Notices

Cobb AccessPORT Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 09:20 PM
  #1176  
Celronx's Avatar
Unregistered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: Spring/The Woodlands
Originally Posted by dannobre
Sounds like a ping...... that would be an area that would ping easily (4-5K) if too lean at WOT
That's exactly what I thought, but I've had detonation in this car before. That detonation event was accompanied with loss of power and that unmistakable sound that says this is gonna hurt. This was more of a metallic rattling sound. Strange.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 09:20 PM
  #1177  
cheeto's Avatar
has money, but unsure
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: find bombs, afghanistan
Originally Posted by mysql
good. When I tested it today going into boost, the afr's quit bouncing and moved to a solid number. It's still too lean though since installing the CAI. I require a richer map.

Funny since a few days ago I was asking Jeff for a much leaner map (before the CAI)

what AFR's are you running in boost?
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 09:23 PM
  #1178  
mysql's Avatar
Doppelgänger
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Originally Posted by cheeto
what AFR's are you running in boost?
in 3rd gear it's 12-13, in the higher gears it appears to be 11-12. I have yet to go over about 6.5k rpm since the CAI install.

Here's a short example I recently made (low boost): http://ircimages.com/afr.wmv
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 09:27 PM
  #1179  
mysql's Avatar
Doppelgänger
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 1
From: Florida
I have way more power with the current setup than I did before the CAI and 10 afr's - it's insane at 11 psi and just half throttle, but I am not going to be comfortable till the AFR is somewhere between 10.5 to 11.2.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 09:30 PM
  #1180  
cheeto's Avatar
has money, but unsure
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: find bombs, afghanistan
Originally Posted by mysql
in 3rd gear it's 12-13, in the higher gears it appears to be 11-12. I have yet to go over about 6.5k rpm since the CAI install.

Here's a short example I recently made (low boost): http://ircimages.com/afr.wmv
here is something to shoot for then.
11.5 = Approximate rich best torque at WOT
12.2 = Safe best power at WOT
13.3 = Approximate lean best torque
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 09:37 PM
  #1181  
olddragger's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 40
From: macon, georgia
dont chase a/f's too much. Remember the 'other things".
I advise now with everyone that has FI to get a water meth system. cheap insurance.
olddragger
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 09:39 PM
  #1182  
mysql's Avatar
Doppelgänger
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 1
From: Florida
I'd be happy with 11 across the entire rev range, with a dip at 5.5k to 10.5 afr.

I don't think I have much need for a meth system.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 09:44 PM
  #1183  
cheeto's Avatar
has money, but unsure
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: find bombs, afghanistan
Originally Posted by mysql
I'd be happy with 11 across the entire rev range, with a dip at 5.5k to 10.5 afr.

I don't think I have much need for a meth system.
i would go with 12.2, that way you have a little room to go either way if you need.


meth system? overkill

if you are worried about intake charge cooling, just upgrade the I/C
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 09:52 PM
  #1184  
mysql's Avatar
Doppelgänger
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 1
From: Florida
i'd love to replace my intercooler (Not that I really need to upgrade, but it's warm in FL in the summers and cooler is better). I just don't want to guess and have something that doesn't fit. And now I need to make sure any replacement doesn't go behind the low impact bumper cause my CAI is routed behind it.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 09:56 PM
  #1185  
cheeto's Avatar
has money, but unsure
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: find bombs, afghanistan
i can read up on it for you. i have a turbo installation and tuning book that should have the proper sizes.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 10:22 PM
  #1186  
devildog1679's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Well I got the AP. I know MM is away for the next few days, so should I load the base Cobb Map and see how things go? I don't even know what I'm looking for. Just so you guys know I have the MS CAI, MS exhuast, and RP supercat. I'm not to worried about fuel mileage, I just want to get the most out of my car as possible.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 10:37 PM
  #1187  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
Originally Posted by Razz1
Using that calculation I would have 289 poines with a 20% drive train loss or 231 at the wheels.

I think it was ULLOSE who tested the Cobb last year and said he got 222 to the rear wheels.
Mu ha ha..... I knew I would get this thread going again.

Hell, I get home from work and there is big o'l disscussion.

I've always thought of insulating the MAF pipe. Thats last on my list.

I pretty close to doing that now. Not many other things I can do for NA.
I still have a few tricks.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 11:02 PM
  #1188  
OnRails's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by cheeto
here is something to shoot for then.
11.5 = Approximate rich best torque at WOT
12.2 = Safe best power at WOT
13.3 = Approximate lean best torque
I guess I don't need to tell you those are N/A numbers.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 11:03 PM
  #1189  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
Msql and Celronx, I have been seeing the samething with N/A

I think the explaination is throttle position and load.

Those are slightly changing because your foot is moving, I know I'm pedal to the metal so how can that happen.

I haven't studied it enough with the data logs to see if the A/F is changing due to slight postion differance in the throttle.

