Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

RX 8 vs. S2000 ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-14-2003, 07:48 PM
  #51  
Pistons.. What are those?
Thread Starter
 
tommy12g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Miami and Ft Lauderdale, Fl
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LIttle boy??? Stick to Selling wine, cause at math your not too good at!!
tommy12g is offline  
Old 12-14-2003, 07:53 PM
  #52  
Pistons.. What are those?
Thread Starter
 
tommy12g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Miami and Ft Lauderdale, Fl
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For a guy with a WRX, you sure spend alot of time on the RX8 Forum with over 1100 posts, I guess living in Milwaukee there is nothing else to do!!!! I understand!!! Don't worry I'm not mad at you, if I lived there I would either be on the internet or drink wine till oblivion!!! and i guess you do both!!
tommy12g is offline  
Old 12-14-2003, 08:07 PM
  #53  
Registered User
 
revhappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by tommy12g
For a guy with a WRX, you sure spend alot of time on the RX8 Forum with over 1100 posts, I guess living in Milwaukee there is nothing else to do!!!! I understand!!! Don't worry I'm not mad at you, if I lived there I would either be on the internet or drink wine till oblivion!!! and i guess you do both!!
Some of us "other car people" waited for the RX8 early on in its development (look who started the topic "The Mazda RX8" in November 2001) and then bought another car because its not a top performing sporty car in the $30K price range.
revhappy is offline  
Old 12-14-2003, 08:20 PM
  #54  
Pistons.. What are those?
Thread Starter
 
tommy12g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Miami and Ft Lauderdale, Fl
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Granted the EVO is faster than the RX8, but thats it? its a cheap looking car with none of the extras that the RX8 has end of discussion...
tommy12g is offline  
Old 12-14-2003, 08:26 PM
  #55  
Registered User
 
revhappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by tommy12g
Granted the EVO is faster than the RX8, but thats it? its a cheap looking car with none of the extras that the RX8 has end of discussion...
Extras? These are supposed to be sports/sporty cars? Maybe, you should have got an Escalade and enjoyed all the pimping features!
revhappy is offline  
Old 12-14-2003, 08:29 PM
  #56  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by tommy12g
LIttle boy??? Stick to Selling wine, cause at math your not too good at!!
your not too good at the english son
Ike is offline  
Old 12-14-2003, 08:34 PM
  #57  
Wut da F Y'all lookin' @!
 
Hornet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by SDFLY
"They share alot more then the shell.Interior of an evo looks like my 01 taurus company car.Mazda coulda made a fast **** box but they didnt thank god.I for one would rather mod up a nicer car to get the speed i want.Im not knocking evo or sti's to each his own i coulda bought either of them.Only other car that i think can compare to a rx-8 is a g35c which i almost bought,but the 8's styling won in the end.Msrp to msrp ill take the 4500 difference and get about 40 more hp with mods and get the best of both worlds"

Could not have been stated any clearer....I too see the coupe and the 8 as the only two in their class for what they provide and chose the 8 becasue it did not look like any other car and the money saved will translate directly into hp down the road...

One other thing, what is up with other type car owners hanging here?? Someone explain please....
Me personally, I am no longer an owner of other cars. I am an RX-8 owner so I've been scanning these forums to find out about aftermarket parts and other information concerning the 8. My defense of the other car(s) comes from me knowing about it from having one for 7 months. So that is why I am here.
Hornet is offline  
Old 12-14-2003, 08:37 PM
  #58  
Wut da F Y'all lookin' @!
 
Hornet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by tommy12g
Granted the EVO is faster than the RX8, but thats it? its a cheap looking car with none of the extras that the RX8 has end of discussion...
In all reality the RX-8 handles very good but the Evo handles better too.
Hornet is offline  
Old 12-15-2003, 10:04 AM
  #59  
Senior Geek
 
RX8-TX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by revhappy
Extras? These are supposed to be sports/sporty cars? Maybe, you should have got an Escalade and enjoyed all the pimping features!
Ehhhhhhh......different people have different needs. Remember that Rev..
RX8-TX is offline  
Old 12-15-2003, 10:40 AM
  #60  
Registered User
 
toykilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: texas
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cars that are close are definitely won off the line.. unless the cars are rediculous unmatched .. like when my friend spanks me with his 400rwhp lsi .. lol
toykilla is offline  
Old 12-16-2003, 10:28 PM
  #61  
Registered User
 
KTM-316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The only car I might have bias against is those darn Mustangs (although I might find myself being strangely drawn to a Cobra every now and then).
I was planning on buying the up coming 2005 Mustang but couldn't wait any longer so I got the RX8. Although, only if Ford changes the interior of the production Mustang to a more classy looking like the RX8. I won't be hesitant to trade in my RX8.

