enthusiast to one degree or another. Any owner knows the RX8 needs a little extra TLC but if you want to sell alot of something you can't have these caveats.
Now if Mazda was going to do 2-3 more cars off the platform with say a turbo 4, convertible, 2 door coupe, hatch/sportback then sure a niche low volume car wouldn’t be a problem as cost is spread among the models.
If Mazda can't remove flooding and having to have your car warmed and run at 3k RPM for X number of seconds then it will forever be a niche car.
When you have to provide specific instruction on how to properly run a car to anyone who uses it or any shop mechanic (average car user doesn't do their own work) then you are going to lose customers.
Keep in mind most anyone on this board would qualify as an enthusiast to one degree or another. Any owner knows the RX8 needs a little extra TLC but if you want to sell alot of something you can't have these caveats.
Now if Mazda was going to do 2-3 more cars off the platform with say a turbo 4, convertible, 2 door coupe, hatch/sportback then sure a niche low volume car wouldn’t be a problem as cost is spread among the models.
where did you get the information that made you decide mazda plans on making their rotary cars more than niche cars?
and Mazda said they planned on at least 4 cars off the platform the RX-8 is built on
1) RX-8
2) MX-5
the only question is what is next.
My guess is they do the same as they just did. 1 rotary car and 1 piston car. but thats just a guess.
#417
Registered
Even cooler is my lightened 93 Miata, which is about 2100 lbs. 6.5 lbs wheels! But still I want a 16x RX-8.
#419
Competing with the Corvette may not be a good idea, but what about a low production, expensive, exotic, rotary "halo" car ala the Ford GT? They may take a hit on the car, but it would boost Mazda's brand recognition, bring people into the showrooms, and raise people's confidence in rotary engines.
p.s. it's my first post. hi forum..
p.s. it's my first post. hi forum..
This is actually a very intriguing suggestion/idea that I'm not sure many of the people on this forum understand.
Such an exotic rotary halo car could be in the $60,000 to $80,000 to $100,000 range. It could change public perception into seeing the rotary engine as something upscale, exotic, and special. If in the more expensive range, Mazda could go 3 rotors. Ads would reference the RX8/new 2010 RX7 and the 787b, reiterating that the rotary is the only engine from a Japanese car company to ever win Lemans.
It could be so limited that it might be sold out or close to sold out from pre-orders alone. It would not need to make money in order for Mazda to benefit.
#420
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With the new 3 rotor being a 24X instead of the 20B I wonder what kind of numbers we would be talking about even under mild boost
#421
Super Moderator
where did you get the information that made you decide mazda plans on making their rotary cars more than niche cars?
and Mazda said they planned on at least 4 cars off the platform the RX-8 is built on
1) RX-8
2) MX-5
the only question is what is next.
My guess is they do the same as they just did. 1 rotary car and 1 piston car. but thats just a guess.
and Mazda said they planned on at least 4 cars off the platform the RX-8 is built on
1) RX-8
2) MX-5
the only question is what is next.
My guess is they do the same as they just did. 1 rotary car and 1 piston car. but thats just a guess.
I recall reading somewhere (maybe here from Charlie) that the Mazda (Domestic Only) MPV 2006~ is off the RX-8 Platform.
#422
Super Moderator
Having said that I think the MPV is FWD?
#423
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here's something I found about the 135i. The UK website (www.bmw.co.uk) lists the unladen weight (EU) of the 135i coupe as 1560 kg [3439lbs]. It lists the the maximum permissible weight as 1925 kg [4244lbs], which is 365 kg more than the unladen (EU) weight. However, the maximum payload is listed as 440 kg. If you take 1925 kg, subtract off the 440 kg that BMW says the car can carry, and you end up at 1485 kg [3274lbs]. This is exactly 75 kg less than the listed unladen (EU) weight, as it should be according to EU weight standards. So, I'd say that the 135i is going to weigh around 3300lbs by US curb weight standards (no passengers, driver, or luggage). Still pretty heavy, but lighter than the 3600lb 335i. I guess we'll just have to wait and see...
Go check out 1addicts.com.; they talk about it heavily there. It will be a 3400 pound + car. That is what lost points on the for me. But, really no one will know until it arrives here and can be tested.
#424
Granted I think Mazda will see anything they put a rotary in as a niche car. It doesn't mean it needs to be if you can work out the kinks.
#425
Not really, I'm thinking a small hybrid to provide a small amount of low end power as well as spinning fuel out of the engine when it's shut off cold. This would be seperate from the starter in sequence. This could also enable start/stop of the engine when sitting at a light to improve city driving MPG.