Critical parallel/symbiotic relationship b/ Nissan & Mazda = RX8's/rotary's survival
#126
i pwn therefore i am
Cooder, there is gotta be something wrong with you. I mean, what the hell.
I just reread Ike's comments from the first few pages. I don't understand where you get this whole "RX-8 must sell or die" thing. I agree with everything he says: the 8 would sell better if it weren't for the 350Z, the average consumer doesn't understand the 8 (low torque and bad gas mileage), the sales for the 8 are dropping (I have exact numbers if you want em), the car is regularly bashed by many other car enthusiasts because of its weirdness/uniqueness, the RX-8 isn't a halo car (the MNAO president said so), and I (as well as just about everyone else) would love for the RX-8 to stay around and get some more power.
There's nothing wrong or attacking about what he's saying. Before he'd even made a second post, you'd thrown down the word "Zeitgeist" -- you didn't deserve even one nice response to that kinda BS. I understand what Ike is saying. You ramble on about things that are so obvious that everyone already knows -- yes, automobile economics are multi-faceted and complicated.
Nissan has found a way to tap into that market with the rebirth of their Japanese muscle car, the Z. It has a long history and old people have lots of money to throw away. They've sold 1.5 MILLION of these things. Mazda has to find a way to make money no matter what. They're not going to do it with their current iteration of the 8 even if they sell it for 20 more years.
There's one more thing that I'll agree with Ike on:
This isn't a debate. This is an exercise in futility.
I just reread Ike's comments from the first few pages. I don't understand where you get this whole "RX-8 must sell or die" thing. I agree with everything he says: the 8 would sell better if it weren't for the 350Z, the average consumer doesn't understand the 8 (low torque and bad gas mileage), the sales for the 8 are dropping (I have exact numbers if you want em), the car is regularly bashed by many other car enthusiasts because of its weirdness/uniqueness, the RX-8 isn't a halo car (the MNAO president said so), and I (as well as just about everyone else) would love for the RX-8 to stay around and get some more power.
There's nothing wrong or attacking about what he's saying. Before he'd even made a second post, you'd thrown down the word "Zeitgeist" -- you didn't deserve even one nice response to that kinda BS. I understand what Ike is saying. You ramble on about things that are so obvious that everyone already knows -- yes, automobile economics are multi-faceted and complicated.
Nissan has found a way to tap into that market with the rebirth of their Japanese muscle car, the Z. It has a long history and old people have lots of money to throw away. They've sold 1.5 MILLION of these things. Mazda has to find a way to make money no matter what. They're not going to do it with their current iteration of the 8 even if they sell it for 20 more years.
There's one more thing that I'll agree with Ike on:
Originally Posted by Ike
Not because you're wordy, because you fail to make strong arguments yet you ramble on anyhow. Being wordy while you ramble just makes your posts more annoying.
Last edited by saturn; 02-22-2006 at 09:20 AM.
#127
My Rex goes to 11!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cooder, would it take you 8 paragraphs to tell us all to f*ck off?
If so, please do so and end all our misery. You've made this thread a pile of ****...oops, let me translate for you "feces".
If so, please do so and end all our misery. You've made this thread a pile of ****...oops, let me translate for you "feces".
Last edited by Dinhx8; 02-22-2006 at 09:27 AM.
#128
Originally Posted by Cooder
You focus is on lowering price. Yet the Evo and WRX STI and RX8 are all in the same price category, yet none is doing close to the success of the 350Z/G35. Where would this market segment be with only the Evo, WRX STI, and RX8? It would be low sales, low mainstream awareness. The 350Z/G35 is a social phenomenon. These cars are in the minds of even housewives. It's the driving force of the entire segment. Because of its success, this segment is now larger, more salient in the mainstream public's mind, and will probably remain healthy longer.
And of course, anyone can disagree with what I just said.
And of course, anyone can disagree with what I just said.
With only the Evo, STi, and RX-8 there might be low sales...because these cars are not exactly what people are looking for. Not because a 350Z wasn't there to cast a glow on the whole segment. Somehow I can't imagine this scenario:
(average guy shopping for cars)
2001: You know, sports cars in general are not desireable or sexy. It's not that no one's building a good, cheap sports car, oh no--I think the sports car segment is simply uninteresting. I think I will be looking at sedans.
2006: You know, that sexy little 350Z didn't just change my mind about Nissans. Now I can see that sports cars are desireable after all.