Just want to say that I've beating an S2000. I guess it all depends on the driver. Next race... a WRX
KTM-316 is offline  
Old 12-17-2003, 05:57 AM
  #62  
Banned
 
WTF no turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Chase Md
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sti will own ya.
WTF no turbo is offline  
Old 12-17-2003, 06:47 AM
  #63  
Registered User
 
KTM-316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sti will own ya.
I'm not talking bout STI. Just a trim line WRX... I'm not stupid to lock horns with STIs and EVOs. I accept this RX8 will get eaten by them.
KTM-316 is offline  
Old 12-17-2003, 08:14 AM
  #64  
Registered User
 
R8N8SIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Princeton NJ
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
me an my best friend just had a race in his '03 s2000 , the s starts to pull from the 8 when it hit vtec. we race fom 5-120mph and he got me by almost one car length. later we exchange cars, and the results are the same. conclusion: the s is a slightly faster car than our 8. i had 6120 mi on the 8, he had 7800 mi on his s. cant wait to install cz ecu adaptor in my 8, i m sure this time when he hit vtec, the 8 wil be pulling.
R8N8SIS is offline  
Old 12-17-2003, 04:34 PM
  #65  
New Member
 
Intrigue 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
n e of yall herd of the rs version of the evo coming out? no wing and black door handles, but same engine and price sticker to go at 28,000. but going back to the original topic i would have to go with the s2000 if it were stock to stock.
Intrigue 8 is offline  
Old 12-17-2003, 04:53 PM
  #66  
Registered User
 
revhappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Intrigue 8
n e of yall herd of the rs version of the evo coming out? no wing and black door handles, but same engine and price sticker to go at 28,000. but going back to the original topic i would have to go with the s2000 if it were stock to stock.
It will be ~$27,000 or cheaper I think. It will also come with a Front LSD and will be about 100 or so pounds lighter.
revhappy is offline  
Old 12-17-2003, 09:44 PM
  #67  
gam
Registered User
 
gam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: ft hood tx
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I, JUST WANTED TO ADD MY 2 CENTS TO THIS TOPIC OF THE COMPARING OF THE CARS. I OWN A RX8 AND I HAVE RAN IT AGAINST THE EVO ON I35 IN KELLIN TX, AFTER WE GOT UP TO 130 MPH I WAS ABOUT TWO CARS AHEAD AND ONCE I HIT 155 THE EVO WAS STILL TRYING TO PASS ME BUT COULD NOT, SO I WOULD SAY THAT THE RX8 ON THE RUN WELL BEAT THE EVO, IF YOU HAVE THE GUTS TO PUSH IT TO IT'S LIMITS.

THIS IS ONLY TO STATE WHICH CAR TO ME IS FASTER NOT A KILL!

GAMRX804
gam is offline  
Old 12-17-2003, 09:50 PM
  #68  
Pistons.. What are those?
Thread Starter
 
tommy12g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Miami and Ft Lauderdale, Fl
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so evo is faster at acceleration and 1/4 but he RX8 will take it at high speed
tommy12g is offline  
Old 12-17-2003, 11:33 PM
  #69  
Registered User
 
revhappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by gam
I, JUST WANTED TO ADD MY 2 CENTS TO THIS TOPIC OF THE COMPARING OF THE CARS. I OWN A RX8 AND I HAVE RAN IT AGAINST THE EVO ON I35 IN KELLIN TX, AFTER WE GOT UP TO 130 MPH I WAS ABOUT TWO CARS AHEAD AND ONCE I HIT 155 THE EVO WAS STILL TRYING TO PASS ME BUT COULD NOT, SO I WOULD SAY THAT THE RX8 ON THE RUN WELL BEAT THE EVO, IF YOU HAVE THE GUTS TO PUSH IT TO IT'S LIMITS.

THIS IS ONLY TO STATE WHICH CAR TO ME IS FASTER NOT A KILL!

GAMRX804
That wouldn't shock me completely as the EVO is geared for acceleration at lower speeds plus AWD is always a hinderance in high speed races. Of course, I don't condone street racing at 155 MPH!
revhappy is offline  
Old 12-18-2003, 07:30 PM
  #70  
Registered
 
Twin 8s!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Riverview FL
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That wouldn't shock me completely as the EVO is geared for acceleration at lower speeds plus AWD is always a hinderance in high speed races. Of course, I don't condone street racing at 155 MPH!
Please advise.... at what speed do you condone street racing?

Point is you folks continue to compare the stock first year version of RX8 with customixed Imprezza and Lancer vehicles.... You want to compare AWD with RWD, turbo to non-turbo, and more... I am glad you like your vehicles.... I like mine too and I will be very interested comparing a turbo-charged AWD RX8 when the factory builds one.
Twin 8s! is offline  
Old 12-18-2003, 10:23 PM
  #71  
Registered User
 
scientist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: dominica
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i've been lookin at this thread for a while and had to register just for this...

1. someone quoted the S2000 as being a 2.2 litre engine....thats .2 litres too much my friend

2. the evo has the plastic interior etc because it isn't meant to be a luxury car etc(we've established that) but to make the car lighter....who pays attention to those details when driving...not me

3. the evos are not lancers....try taking a lancer yourself and build it to an evo...you may get it to look like an evo...sound like an evo..but not be half the beast and evo is...don't believe me?...see ppl who have tried....


