Autoweek bashing 4g eclipse
#76
Pining for the Fjords
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by saturn
Hey there tough guy that second quote isn't even mine. Way to pay attention....
It escaped my notice that there are TWO misguided souls here who'd rather read Consumer Reports car reviews than be entertained by automotive magazines.
#79
i pwn therefore i am
Originally Posted by DrDiaboloco
You're correct, it isn't yours. Sorry, sporto. I'll pay closer attention next time... My powers of perception aren't bulletproof.
It escaped my notice that there are TWO misguided souls here who'd rather read Consumer Reports car reviews than be entertained by automotive magazines.
It escaped my notice that there are TWO misguided souls here who'd rather read Consumer Reports car reviews than be entertained by automotive magazines.
#82
Lascivious Post Whore
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JRichter
Can someone sum up this whole thread in 3 lines? I don't feel like reading the whole thing...
..MMMM...Colorado Omelat du fromage *****....
Are you a ****** ***, I'm tha Juggernaught BEEYAATCH!
#83
Lascivious Post Whore
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DrDiaboloco
You're correct, it isn't yours. Sorry, sporto. I'll pay closer attention next time... My powers of perception aren't bulletproof.
It escaped my notice that there are TWO misguided souls here who'd rather read Consumer Reports car reviews than be entertained by automotive magazines.
It escaped my notice that there are TWO misguided souls here who'd rather read Consumer Reports car reviews than be entertained by automotive magazines.
Lend your mind to the gray area, instead of fabricating conclusions from your rectum.
Nay, we much enojoy language. Which is why we post....blah...nevermind....
I was goin somewhere with this, but if you ain't got it yet, I don't think you're gonna get it, unless you're just ****** with me, and I didn't get that, so either way what we got is errors in communication which is what really my point was all about.
#84
Blue By You
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JRichter
Can someone sum up this whole thread in 3 lines? I don't feel like reading the whole thing...
#86
i pwn therefore i am
Originally Posted by JRichter
Can someone sum up this whole thread in 3 lines? I don't feel like reading the whole thing...
- DrDiaboloco got pwn3d
- "Bulletproof" is a retarded word
#87
Lascivious Post Whore
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by saturn
It's all good. But technically speaking, from a linguistics standpoint of course, you just got pwn3d.
#88
i pwn therefore i am
Originally Posted by Skythe
pssst...hey, i know i been in this thread...but ummm...where'd he get pwneded?
#89
Pining for the Fjords
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by saturn
It's all good. But technically speaking, from a linguistics standpoint of course, you just got pwn3d.
Originally Posted by saturn
If you want to use colloquialisms at least be original.
I may have been busted for neglecting to quote you properly, but linguistically, you have not successfully made a point that proves anything aside from your being grumpy about most everyone ELSE's use of language. If I may steal your own figures, I believe far more than 90% of people who read the terms and phrases you're pissed off about understand them, especially when you consider the audience to whom they are writing.
(now fully expecting the "they are considering their audience, and they're all stupid" comment)
#90
Pining for the Fjords
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Skythe
Dammit man....
Lend your mind to the gray area, instead of fabricating conclusions from your rectum.
Nay, we much enojoy language. Which is why we post....blah...nevermind....
I was goin somewhere with this, but if you ain't got it yet, I don't think you're gonna get it, unless you're just ****** with me, and I didn't get that, so either way what we got is errors in communication which is what really my point was all about.
Lend your mind to the gray area, instead of fabricating conclusions from your rectum.
Nay, we much enojoy language. Which is why we post....blah...nevermind....
I was goin somewhere with this, but if you ain't got it yet, I don't think you're gonna get it, unless you're just ****** with me, and I didn't get that, so either way what we got is errors in communication which is what really my point was all about.
Don't worry, "I got it". Using language to paint a picture in the reader's mind=bad.
