Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

9krpmrx8's Boost Build Thread

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jun 19, 2011 | 02:04 PM
  #351  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
TX

Originally Posted by NgoRX8
it has blown out. lol
Fixed power steering today and some other issues. Getting stuff coated next week and then it's on.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2011 | 03:44 PM
  #352  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,140
blah, blah, blah ...
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2011 | 03:56 PM
  #353  
Roidz's Avatar
Strength/Confidence
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,428
Likes: 2
From: Utah
This if the first I've checked out this thread. Pretty cool 9k.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2011 | 05:15 PM
  #354  
Highway8's Avatar
Registered RX8 Nut
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 9
From: Fairfield, CA
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
Fixed power steering today and some other issues. Getting stuff coated next week and then it's on.
What are you coating and with what?

My car is down for a motor change and some other stuff and while I have the intercooler and my fluidyne oil cooler out I am going to have them coated with a heat dissipation coating that claims to increase heat transfer by 35-40% If I get an increase of 10% I will be happy. Infact, depending on the results of the intercooler and oil cooler I might have my BHR radiator treated and see if I can ditch my secondary radiator.

http://www.nicindustries.com/heat_dissipation.php

I have not read every page of your thread, so i apologize if it has already been mentioned, but what injectors are you going to go with? I tried running stock with modified p2's (yellows). I was making 300-325 RWHP (with the supercharger power loss and drivetrain loss, thats like 425 flywheel) and running very lean (likely caused a side seal spring failure).

I am upgrading to the green S2 (primary) for the primary injectors, and modified yellows for secondary and P2. Finding a set of used greens might be hard. I had to go with new ones from mazda part #N3r1-13-250. Should flow about 400 CC's and have better fuel atomization. So in all I added about 600-800 cc's or around 30% more fuel from my previous set up.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 01:51 AM
  #355  
hoss -05's Avatar
Lucky #33
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 5
From: San Antonio, SARX Garage
Highway,

I am not sure what all 9k is having coated on his set up but 9k is also bringing in my IC and SC outlet pipes to be coated. I have herd the same #s on the heat dissipation coating we will be using. Like you if I get even 10% Ill be happy.... + then my intercooler will be more "stealth".

On my SC outlet pipe I will be have a thermal barrier coating to try and help keep heat out of my engine bay as it has been a problem with at least one other with my kit.

I believe the plan for now is to use stock balanced and blueprinted injectors. We will be turning in a minimum of two full sets for the balancing session.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 03:52 AM
  #356  
Brettus's Avatar
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,845
Likes: 1,799
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Originally Posted by Highway8
I have not read every page of your thread, so i apologize if it has already been mentioned, but what injectors are you going to go with? I tried running stock with modified p2's (yellows). I was making 300-325 RWHP (with the supercharger power loss and drivetrain loss, thats like 425 flywheel) and running very lean (likely caused a side seal spring failure).

I am upgrading to the green S2 (primary) for the primary injectors, and modified yellows for secondary and P2. Finding a set of used greens might be hard. I had to go with new ones from mazda part #N3r1-13-250. Should flow about 400 CC's and have better fuel atomization. So in all I added about 600-800 cc's or around 30% more fuel from my previous set up.

The modded yellows flow a **** load less than what we have been led to believe . Around about the same as blues by my reckoning . Not surprising that you ran out of injector if your flywheel HP was as you say .
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 09:17 AM
  #357  
pdxhak's Avatar
Official Post Whore
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,462
Likes: 32
From: Portland,OR
Has the build started yet
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 11:17 AM
  #358  
Highway8's Avatar
Registered RX8 Nut
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 9
From: Fairfield, CA
Originally Posted by Brettus
The modded yellows flow a **** load less than what we have been led to believe . Around about the same as blues by my reckoning . Not surprising that you ran out of injector if your flywheel HP was as you say .
When they get flow tested the bench flow numbers are higher then the actual numbers in the car. It has to do with pulse widths and fuel pressure (I think). However they do give you the pre and post numbers and because they are tested the same way, you can get a % increase off that, do the math and be pretty close the the actual in vehicle numbers. Keeping in mind that under full load the fuel pump (especialy stock) might not be able to maintain proper fuel pressure which results in less fuel flow. Attached is the numbers from the set of injectors I was running. Showed a 100% flow increase 420 to 840. The 420 is 10% high, so subtract 10% from 840 and you have 755 injectors. I think the issue might be that the fuel pressure drops under WOT around 6-8K RPM.

