Notices
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension

Will It Fit Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old 10-05-2012, 09:33 AM
  #8851  
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
J8635621's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Waco
Posts: 6,344
Received 128 Likes on 89 Posts
9" go with 245/40. I assume street driving.

What was said about the 9.5" is correct. 245/40 is a bit more stretch than I'd like. I don't know about you. I ran that setup for a while though
Old 10-05-2012, 09:55 PM
  #8852  
Registered
iTrader: (17)
 
LifeAfterRx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 782
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr_Pieper
Those offsets are close enough to not really make a difference. That tire size is okay but with a +35 you can fit a lot more. It may look a little goofy at stock height, though.
Originally Posted by J8635621
9" go with 245/40. I assume street driving.

What was said about the 9.5" is correct. 245/40 is a bit more stretch than I'd like. I don't know about you. I ran that setup for a while though
Any rubbing issues with the front?
Will I need to roll the fenders on stock height?
I spoke with someone on the phone and he said it's not common with the 8 to run a 9.5, mostly 9?

The wheels I'm looking at right now are Kiwami's in 18x9.5, same size all around. I know there's the newer deep concave wheels with an 18x10 but I'm guessing that's too wide of a wheel?

Also, would a +30 be too aggressive or just stick to +38?

Last edited by LifeAfterRx8; 10-05-2012 at 09:57 PM.
Old 10-06-2012, 07:53 AM
  #8853  
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
J8635621's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Waco
Posts: 6,344
Received 128 Likes on 89 Posts
Stock height sucks. 9.5 isn't uncommon at all. It isn't too wide. +30 is great if you are lowered. The lower the car, the lower offset you can run and it not look stupid. If you are going to stay stock height then +38 is even a little too low of an offset IMO.
Old 10-06-2012, 09:15 AM
  #8854  
Danny Rotstein
iTrader: (10)
 
Danmn858's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by J8635621
Stock height sucks. 9.5 isn't uncommon at all. It isn't too wide. +30 is great if you are lowered. The lower the car, the lower offset you can run and it not look stupid. If you are going to stay stock height then +38 is even a little too low of an offset IMO.
100% agree
Old 10-07-2012, 11:34 AM
  #8855  
New Member
 
Darth Rex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
18”
Front: 8.0j ET30 225/40/18
rear : 9.5j ET26 255/35/18

still stock height, will be lowered 40mm in the near future.
Help me make my decision...
Old 10-07-2012, 11:37 AM
  #8856  
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
J8635621's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Waco
Posts: 6,344
Received 128 Likes on 89 Posts
No. Staggered is whack and lower the car first
Old 10-07-2012, 12:53 PM
  #8857  
Danny Rotstein
iTrader: (10)
 
Danmn858's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by J8635621
No. Staggered is whack and lower the car first
the car is rwd, staggered is fine.
Old 10-07-2012, 01:02 PM
  #8858  
Trust Me, I'm an Engineer
iTrader: (3)
 
JCrane82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Elkhorn, WI
Posts: 621
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Danmn858
the car is rwd, staggered is fine.
Disagree. The RX-8 doesn't have enough power to justify a staggered setup. If you are FI, then go staggered if you want. I suggest just going with 265's all around on 9.5" wheels.
Old 10-07-2012, 01:06 PM
  #8859  
Danny Rotstein
iTrader: (10)
 
Danmn858's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JCrane82
Disagree. The RX-8 doesn't have enough power to justify a staggered setup. If you are FI, then go staggered if you want. I suggest just going with 265's all around on 9.5" wheels.
If he's going for track setup maybe... which I highly doubt.
Old 10-07-2012, 01:07 PM
  #8860  
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
J8635621's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Waco
Posts: 6,344
Received 128 Likes on 89 Posts
Originally Posted by Danmn858
the car is rwd, staggered is fine.
Benefit to going staggered?
Old 10-07-2012, 01:11 PM
  #8861  
Trust Me, I'm an Engineer
iTrader: (3)
 
JCrane82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Elkhorn, WI
Posts: 621
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Danmn858
If he's going for track setup maybe... which I highly doubt.
Very possible. I won't deny that some huge wheels look sweet on the rear of the RX-8, I just wonder why you wouldn't put those big wheels and tires up front as well.

But you are right......staggered isn't a really a issue unless you want to maintain the handling for track.

