Notices
New Member Forum A place for new members to get their feet wet

Hp difference With or without cat.

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jan 27, 2019 | 12:34 PM
  #1  
Onlyoneromeo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Hp difference With or without cat.

As the title says. How much hp is freed up when you remove the cat?
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2019 | 12:35 PM
  #2  
dannobre's Avatar
Modulated Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 344
From: Smallville
If the CAT is healthy.... very little. Maybe 5HP.. hard to quantify really

if the CAT is partially plugged up.... bit more
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2019 | 07:23 PM
  #3  
Steve Dallas's Avatar
Water Foul
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,521
Likes: 266
From: Republic of Texas
Right around 2% at most. Not worth doing. Your butt dyno will not feel the difference, and it is within the margin of error for a real dyno.

Take a look at this article and maybe multiply the tiny gains by 2 for the RX-8. As they found, you may realize a small gain in some RPM band, but you often lose a few HP in another RPM band. The most common scenario is gaining power at high RPM, thanks to increased flow, but losing power at lower RPM, where flow is less important. I'd rather have the lower end power--especially with this car. I spend a lot more time at 4500 RPM than I do at 7500 RPM.

I do extensive data logging at the track. Between running cat-less and cat-ted under the same conditions, my lap times are exactly the same. Because of this, I choose to run a cat. The only downside, is the car doesn't fart flames with the cat on.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2019 | 10:29 PM
  #4  
UnknownJinX's Avatar
Smoking turbo yay
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,119
Likes: 674
From: BC, Canada
Here is a video of an STi on a dyno with and without cat:


Bottom line: if you like to spit fire, go catless; if you don't like smelling gas fume, go catted.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2019 | 06:44 AM
  #5  
Onlyoneromeo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
I couldn't see the numbers in the video. What were they?
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2019 | 06:47 AM
  #6  
sonicsdaman's Avatar
The Blue Blur
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 4,769
From: Green Hill Zone Running in Loops
Originally Posted by Onlyoneromeo
I couldn't see the numbers in the video. What were they?
with cat
297/345

without cat
297/349
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2019 | 06:50 AM
  #7  
Onlyoneromeo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2019 | 09:01 AM
  #8  
Steve Dallas's Avatar
Water Foul
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,521
Likes: 266
From: Republic of Texas
Originally Posted by Onlyoneromeo
Not at all comparable to this engine. The exhaust systems are completely different. Flow rates and pulse frequencies are completely different.

Also, he is claiming removing the cat gained him 50HP, but they also removed the muffler, increased the boost, and were actively tuning the engine. In short, he's an idiot.

Do some searching on this forum. There are a lot of before and after dynos. Many members have optimized intake and exhaust with all the best bolt-ons, and spent a lot of $$ doing it, only to LOSE power. You can expect +/- 5HP.

The most legitimate reason to remove the cat is to prevent a clogged cat from killing your engine.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2019 | 09:12 AM
  #9  
sonicsdaman's Avatar
The Blue Blur
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 4,769
From: Green Hill Zone Running in Loops
Originally Posted by Steve Dallas
The most legitimate reason to remove the cat is to prevent a clogged cat from killing your engine. shoot hella kewl flamez
Fiffy
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2019 | 09:40 AM
  #10  
eichhoma's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
I just pulled a catless midpipe off of a 2011.... if interested let me know
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2019 | 09:41 AM
  #11  
Onlyoneromeo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Steve Dallas
Not at all comparable to this engine. The exhaust systems are completely different. Flow rates and pulse frequencies are completely different.

Also, he is claiming removing the cat gained him 50HP, but they also removed the muffler, increased the boost, and were actively tuning the engine. In short, he's an idiot.

Do some searching on this forum. There are a lot of before and after dynos. Many members have optimized intake and exhaust with all the best bolt-ons, and spent a lot of $$ doing it, only to LOSE power. You can expect +/- 5HP.

The most legitimate reason to remove the cat is to prevent a clogged cat from killing your engine.
I think in the truck video all he did was remove the cats and muffler in the second pull. I can't imagine a muffler making much of a difference . But either way you're right about the engines and setups being different. The same goes for the first video posted. That engine had cylinders and a turbo right ? I'd like to see before and after on a n/a rotary.

