9krpmrx8's Boost Build Thread
#410
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
what are you tuning with and at what skill level?
perhaps you can explain how these same injectors are being used on non-RX8 applications without experiencing the issue you are claiming, but probably not since you don't likely have any experience tuning them there ...
I attached a good injector report, this was a used set of unmodified 6 port injectors I had flowed by a world class engine builder
.
perhaps you can explain how these same injectors are being used on non-RX8 applications without experiencing the issue you are claiming, but probably not since you don't likely have any experience tuning them there ...
I attached a good injector report, this was a used set of unmodified 6 port injectors I had flowed by a world class engine builder
.
Last edited by TeamRX8; 06-22-2011 at 12:07 AM.
#411
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
You also might want to try explain why a certain members car (tuned by MM) with the uncapped yellows made 50whp LESS than my car has and ran out of Injector when, if the bench tests are to be believed , it had a good 600 ccs more capacity than I did .
Last edited by Brettus; 06-22-2011 at 12:43 AM.
#416
Registered RX8 Nut
iTrader: (11)
As I mentioned earlier - it's not what they flow on the bench that matters it's what they flow in the car . In that scenario they don't do what you might expect them to for reasons I (admittedly) don't fully understand. When you have actually done that for yourself you can tell me how you overcame this . Until then , stop talking out of your *** .
You also might want to try explain why a certain members car (tuned by MM) with the uncapped yellows made 50whp LESS than my car has and ran out of Injector when, if the bench tests are to be believed , it had a good 600 ccs more capacity than I did .
You also might want to try explain why a certain members car (tuned by MM) with the uncapped yellows made 50whp LESS than my car has and ran out of Injector when, if the bench tests are to be believed , it had a good 600 ccs more capacity than I did .
#417
Lucky #33
iTrader: (4)
it's not because of the injectors themselves as all of your erroneous guesses and assumptions are presuming, that has been and is my only point
#421
SARX Legend
Thread Starter
iTrader: (46)
You must have missed it in this thread, like on page 4 or 5. Team linked it
http://www.turbohoses.com/velocity_stack.htm
#424
SPOOLN8
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,225
Received 208 Likes
on
156 Posts
You must have missed it in this thread, like on page 4 or 5. Team linked it
http://www.turbohoses.com/velocity_stack.htm
http://www.turbohoses.com/velocity_stack.htm
The science behind it makes sense; but a gain of 20whp claimed?
#425
SARX Legend
Thread Starter
iTrader: (46)
Yeah, I could care less about HP claims, I just want the best intake possible. I have been doing some unscientific testing using a few custom intakes i have made using a few different filters and the AEM and some aluminum piping and panels I have and I can tell you the key is intake temps. insulating the piping and putting the filter out of the engine bay makes about a 40F difference in intake temps at the limit. It makes you realize how good the stock system is. The stock intake box and the stock tray under the box are very well insulated.
I'll give you this for a laugh GMC 6.0L stock paper filter
http://www.flickr.com/photos/9krpmrx8/5846411133/http://www.flickr.com/photos/9krpmrx8/5846411133/ by http://www.flickr.com/people/9krpmrx8/, on Flickr