Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Another Top Mount Setup

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-05-2011, 11:02 PM
  #526  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
Pstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Turblown
I actually built this stuff quite a long time before we had the car in our possession, and accordingly to everyone I spoke to( mostly other shop owners) it made zero difference. Keep in mind I don't read everything on the forum . If I had time for that we wouldn't be in business...

Regardless the design has been changed, and if there wasn't a 20B on the way to our place for this car, it would be changed on his setup....

I like where this is going!
Old 07-05-2011, 11:44 PM
  #527  
Registered
 
AAaF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Norway
Posts: 404
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by Turblown
All of our kits now come with enough downpipe clearance to allow proper operation of the valve. At the time this was built everyone was under the impression the aux ports made no difference in power...

Car will be running shortly, its 95% back together...


Will you make room for OMP as well, or will the kit still be dependent on premixing?
Old 10-19-2011, 11:26 PM
  #528  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
Any updates on this build? Is the car running again?
Old 10-20-2011, 09:25 AM
  #529  
Boostin'
Thread Starter
 
Turblown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yes the car is running. Steve Kahn tried to tune it, and it appears the front o2 sensor burned up and he suspected issues with the TB. Car was dumping fuel up top..

Not sure exactly I wasn't there. I did hear Jamaal thought the car was fast @ 9/10 psi not tuned.. Not sure if its just been such a long time since hes been in a fast car or the engine/port work made a big difference...
Old 10-20-2011, 09:42 AM
  #530  
Lucky #33
iTrader: (4)
 
hoss -05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Antonio, SARX Garage
Posts: 2,851
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Not sure if its just been such a long time since hes been in a fast car

Ugh.... i know how it feels.
Old 10-22-2011, 11:51 PM
  #531  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
TX

Originally Posted by Turblown
Yes the car is running. Steve Kahn tried to tune it, and it appears the front o2 sensor burned up and he suspected issues with the TB. Car was dumping fuel up top..

Not sure exactly I wasn't there. I did hear Jamaal thought the car was fast @ 9/10 psi not tuned.. Not sure if its just been such a long time since hes been in a fast car or the engine/port work made a big difference...
Well I hope they get it sorted, I'd like to see one if these tuned and running daily.
Old 10-25-2011, 06:06 PM
  #532  
Registered
 
freaklinkmusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well while this thread is on a break....I have a question for the tuner MazdaManiac. You seem pretty sure that when the car wouldve dynoed, it probably wouldnt have gotten to 500whp. What do you suspect would've happened with the higher pressure rating? Torque increase?? After going over what youve said in the past about other setups with turbos/efficiency, I suspect he wouldve made about 475 whp / 380 lb/tq.... since the thread needs a bump I just thought I would ask...
Old 10-25-2011, 08:11 PM
  #533  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by freaklinkmusic
Well while this thread is on a break....I have a question for the tuner MazdaManiac. You seem pretty sure that when the car wouldve dynoed, it probably wouldnt have gotten to 500whp. What do you suspect would've happened with the higher pressure rating? Torque increase?? After going over what youve said in the past about other setups with turbos/efficiency, I suspect he wouldve made about 475 whp / 380 lb/tq.... since the thread needs a bump I just thought I would ask...
It is difficult to play that guessing game, but generally you need a lot of turbo and a lot of fuel to get to that HP range.
Simply turning up the boost would have pumped up the torque, but the HP probably would have stayed the same as the turbo efficiency dropped off.
Old 10-31-2011, 04:11 PM
  #534  
Registered User
 
Jamaalsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Your Mouth
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Holy crap..
its been awhile since i've been on here. Car is running. there are some minor issues (likes to stall out on decel, irrgardless of boost, rpm), some oil leak issues that were suPPOSED to have been fixed by the last shop in colorado. 02 sensor may have been fried from being to close to the exhaust, so its running stupid rich. Im going to use this week to do some troubleshooting. Nick has been very good about working through the issue with me, and Elliot has even payed for him to come out to fix issues. Despite that, its pretty quick, sitting at about 300 to the wheels on a mustang dyno. Steve Kan and i spent the better part of two days trying to tune it, and it was only on my way back (6 hour drive) that i figured out the water/meth system was still hooked up, causing it to run stupid rich up top. The jets are also probably too large. Boost controller has been installed, but im still only running 10psi of boost until we work out those issues. Hopefully we'll be putting down some good numbers in the very near future.
Old 11-01-2011, 06:01 PM
  #535  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
wow - water meth would drop power by a little but not 100+whp ........
Old 11-01-2011, 07:01 PM
  #536  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,727
Received 2,011 Likes on 1,639 Posts
Originally Posted by freaklinkmusic
I suspect he wouldve made about 475 whp / 380 lb/tq....
I don't know whether to be amazed or disgusted that someone can actually pull something that big out of their butt ...
Old 11-01-2011, 08:10 PM
  #537  
Boostin'
Thread Starter
 
Turblown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Brettus
wow - water meth would drop power by a little but not 100+whp ........
If its so rich there is almost no combustion it sure will. Don't you remember the 1st time we hit the dyno? Car was only making 300rwhp...
Old 11-02-2011, 01:35 AM
  #538  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by Turblown
If its so rich there is almost no combustion it sure will. Don't you remember the 1st time we hit the dyno? Car was only making 300rwhp...
Sure do . Sounded about right at the time too , for that boost level .
Hard to imagine an experienced tuner working on it for 2 days , not noticing that it was rich and losing 100 whp .
Old 11-02-2011, 08:08 AM
  #539  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
must be multiple issues?
Old 11-02-2011, 09:08 AM
  #540  
Former Sponsor
 
RIP IT!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Guys Steve's Dyno reads 10% low compared to what you are used to seeing. I have had several cars on it. You have to remember numbers are just numbers and numbers don't win races.

