Notices
Non-Rotary Swaps Engine Swap Forum

Frankenstein Fun Thread Let it all Rip!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-17-2015, 03:34 PM
  #976  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 453 Likes on 367 Posts
There are LSX engines but yes referring to LS engines as LSx is correct for referring to LS engines as a whole.
Old 02-17-2015, 03:38 PM
  #977  
Banned
 
LSXREX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Apologies. I took that too literally. There is such a thing as an LSX. As 9k said LSX does denote the class of engine. I'll just leave this here
Name:  image.jpg3_zps1pms2hwr.jpg
Views: 23
Size:  50.1 KB

Last edited by LSXREX; 02-17-2015 at 03:51 PM.
Old 02-17-2015, 05:30 PM
  #978  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
LiveWire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Richfield
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by LSXREX
Lol I don't think density really takes reliability and drivability into consideration. you cant say with an objective view that a 500 hp rotor will have better drive ability and be as reliable as a 500 hp ls motor? And whether you like to believe it or not, the rotor along with all the turbo piping and oil cooler crap weighs as much or more than an LS. The V8 is simpler, stronger per lb (you would call that density), and has more potential to make reliable, streetable hp.
Then just compare the LS to an all aluminum 20B N/A, that's a much closer comparison. Block to block, no extra stuff. Don't fault the motor for having reliability mods added on.

With improper care anyone can break any engine. Reliability is an old argument and we know the crux of it is the driver's fault.

Stronger per pound would be power/weight ratio, density is specifically referring to the replacement for volume. Math suggests that by increasing the density of the air you put into your engine you can increase power just as you could with more volume.
Old 02-17-2015, 05:51 PM
  #979  
Banned
 
LSXREX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Valid point but I'm looking at it logically. Only ricers consider power per any unit volume. Who cares about specific output when it is installed in a similar weight car.

And no that's like comparing apples to gold plated oranges. I looked up the side housings. Just one is like $1600! What does an aluminum 20B cost? It would sure suck to have a near $10k motor die in 10k miles but that's what roturdies do.
Old 02-17-2015, 06:08 PM
  #980  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 453 Likes on 367 Posts
Do you think and extra 160lbs higher and up front is insignificant?
Old 02-17-2015, 06:13 PM
  #981  
Banned
 
LSXREX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lets see the numbers man. Youre basing your statement on internet trash. I cant imagine ill get an honest number from ya. You have a 28k post sterling reputation to.uphold. youre not gonna let a V8 swap be lighter than your turdbo

Last edited by LSXREX; 02-17-2015 at 06:28 PM.
Old 02-17-2015, 08:04 PM
  #982  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 240 Likes on 110 Posts
Originally Posted by LSXREX
It would sure suck to have a near $10k motor die in 10k miles
... now the brand new cost of an engine matters for failure? LS engines fail too you know. I hear the C7 is having a rash of them already. Must suck to have a high cost engine that fails.
Old 02-17-2015, 08:06 PM
  #983  
Banned
 
LSXREX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New technology always has bugs. Roturds wouldn't understand that as they use two stroke dirt bike tech.
Old 02-17-2015, 08:13 PM
  #984  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 240 Likes on 110 Posts
Wait wait wait...


WE don't understand that?


The rotary is always new technology. It's only on it's 8th or 9th iteration since the concept was proven. At a comparable point in the piston engine's lifespan, it was getting a whole 300hp out of 28.5 LITERS (http://www.topgear.com/uk/car-news/f...rin-2014-12-02). With a reliability measured in hundreds of miles.

The rotary is advancing far faster than the piston engine ever did, it just started at a different point and has far fewer people working on it. Every rotary is immediately new technology, and every rotary thus has some bugs.


So thanks for making our case for us?
Old 02-17-2015, 08:22 PM
  #985  
Banned
 
LSXREX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I see so I guess when rotaries become more mainstream I'll believe it. But while they litter the scrapyards and Craigslist my point is made. And evolving? Lol that's hilarious. They can't even be made to pass the emissions requirements that piston motor (very high hp ones might I add) pass just fine.
Old 02-17-2015, 08:23 PM
  #986  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 240 Likes on 110 Posts
Actually they can pass emissions. In fact, they haven't sold any that haven't passed emissions. And they already said that the next iteration can pass the EU's much harder emissions too.


