Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Greddy turbo intercooler upgrade comparison test

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-27-2011, 12:55 AM
  #76  
Boosted Kiwi
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
Nice. What do you think that equates too in performance?
Probably turned it into a 10 second car


I'm Guessing around 10whp from 5500 onwards .
Old 07-27-2011, 09:10 AM
  #77  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
TX

Originally Posted by Brettus
Probably turned it into a 10 second car


I'm Guessing around 10whp from 5500 onwards .

Nice.
Old 08-09-2011, 09:34 PM
  #78  
Boosted Marine
 
USMC_Skip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
this may be a dumb question or the safety aspect might outweigh the potential gain, but what about cutting away part of the 40 mile an hour bumper and fitting a bigger IC there? Any takers?
Old 08-09-2011, 10:46 PM
  #79  
Boosted Kiwi
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
/\ I have a JDM bumper , which is a lot shorter than the US one - perfect in fact
Old 08-10-2011, 09:29 AM
  #80  
SPOOLN8
iTrader: (1)
 
RotaryMachineRx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,225
Received 208 Likes on 156 Posts
Originally Posted by USMC_Skip
this may be a dumb question or the safety aspect might outweigh the potential gain, but what about cutting away part of the 40 mile an hour bumper and fitting a bigger IC there? Any takers?
You talking about the crash bar?
Old 08-11-2011, 05:17 AM
  #81  
Boosted Marine
 
USMC_Skip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yea what everyone puts their IC behind and ends up blocking part of the IC
Old 08-11-2011, 07:54 AM
  #82  
Turbo Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
The IC placement on my car does not block any of my IC and I have the crash bar. The ms bumper helps a lot there though.
Old 08-11-2011, 09:41 AM
  #83  
SPOOLN8
iTrader: (1)
 
RotaryMachineRx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,225
Received 208 Likes on 156 Posts
I bent my IC brackets so it hangs a bit lower.... I have very minimal blockage if any at all.... blocking off more of the rad isn't a huge issue for the climate I live in though
Old 08-11-2011, 05:46 PM
  #84  
Boosted Marine
 
USMC_Skip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RWD+LSD=Zoom
The IC placement on my car does not block any of my IC and I have the crash bar. The ms bumper helps a lot there though.
In order for mine to fit under the crash bar with out cutting it I need to angle the IC forward, also because the AEM intake is directly behind the bar. I have to either cut part of the "crash bar" or cut away the inside bottom part of my bumper and get some longer brackets in order to sit it upright.
Old 09-01-2011, 11:04 PM
  #85  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
it would be curious for you to try a tube and fin design...
Old 10-02-2011, 02:57 PM
  #86  
Boosted Kiwi
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
For a direct comparison :


DOES OVERHEAT





DOES NOT OVERHEAT
Attached Thumbnails Greddy turbo intercooler upgrade comparison test-intercoolerft.jpg   Greddy turbo intercooler upgrade comparison test-p1010053.jpg  

Last edited by Brettus; 10-02-2011 at 03:03 PM.
Old 10-03-2011, 12:52 PM
  #87  
SPOOLN8
iTrader: (1)
 
RotaryMachineRx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,225
Received 208 Likes on 156 Posts
^ stand further back when you take the pics?
Old 10-03-2011, 01:27 PM
  #88  
Turbo Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
lighting. you need to have light shinning through the grill if you want to see the IC when taking pics
Old 10-05-2011, 12:19 AM
  #89  
Registered
 
AAaF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Norway
Posts: 404
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
How good would it work to let the A/C feed a liquid intercooler? Would the airflow might be to high compared to how much the A/C can cool?
Old 10-05-2011, 12:27 AM
  #90  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
TX

Originally Posted by AAaF
How good would it work to let the A/C feed a liquid intercooler? Would the airflow might be to high compared to how much the A/C can cool?
Say what? Like feed the AC lines through a water/air intercooler?
Old 10-05-2011, 12:29 AM
  #91  
Boosted Kiwi
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by AAaF
How good would it work to let the A/C feed a liquid intercooler? Would the airflow might be to high compared to how much the A/C can cool?
For starters I'm pretty sure the AC turns off at wot past a certain rpm .

Other than that there are better ways to cool air than employing something that sucks a lot of energy from the engine to do comparatively little cooling .
Old 10-05-2011, 01:11 AM
  #92  
Registered
 
AAaF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Norway
Posts: 404
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by Brettus
For starters I'm pretty sure the AC turns off at wot past a certain rpm .

Other than that there are better ways to cool air than employing something that sucks a lot of energy from the engine to do comparatively little cooling .
1. So the AC cannot surge alot of heat? I dont have a clue how much energy a normal AC can get rid of....? That was mainly what I wondered: does the AC have capacity to influence the huge amount of air to any valuable point? If you want to cool say 300g/s by 20 C, would AC be capable of that?

2. I didnt think it absorbed that much energy, heard 3hp once(in a TV interview), but that might have been taken out of thin air for all I know. Is it?

3. Keeping the AC on at all times, should not be any problem. Electronics is my homefield.
Old 10-05-2011, 01:13 AM
  #93  
Registered
 
AAaF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Norway
Posts: 404
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
Say what? Like feed the AC lines through a water/air intercooler?
Exactly.

We dont need AC in Norway
Old 10-05-2011, 01:32 AM
  #94  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
most of your research is all pertained to a bar and plate design, never has a tube and fin been mentioned.

I remember finding a thread where someone held up a stock radiator, and a BHR radiator, the difference was the BHR Radiator had less dense fins, one could nearly see right through it, its still effective and flows more air. so I decided to do the same with intercooler cores

average Bar and Plate intercooler core


A Tube and Fine intercooler I ran for a bit (core was too Thin 2.25" (57.15mm))


Notice much of a difference?

I was under the impression that the tube and fin was a bar and plate so when I ordered my larger one, I looked for bar and plate. upon receiving the larger unit I discovered the difference.
with the smaller intercooler core 21x6.5x2.25 I didn't have any issues with heat but had a large pressure difference. I installed the bar and plate 21x10x3 the pressure difference dropped and the car was more responsive, but My motor temps jumped from 183 to 193 in 85 degree weather. when I get more funds my plan is to purchase a Tube and Fin of the same size and see what happens, I figure the temps will be normal again, looking at the pictures I just posted

Last edited by FazdaRX_8; 10-05-2011 at 01:44 AM.
Old 10-05-2011, 01:51 AM
  #95  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
NgoRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CA, Rowland Hts.
Posts: 10,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
the greddy intercooler is tube and fin.

bar and plate in general restricts more airflow passing through it but offers better heat rejection.

your tube and fin looks very thin compared to the bar and plate, not to mention the lighting and distance allows you to see through it easier.

don't forget, the bhr radiators fin density is not the only aspect that is different. it is also much thicker than stock.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Carbon8
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
42
02-27-2020 08:39 AM
JimmyBlack
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades
273
02-10-2020 10:23 PM
05rx8mazda
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
18
11-28-2015 09:42 AM
Randolph Alvarez
New Member Forum
1
09-14-2015 04:25 AM
Fickert
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades
7
09-09-2015 01:21 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Greddy turbo intercooler upgrade comparison test



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:40 PM.