Autoweek bashing 4g eclipse
#26
i pwn therefore i am
Originally Posted by Skythe
I've noticed that about you. I would characterize you as having inflammatory tendencies, nont in a man-man or man-boy love kinda way, but more like a "there's that guy gettin in someone's **** again" kinda way. Kinda makes one think, either you're having a lot of bad days or you are seriously having too much fun ******* with people.
#27
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Ike
Actually the sad joke was the 3g, which doesn't even deserve to be considered a 3rd Gen.
whats wrong with the 3g? i like the way they look, but not the way they preform for the price. then you consider that its basically a prettier alternative to civic coupe and not many GT, GTS are sold... its not too bad for what it is.
Last edited by playdoh43; 04-24-2006 at 02:07 PM.
#28
Lascivious Post Whore
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ike
Actually the sad joke was the 3g, which doesn't even deserve to be considered a 3rd Gen.
#30
Bummed, but bring on OU!
Originally Posted by playdoh43
I heart autoweek ,
whats wrong with the 3g? i like the way they look, but not the way they preform for the price. then you consider that its basically a prettier alternative to civic coupe and not many GT, GTS are sold... its not too bad for what it is.
whats wrong with the 3g? i like the way they look, but not the way they preform for the price. then you consider that its basically a prettier alternative to civic coupe and not many GT, GTS are sold... its not too bad for what it is.
#31
Registered
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Fredericskburg VA
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ike
Actually the sad joke was the 3g, which doesn't even deserve to be considered a 3rd Gen.
Truthly the eclipse name should have ended with the DSM heritage, the 3rd and 4th gen shouldn't really be considered part of it. Though all said the 4gen does bring back some of the sporty nature of the orginal namesake. That and the engine in there is super super smooth, good little performer.
#32
"Call me Darkman"
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto/Florida
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I actually didn't mind the 3g sebring/eclipse coupe. It's got 200hp and 200lbs/torque I believe. The car could get up and go but as far as all out performance, the 1st and 2nd Gen are the ones to have.
#33
Big Bad and Black.
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I like everything on the 4th gen except the mirrors just seem they design the entire car and forgot the door mirrors so they just put them on stalks and then the doors.
#34
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
after owning a 1st and a 2nd gen eclipse, and 2 monteros and a evo VI, I have to say mitsubishi is one of the worse car maker out there, they make fun vehicles but after a year or 2 THEY FALL APART, my wife's montero engine die in the garage without any reason, my montero's engine also gave me problems, my 1st gen eclipse engine blew up like 4 times with stock boost , the evo was a nightmare, cluht and diferential problems then the engine, etc.
#35
Originally Posted by rotary crazy
after owning a 1st and a 2nd gen eclipse, and 2 monteros and a evo VI, I have to say mitsubishi is one of the worse car maker out there, they make fun vehicles but after a year or 2 THEY FALL APART, my wife's montero engine die in the garage without any reason, my montero's engine also gave me problems, my 1st gen eclipse engine blew up like 4 times with stock boost , the evo was a nightmare, cluht and diferential problems then the engine, etc.
Man the car was sweet, it talked to you, "Your door is open","Please turn off headlamps"..etc. For 190HP/240 Trq....that turbo 4 banger moved! But unfortunately the reliability was flawed. Chrysler replaced 3 stock turbos,2 turbo's in the first year, finally the last turbo they put in it was from the 89 Eclipse turbo. Mitsu released a new and improved turbo at that time. After that the car was fine....I was the most popular kid on the block at the time.....while other kids parents had Beemers and station wagons or un inspiring econo boxes we had the hot sportscar that could talk! Those were the days........ahhhhh.
#36
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just because of that, their opinions are vetoed.
I honestly liked the first 2 generations of the Eclipse/Talon than the last 2. Even this one, with a big V6...gets ruined by its FWD orientation.
I almost got a AWD Turbo Talon as my first car but...get this, at first there was title problems then there wasn't any...then the owner of the used car lot decided to keep it for himself, what a jerk...lol.
Anyway, until they make it lighter and stick the EVO AWD package in the Eclipse my response is...YAWN...
It's a OK car, but not a really good sport-anything…it actually makes the EVO look bad, like an older drunk brother that ruins family events.
#37
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My parents had a '88 Chrysler ConquestTSI , the variant to the Mitsu Starion TSI.
STAY AWAY, it's garbage...so I did.
I wouldn't mind getting a used one stripping it inside and in the engine bay, and sticking something better in there. In many ways...it was a unique car, while yes...reliability pretty much sucked (so I hear).
#38
Originally Posted by Glyphon
first gen was much better.
just from what I was told...
#40
Pining for the Fjords
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SSJ 909
My uncle is a mechanic and my aunt had a first gen, he said it had sooooo many problems. Either hers had bad luck with the car, or the first gen sucked ***.
just from what I was told...
just from what I was told...
Now THAT was a fun car. Small, light, plenty of power (even stock it is probably the equal to the RX8 if you don't do 7000rpm clutch drops in the Mazda), and an absolute HOOT to drive in the snow. I had a WRC-quality 4-wheel drift in a snowstorm in that car that I still remember like it was yesterday...
