Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Lets look at expo1's over 100K renesis motor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-21-2008, 12:29 PM
  #401  
Registered
 
musclecarconvrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vasichko, do yourself a favor and switch to 10w 40 at least for the summer.
Old 05-21-2008, 01:24 PM
  #402  
Registered Mommy
 
~0zzygirl~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: OKC
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, what do we do? If we want any chance of Mazda honoring their warranty, we have to use 5w20 and show proof of it. It's like they're asking us to ruin our engines.

FWIW, if I just bought a brand new 8, I would take my chances with thicker oil. Probably wouldn't need the powertrain warranty.

My next engine, being in oklahoma... I think 10w30 and premix all year long.

Synthetic vs dino isn't even a debate compared to whether to go heavier than 5w20... it's the thin oil that is sending our engines to the graveyard, i.e. reman plant!
Old 05-21-2008, 01:49 PM
  #403  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Jasonawojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I once e-mailed Mazda about synthetic oil and heavier weights, and while they would basically not comment on synthetic except that they don't recommend it, they said that heavier weights could be used. The response is a few months old, but this is what I got..

Hello Jason,

Thank you for contacting Mazda.

In response to your question the 2004 RX-8 rotary engine is not designed to use any type of synthetic oil. The rotary Renesis engine is designed to burn oil. By using synthetic oil which does not burn as fast as conventional oil, potential engine problems could arise. For that reason Mazda does not recommend the use of synthetic oil in their rotary engines. However, the use of a higher viscosity rating for use in high temperature weather conditions is allowed. Just make sure that the oil you use meets both API and ILSAC standards.

Regards,

Steve P.
Specialist, Customer Assistance E-Business
I personally have been using 5w20 Royal Purple, might go to 5w30 for summer though.

Last edited by Jasonawojo; 05-21-2008 at 01:52 PM.
Old 05-21-2008, 04:18 PM
  #404  
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Mazmart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,793
Received 63 Likes on 32 Posts
Don't be afraid of the 40 weight! I think secretly, Mazda is happy that I'm preaching this message. As I said previously: The manufacturer has to do what the manufacturer has to do and we, the enlightened, need to do what we need to do.

Unfortunately, in this very political age, there are many other concerns beyond overall engine life. The balancing act for a manufacturer is a tricky one.

Paul.
Old 05-21-2008, 07:22 PM
  #405  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
r0tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ~0zzygirl~
So, what do we do? If we want any chance of Mazda honoring their warranty, we have to use 5w20 and show proof of it. It's like they're asking us to ruin our engines.

FWIW, if I just bought a brand new 8, I would take my chances with thicker oil. Probably wouldn't need the powertrain warranty.

My next engine, being in oklahoma... I think 10w30 and premix all year long.

Synthetic vs dino isn't even a debate compared to whether to go heavier than 5w20... it's the thin oil that is sending our engines to the graveyard, i.e. reman plant!
there is zero to be gained from 10w30 over 5w30 except some start-up wear... at operating temps they are both the same 30 weight
Old 05-21-2008, 11:03 PM
  #406  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Vasichko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would it matter at this point having 33k miles on it?

Here is what Im worried about.

Look at the viscosity at 40C here. There is a pretty big difference between 10w30 and 10w40.

http://www.castrol.com/liveassets/bp...sd_gtx_usa.pdf

This leads me to another question. I am about to do my oil this week, I had 5w30 in before hand. I bought my car used, so I dont know what the hell was put in there for the first 20k miles, but the dealer I got it from only serviced with 10w30. Anyways, I usually let my car idle for 30 seconds then drive away being very gentle on the car. What would you guys say is a proper amount of time to let the car idle before driving?

Originally Posted by musclecarconvrt
Vasichko, do yourself a favor and switch to 10w 40 at least for the summer.
Old 05-22-2008, 02:16 PM
  #407  
Registered Mommy
 
~0zzygirl~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: OKC
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by r0tor
there is zero to be gained from 10w30 over 5w30 except some start-up wear... at operating temps they are both the same 30 weight
I'm sure you're right, but I never said anything about 5w30.

Jasonawojo's letter is interesting, but didn't I read somewhere that Mazda tested their engines with synthetic before shipping them out?

Maybe the best bet for someone under warranty who wants better protection for the engine and not get denied warranty repairs is to go with a heavier oil, but stick to conventional. That way you could cover your butt from both sides.

While I'm a fan of synthetics, if you change your oil every 3k miles, most of the added benefit of synthetic is negated, in my opinion... ESPECIALLY if there's a chance it will void warranty.
Old 05-22-2008, 03:07 PM
  #408  
Out of NYC
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by ~0zzygirl~
I'm sure you're right, but I never said anything about 5w30.