#129
Blue By You
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cooder
You do understand how it would look to the other members if you ran away from the debate challenge, right? I know you won't run away because you are confident in your intellect and the reasoning behind your position.
![Freak Anim](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/Freak_anim.gif)
#133
My Rex goes to 11!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by zoom44
Din , Ike and Saturn re- consider your participation in this thread.
j/k, understood zoom.
#135
Originally Posted by BaronVonBigmeat
The Evo and STi are fast but too ugly. The RX-8 is sexy but too slow. The S2000 is a hot little car and somewhat quick, but too impractical for many. The 350Z/G35 simply managed to hit squarely in the middle of what the average consumer wanted.
With only the Evo, STi, and RX-8 there might be low sales...because these cars are not exactly what people are looking for. Not because a 350Z wasn't there to cast a glow on the whole segment. Somehow I can't imagine this scenario:
(average guy shopping for cars)
2001: You know, sports cars in general are not desireable or sexy. It's not that no one's building a good, cheap sports car, oh no--I think the sports car segment is simply uninteresting. I think I will be looking at sedans.
2006: You know, that sexy little 350Z didn't just change my mind about Nissans. Now I can see that sports cars are desireable after all.
With only the Evo, STi, and RX-8 there might be low sales...because these cars are not exactly what people are looking for. Not because a 350Z wasn't there to cast a glow on the whole segment. Somehow I can't imagine this scenario:
(average guy shopping for cars)
2001: You know, sports cars in general are not desireable or sexy. It's not that no one's building a good, cheap sports car, oh no--I think the sports car segment is simply uninteresting. I think I will be looking at sedans.
2006: You know, that sexy little 350Z didn't just change my mind about Nissans. Now I can see that sports cars are desireable after all.
Where is the challenge and the arrogance? Where is the poor thinking? I haven't proven anything and others haven't proven anything (even the many whose arguments are basically in agreement). I've tried very hard to come up with points. Some others have also. If their thinking is not poor, neither is mine. Those criticisms are ludicrous and are really coming from a limited number of individuals who have their own agendas. A couple of others I believe are serious, mature professionals who may have gotten suckered in a little by the pernicious agenda of one defeated individual.
The whole first page is all it takes to vindicate me. Even if the initial posts were wordy, they were not confusing. They are not designed to confuse people but in fact the opposite, to reduce confusion. They are not written in super concise scientific format but rather in an easy conversational style. In my opinion, as I review and review them, they are very digestible. Remember, I'm the one who came up with this multifacted idea, and so I'm the one who had to try to illustrate it to a bunch of people the best I can. It's not an easy task. There are a few lines of reasoning (some connected, others not really) and even though it's a limited number, it isn't easy for ANY reader to absorb and organize the entire thing. It would have been difficult for both sides regardless. Why attack me? Just try to figure it out the best you can or even ask me questions to clarify. Doesn't that make good sense? When I pick up someone else's research article to review, it's never super easy to understand. I have to put a lot of effort and reread and reread and try to pick up what they REALLY intended to say. Reviewers make a ton of suggestions but I've never felt compelled to say a lab's work and ideas are stupid. I think any profesional here can relate to that in their own arenas.
Last edited by Cooder; 02-22-2006 at 04:10 PM.
#136
Originally Posted by zoom44
Din , Ike and Saturn re- consider your participation in this thread.
#138
Blue By You
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cooder
Thanks. I was just about to ask a moderator to put a stop to those exact three people, plus to a lesser extent playdoh. There's no justification for what they were doing.
#141
Well I wish you would put that post back up (along with some edits of words like bonehead and mouseketeers) because it shows that two of the people who keep attacking me are doing so based on inaccurate facts where they didn't even get straight who said what.
#142
My Rex goes to 11!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dear Cooder,
I think the rx8 will do well so long as rotary development continues, which is the most important factor in driving its future.
okay sweet, now that i got that out I can continue:
I did actually respond (page 2 or something) actually to offer my opinion on the sucess of the car. I only responded to you after your posts seemed arrogant
claiming worthy of PHD status.
Don't be so upset. no one here really is. I'm not. I was giving you a tip in my first post to you, to say, you don't need fancy words to prove a point. I ended that post with the PEACE smiley in which you proceeded to attack me with more. Don't be that cheesy guy at the 'dinner party'. That was all my advice was.
LYLAS, have a great summer, hope we can be friends and have more classes together next year.