*sigh*
Personally, that was the first and last Eclipse that caught my eye.
Now a Q about that "Chrysler Conquest".... Wasn't that a DODGE? That's just what I recall. Damn, I loved that car, too, when I was still in the age range that began with a "1".
#42
Gotta have boost!!!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Favorite car so far, 2nd gen Eclipse. So easy to make a fast car faster when you have a turbo to work with and that motor was bullitproof.
Just for grins, and the dealership had both Mazda's and Mitsu's, I went and drove the 4th gen. I do like the styling better than the 3rd gen, but still way too much plastic inside. Plus to me, and eclipse is just not the same without boost. Not to mention, I laughed when I saw a sticker price of 30,800 for the GT model I drove. Gotta be freakin kidding me.
Went and drove an 8 afterwords.........well, its in my driveway!
Just for grins, and the dealership had both Mazda's and Mitsu's, I went and drove the 4th gen. I do like the styling better than the 3rd gen, but still way too much plastic inside. Plus to me, and eclipse is just not the same without boost. Not to mention, I laughed when I saw a sticker price of 30,800 for the GT model I drove. Gotta be freakin kidding me.
Went and drove an 8 afterwords.........well, its in my driveway!
#43
脾臓が痛みました
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Land of Peaches, Pecans, and Peanuts
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
heheh...you called the 420a bulletproof.
edit: oops. i forgot the turboed engines didn't use the 420a. good thing too. those sucked ***
edit: oops. i forgot the turboed engines didn't use the 420a. good thing too. those sucked ***
Last edited by Glyphon; 04-25-2006 at 02:17 PM.
#44
Originally Posted by rx8wannahave
LOL...that also was ALMOST my first car. I always thought that it looked really aggressive and sporty, but my mechanic at the time told me...
STAY AWAY, it's garbage...so I did.
I wouldn't mind getting a used one stripping it inside and in the engine bay, and sticking something better in there. In many ways...it was a unique car, while yes...reliability pretty much sucked (so I hear).
STAY AWAY, it's garbage...so I did.
I wouldn't mind getting a used one stripping it inside and in the engine bay, and sticking something better in there. In many ways...it was a unique car, while yes...reliability pretty much sucked (so I hear).
I had a 1988 Conquest TSI back in 1995 (it was the second car I'd bought on my own). It was a really nice car for the time.....and the guy I bought it off of took really good care of it. I owned for 6 months before I started having serious electrical problems and had to have the head gasket replaced. They told me the cats were plugged so I sold it.
#45
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Georgetown
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lets face it, a Lotus Super 7 wouldn't sell in North America today. ALL cars are getting fatter, more luxurious, more about the bling and less about the feel...a 3600 pound FWD sportscar, c'mon!
Its not Mitsu's fault, its consumer preference. True enthusiasts make up a tiny percentage of the market; guys who go for a drive for the sake of driving are a dying breed. Instead we got cruisers and parkers and import shows that are more about fancy paint, lambo doors, having 12 DVD screens, 2000 watt sound systems...this car will appeal to this crowd.
Its not Mitsu's fault, its consumer preference. True enthusiasts make up a tiny percentage of the market; guys who go for a drive for the sake of driving are a dying breed. Instead we got cruisers and parkers and import shows that are more about fancy paint, lambo doors, having 12 DVD screens, 2000 watt sound systems...this car will appeal to this crowd.
#46
i pwn therefore i am
Why does everyone throw around the term "bulletproof" when talking about engines? Does it have some sort of special automotive meaning? If not, who the hell cares if an engine can be shot and continue to run? If I ever come to worry about the survivability of my engine in a gun fight, my life took a serious wrong turn at some point. I'd rather have the engine run for a long time than be able to be shot with a bullet. And if "bulletproof" means "well-built engine that last a long time" I'd be very disappointed in whoever coined the term.
#47
Blackbelt Thread Hijacker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dallas, Texas!
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by saturn
Why does everyone throw around the term "bulletproof" when talking about engines? Does it have some sort of special automotive meaning? If not, who the hell cares if an engine can be shot and continue to run? If I ever come to worry about the survivability of my engine in a gun fight, my life took a serious wrong turn at some point. I'd rather have the engine run for a long time than be able to be shot with a bullet. And if "bulletproof" means "well-built engine that last a long time" I'd be very disappointed in whoever coined the term.
#48
Lascivious Post Whore
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by saturn
Why does everyone throw around the term "bulletproof" when talking about engines? Does it have some sort of special automotive meaning? If not, who the hell cares if an engine can be shot and continue to run? If I ever come to worry about the survivability of my engine in a gun fight, my life took a serious wrong turn at some point. I'd rather have the engine run for a long time than be able to be shot with a bullet. And if "bulletproof" means "well-built engine that last a long time" I'd be very disappointed in whoever coined the term.
#49
i pwn therefore i am
Originally Posted by RENESIS_NEENJA
saturn.... you just made me giggle like a schoolgirl nice.. but I can't tell if your kidding or not!?
#50
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Palmdale, CA
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rx8wannahave
Yeah, Autoweek must be driving at half throttle or something. Those times are VERY bad.
0-60 mph: 6.26 sec
0-quarter-mile: 14.75 sec @ 94.4 mph