Jasonawojo's letter is interesting, but didn't I read somewhere that Mazda tested their engines with synthetic before shipping them out?

Maybe the best bet for someone under warranty who wants better protection for the engine and not get denied warranty repairs is to go with a heavier oil, but stick to conventional. That way you could cover your butt from both sides.

While I'm a fan of synthetics, if you change your oil every 3k miles, most of the added benefit of synthetic is negated, in my opinion... ESPECIALLY if there's a chance it will void warranty.
They cant void your warranty for the oil you use, unless they can prove that is the cause of failure. Damn, how many times I gotta repeat this ?

Synthetic, even at the same weight, can offer better film strength/protection than their Dino cousin. that is a known fact. meh. what do I know.
Old 05-22-2008, 03:09 PM
  #409  
Doppelgänger
 
mysql's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
...and it doesn't cook as easily.
Old 05-22-2008, 03:14 PM
  #410  
Out of NYC
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by mysql
...and it doesn't cook as easily.
@ +1600f degrees ?

not to mention, if the oil burns out at every combustion process, then the seals will run dry after the exhaust port ?
Old 05-22-2008, 03:16 PM
  #411  
Doppelgänger
 
mysql's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm talking about inside a turbo. In the engine it's diluted with a ton of fuel.
Old 05-22-2008, 03:27 PM
  #412  
Out of NYC
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by mysql
I'm talking about inside a turbo. In the engine it's diluted with a ton of fuel.
phew, about to say.

Turbo yes u need oil thats stable. Synthetic is da best
Old 05-22-2008, 03:29 PM
  #413  
Registered Mommy
 
~0zzygirl~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: OKC
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nycgps
They cant void your warranty for the oil you use, unless they can prove that is the cause of failure. Damn, how many times I gotta repeat this ?

Synthetic, even at the same weight, can offer better film strength/protection than their Dino cousin. that is a known fact. meh. what do I know.
I think they would easily void the warranty on an engine replacement if you used synthetic. And since you asked... maybe you could try repeating it as many times as Mazda throws a fit over it? Although that wouldn't leave much time for hobbies.

FWIW, I don't know what you know but it seems like a lot. I think you missed my point, is all.
Old 05-22-2008, 03:32 PM
  #414  
Out of NYC
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
I just notice something in Castrol GTX's Product Data sheet

http://www.castrol.com/liveassets/bp...sd_gtx_usa.pdf

Industry Specifications and OEM Approvals by Grade
SAE 5W-20: is a premium, multi-grade oil,providing cold start protection with Exceptional Fuel Economy. SAE 5W-20 exceeds API service SM, SL, SJ and SH, as well as exceeding ILSAC GF-4/GF-3/GF-2 for API Certified Gasoline Engine Oils. Exceeds Ford specifications WSS M2C153-H and WSS M2C930-A. Exceeds the service fill requirements of Ford, Honda and Chrysler where an SAE 5W-20 motor oil is specified. SAE 5W-20 should only be used in vehicles where SAE 5W-
20 is recommended by manufacturer.
SAE 5W-30: is a premium, super multi-grade that provides maximum cold weather engine protection and can help extend engine life. SAE 5W-30 exceeds API Service SM, SL, SJ and SH, as well as exceeding all the requirements of ILSAC GF-4/GF-3/GF-2 for API Certified Gasoline Engine Oils and meets Energy Conserving Standards. Exceeds GM6094M and Ford WSS M2C929-A.
SAE 10W-30: is a premium, super multi-grade that provides fuel economy and can help extend engine life. SAE 10W-30 exceeds API Service SM, SL, SJ and SH as well as exceeding all the requirements of ILSAC GF-4/GF-3/GF-2 for API Certified Gasoline Engine Oils and meets Energy Conserving Standards. Exceeds GM6094M
SAE 10W-40: is a premium, super multigrade that provides maximum protection in all seasons and can help extend engine life. SAE 10W-40 exceeds API service SM, SL, SJ and SH as well as exceeding the engine protection requirements for API Certified Gasoline Engine Oils.
SAE 20W-50: is a premium, super multigrade that guards against wear by providing a superior oil film strength and extreme high temperature strength. 20W-50 exceeds API service SM, SL, SJ and SH. Use SAE 20W-50 when ambient temperature is above 20 F.
Hmm, I wonder why they didnt say anything about 5w20's protection/extend engine life. but anything *above* w20 grade, for some reason, has mention *extended engine life* in them. and 20w50 is providing superior oil film strength(ALL engine needs this) and extreme High temp. strength(ALL engine needs this)

I wonder why ... hmm I wonder why when auto manufacture started to recommend 5w20 as factory fill & recommend it since hmm .. 2001 I think ? Or 2002 I dont remember. Engine dies faster than ever. happening every year. Most of them can *get pass* the warranty period. after that hmm, hard to say.