Obviously their needs to be a little work done, but when you are pushing things that are more in the unexplored area there are set backs that take time.

To everyone involved, keep up the good work.
Old 11-02-2011, 09:27 AM
  #541  
Lucky #33
iTrader: (4)
 
hoss -05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Antonio, SARX Garage
Posts: 2,851
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
What size W/M injection "jets" is Jamal running?
Old 11-24-2011, 05:36 PM
  #542  
Registered User
 
Jamaalsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Your Mouth
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Old D! im in you're neck of the woods right now visiting my sister in GA... let me know in the very near future if you want to meet up! Im supposed to be seeing my tuner tomorrow as i'm still working through these issues...Hoss, i dont know what sized jet is in right now for the water meth. Arent you supposed to be down here?

Anyhow, ecu's throwing a bunch of codes, car is acting up big time, but the one code that keeps coming up is the 0035 (crankshaft position sensor circuit malfunction). Took out the ess, cleaned it, put it back in, same code. 20 Brake stomp to reset...same code.

Steve definitely noticed something was jacked up as whatever he tried to seemed to be counteracted by the system... he would lean it out and it would still run rich. We thought we disconnected it, but we didn't...was probably the pressure sensor for the boost a pump.

O2 sensor i bought has a harness that is far too short so i have to reorder...hopefully will solve the stalling problem but im sure there are more issues to be hammered out.

What i am considering in the very near future is grabbing a haltech ps2000.
Old 11-24-2011, 09:39 PM
  #543  
Lucky #33
iTrader: (4)
 
hoss -05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Antonio, SARX Garage
Posts: 2,851
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Yeah, I was suppose to have been down there a long time ago... grrr. If you are at Dennys give my R3 a pat and say hello!

Man I hate that you have all these issues. You have a turbo set up most of us can only dream of. Please Please get your issues worked out in the near future.
Old 11-26-2011, 06:23 PM
  #544  
Registered User
 
Jamaalsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Your Mouth
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Had the pleasure of meeting Denny and Charlie yesterday...both very personable and knowledgeable fellas. Think im going to go with a Haltec to take care of alot of these issues. This engine is capable of so much more...Will definitely be consulting with Charlie, Steve, Denny and Nick to plan my next move. Stay tuned...
Old 11-26-2011, 07:27 PM
  #545  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
Hey Jammaal !!
I never knew this was an Anniversary edition car--beautiful model and nice set up.
I am really glad you were able to come by. Dont worry --every set up has bugs to get worked out.
It was kind of trick the way they did that clip on the apv gear--sweet. Really like the design of your intercooler too--you could tell it had very good flow.
Man--you have my admiration--i could NEVER keep track of all the controls you have to deal with!
That vacuum level we talked bout right before I left--its good for youre ported engine--dont worry about it.
Really, really hope you can visit us at Road Atlanta this coming w/e--i guarantee you will have a good time.
Guys for those of you that havent had a chance to met this man--he is smooth and cool--cant help but like a guy like this--almost like an old friend after the 1st 30 minutes.
The Ga StaTE Patrol was out in force yesterday--you got through ok didnt ya?
Old 11-26-2011, 09:23 PM
  #546  
Lucky #33
iTrader: (4)
 
hoss -05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Antonio, SARX Garage
Posts: 2,851
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Yeah I miss hanging out with Jamal... I dont have any RX8 guys to talk to in my AO anymore that I know of
Old 11-26-2011, 11:51 PM
  #547  
Registered
 
freaklinkmusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
I don't know whether to be amazed or disgusted that someone can actually pull something that big out of their butt ...
im not sure about horsepower but as far as torque you saw chickenwafer made 325 lb/ft on a 3071r once it got past max eff range. Its possible it could reach 380 if the intake manifold could properly handle the airflow. Oh... and go back through this thread, there are way more outrageous predictions and speculations. And for the record, both of us are full of **** cuz neither me or you can prove our beliefs or statements. thank & goodnight.
Old 11-28-2011, 03:51 PM
  #548  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by freaklinkmusic
chickenwafer made 325 lb/ft on a 3071r once it got past max eff range.
I've had a couple of MM Upgrade users make it north of 340 ft/lbs.

Originally Posted by freaklinkmusic
Its possible it could reach 380 if the intake manifold could properly handle the airflow.
The intake manifold isn't really a weak link.
Old 11-28-2011, 05:33 PM
  #549  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,727
Received 2,011 Likes on 1,639 Posts
Originally Posted by freaklinkmusic
im not sure about horsepower but as far as torque you saw chickenwafer made 325 lb/ft on a 3071r once it got past max eff range. Its possible it could reach 380 if the intake manifold could properly handle the airflow. Oh... and go back through this thread, there are way more outrageous predictions and speculations. And for the record, both of us are full of **** cuz neither me or you can prove our beliefs or statements. thank & goodnight.
I was mostly referring to the 475 WHP part of your original statement. It's not up to me to prove that something is unsustainable. This leaves you standing alone in the full of poop line ...
Old 11-28-2011, 05:54 PM
  #550  
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
J8635621's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Waco
Posts: 6,344
Received 128 Likes on 89 Posts
He said unsustainable not unattainable. He will never be wrong


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Another Top Mount Setup



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:10 PM.