DinhX8
I think the rx8 will do well so long as rotary development continues, which is the most important factor in driving its future.
okay sweet, now that i got that out I can continue:
I did actually respond (page 2 or something) actually to offer my opinion on the sucess of the car. I only responded to you after your posts seemed arrogant
claiming worthy of PHD status.
Don't be so upset. no one here really is. I'm not. I was giving you a tip in my first post to you, to say, you don't need fancy words to prove a point. I ended that post with the PEACE smiley in which you proceeded to attack me with more. Don't be that cheesy guy at the 'dinner party'. That was all my advice was.
LYLAS, have a great summer, hope we can be friends and have more classes together next year.
DinhX8
#143
Originally Posted by trickshot
Psychic people should always get straight As, I would think.
Doesn't matter how bad, boring, wordy, or pretentious the professor is. Doesn't matter how poorly written (I think) the textbook is. If there are notes to be taken and books to be read, I'll take care of my end. So many poor students with the basic ubiquitous personality flaws would come to me and complain about everyone and everything but themselves and then ask me what my secret was. I told them go to every class and read every page and then reread every page until you understood everything. Look at yourself. Don't worry about the professor or the book. It is up to you to not let yourself down. No shortcut secrets.
In any class in which you didn't get an A, was it your fault or was it the professor's or the book's? At one point in here, with that group of haters, this fitting analogy occurred to me.
#145
Administrator
Originally Posted by playdoh43
Cooder first of all your pathetic writing skills is not even close to being professional, children in 6th grade can write more coherently than you.
Second - be careful what you say. Dont be so sure about who's "writing skills" are better. of the 2 "scores" im attaching your's is the lesser
Cooder- once more- do not respond to the personal attacks. it only prolongs the arguement and obfuscates the discussion
#148
Mr. T is my copilot
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: los angeles
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yikes.
somehow i read through this whole thread. i must be bored.
i have to say i agree with cooder a bit about the rx-8 surviving as long as other cars continue to carry it. it does seem to me that mazda isnt too worried about the rx-8's sales, but likes to use it as more of a novelty figurehead. although, they might try advertising and a little more public exposure if thats true.
anyway, now that im here at the end of the thread i forgot what i was really going to say. but, im sure it wasnt important or interesting.
somehow i read through this whole thread. i must be bored.
i have to say i agree with cooder a bit about the rx-8 surviving as long as other cars continue to carry it. it does seem to me that mazda isnt too worried about the rx-8's sales, but likes to use it as more of a novelty figurehead. although, they might try advertising and a little more public exposure if thats true.
anyway, now that im here at the end of the thread i forgot what i was really going to say. but, im sure it wasnt important or interesting.
#149
Originally Posted by captain mercury
yikes.
somehow i read through this whole thread. i must be bored.
i have to say i agree with cooder a bit about the rx-8 surviving as long as other cars continue to carry it. it does seem to me that mazda isnt too worried about the rx-8's sales, but likes to use it as more of a novelty figurehead. although, they might try advertising and a little more public exposure if thats true.
anyway, now that im here at the end of the thread i forgot what i was really going to say. but, im sure it wasnt important or interesting.
somehow i read through this whole thread. i must be bored.
i have to say i agree with cooder a bit about the rx-8 surviving as long as other cars continue to carry it. it does seem to me that mazda isnt too worried about the rx-8's sales, but likes to use it as more of a novelty figurehead. although, they might try advertising and a little more public exposure if thats true.
anyway, now that im here at the end of the thread i forgot what i was really going to say. but, im sure it wasnt important or interesting.
It's really not very confusing or controversial, as 3 or 4 boneheads on their own agendas have tried to make it. One person wanted so much to knock me off my "pedestal" that he was driven to push the ridiculously narrow and stupid idea that the ONLY factor Mazda considers is if the RX8 sells and if it doesn't it's gone! In REAL intellectual life, human beings need to learn to focus on the substance and topic, not on personal competition or jealousies. The latter will only cause you to come up with lines of "reasoning" that defy common sense, thus making you look stupid.
#150
Originally Posted by StealthFox
i'm extremely suprised you agree with me, its good to see you understand what light im bringing to the table, with that there is a miscommunication happening and i think more people would understand and side with you if you were clearer. i think because of the medium that we are debating on(an online forum) simple to the point messages are better because the more you type, the more your point is open to misinterpretation because of too many moving parts, like the simpler your car is the less goes wrong, ie honda civic, and the more moving parts you have ie. rx7 fd3s the more there is to go wrong.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RenesisRacer
General Automotive
8
02-20-2006 10:21 AM