If littering the scrap yards is your argument, though, I'll wager that there are more piston engines in scrap yards than rotaries... A hell of a lot more.
Old 02-17-2015, 08:38 PM
  #987  
Banned
 
LSXREX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well ill believe.it.when i see it. Rotary guys sure are alot of talk.
Old 02-17-2015, 08:42 PM
  #988  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 240 Likes on 110 Posts
Can you point to a single rotary that has been sold without meeting the current emissions regulations?

That's pretty obvious proof to me.
Old 02-17-2015, 08:48 PM
  #989  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,531
Received 1,494 Likes on 842 Posts
Just went down and weighed my turbo renesis rx8 .
JDM model 6 speed with cloth seats ..... full tank of gas ,no weight reduction other than no cat and lighter front brakes

All up : 2963lbs


So ............. 157lbs (71kg in my lingo) lighter

Last edited by Brettus; 02-17-2015 at 08:53 PM.
Old 02-17-2015, 08:53 PM
  #990  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 240 Likes on 110 Posts
Brettus, New Zealand pounds must be heavier than American pounds...
Old 02-17-2015, 08:58 PM
  #991  
Banned
 
LSXREX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Proof? Id say i did prett good to not gain much weight adding a V8. Im also pretty sure my stock, more reliable, longer lived V8 will drag a turdbo renny down the track.
Old 02-17-2015, 09:00 PM
  #992  
Registered
 
I8yourv8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by logalinipoo
Sure your v8 has great milage at 4k rpm driving dOwn the highway. What do you call great 5 mpg maybe 7
a ls1 camaro/trans am wll get 30mpg highway with 400hp while were lucky to get 20 with 180hp... Yes, that changes dramatically when your WOT, but so does any car, especially boosted cars
Old 02-17-2015, 09:03 PM
  #993  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,531
Received 1,494 Likes on 842 Posts
Originally Posted by LSXREX
Proof? Id say i did prett good to not gain much weight adding a V8. Im also pretty sure my stock, more reliable, longer lived V8 will drag a turdbo renny down the track.
You will have to take my word for it . I just bowled up to the weighbridge at our local dump , and poked my head in the window to see what the weight was.
i would love to take you on , not that i'm much of a drag racer ..............not sure how much value there would be doing it in separate countries/strips

Last edited by Brettus; 02-17-2015 at 09:09 PM.
Old 02-17-2015, 09:16 PM
  #994  
Banned
 
LSXREX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not buying it. However that is an epic win for your roturdy brethren who will likely take that back to their.camp and chant around the fire.
Old 02-17-2015, 09:21 PM
  #995  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 240 Likes on 110 Posts
Yeah, you just want us to take your unverified word for your claims, while not being willing to take our word for our verified claims.

Typical muscle head.
Old 02-17-2015, 09:22 PM
  #996  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,531
Received 1,494 Likes on 842 Posts
Originally Posted by LSXREX
Not buying it. However that is an epic win for your roturdy brethren who will likely take that back to their.camp and chant around the fire.
I could go down to the weighbridge and get a slip for any number I liked but I thought just reporting the truth might be more useful
Old 02-17-2015, 09:28 PM
  #997  
Banned
 
LSXREX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No worries. I didn't expect much. I'm coming to y'all's house with real numbers. I have nothing to lose so lying doesn't do me any good. However you guys have your roturd reps to maintain.
Old 02-17-2015, 09:29 PM
  #998  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 240 Likes on 110 Posts
Originally Posted by I8yourv8
while were lucky to get 20 with 180hp
Lucky? I never had trouble getting more than 20, usually 22-23. I even got 27 3 tanks in a row, although that was rather boring.

If you can't get 20mpg highway in an 8, you are doing something wrong, either your driving or your hardware maintenance.
Old 02-17-2015, 09:30 PM
  #999  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 240 Likes on 110 Posts
Originally Posted by LSXREX
No worries. I didn't expect much. I'm coming to y'all's house with real numbers. I have nothing to lose so lying doesn't do me any good. However you guys have your roturd reps to maintain.
Actually out of all of the claims you have made... dozens of them... the weight was the first one you actually showed up with some proof on. The rest is just hot air until proven otherwise. You would hold us to the same standard that you fail to maintain yourself.
Old 02-17-2015, 09:42 PM
  #1000  
Banned
 
LSXREX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is required to show that I'm driving my car everyday in Austin traffic. 50 mile round trips to school. Sometimes twice a day. Not sure how to prove that. My only goals when I started this swap was to build a better car. I feel I've done that and happy with my work. Best part is another roturd is off the road.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Frankenstein Fun Thread Let it all Rip!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07 AM.