#92
i pwn therefore i am
Originally Posted by DrDiaboloco
Are these what you call "original" colloquialisms? After all, you said:
Yes, I did double check to be sure it was YOU who typed that.
I may have been busted for neglecting to quote you properly, but linguistically, you have not successfully made a point that proves anything aside from your being grumpy about most everyone ELSE's use of language. If I may steal your own figures, I believe far more than 90% of people who read the terms and phrases you're pissed off about understand them, especially when you consider the audience to whom they are writing.
(now fully expecting the "they are considering their audience, and they're all stupid" comment)
Yes, I did double check to be sure it was YOU who typed that.
I may have been busted for neglecting to quote you properly, but linguistically, you have not successfully made a point that proves anything aside from your being grumpy about most everyone ELSE's use of language. If I may steal your own figures, I believe far more than 90% of people who read the terms and phrases you're pissed off about understand them, especially when you consider the audience to whom they are writing.
(now fully expecting the "they are considering their audience, and they're all stupid" comment)
#96
Void Where Prohibited
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mineola, TX
Posts: 3,046
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ike
The new Eclipse sucks, the 3rd gen Eclipse sucks more, DSMs rule (1G > 2G), Starquests are junk but are cool cars, words make me angry, yo.
#97
Lascivious Post Whore
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DrDiaboloco
Ah, yes, the "when in doubt, resort to insults" approach.
Don't worry, "I got it". Using language to paint a picture in the reader's mind=bad.
Don't worry, "I got it". Using language to paint a picture in the reader's mind=bad.
Something similar happens when these writers use fluffy, vague language when describing aspects or qualities of automobiles.Do some people fully understand the meaning of the words,....yes. When writers use these words, are they properly using the word or phrase in conjuction with its official meaning? Not all the time. And that's my issue. Is when writers use ineffective and innacurate language to convey a message, becuase one has to surmise and extrapolate what the writer is trying to convey based upon the context of the article. While it is entertaing (I don't dispute you on this) it is a gamble and innefficient, which is NOT to say that it isn't emotionally effective.
When being concise and accurate with language...will that lend a body of work to be boring or unimaginative, perhaps. BUT you have understand the purpose of language first before manipulating it. We speak and write to convey messages. We have dictionaries so that we have a general consesus of what particular words mean. Thus, with these definitions we use our concise abbreviated symbols, words, to communicate our thoughts and feelings to others. This last section is the basis of my arguement hopefully with this you will better understand.
#98
Pining for the Fjords
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Skythe
I'm not insulting you. I giving you observations.
Originally Posted by Skythe
Lend your mind to the gray area, instead of fabricating conclusions from your rectum.
I'm sorry, I "lack analytical ability" and I need this to be explained further. Saying "fabricating conclusions from your rectum" instead of "pulling **** out of your ***" doesn't quite explain how your argument holds any water.
#99
Lascivious Post Whore
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DrDiaboloco
I see. Which part of this should I not have interpreted as insulting?
Which "internal egotistical noise", exactly, is causing me to interpret an insult out of such "concise and accurate language"?
I'm sorry, I "lack analytical ability" and I need this to be explained further. Saying "fabricating conclusions from your rectum" instead of "pulling **** out of your ***" doesn't quite explain how your argument holds any water.
Which "internal egotistical noise", exactly, is causing me to interpret an insult out of such "concise and accurate language"?
I'm sorry, I "lack analytical ability" and I need this to be explained further. Saying "fabricating conclusions from your rectum" instead of "pulling **** out of your ***" doesn't quite explain how your argument holds any water.
Ok, ok, I quit....you got me. Yes, those are dick things to say to someone. Although, when someone is fitting the profile, does it make it less offensive becuase it may be accurate?
ok,ok I QUIT!! Seriously...I'll stop defending myself. If you in anyway were offended by my words, I r sowwy. K? I mean it.
The analytical thing, I am serious about. You seem to apply alternate meanings to messages and/or take messages out of context.