Cobb AccessPORT Discussion
#1053
Regardless of size, here it is, working perfectly with the out of the box tune by Jeff.
Looks like 11.1 - 11.5 AFR during WOT. I wouldn't mind it a tad richer, but it's amazing how spot on it is for a tune without any customization. I'm using 3 2b map btw.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=5YKErd6MvXE
Looks like 11.1 - 11.5 AFR during WOT. I wouldn't mind it a tad richer, but it's amazing how spot on it is for a tune without any customization. I'm using 3 2b map btw.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=5YKErd6MvXE
#1058
has money, but unsure
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: find bombs, afghanistan
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#1062
Registered
Ordered mine from mazdamaniac.com a few hours ago. Hope it's in time for this batch.
I'm late to the game but apart from a lack of onboard datalogging, this appears to be the best engine management solution so far for the RX-8.
I'm late to the game but apart from a lack of onboard datalogging, this appears to be the best engine management solution so far for the RX-8.
#1065
Was it a WRX STi?
#1066
Registered
#1069
i'd be interested in seeing what happens if all the intakes are open all the time. if it's noticeable in regular driving or not, and if it makes the powerband smoother.
#1073
has money, but unsure
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: find bombs, afghanistan
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well i dont know if anyone replied to this, but if you did do that, your drivability would suck. you would have no low end power N/A. turbo i dont know about. but low rpms need long narrow intake runners to fill the combustion chamber properly. long narrow runnners increases the speed and turbulence of the air entering the chamber, which results in a lot better VE than if all the intake ports were open all the time. thats just N/A. turbo could be different.