Cobb AccessPORT Discussion
The only reliable method I've found for measuring mpg is the tried and true means of filling up, resetting the trip, driving till warning light, filling back up noting mileage and gallons and dividing mileage by gallons.
Last edited by ShellDude; Jul 20, 2008 at 07:57 PM. Reason: typos
MM,
I know this is more in line with the AP on Turbo thread.
I still having the Extreme Richness @/near 100 Gm/S.
plugged the water/meth line. The BOV has no way to open. I looked at the plunger seat and it tight and seals againg the plunger.
Could it be turbulance from the outside arccordian Cold Air pickup hitting the MAF? I have ONE Screen before the MAF...
Oh I also changed the MAF out, did a reset and tried again. was able to reproduce the bog.
I'll take the CA tube off that connects to the K&N MAF tube tonight and see.
If thats not it,,,, any ideas?
I checked the couplers and all are tight. manifold bolts are torqued to spec. manifold hoses are all connected...
I know this is more in line with the AP on Turbo thread.
I still having the Extreme Richness @/near 100 Gm/S.
plugged the water/meth line. The BOV has no way to open. I looked at the plunger seat and it tight and seals againg the plunger.
Could it be turbulance from the outside arccordian Cold Air pickup hitting the MAF? I have ONE Screen before the MAF...
Oh I also changed the MAF out, did a reset and tried again. was able to reproduce the bog.
I'll take the CA tube off that connects to the K&N MAF tube tonight and see.
If thats not it,,,, any ideas?
I checked the couplers and all are tight. manifold bolts are torqued to spec. manifold hoses are all connected...
Well, on your setup, air is going somewhere.
As soon as you get anywhere near positive manifold pressure, the MAF reading jumps into the several pounds of boost range.
As soon as you get anywhere near positive manifold pressure, the MAF reading jumps into the several pounds of boost range.
I've read 90% of this thread and I have a question I don't think has been asked before.
Would installing larger injectors for a NA Renesis have any impact at all? I'm thinking along the lines of adjusting the timing of the fuel injectors. More fuel in shorter time to get a better boom.
Would installing larger injectors for a NA Renesis have any impact at all? I'm thinking along the lines of adjusting the timing of the fuel injectors. More fuel in shorter time to get a better boom.
If your current injectors can give you ideal injection the option of providing more would be waste uless you can provide it with more air to mix with it.
I've read 90% of this thread and I have a question I don't think has been asked before.
Would installing larger injectors for a NA Renesis have any impact at all? I'm thinking along the lines of adjusting the timing of the fuel injectors. More fuel in shorter time to get a better boom.
Would installing larger injectors for a NA Renesis have any impact at all? I'm thinking along the lines of adjusting the timing of the fuel injectors. More fuel in shorter time to get a better boom.
Why so silly?
I see significant gains advancing injection timing and extending injection duration on my diesel engine. Are the RX-8 injectors not electronically controlled or am I just spark plug stupid? Concept would be the same.
I see significant gains advancing injection timing and extending injection duration on my diesel engine. Are the RX-8 injectors not electronically controlled or am I just spark plug stupid? Concept would be the same.
what kind of car is your diesel in? Is it a direct inject diesel?
I'm not going to type out a whole explanation of EFI, so just do a search on the subject.
I want to AP my car. i was at the dealership today and my friend works there. i like my warranty... he said you can kiss it goodbye as soon as the AP is programmed. How true is that? Anyone had any problems with it?
When you go in to the dealer, just uninstall it.
Second, it does nothing to your car that will damage or modify it physically.
The only thing it will do is eventually destroy your CAT.
Unfortunately, that is why Mazda has crippled the performance in the first place - to make the CAT live up to Draconian EPA standards.
Of course, there are several ways to deal with that eventuality.
Like Jeff said, worse case, hit UNINSTALL and your car is back to exactly the way it was prior.
Highway Only Fuel Economy
Here's some fuel economy data. Sorry for no non-AP baseline. I didn't start collecting data until after I started flashing Jeff's maps.
All entries are PURE interstate highway driving... one or two stops, at most (pee/coffee breaks mostly).
All driving consisted of 70mph to 80mph average between Pottstown, PA, and Sevierville, TN.
All entries are PURE interstate highway driving... one or two stops, at most (pee/coffee breaks mostly).
All driving consisted of 70mph to 80mph average between Pottstown, PA, and Sevierville, TN.
I just checked a couple of the dedicated fuel economy threads and I'd say my numbers are definitely high end "outliers" 
The trick is go with a top tier fuel, fill up immediately before entering the highway, make as few stops as possible, use cruise control between 70-80 mph, and run as much of the tank as possible. Effeciency increases significantly the longer you can keep her constant on the road.

The trick is go with a top tier fuel, fill up immediately before entering the highway, make as few stops as possible, use cruise control between 70-80 mph, and run as much of the tank as possible. Effeciency increases significantly the longer you can keep her constant on the road.
Last edited by ShellDude; Jul 22, 2008 at 12:46 AM.
Can you possibly create a "economy" map for long haul cruising such as this?
25 mpg is pretty damn economical for the RX8 in my book! I think part of Jeff's point is that his base maps have an economy factor of sorts built into them just by providing for a more effecient high end map.
The above data was collected over 2 round trips consisting of approximately 2,400 miles total. During the course of the trips I put in a smidge over a quart of oil... started off full and ended up full. I'm assuming this is also a bit better than what we'd get stock. I REALLY like the idea of my rotors getting extra lube
The above data was collected over 2 round trips consisting of approximately 2,400 miles total. During the course of the trips I put in a smidge over a quart of oil... started off full and ended up full. I'm assuming this is also a bit better than what we'd get stock. I REALLY like the idea of my rotors getting extra lube
Last edited by ShellDude; Jul 22, 2008 at 01:14 AM.
Yeah, the only caveat to the economy tuning is that the calibration is the proper one for your car.
That means, get the car up to 4200 RPM or so in 4th, hold it at that RPM for at least 20 seconds and look at your AFR (equivalence).
If it is below 14:1, I need to adjust your injector scaling a bit.
This is especially the case if you are running one of the "b" series calibrations.
That means, get the car up to 4200 RPM or so in 4th, hold it at that RPM for at least 20 seconds and look at your AFR (equivalence).
If it is below 14:1, I need to adjust your injector scaling a bit.
This is especially the case if you are running one of the "b" series calibrations.
25 mpg is pretty damn economical for the RX8 in my book! I think part of Jeff's point is that his base maps have an economy factor of sorts built into them just by providing for a more effecient high end map.
The above data was collected over 2 round trips consisting of approximately 2,400 miles total. During the course of the trips I put in a smidge over a quart of oil... started off full and ended up full. I'm assuming this is also a bit better than what we'd get stock. I REALLY like the idea of my rotors getting extra lube
The above data was collected over 2 round trips consisting of approximately 2,400 miles total. During the course of the trips I put in a smidge over a quart of oil... started off full and ended up full. I'm assuming this is also a bit better than what we'd get stock. I REALLY like the idea of my rotors getting extra lube

heh