Last edited by Onlyoneromeo; Jan 28, 2019 at 09:45 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2019 | 09:46 AM
  #12  
Onlyoneromeo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by sonicsdaman
Fiffy
Lmao
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2019 | 03:52 PM
  #13  
Steve Dallas's Avatar
Water Foul
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,521
Likes: 266
From: Republic of Texas
Originally Posted by Onlyoneromeo


I think in the truck video all he did was remove the cats and muffler in the second pull. I can't imagine a muffler making much of a difference . But either way you're right about the engines and setups being different. The same goes for the first video posted. That engine had cylinders and a turbo right ? I'd like to see before and after on a n/a rotary.
In the video, the guy said they increased boost and worked on the tune before the 2nd pull.

Think about this logically, though. Do you really think cat design is so poor in 2019, that simply removing one is good for a 10% power gain? This isn't 1980. The factory cat flows more than a normally aspirated Renny can pump. There is little to no restriction in the cat. Mazda squeezed nearly every last HP out of this engine from the factory. As stated before, even if you gain some power up top, it is very likely you are losing it somewhere else, and the result is often a poor trade.

But you don't have to take my word for it. Search this site for dyno plots. The truth is out there.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2019 | 04:16 PM
  #14  
Onlyoneromeo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Steve Dallas
In the video, the guy said they increased boost and worked on the tune before the 2nd pull.

Think about this logically, though. Do you really think cat design is so poor in 2019, that simply removing one is good for a 10% power gain? This isn't 1980. The factory cat flows more than a normally aspirated Renny can pump. There is little to no restriction in the cat. Mazda squeezed nearly every last HP out of this engine from the factory. As stated before, even if you gain some power up top, it is very likely you are losing it somewhere else, and the result is often a poor trade.

But you don't have to take my word for it. Search this site for dyno plots. The truth is out there.

In the video at 1:04 he said he only took cats and exhaust off and ran an open exhaust. He did not say anything about making any other changes. Watch it again.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2019 | 04:55 PM
  #15  
Steve Dallas's Avatar
Water Foul
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,521
Likes: 266
From: Republic of Texas
Originally Posted by Onlyoneromeo



In the video at 1:04 he said he only took cats and exhaust off and ran an open exhaust. He did not say anything about making any other changes. Watch it again.
So, you are going to ignore all the other logic and experience and double down on a video of a doofus? That. You. Didn't. Even. Watch.

Watch it all the way through at least 1:47. He says at 1:36 they were still tuning, and at 1:46 they increased boost to 17psi for that pull.

Let me condense his nonsense for you... "All we did was remove the cat and muffler and did nothing else and gained like 50 hundred HP. Also, we increased the boost to 17psi and were still tuning, but only removed the cat and muffler. So next time someone tells you cats don't kill HP, show them this lame video in which I contradict myself and otherwise say idiotic things."

Yep. Trust that guy!

Reply
Old Jan 29, 2019 | 12:13 PM
  #16  
blackmount's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 126
Likes: 37
From: Monroe, WI
Keep in mind, going catless on something with a Turbo has a completely different effect then doing it on some thing naturally aspirated, especially a typical OEM Cat on something like a truck.

Not to mention per the video, this is being done on a vehicle with a cat designed around much less power and flow then originally intended..

It is not uncommon for NA engines to pick up a small amount of torque with a High Flow Cat over no Cat at all...

I drank the coolaid and gutted my OEM Cat the same week I got my RX-8. virtually felt zero difference even at redline, and was left with a car that constantly made my clothes smell like I had been using a 2 Stroke Lawn Mower all day, and a check engine light that feels like staring into the sun when driving down a dark road at night.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hiroyukiiwaasa
RX-8 Discussion
16
Aug 19, 2016 09:40 PM
schnipster
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications
16
Sep 4, 2012 02:12 PM
KIDUS
RX-8 Discussion
7
Mar 14, 2011 08:26 PM
theboy
Series I AT-Specific Performance Mods
18
Feb 5, 2007 12:06 PM
flip
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications
3
Jun 29, 2004 09:33 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:11 AM.