If the throttle remains the same and the A/F bounces then perhaps the load is changing due to wind resistance.


Back on the MAF issue, if velocity is effecting the MAF more than pressure, what about the position of the sensor? The question is:

Is the velocity decrease and sensor loaction enough to overide the pressure increase using a largertube size with FI applications.

I think the answer to this question is Yes.

Last edited by Razz1; Mar 31, 2008 at 11:05 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 11:06 PM
  #1190  
dynamho's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 7
From: Norwood, NJ
I tend to be gullible when it comes to Wikipedia, since I don't know much. Now I'm really confused. So my initial hunch to side w/ dannobre is the current "correct" consensus?

Anyway, sorry to add to the topic diversion.

I'm hoping to contribute, if I can, to this thread after I receive the product.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 12:11 AM
  #1191  
Kane's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,364
Likes: 44
From: PCB
Too.... much..... reading! HAHA.

Short version = Dan is MORE right than the stagnant pressure folks; but both of you are somewhat right; however the pressure changes you are talking about are very very very very small.

For example - when we flow 150 PSI through 300' of 3/8 ID diameter hose; we get 135 PSI to the divers (roughly) at 8 SCFM. When we need to flow the same 135 PSI to a diver through a 1/4 hose; we have to push 300 PSI. So flow velocity and total capable volume play WAY more of a roll than extra pressure from a larger tube.

In addition; if the MAF were that sensitive to changes in size; then a blow through setup would immediately peg once you entered boost.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 12:22 AM
  #1192  
FloppinNachos's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Suwanee, GA
haha, stagnant pressure sucks...


So, why does the Pettit system create such large maf readings? Something to do with temperature?
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 01:11 AM
  #1193  
FloppinNachos's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Suwanee, GA
bernoulli stuff, the whole airfoil thing.

the top of the wing is "longer" so the air travels over it faster. Higher velocity = lower pressure. the bottom of the wing is "shorter" so air travels over it more slowly. Lower velocity = higher pressure. This generates lift...

It's kind of an abstract thing. Another example is blowing over the top of something, it creates a lower pressure and can suck liquid through the orifice. If you have an air compressor, a thin piece of tubing/needle (like to inflate a football), and a jar of water it's easy to do. Take the needle and put it in the jar of water, spray air over the needle and it will make a nice atomized mist. This form of atomizer is also found in perfume bottles...

Last edited by FloppinNachos; Apr 1, 2008 at 01:19 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 01:41 AM
  #1194  
FloppinNachos's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Suwanee, GA
eh, i guess, but that's really really different haha.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 01:45 AM
  #1195  
dannobre's Avatar
Modulated Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 344
From: Smallville
It's all about what we do/use I do a lot of flow calculations in rebreather diving applications....where screw ups are deadly. Luckily I haven't screwed up bad enough yet....
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 01:56 AM
  #1196  
FloppinNachos's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Suwanee, GA

heat seeking missile...




You're approaching this too "structuredly", first you open your mind to accept the new idea, then build structure around it.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 02:37 AM
  #1197  
FloppinNachos's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Suwanee, GA
I dunno what to say, the atomizer experiment helped me understand it kinda.

I still don't fully understand what exactly is happening, only that it does and it definitely doesn't have many good analogies to describe it...
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 06:31 AM
  #1198  
Phil's 8's Avatar
FI by Pettit-BHR-Cobb AP
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,026
Likes: 2
From: Sin City, Nevada
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
I remember now why I didn't consider this principle all that complicated when I was learning it in school, and it was because of this statement on Mitchell's website;

"The sum of the static and dynamic pressures remains constant along the pipe."

Earlier I asked what was meant by "pressure". If I am undertsanding correctly, "static" pressure is the one we usually visualize when discussing pressures but "dynamic" pressures are what might be more commonly called "velocities". There are also references to static pressures and ram pressures, with ram pressure also being velocity.

Now I re-get it(after having forgotten it many years ago).

Damn this website and damn you guys!
They had schools when you were young . Yeah I guess Aristotle did give classes
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 07:15 AM
  #1199  
r0tor's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 1
From: PA
Originally Posted by FloppinNachos
bernoulli stuff, the whole airfoil thing.

the top of the wing is "longer" so the air travels over it faster. Higher velocity = lower pressure. the bottom of the wing is "shorter" so air travels over it more slowly. Lower velocity = higher pressure. This generates lift...

When you take an advanced fluid dynamics class, you learn Bernouli is given too much credit and the Kutta-Joukowski Theorem involving circulation around an airfloil is what really produces lift and the dP predicted by Bernouli can not make a modern airplane fly.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 07:51 AM
  #1200  
devildog1679's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
I hate to interupt the flow of this thread but I got the AP. I know MM is away for the next few days, in the meantime should I load the base Cobb Map and see how things go? I don't even know what I'm looking for. Just so you guys know I have the MS CAI, MS exhuast, and RP supercat.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:05 PM.