I dynoed 300 RWHP but then I upgraded my intake (cooler air and bigger filter) and my pulleys so it wouldnt slip and the boost increased. I was maxing out my maf from 8200 RPM all the way to redline. Maf scalled by MM. I never got close to maxing it when I made 300 RWHP. So 325 RWHP is a fair number. 17-20% drivetrain loss and add another 25-40 HP for the procharger. Puts me well over 400 BHP. Flywheel sees less, but the motor is making the power.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 11:20 AM
  #359  
pdxhak's Avatar
Official Post Whore
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,462
Likes: 32
From: Portland,OR
I thought the Blue injectors flowed fine? I do not seem to have any issues getting enough fuel.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 12:24 PM
  #360  
RotaryMachineRx's Avatar
SPOOLN8
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,300
Likes: 245
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
How did I miss this thread?? Anyways looks like I've got some catching up to do; good thing I have a job at a computer
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 01:09 PM
  #361  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
TX

Originally Posted by Highway8
What are you coating and with what?

My car is down for a motor change and some other stuff and while I have the intercooler and my fluidyne oil cooler out I am going to have them coated with a heat dissipation coating that claims to increase heat transfer by 35-40% If I get an increase of 10% I will be happy. Infact, depending on the results of the intercooler and oil cooler I might have my BHR radiator treated and see if I can ditch my secondary radiator.

http://www.nicindustries.com/heat_dissipation.php

I have not read every page of your thread, so i apologize if it has already been mentioned, but what injectors are you going to go with? I tried running stock with modified p2's (yellows). I was making 300-325 RWHP (with the supercharger power loss and drivetrain loss, thats like 425 flywheel) and running very lean (likely caused a side seal spring failure).

I am upgrading to the green S2 (primary) for the primary injectors, and modified yellows for secondary and P2. Finding a set of used greens might be hard. I had to go with new ones from mazda part #N3r1-13-250. Should flow about 400 CC's and have better fuel atomization. So in all I added about 600-800 cc's or around 30% more fuel from my previous set up.
I am using a local coating place that Hoss-05 found. It's http://www.cradin.com/index.html

We (Hoss-05 and I) will likely be going with the zirconium coatings even though they are not the prettiest color wise. He does the coatings for Corky Bell's stuff so he is well respected.

For my power levels, the stock injectors seem to be just fine from everything I have read. Hoss-05 got an extra set of stock injectors as well, so once I drop them all off, SARX will have a set of injectors available at all times in case we need them.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 01:10 PM
  #362  
Highway8's Avatar
Registered RX8 Nut
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 9
From: Fairfield, CA
Originally Posted by pdxhak
I thought the Blue injectors flowed fine? I do not seem to have any issues getting enough fuel.
I do not know the specification of your setup so I cant comment on why they work for you except maybe Less power/ less air flow or are you running stoc blues in both Secondary and P2, what about p1?

I do know that the Modified yellows flow more then the stock blues. Modified blues would be the highest flowing S1 injector. I am guessing you could get S2 secondary injectors to modify for even higher flow but with my new green s2 injectors in the primary and secondary/p2 both running modified yellows, I will have enough fuel.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 01:19 PM
  #363  
shadycrew31's Avatar
WENTGERMAN
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,806
Likes: 31
From: Burbs,PA
Why not just buy some RC injectors and call it a day?
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 01:25 PM
  #364  
Highway8's Avatar
Registered RX8 Nut
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 9
From: Fairfield, CA
Originally Posted by shadycrew31
Why not just buy some RC injectors and call it a day?
I dont know the specs on the RC injectors, but I do not know that aftermarket injectors can create tunning issues, plus I already had 2 full sets of stock injectors. Modifying 2 sets of yellows cost me about $100. The green s2 injectors are the best choice for the primary injectors. They have an improved spray patter and the proper % increase over stock. Dropping in big P2 injectors and not changing p1 and secondary injectors makes tunning more difficult. Not impossible but just more difficult. Driveabilty can suffer too.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 01:37 PM
  #365  
Highway8's Avatar
Registered RX8 Nut
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 9
From: Fairfield, CA
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
I am using a local coating place that Hoss-05 found. It's http://www.cradin.com/index.html

We (Hoss-05 and I) will likely be going with the zirconium coatings even though they are not the prettiest color wise. He does the coatings for Corky Bell's stuff so he is well respected.