4. the RX8 is a great car...mazda did a good job in makin a comeback into the market...but what category does the car fall under?...the full charges makes it cost about the same as an evo in the 30,000 range....the engine specs etc puts it in the S2000 and RSX etc range. i don't really think mazda will ever release a turbo version of the RX8...just a more powerfull naturally aspirated 8...do u know how difficult it is gettin the rotary engine to meet emission under boost?...thats what killed the RX7 in the first place...mitsu and subaru are the only companies engines that survived through that crisis...all other companies had to call off the turboed vehicles (nissan, toyota, mazda)

5. Comeon...comparing you beating an S2000 on the street doesn't count....there are no standard conditions, no matter how good you say you are neither you or your opponent are not that skilled of drivers to even properly show the power potention of the two cars

6. for the gearing of evos....yeah they have close ratio transmissions...a friend of mine owns an evolution V...if you can follow him on the roads we got hear and keep up with those fast cornering speeds on his stock evo...then waw u got a fast car.... we put it up in stock for m against an FC RX7 running around 15 Pounds of boost...(don't have a RWHP figure) you know what happened?...off the line the were neck and neck...by 3rd gear the evo was 3 car lenghts ahead.....the evo topped out at 157MPH wheas the RX7 was doin 140 with a lot more to go...but the race was over by then
scientist is offline  
Old 12-18-2003, 10:53 PM
  #72  
Registered User
 
revhappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Twin 8s!
Please advise.... at what speed do you condone street racing?
I don't condone any street racing. It was a joke, lighten up.

Originally posted by Twin 8s!
Point is you folks continue to compare the stock first year version of RX8 with customixed Imprezza and Lancer vehicles.... You want to compare AWD with RWD, turbo to non-turbo, and more... I am glad you like your vehicles.... I like mine too and I will be very interested comparing a turbo-charged AWD RX8 when the factory builds one.
Comparing the US EVO to a base lancer is like comparing 4 species below humans in our evolutionary lineage. Anyway, the US EVO is a lower end EVO from a Global perspective.

US EVO - 271 HP, No Active Yaw Control (AYC) or Active Center Differential (ACD)

Standard EVO - Outside of the US - 280 HP - AYC and ACD

FQ300 - 300 HP, AYC and ACD

FQ330 - 330 HP, AYC and ACD

EVO Extreme ~ 340 HP, AYC and ACD

EVO RS Sprint - ~ 340 HP, NO AYC, Has ACD - Lighter, Stripped Down Racing Model

As for the RX8, its going to be hard pressed for them to release a high-powered turbo model with the fuel economy and emissions the Renesis has in NA terms. Perhaps, if the issues are worked maybe it could happen.
revhappy is offline  
Old 12-18-2003, 11:13 PM
  #73  
Registered User
 
scientist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: dominica
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you've forgotten the RS450s....these baby's put down an amazing 450HP and 400 LBS of tq
scientist is offline  
Old 12-19-2003, 12:26 AM
  #74  
Registered User
 
AbusiveWombat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Twin 8s!
Please advise.... at what speed do you condone street racing?

Point is you folks continue to compare the stock first year version of RX8 with customixed Imprezza and Lancer vehicles.... You want to compare AWD with RWD, turbo to non-turbo, and more... I am glad you like your vehicles.... I like mine too and I will be very interested comparing a turbo-charged AWD RX8 when the factory builds one.
run what ya brung. Both cars are in the same price and similar catagory. I compared the two, so did revhappy. You compared the RX8 to the G35...to each his own. Like it or not, many people are comparing the EVO, STi, G35, 350z, S2000, '03 Cobra, and RX8. Each person has a different idea of what the perfect car is...you may not agree and that's your opinion.

But accept the fact that the EVO is at a higher level of performance than the RX8. I don't think any of the EVO owners, myself included, will argue with you about which car looks better or which has nicer materials inside.

I've never understood why people think that a turbocharged car should not be compared with a N/A car. It seems like this "card" is only played by the loser. Covette, SupraTT, 300ZX TT...so you can only compare the Supra to the 300zx?

Back on topic. the S2000 should win all day long. As mentioned before the S2000 runs low 14's...the RX8 runs low 15's. The difference is about 1 second. So imagine a S2000 traveling at 97 mph past you....you count 1 second and then the RX8 flys by...that's close to 10 car lengths. The acceleration may not seem very different between the two and that's because both have a flat, low torque curve but trust me...the S2000 is much faster.

S2000:
2800 lbs
240 hp
0.086 hp/# (bigger is better)

RX8:
3029 lbs
238 hp
0.078 hp/#
AbusiveWombat is offline  
Old 12-19-2003, 11:49 AM
  #75  
Registered User
 
R8N8SIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Princeton NJ
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the S2000 is NOT much faster ! read my post on top, S2000 is just little faster than the 8. S2000 pull really hard when it hits vtec while the 8 stop pulling due to mazda running it too rich up top to safe the CAT . when cz mods installed in the 8, i m sure the 8 will give the s2000 a tough time.
R8N8SIS is offline  


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: RX 8 vs. S2000 ???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21 PM.