Notices

Cobb AccessPORT Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 08:01 AM
  #1201  
Celronx's Avatar
Unregistered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: Spring/The Woodlands
You can use the Cobb map just fine as far as I can tell. I started out with it also while I was waiting for MM to e-mail me my maps. It didn't change the idle or the MOP setting like MM's does, but it worked just fine.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 08:02 AM
  #1202  
morkusyambo's Avatar
Dongbag extrordinare
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 0
From: Away from the fruits of my labor
Originally Posted by devildog1679
I hate to interupt the flow of this thread but I got the AP. I know MM is away for the next few days, in the meantime should I load the base Cobb Map and see how things go? I don't even know what I'm looking for. Just so you guys know I have the MS CAI, MS exhuast, and RP supercat.
Load up the Cobb stage 1. Use the AP to monitor your LTFT. It should be as close to 0 as possible. Don't worry about the STFT as that number will be constantly changing. If you do not have an A/F gauge, you can use the AP screen titled "eqiv ratio" to look at the AFRs. I would do a couple of WOT runs and make sure you're somewhere in the 12-13 range under WOT. Don't forget that the AP displays data about 1-2 seconds behind real time.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 08:02 AM
  #1203  
r0tor's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 1
From: PA
If you want to take the safe approach, load the Cobb stock map and take your car for a spin and watch the afr in the "Live" mode... if your in the 11's or low 12's at wide open throttle above 6k rpms, you might be fine with Cobb's Stage 1.

If not, I'd wait until you hear from Jeff.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 08:03 AM
  #1204  
Celronx's Avatar
Unregistered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: Spring/The Woodlands
Originally Posted by r0tor
When you take an advanced fluid dynamics class, you learn Bernouli is given too much credit and the Kutta-Joukowski Theorem involving circulation around an airfloil is what really produces lift and the dP predicted by Bernouli can not make a modern airplane fly.
I agree. Airfoils are completely different in terms of actual flows, but the principals are basically the same. Faster flowing air has less pressure at the same volume. That's why I brought it up, just to try to get people to relate the two together.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 08:21 AM
  #1205  
mysql's Avatar
Doppelgänger
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 1
From: Florida
sure. Why not? Try it out. Watch the afrs and see if it works without going too lean.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 08:35 AM
  #1206  
mysql's Avatar
Doppelgänger
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Just wanted to let everyone know my latest findings...

When I first bought my car, I was able to get around 18 mpg during breakin process. After that I got around 16 mpg. When I went turbo, I got around 15 mpg. Basically each quarter tank of gas = 50 miles. So at 180-200 miles, I had to refill.

My last tank of gas was calculated to 16.3 mpg, which was pretty good, but didn't really count because I had the crappy maf housing and I couldn't accelerate for half of that tank of gas!

Today I was approaching 200 miles and decided to fill up, even though I had a quarter tank of gas left. I was worried maybe my fuel gauge was off and didn't want to be stranded without gas.. Sure enough, I filled up and I had 17.4 mpg! I've never had fuel mileage this good with the turbo installed. I am driving the same - lots of hard acceleration. Rarely ever driving for mileage.

The car previously had been premixing with 4 oz of FP+/FP60.

The changes since the fuel mileage increase are the accessport instead of the interceptor, the CAI, and a new premix blend. The premix now has 1 oz fp+, 1 oz mmo, and 4 oz idemitsu.

Given that I had premixed in the past with rp, and pettit's stuff without any change in mileage, I think the biggest factor to mileage is the accessport because the car is seeking better afr's as I cruise (where the car is most of the time).
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 08:43 AM
  #1207  
morkusyambo's Avatar
Dongbag extrordinare
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 0
From: Away from the fruits of my labor
Yeah. Seeking better AFRs was never something we could say to describe the INT-X.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 09:46 AM
  #1208  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
Be careful with the stock Cobb Map.

I posted that it was way too lean on top end. 15.5 to 16.5 to 16.9

You have similar mods.

Stay away from 8k plus. You will see what I mean.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 11:31 AM
  #1209  
kristopher_d's Avatar
Drive Master
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Redmond
Air does not HAVE pressure, it EXERTS it. The air exerts less pressure(force) on a surface it flows parallel to than one it flows perpendicular to. Quit worrying about pressure. In this situation it is, for the most part, a non-entity.

the MAF is a MASS Air Flow sensor. This entire discussion has revolved around volume flow rate or density. But you need both to get mass. A hot wire MAF samples a portion of the volume flow, but the density is assumed to be constant.

Sorry, guys volume != density and density != volume.
density = mass/volume, or volume = mass/density.

We're talking about a SAMPLING of MASS.

crh is right, the biggest issue is misunderstanding of terms, by mulitple parties, due to both attempts at simplifying the problem and likely issues with vernacular being used when scientific definitions are required.