For my power levels, the stock injectors seem to be just fine from everything I have read. Hoss-05 got an extra set of stock injectors as well, so once I drop them all off, SARX will have a set of injectors available at all times in case we need them.
The cost of upgrading to modified yellows in the P2 position is so cheap. Not upgrading them and blowing a motor cost a lot more.

Regarding the coatings. I PM'd with Hoss-05 a little. I dont know what the purpose of the coating is (barrier or dispersant), so we might have the some or different opinions.

I think some people coat the wrong items or use the wrong type of coating. Barrier VS Disspersant. If you have a Hot pipe in a 200-225 degree underhood enviroment with air movment, why would you want to add a thermal barrier and trap the heat in the pipe? If you use a heat dissipation coating or leave it bare, the air in that pipe will be cooler and therefore you will have lower IAT's. The interooler to engine pipe is easy, you want that coated with a barrier to keep it cool.

Depending on the location and proximity of the hot turbo pipes to other engine components might make a barrier coating the best option, however the best option is to let the pipe disipate heat and use a barrier on those other items instead of the hot pipe.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 02:02 PM
  #366  
hoss -05's Avatar
Lucky #33
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 5
From: San Antonio, SARX Garage
why would you want to add a thermal barrier and trap the heat in the pipe?
Different opinions ... neah.. not really. Different train of thought.. yes. The idea was to coat it to keep excess heat out of the engine bay as this was a problem with someone else in the past. I can see your point of view as well I just dont know if the pipe can shed enough heat to make an appreciable difference to the charge temp no matter the coating. You made me look at things from a different point of view and I thank you for that. I will think about this issue some more.

You just getting your intercooler done for now Scott?
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 02:04 PM
  #367  
olddragger's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 40
From: macon, georgia
coatings will not help on track. the speed of the air going through that pipe at wot is about 120mph! it doesnt spent enough time there to absorb any heat.
Now around town and in traffic--yep it will help with that. If the air temps is strictly coming from boost--then maybe it also will help with that a little.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 02:16 PM
  #368  
RotaryMachineRx's Avatar
SPOOLN8
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,300
Likes: 245
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Just got through the first 10 pages so far... I can't believe you haven't even started the install yet


Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8

Question. Is anyone reading boost from two sources? I have the goodbox which has a boots gauge built into it, I am thinking of getting a standard 52mm boost gauge as well. Thoughts?
I plan on running the boost gauge line from my GReddy EBC to my Jet Air Hose just before the TB. I am using the readings from this just to compare between Pre-TB to UIM pressures as my 52mm boost gauge to my UIM is the one that really matters. Any thoughts on the placement of the EBC boost line or would you recomend I tee it into my Turbo outlet where the EBC boost solenoid signal will be coming from? Again the reading on the EBC boost gauge is just for additional information and I do have a mechanical boost gauge mounted in my dash from the UIM.

Originally Posted by TeamRX8
You want a new front O2 sensor if for no other reason that they usually seize and gall the threads upon attempted removal from the OE exhaust manifold after that much use. So not only will you likely need an O2 sensor anyway, you won't end up needing to repair the OE exhaust manifold in the process by purchasing and installing a new one with the turbo install.
I also bought at new front 02 sensor as there was no way in hell I was getting my original one out from the exhaust manifold.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 02:18 PM
  #369  
Highway8's Avatar
Registered RX8 Nut
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 9
From: Fairfield, CA
Originally Posted by hoss -05
Different opinions ... neah.. not really. Different train of thought.. yes. The idea was to coat it to keep excess heat out of the engine bay as this was a problem with someone else in the past. I can see your point of view as well I just dont know if the pipe can shed enough heat to make an appreciable difference to the charge temp no matter the coating. You made me look at things from a different point of view and I thank you for that. I will think about this issue some more.

You just getting your intercooler done for now Scott?
Yes, just the intercooler and second oil cooler for now. Second oil cooler is only to make them match. Plus it does help protect it.

I might be wrong, but I will atleast make you think.

A smart man doesnt know everything, he just knows when to ask for help.

Last edited by Highway8; Jun 20, 2011 at 02:32 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 02:23 PM
  #370  
Highway8's Avatar
Registered RX8 Nut
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 9
From: Fairfield, CA
Originally Posted by olddragger
coatings will not help on track. the speed of the air going through that pipe at wot is about 120mph! it doesnt spent enough time there to absorb any heat.
Now around town and in traffic--yep it will help with that. If the air temps is strictly coming from boost--then maybe it also will help with that a little.
Its the little things that add up, both in cost and performance.

