Notices
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension

Will It Fit Thread

Old Aug 3, 2012 | 04:41 PM
  #8601  
Danmn858's Avatar
Danny Rotstein
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by pdxhak
Danmn858, you rolling replica wheels and banging on someone for a replica lip
I wasn't "banging" on him for the lip. I was "banging" on him for getting an $80 poly urethane lip and ruining his bumper with it by drilling holes through it! I had the same lip, I even said it was fun to drag around.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2012 | 04:51 PM
  #8602  
Danmn858's Avatar
Danny Rotstein
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by SayNoToPistons
Here's a little challenge for you guys. Searched and didn't find much on this specific need. It'll sound a bit ridiculous, but it's all for the sake of function with no concerns for "flushness".

What is the WIDEST one can go with 18" wheels meeting these guidelines:

- No staggering (squared only)
-(No narrower than) 275/35/18
- No fender modifications other than slight shaving of the rear tab (no metal rolling)
- No more than -2.5 camber

Of course there is the usual 18x9.5 +45 and the stuffing of tires wider than 275 on it. But I am looking for something even wider. The width comes first and the offset obviously comes accordingly to the width for the widest stuffing of the wheel wells and clearing of the brakes, which shouldn't be that hard with factory calipers.

I recalled tiltmode's Weds Kranzes in 19x11.5 ET31 (may be a little off) having problems clearing the inside as it was hitting the unibody. So perhaps tiltmode can chime in on some wheel well stuffing insight?
Matt (tilt) was running a lot of camber and had a lot of fender work done to his Rx8. It also depends what you're lowered on. If you're on springs (which I'm assuming you're not since you want to run wider than 10's.) From my experience, with no more than -2.5 camber in the rear you wont achieve much width unless you're unreasonably high.
Last year I had 275/35/19 on 19x10 +20 tires in the rear and was only dropped about 1.5" in the rear and had some serious rubbing issues. I had to run over -5 degrees of camber to make it work with extensive fender work. This example though is a problem due to offset though.
Running anything bigger than a 275 is completely pointless too. A 275 on an 11" rim will already be stretched so you'll get some meaty looking fitment no matter what.
If you want no stretch on the tire 10" is the widest you can go.
Hope this helps you narrow it down.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2012 | 05:04 PM
  #8603  
SayNoToPistons's Avatar
Wheels, not rims!!
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,527
Likes: 68
From: LA
Originally Posted by SayNoToPistons
Here's a little challenge for you guys. Searched and didn't find much on this specific need. It'll sound a bit ridiculous, but it's all for the sake of function with no concerns for "flushness".

What is the WIDEST one can go with 18" wheels meeting these guidelines:

- No staggering (squared only)
-(No narrower than) 275/35/18
- No fender modifications other than slight shaving of the rear tab (no metal rolling)
- No more than -2.5 camber
- On Progress Tech springs and soon to be Koni Yellows. Won't be much of a drop at all.

Of course there is the usual 18x9.5 +45 and the stuffing of tires wider than 275 on it. But I am looking for something even wider. The width comes first and the offset obviously comes accordingly to the width for the widest stuffing of the wheel wells and clearing of the brakes, which shouldn't be that hard with factory calipers.

I recalled tiltmode's Weds Kranzes in 19x11.5 ET31 (may be a little off) having problems clearing the inside as it was hitting the unibody. So perhaps tiltmode can chime in on some wheel well stuffing insight?
Originally Posted by J8635621
9.5 +35 pokes at stock height FOR SURE

9.5 +22 will poke with just a spring drop
Looking for the widest without much care for how low of an offset I go.


Originally Posted by Danmn858
Matt (tilt) was running a lot of camber and had a lot of fender work done to his Rx8. It also depends what you're lowered on. If you're on springs (which I'm assuming you're not since you want to run wider than 10's.) From my experience, with no more than -2.5 camber in the rear you wont achieve much width unless you're unreasonably high.
Last year I had 275/35/19 on 19x10 +20 tires in the rear and was only dropped about 1.5" in the rear and had some serious rubbing issues. I had to run over -5 degrees of camber to make it work with extensive fender work. This example though is a problem due to offset though.
Running anything bigger than a 275 is completely pointless too. A 275 on an 11" rim will already be stretched so you'll get some meaty looking fitment no matter what.
If you want no stretch on the tire 10" is the widest you can go.
Hope this helps you narrow it down.
Sorry, updated post with suspension set up. It is in the above quote. Progress Tech springs with Koni yellows, which is barely a drop.

Ideally, I want to be able to run on 295's squared with as much wheel width as possible. I know many are running Hoosier A6 285/30/18 on factory wheels (with much ballooning of course), some have consistently ran 295's. Hoosier A6's can run up to 20mm wider than factory tires. So in other words, I want to run 295's squared without ballooning the tires .