(Castrol is waitng for your counter-attack)

Last edited by nycgps; 05-22-2008 at 03:38 PM.
Old 05-22-2008, 03:34 PM
  #415  
Out of NYC
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by ~0zzygirl~
I think they would easily void the warranty on an engine replacement if you used synthetic. And since you asked... maybe you could try repeating it as many times as Mazda throws a fit over it? Although that wouldn't leave much time for hobbies.

FWIW, I don't know what you know but it seems like a lot. I think you missed my point, is all.
Haha ! I did tell my dealership that I use nothing but Synthetic oil only. There are times that they tried to void my warranty, but it was due to intake kind of BS. nothing oil related.

NOT TO MENTION, in the states, they CANNOT void your warranty for using Full Synthetic oil. Im using oil that meet actually farrrrr exceed their specification. If they void me base on Synthetic, Im sure I can sue them and I will win.
Old 05-22-2008, 03:35 PM
  #416  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Jasonawojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just posted that letter to show that Mazda claimed to not be against using a heavier weight in hot weather.

The deal with the synthetic is, Mazda would need to prove that the use of synthetic oil caused the engine to fail in order to void the engine warranty. If they found out, they might try to void it without investigating as they attempt to do in many situations, but if you pushed hard enough they would have to prove it or give up, technically.
Old 05-22-2008, 04:30 PM
  #417  
Registered Mommy
 
~0zzygirl~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: OKC
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nycgps
Haha ! I did tell my dealership that I use nothing but Synthetic oil only. There are times that they tried to void my warranty, but it was due to intake kind of BS. nothing oil related.

NOT TO MENTION, in the states, they CANNOT void your warranty for using Full Synthetic oil. Im using oil that meet actually farrrrr exceed their specification. If they void me base on Synthetic, Im sure I can sue them and I will win.
nyc, I'm not trying to get into a pissing match with you, nor am I arguing the fact that synthetic is the ultimate protection, and maybe I'm just in a pissy mood b/c my car is broken and I have yet to hear from the dealer after 3 1/2 days (<--most likely.)

We know that synthetic oil isn't killing our engine, conventional isn't either... thin weight likely is.

But coming from someone who has had their engine replaced, and from reading about others on this board, I see no reason to believe they wouldn't try to decline an engine replacement based on the manufacturer's belief that synthetic is a wankel killer.

It sucks to have to go through an engine replacement, and to give them one more reason to make you pay for it unless you sue them is not worth it when there are plenty of conventional oils that are fine with proper maintenance.

That's all I was trying to say.
Old 05-22-2008, 05:25 PM
  #418  
Registered User
 
Shoafb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nycgps
I just notice something in Castrol GTX's Product Data sheet

http://www.castrol.com/liveassets/bp...sd_gtx_usa.pdf



Hmm, I wonder why they didnt say anything about 5w20's protection/extend engine life. but anything *above* w20 grade, for some reason, has mention *extended engine life* in them. and 20w50 is providing superior oil film strength(ALL engine needs this) and extreme High temp. strength(ALL engine needs this)

I wonder why ... hmm I wonder why when auto manufacture started to recommend 5w20 as factory fill & recommend it since hmm .. 2001 I think ? Or 2002 I dont remember. Engine dies faster than ever. happening every year. Most of them can *get pass* the warranty period. after that hmm, hard to say.

(Castrol is waitng for your counter-attack)
I still don't see where you are getting the data that newer engines using 5w20 are not lasting as long?
Old 05-22-2008, 05:33 PM
  #419  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
r0tor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nycgps
I just notice something in Castrol GTX's Product Data sheet

http://www.castrol.com/liveassets/bp...sd_gtx_usa.pdf



Hmm, I wonder why they didnt say anything about 5w20's protection/extend engine life. but anything *above* w20 grade, for some reason, has mention *extended engine life* in them. and 20w50 is providing superior oil film strength(ALL engine needs this) and extreme High temp. strength(ALL engine needs this)
all street driven engines really need cold start protection too... thats not listed above a 5 weight.... so whats your point?
Old 05-22-2008, 05:37 PM
  #420  
Registered
 
robrecht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hunterdon County
Posts: 1,932
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by r0tor
all street driven engines really need cold start protection too... thats not listed above a 5 weight.... so whats your point?
And some would say that this is when most engine wear occurs. Oil choice, like tires, is always a compromise of some sort.
Old 05-22-2008, 05:59 PM
  #421  
road warrior
 
LionZoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by robrecht
And some would say that this is when most engine wear occurs. Oil choice, like tires, is always a compromise of some sort.
Which is why I'm going to 5W40; to try to get the best of both worlds. Unfortunately, this oil is a SM oil and Mazmart says they might be seeing an issue with SM oils not being as good for engine life; though they haven't stated where and why yet. C'mon Paul, spill the beans!
Old 05-22-2008, 07:22 PM
  #422  
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Mazmart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,793
Received 63 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by LionZoo
Which is why I'm going to 5W40; to try to get the best of both worlds. Unfortunately, this oil is a SM oil and Mazmart says they might be seeing an issue with SM oils not being as good for engine life; though they haven't stated where and why yet. C'mon Paul, spill the beans!
The problem, I guess, comes from what I've found in the purpose, expressed by ILSAC, of reducing various additives in the oils meeting the newest standards. I'm old enough to remember when the SG rating came out. The advantage of SG over SF was anti-sludging. Now, it seems, the most important factoring in the standards for our oils has strayed from engine longevity to fuel mileage (Energy conservation) and protecting emissions equipment. The additives in question are Zinc and Phosphorous in particular. The decrease in these anti-wear ingredients is shocking. I read one excellent write-up on the topic suggesting that they weren't sure how these oils would affect pre 2004 vehicles but we haven't seen much evidence of changes to the newer cars to accomodate these thinner oils with deficiencies in anti-wear additives. Rotary engines do have some unique requirements in relation to oil and wear. I would want excellent protection where oil seals and side seals travel and proper film strength for it's bearings. I've always said I'd prefer a separate supply of oil for the metering system (Like Sohn provided).

SM is cool if you've done all your homework. Some great oils have added Moly to compensate. I just want more than most in the area of protection.

The saga continues.

Paul.
Old 05-22-2008, 07:35 PM
  #423  
Out of NYC
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by ~0zzygirl~
nyc, I'm not trying to get into a pissing match with you, nor am I arguing the fact that synthetic is the ultimate protection, and maybe I'm just in a pissy mood b/c my car is broken and I have yet to hear from the dealer after 3 1/2 days (<--most likely.)

We know that synthetic oil isn't killing our engine, conventional isn't either... thin weight likely is.

But coming from someone who has had their engine replaced, and from reading about others on this board, I see no reason to believe they wouldn't try to decline an engine replacement based on the manufacturer's belief that synthetic is a wankel killer.

It sucks to have to go through an engine replacement, and to give them one more reason to make you pay for it unless you sue them is not worth it when there are plenty of conventional oils that are fine with proper maintenance.

That's all I was trying to say.
I understand, we're simply trying to make things better, arent we ?

The thing is that, Mazda cant deny warranty claims based on Synthetic alone, they HAVE to prove that the issue is caused by *name item here*.

Synthetic has stronger film strength, can withstand higher heat, etc. Its simply a *Better* product since day 1. The problem is just that, to some people, the Extra characteristic does not worth the extra cost to them(cost 3x or more)

Originally Posted by Shoafb
I still don't see where you are getting the data that newer engines using 5w20 are not lasting as long?
I spent a lot of time to read and ask. If you want to know/learn something, you HAVE to do your own homework. Not just *Please post your data up* like you did.

Originally Posted by r0tor
all street driven engines really need cold start protection too... thats not listed above a 5 weight.... so whats your point?
If 10wWhatever can make them put the *Extend engine life* line in their data sheet, I dont see the reason for 5 or 0w, unless the user lives at some really cold places.

Last edited by nycgps; 05-22-2008 at 07:39 PM.
Old 05-22-2008, 07:49 PM
  #424  
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Mazmart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,793
Received 63 Likes on 32 Posts
According to engine oil manufacturers, it is proper to use a 20W50 in ambient temps as low as 20deg F for cold start up but they caution: Use what your vehicle manufacturer recommends. The purpose of that latter statement is legality. If I had to rush into traffic from dead cold conditions, I'd want the very low winter rating;especially in the winter, but I'm not going to give up film strength and viscosity.

Read my lips people: 5W20 is intended for REDUCED AVERAGE CORPORATE FUEL CONSUMPTION and not much else .

Paul.
Old 05-22-2008, 07:53 PM
  #425  
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Mazmart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,793
Received 63 Likes on 32 Posts
Another way to phrase that would be: IMPROVE AVERAGE CORPORATE FUEL ECONOMY.

Paul.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Lets look at expo1's over 100K renesis motor



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:50 PM.