My pipes are all scratched up anyways. I am a function or fashion guy, but if I can make something pretty and maybe improve performance then I will do it. Besides its just money.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 03:22 PM
  #371  
pdxhak's Avatar
Official Post Whore
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,462
Likes: 32
From: Portland,OR
Originally Posted by Highway8
I do not know the specification of your setup so I cant comment on why they work for you except maybe Less power/ less air flow or are you running stoc blues in both Secondary and P2, what about p1?

I do know that the Modified yellows flow more then the stock blues. Modified blues would be the highest flowing S1 injector. I am guessing you could get S2 secondary injectors to modify for even higher flow but with my new green s2 injectors in the primary and secondary/p2 both running modified yellows, I will have enough fuel.
Sorry I should have stated my blue injectors (P2) were updated by KG and flow 880cc.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 03:32 PM
  #372  
RotaryMachineRx's Avatar
SPOOLN8
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,300
Likes: 245
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
I tried looking but does anyone have a pic of the Greddy turbo/manifold installed with the intake tubes attached?


Check out my build thread for installed pics from a bunch of angles...



Originally Posted by Brettus
Following on from the discussion of the last few days , this is how I would see the progression for hp using the base Greddy kit .


240-260whp - stock greddy turbo with the usual recommended upgrades

280-300 whp - Upgrade the compressor to BNR T04e 50 trim or equivalent . No other major changes required.

330-350 whp - Upgrade the compressor to BNR 60-1 , upgrade the suction piping to 21/2" min the compression piping to the I/C to 21/4" min , upgrade the I/C . Modify the turbo exit for better flow . Fit 3" exhaust . Upgrade fuel pump , injectors , ignition. Do the wastegate mod or upgrade the actuator. Then pray it all hangs together .

Great guide Brett....

9K don't take this the wrong way but I feel like for the number you are looking for you are going a bit excessive. The nice thing about this ***** out attitude though is that your are going to have a ton of room to go bigger.... and believe me you are going to eventually want to do that... its an addiction!!
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 03:32 PM
  #373  
Highway8's Avatar
Registered RX8 Nut
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 9
From: Fairfield, CA
Originally Posted by pdxhak
Sorry I should have stated my blue injectors (P2) were updated by KG and flow 880cc.
Yep big difference. I would have done the same thing, but I had 2 complete sets of yellows so it just made sense to use them.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 03:57 PM
  #374  
Brettus's Avatar
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,845
Likes: 1,799
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Originally Posted by Highway8
When they get flow tested the bench flow numbers are higher then the actual numbers in the car. It has to do with pulse widths and fuel pressure (I think). However they do give you the pre and post numbers and because they are tested the same way, you can get a % increase off that, do the math and be pretty close the the actual in vehicle numbers. Keeping in mind that under full load the fuel pump (especialy stock) might not be able to maintain proper fuel pressure which results in less fuel flow. Attached is the numbers from the set of injectors I was running. Showed a 100% flow increase 420 to 840. The 420 is 10% high, so subtract 10% from 840 and you have 755 injectors. I think the issue might be that the fuel pressure drops under WOT around 6-8K RPM.
.
I have tuned a couple of cars with uncapped yellows now and what I found is that with an unaltered latency table they flow practically the same as the stock blues . I have not tried changing the latency table because the same table also handles the secondaries and to max. the UC yellows could be counter productive.
What is important is what happens in the actual environment where you run the injector - not what it flows on the bench .
My own experience is that with blues in the P2 position (the others stock)the engine will start running lean at around the flywheel hp you mentioned or less - hence my comment about you running out of injector.

Last edited by Brettus; Jun 20, 2011 at 04:02 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 04:07 PM
  #375  
Brettus's Avatar
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,845
Likes: 1,799
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Originally Posted by Highway8
I dont know the specs on the RC injectors, but I do not know that aftermarket injectors can create tunning issues, plus I already had 2 full sets of stock injectors. Modifying 2 sets of yellows cost me about $100. The green s2 injectors are the best choice for the primary injectors. They have an improved spray patter and the proper % increase over stock. Dropping in big P2 injectors and not changing p1 and secondary injectors makes tunning more difficult. Not impossible but just more difficult. Driveabilty can suffer too.
Not to mention that dropping in big P2s may not yield you anywhere near what they are supposed to flow because of the shared latency table issue.
I recently tuned a car with 1100cc P2s that only flowed 1/2 that on the stock table .
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 AM.