Last edited by SayNoToPistons; Aug 3, 2012 at 05:06 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2012 | 05:14 PM
  #8604  
fuztupnz's Avatar
Phone Booth'd
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 1
From: Cincinnasty
Why do you want that much tire?

Nnless you have 100whp more than stock, you don't need anything more than a 245 on a road course. Anything wider won't get enough heat in the tires evenly.

For dodging cones in a parking lot, the same applies unless you're running r-comps, then you might want more tire for cold grip since they won't get hot enough anyway.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2012 | 05:16 PM
  #8605  
Danmn858's Avatar
Danny Rotstein
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by SayNoToPistons
Looking for the widest without much care for how low of an offset I go.




Sorry, updated post with suspension set up. It is in the above quote. Progress Tech springs with Koni yellows, which is barely a drop.

I want to run 295's squared without ballooning the tires .
but, why?
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2012 | 05:17 PM
  #8606  
Atilla's Avatar
I am THAT guy
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,994
Likes: 5
From: Caca Cali
18x11 +50 is my best guess

I've ran 18x10 +40 w/265/35's on a 1" drop (swift springs)

I easily had enough space to fit 275's - probably even more.

Hoosier tires are fat tho...never dealt with them personally.

If you're gonna try n' run it squared up - best to keep the offset as high as possible to give you some play along the fenders.

Hope this helps
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2012 | 05:42 PM
  #8607  
SayNoToPistons's Avatar
Wheels, not rims!!
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,527
Likes: 68
From: LA
Originally Posted by fuztupnz
Why do you want that much tire?

Nnless you have 100whp more than stock, you don't need anything more than a 245 on a road course. Anything wider won't get enough heat in the tires evenly.

For dodging cones in a parking lot, the same applies unless you're running r-comps, then you might want more tire for cold grip since they won't get hot enough anyway.
Originally Posted by Danmn858
but, why?
285/30/18's Hoosier A6/Kumho V710's are the norm for the RX-8 C-stock AutoX'ers, since they are limited to factory 18x8 size wheels. I'd like to experiment with something with more wheel width in addition to running 295's.

Pics of 285 A6's on factory wheels. Click link as the pic is ******* HUGE.

https://www.rx8club.com/attachments/...8-imgp0262-jpg


Originally Posted by Atilla
18x11 +50 is my best guess

I've ran 18x10 +40 w/265/35's on a 1" drop (swift springs)

I easily had enough space to fit 275's - probably even more.

Hoosier tires are fat tho...never dealt with them personally.

If you're gonna try n' run it squared up - best to keep the offset as high as possible to give you some play along the fenders.

Hope this helps
Thanks, that definitely helps. I may be willing to roll the lip of the fenders slightly. Reason for not wanting to roll is I hate the look of how thin the fender lip is when rolled and how in some situations rolling pushes out the rim of the fender instead of being completely flat. It's the OCD in me. So I rather not, if I can find out that I can run at least a 10.5 width without rolling.

Last edited by SayNoToPistons; Aug 3, 2012 at 05:46 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2012 | 06:01 PM
  #8608  
J8635621's Avatar
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 128
From: Waco
For what purpose do you plan on using these wheels? Autocross?
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2012 | 06:43 PM
  #8609  
fuztupnz's Avatar
Phone Booth'd
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 1
From: Cincinnasty
You still didn't answer why you wanted to do it. If you're doing it for Autox It will put you into a street prepared class and you'll get your *** handed to you and likely won't have any fun.

a 18x10.5 + 45-50 might fit 295's without a roll depending on ride hight and the amount of camber you're running. You'll likely need a roll though. It will look pretty sunk as well, so if you're doing it for looks, you're going to fail.

the reason you're having a hard time finding an answer is because not many people are doing it. The autox guys don't run that much tire, the track guys don't run that much tire, and the fitment guys don't run that much tire or that high of an offset.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2012 | 06:55 PM
  #8610  
Danmn858's Avatar
Danny Rotstein
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by fuztupnz

the reason you're having a hard time finding an answer is because not many people are doing it. The autox guys don't run that much tire, the track guys don't run that much tire, and the fitment guys don't run that much tire or that high of an offset.
Very true!
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2012 | 08:48 PM
  #8611  
SayNoToPistons's Avatar
Wheels, not rims!!
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,527
Likes: 68
From: LA
There are quite a few local CS 8's running 285/30 A6's. It will be mainly for AutoX, yes. Yes I am aware that it will throw me into SP, which will be extremely competitive.

I am looking at a set of CCW classics for sale. 18x10 +50. I am assuming these will fit without an issue because of the high offset, will be "sunk", and will "look retarded" to some.