BTW, in an FI application, static pressures will ALWAYS be lower than ambient before the compressor. That's how it's drawing the air in.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 11:39 AM
  #1210  
Nemesis8's Avatar
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
OK, 10 drive cycles now on 1.3a for NA and my LTFT is 1. Pretty sweet if you ask me. Of course all things will change once I change my exhaust again...

This is with the REVi intake with bug sucker.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 11:42 AM
  #1211  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
Originally Posted by dannobre
It's all about what we do/use I do a lot of flow calculations in rebreather diving applications....where screw ups are deadly. Luckily I haven't screwed up bad enough yet....

just to get a dig in against Dan- my dad's a very experienced technical diver using tri-mix etc for extended wreck dives in deep water and also cave dives. he hates re-breathers
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 12:03 PM
  #1212  
Celronx's Avatar
Unregistered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: Spring/The Woodlands
Well at this point I just want to know why the larger pipe diameter would cause the MAF to show to much airflow(not just more airflow, but to much), unless of course that's incorrect. That's what got this whole thing started. Someone tell me that, that's what I've been trying to figure out.

Back OT I'm still at +1 LTFT and -1 STFT. I'm still waiting for my Mazsport midpipe and ignition. I wonder what those will do to my trims? My guess is a percent or two leaner.


Cel

Last edited by Celronx; Apr 1, 2008 at 12:07 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 12:20 PM
  #1213  
Nemesis8's Avatar
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
It would be interesting to see how the Cobb responds if you were to change your exhaust, first, and watch things for a while before flipping to another set of maps.
Not sure, I'll try that and see what happens prior to going bonkers...

Originally Posted by Celronx
...I'm still waiting for my Mazsport midpipe and ignition.
You and me both...
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 12:31 PM
  #1214  
Celronx's Avatar
Unregistered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: Spring/The Woodlands
Originally Posted by Nemesis8
You and me both...
Yep, I know. I keep watchin your posts and responses in the Midpipe thread. I'm scared that they will finally get one or the other ready and send it to me forgetting about the other piece that I ordered.

It really sucks. Paying $1,100.00+ almost six weeks ago when they posted that the lead time was three weeks. They really shouldn't charge 100% for something untill it ships. If it's not ready this week, being they've said next week or so for about 4 of the almost six weeks, I'm canceling and waiting for BHR's ignition and getting my own midpipe made.

Cel
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 12:36 PM
  #1215  
RedefineRX8's Avatar
Super-impreza!
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
From: SoCal/NY
patience is a true virtue.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 12:38 PM
  #1216  
Celronx's Avatar
Unregistered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: Spring/The Woodlands
I don't mind waiting, I hate paying and then having to wait twice the time quoted. If they had said 6 weeks from the get go and only asked for 50% upfront, no problem. I waited 14 weeks and paid $1,200 up front for my wheels but that was the deal. This has been entirely different.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 12:48 PM
  #1217  
devildog1679's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Thank You all for your advice. Here comes a stupid question what does LTFT and STFT stand for and what do they signify?
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 12:50 PM
  #1218  
mysql's Avatar
Doppelgänger
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 1
From: Florida
ft = fuel trim

lt = long term
st = short term

so short term fuel trim, long term fuel trim

it defines adjustments made to the fuel system to properly drive the car around. basically the car monitors how the car performs and adjusts it to meet the desired numbers it has in mind.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 12:52 PM
  #1219  
alnielsen's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,255
Likes: 8
From: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
Originally Posted by devildog1679
Thank You all for your advice. Here comes a stupid question what does LTFT and STFT stand for and what do they signify?
An explanation can be found here.
http://www.c5forum.com/diy/ltft.php
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 12:59 PM
  #1220  
Jedi54's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 22,600
Likes: 3,455
From: The Dark Side
w0000000t!!!!!! UPS just showed up.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 01:03 PM
  #1221  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
I hate mouth-breathers.
hey!! i have a sinus condition!!!
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 01:16 PM
  #1222  
Jedi54's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 22,600
Likes: 3,455
From: The Dark Side
clutch pedal.


that was an easy game.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 01:37 PM
  #1223  
devildog1679's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Thanks
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 01:54 PM
  #1224  
FloppinNachos's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Suwanee, GA
Originally Posted by Celronx
Well at this point I just want to know why the larger pipe diameter would cause the MAF to show to much airflow(not just more airflow, but to much), unless of course that's incorrect. That's what got this whole thing started. Someone tell me that, that's what I've been trying to figure out.
Same here!!! Anyone?
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 02:01 PM
  #1225  
Jedi54's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 22,600
Likes: 3,455
From: The Dark Side
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
Well, I'll say this much; your reputation precedes you.
Wiseass.
HAHA, c'mon Ray...that was funny and you know it.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:10 AM.