An alternative to a staggered setup is to run some spacers on the rear. Then you have the look, but still keep a square setup for handling and rotations.
Old 10-08-2012, 05:14 PM
  #8862  
Registered
 
R80MAV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: U.K
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im currently running 9j lm reps et 39 all round (3mm spacers) the next step up would be 25mm spacers to clear the factory studs. will i rub with stock fenders and stock profile tyre (225/45/18)? the overall offset will be et17 :o.

ive noticed the tabs are pretty large in rear arches does this make it difficult to roll them?
Old 10-19-2012, 06:33 AM
  #8863  
Registered User
 
RX8 Nutta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi All,

I'm pretty new to this whole after market wheel thing but have been doing heaps of reading through the forum but haven't been able to find an answer to my question.

Looking at getting a set of Enkei RP-03 18x8.5 +35 or 18x8.5 +30.

Tyre wise I'm looking at the Bridgestone S001 in 235/40/18

Car is lowered on Koni Yellows and Eibach Pro springs. Eibach springs drop ~1.5" and the Koni's seem to drop it a little more.

Will these fit without needing to roll the guards?

Thanks
Old 10-19-2012, 06:48 AM
  #8864  
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
J8635621's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Waco
Posts: 6,344
Received 128 Likes on 89 Posts
They look much better in the 9.5 width. Your choices shouldn't need fenders rolled and I would suggest 245/40 tires
Old 10-19-2012, 09:31 AM
  #8865  
Registered User
 
RX8 Nutta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks J,

The 9.5" do look good, but the car is mainly a DD so didn't see the need to go that wide.

I was more concerned about the +30 fitting as the +35 for these are getting harder to find down here in Australia.

I'll check out prices on the 245's tomorrow.

Thanks again!
Old 10-19-2012, 09:33 AM
  #8866  
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
J8635621's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Waco
Posts: 6,344
Received 128 Likes on 89 Posts
Mine was a DD too and I still got the 9.5" rp03.
Old 10-19-2012, 09:56 AM
  #8867  
Registered User
 
RX8 Nutta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What offset did you have on those? And how much work did you do to fit them?

245 would be pretty stretched on a 9.5 I would have thought?
Old 10-19-2012, 10:05 AM
  #8868  
Legend In My Own Mind
 
Mr_Pieper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: The Lou
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I have a 245 on a 9.75 and the stretch isn't too bad. Still wish I hadn't been so paranoid and should have gone wider.
Old 10-19-2012, 10:13 AM
  #8869  
Legend In My Own Mind
 
Mr_Pieper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: The Lou
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Here is the best picture example I had of mine on hand.

Name:  SAM_0946_zpsdc254418.jpg
Views: 324
Size:  219.4 KB
Old 10-19-2012, 11:04 AM
  #8870  
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
J8635621's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Waco
Posts: 6,344
Received 128 Likes on 89 Posts
One moment and I'll show my old pictures. 245s on a 9.5 or 9.75 is more stretch than I'd like. I'd say go with 265/35 on the 9.5s to be honest. That's what I have now.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/j863562...7611482633008/ 245/40 18x9.5 +38 lowered about an inch all around with no work needed at all
Old 10-19-2012, 07:27 PM
  #8871  
Registered User
 
RX8 Nutta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks guys,

Looks good J. It will come down to what I can actually get my hands on down here.

Seems like they are getting harder to come by for whatever reason.

Thanks again.
Old 10-20-2012, 07:12 AM
  #8872  
Registered User
 
freewire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
geometry/alignment 20mm Spacers

Just looking for a bit of advice really, does anyone know if an adjustment to the geometry needs to be made with 20mm spacers on S1 or S2, and considering whether it has been lowered or not?? Any help here would be appreciated.

Regards
Old 10-20-2012, 07:44 AM
  #8873  
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
J8635621's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Waco
Posts: 6,344
Received 128 Likes on 89 Posts
Just spacers requires nothing else. I don't really understand your question though
Old 10-20-2012, 08:24 AM
  #8874  
Legend In My Own Mind
 
Mr_Pieper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: The Lou
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The adjustment of your isosceles needs to be equal to the sine of the angle perpendicular to your rhombus alignment.
Old 10-20-2012, 09:51 AM
  #8875  
Registered User
 
freewire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by J8635621
Just spacers requires nothing else. I don't really understand your question though
Thanks and sorry I meant alignment.. regards.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: Will It Fit Thread



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:08 PM.