All I'm asking is what will be the widest 18" wheel that will fit in the wheel wells (without modification) and with what offset would that width have to associate with?

Pic of CCW Classics if anyone cares...

Name:  S.jpg
Views: 110
Size:  123.7 KB
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2012 | 01:51 AM
  #8612  
Rotor Gunnin' it's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: Danbury, CT
waiting on J8635621 for the classic,

"Poke is bad, mkay"

hahahaha
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2012 | 06:42 AM
  #8613  
musicaddikt's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Okay guys what do you think if I run 245/35/19 8.5x19+35 offset in front and 265/35/19 in rears 9.5x19 +35 offset. Will there be any rubbing?( my car is stock). If they only poke out, what I must do; lower it?
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2012 | 09:23 AM
  #8614  
Danmn858's Avatar
Danny Rotstein
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by musicaddikt
Okay guys what do you think if I run 245/35/19 8.5x19+35 offset in front and 265/35/19 in rears 9.5x19 +35 offset. Will there be any rubbing?( my car is stock). If they only poke out, what I must do; lower it?
no thats fine. You wont really get any poking with an offset that high.

you guys really have to search this forum a bit!!
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2012 | 10:44 AM
  #8615  
Mr_Pieper's Avatar
Legend In My Own Mind
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 3
From: The Lou
Everyone is always hunting for poke.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2012 | 11:03 AM
  #8616  
Danmn858's Avatar
Danny Rotstein
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by Mr_Pieper
Everyone is always hunting for poke.
more like "hunting for a poke"
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2012 | 02:18 PM
  #8617  
musicaddikt's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Danmn858
no thats fine. You wont really get any poking with an offset that high.

you guys really have to search this forum a bit!!


Okay then I will go for it, if anyone thinks I shouldn't do that tyre setup please talk, buying tires next week.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2012 | 03:12 AM
  #8618  
tiltmode43's Avatar
OMGITM!
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 6
From: Sunny Southern California
Measure inner clearance. With camber bolt @ 50% the 19x11.5 ET31 had inner clearance issue @ compression. I went to 11.5 ET26 but still have to do some inner modification to allow proper clearance. Pretty much the limit for inner, and this is wheel clearance. If you plan on having a fat tire, depending on wheel width, you will run into inner problems at compression.

295's can definitely fit. Will require a light bit of fender work with the right width & offset wheel. I would say one could get 315's to fit with the proper offset, wheel width, and offset.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2012 | 09:01 AM
  #8619  
Phyrx's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Millbrook, AL
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Phyrx
19x8.5 +30 - 235/35/19
19x9.5 +25 - 265/30/19

I'm currently on Mazdaspeed springs (slightly lower than stock) with slightly rolled fenders and no spacers and have no issues but I want to go lower (and the stock struts are trash in the rear...)

I am looking to buy the Powertrix coilovers and lower the car to get a nice stance. Will I need to run spacers for this to look good? Or will my offsets/size sit pretty flush? I don't want wheel gap but I don't want to rub on every bump


Thanks in advance! Current picture for reference:


Any help?
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 05:59 AM
  #8620  
paparn's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Any ideas ??? What should be made with the car camber?
TE-37sl. 18x9.5+22 F + R
Tires. 235 40 18. f+R
On tein ss coil overs
Thanks
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 10:59 PM
  #8621  
Ian Korgel's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Minot, ND
Advan RS Wheel 18x9.5 5x120

Wondering about these. newby question about lug spacing. will 120 work? and what is a good reccomended offset. thanks for all the help guys. you guys are life savers for those of us that need to step our wheel knowledge game up!



EDIT: found the same rim with 114.3. but they are only 18x9

Last edited by Ian Korgel; Aug 8, 2012 at 11:04 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2012 | 10:13 AM
  #8622  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
Of course it won't work it's the wrong bolt pattern. Come on man!
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 04:59 PM
  #8623  
Ian Korgel's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Minot, ND
yeah, i wasnt thinking. thanks though
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 05:13 PM
  #8624  
Atilla's Avatar
I am THAT guy
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,994
Likes: 5
From: Caca Cali
Originally Posted by paparn
Any ideas ??? What should be made with the car camber?
TE-37sl. 18x9.5+22 F + R
Tires. 235 40 18. f+R
On tein ss coil overs
Thanks
Unnecessary tire stretch.

you can run 255's or 265's w/a roll n' grinded tabs.

If you're going for stance you'll look retarded with stretched tires on a tucked wheel.

imo, run more rubber - save on the camber n' run it more straight up until you get something more aggressive.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 05:20 PM
  #8625  
J8635621's Avatar
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 128
From: Waco
265 on 9.5 +22? I wish I was ballsy enough for that. 245/40 wasn't a problem though
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:16 PM.