Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Coolant Boiling Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-21-2007, 08:11 PM
  #51  
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
mysql101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 8,625
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Yeah, it isn't for everyone. But for me living in Tampa, FL - I'm looking at 18F cooler temp, and being able to get the temps down faster. It's a win-win situation for me, with no drawbacks.


Also, if you hook up a odb2 scanner like the ScanGauge2 to your car (or racing beat gauge pod), you'll be able to monitor coolant temps. You'll not need the increased boiling point if you know that your car is on the edge and close to boiling. Less chance of doing damage to your car too. I usually stop going into boost when I see coolant temps at 210F, even though that's no where in the danger zone.
Old 08-21-2007, 08:12 PM
  #52  
Registered User
 
grey1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I live in a climate where I would be looking for freeze plugs if I don't use anti-freeze and water, so it's a mute point for me. So exactly what gain do you guys down south see from using water instead of a mix?
Old 08-21-2007, 11:30 PM
  #53  
Modulated Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
dannobre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Smallville
Posts: 13,718
Received 335 Likes on 290 Posts
Originally Posted by ProCharger GT
Holy crap Batman we have a winner....

First, malinformed isn't even a word - I believe you are looking for the word misinformed.

Secondly, not once did I ever say running pure coolant was the way to go. Antifreeze + Water changes the chemical properties of the liquid, and it's typically called "Engine Coolant". Why do you people refuse to see this?

Coolant absorbs heat from the block, flows through a radiator which blows outside air over cooling fins, which in turn take heat away from the coolant inside the radiator, which is pumped by a water pump, to keep a constant flow of new coolant going to your engine. This is not new technology.

Wow...best rebuttle is to attack grammar/spelling

By the way Malinformed is a commonly used word to describe " a deliberate, and often harmful attempt to misinform"

Anyways...I never said anything about straight coolant...I just said that water will carry away more heat than glycol based coolants...as long as you don't have to worry about freezing and other properties that tend to be very important for engine life

Hell...the biggest cooling problem in this car is the sub-par water pump that craps out long before redline

Go back to Chemistry 101.....and I'll try English 100..then the world will be a better place

Old 08-21-2007, 11:56 PM
  #54  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,528
Received 1,494 Likes on 842 Posts
Originally Posted by dannobre

Hell...the biggest cooling problem in this car is the sub-par water pump that craps out long before redline
this is why me and MM love the underdrive pulley so much .

Anyway - I put Redline WW in mine a little while ago but only used tap water - Is it really essential to use distilled ?
Old 08-21-2007, 11:56 PM
  #55  
a/s/l/n00dz?
 
ProCharger GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was simply pointing out that you used a word that wasn't real.

Anyway, what was the block and head temperatures of these engines that ran water + water wetter only?
Old 08-22-2007, 01:20 AM
  #56  
Modulated Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
dannobre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Smallville
Posts: 13,718
Received 335 Likes on 290 Posts
Originally Posted by Brettus
this is why me and MM love the underdrive pulley so much .

Anyway - I put Redline WW in mine a little while ago but only used tap water - Is it really essential to use distilled ?

Underdrive pullies will help the high RPM cavitation problems...but make the low speed cooling worse...not ideal

Mazmarts redesigned impeller does a much better job.......

Adding minerals to the mixture, just adds to the problems the additive has to overcome to prevent corrosion.....distilled or DI water is much better
Old 08-22-2007, 02:20 AM
  #57  
road warrior
Thread Starter
 
LionZoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Mazmart's new impeller? Anyone want to elaborate?

Also, it seems a lot of amateur racers use straight water plus waterwetter for their cars. If you're worried about boiling, you have to realize that it becomes a trade-off between the lower boiling temperature of the straight water mixture versus the greater ability of the mixture to wisk heat away from the engine. This trade-off is what I'm interested in, but apparently people have had no issues with it.

Last edited by LionZoo; 08-22-2007 at 02:27 AM.
Old 08-22-2007, 03:22 AM
  #58  
Registered User
 
sosonic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Brettus
this is why me and MM love the underdrive pulley so much .

Anyway - I put Redline WW in mine a little while ago but only used tap water - Is it really essential to use distilled ?
Yes, use the distilled water. Why would you want use tap water with all kinds of crap in it, that could have a negative effect on your radiator? Plus distilled water is pretty cheap.

Originally Posted by dannobre
Underdrive pullies will help the high RPM cavitation problems...but make the low speed cooling worse...not ideal

Mazmarts redesigned impeller does a much better job.......
How bad would you estimate the low speed cooling to be? Anyone with an underdrive pulley (especially AP) feel free to chime in.

Mazmart water pump > than underdrive pulley? Water pump freeing HP (so how much)? No advantage using both (pulley and new water pump) together?

Anybody finally come out with a water pump solution that they are selling that has a weblink)?

Last edited by sosonic; 08-22-2007 at 03:55 AM.
Old 08-22-2007, 07:15 AM
  #59  
Modulated Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
dannobre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Smallville
Posts: 13,718
Received 335 Likes on 290 Posts
Originally Posted by LionZoo
Mazmart's new impeller? Anyone want to elaborate?

Also, it seems a lot of amateur racers use straight water plus waterwetter for their cars. If you're worried about boiling, you have to realize that it becomes a trade-off between the lower boiling temperature of the straight water mixture versus the greater ability of the mixture to wisk heat away from the engine. This trade-off is what I'm interested in, but apparently people have had no issues with it.
Mazmart has redesigned the water pump...it is a beautiful thing

There are other reasons racers use water only....heat capacity is one...plus coolant is hellishly slippery on the track
Old 08-22-2007, 02:20 PM
  #60  
a/s/l/n00dz?
 
ProCharger GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I love how nobody answered my question; what was the block temperature? Secondly, the results of the "temperature test" is based off a non-independent lab test result - show me an independent lab that has the same results + the temperature of the block/cylinder head were reduced, and I won't say another word.
Old 08-22-2007, 02:34 PM
  #61  
The devil made me do it
iTrader: (1)
 
DeViLbOi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I understand the POV that mysql has. If the temp of the coolant is lower than it has to be more effectively pulling heat from the block and then cooling down quickly with the fan. But something to back it up would be wonderful.
Old 08-22-2007, 02:59 PM
  #62  
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
mysql101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 8,625
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
I figure you guys can search on google as easily as I can, but if not, here's two links to get you started:

http://www.redlineoil.com/whitePaper/17.pdf

http://e30m3performance.com/myths/mo...ter_wetter.htm

" I have a Ph.D. in Heat Transfer and have taken a graduate course in Boiling and Condensation.

...

An additional benefit of using "Water Wetter" (in conjunction with 100% water) in you cooling system is that water has an extremely high heat capacity. Thus a gallon of 100% water can carry more heat away from you engine than an equivalent gallon of 50/50 water and coolant.

...

But remember that if your cooling system is operating properly, it should never get hot enough to boil (I mean BOIL, not just localized boiling).

...

On performance cars the primary duty of the cooling system is to keep the engine in its optimum temperature range. This is best accomplished with 100% water, because its high heat capacity makes it very efficient at transferring heat.
"
So... I suggest emailing the guy with the Ph.D. in Heat Transfer and telling him he doesn't know squat


More on http://google.com

Last edited by mysql101; 08-22-2007 at 03:10 PM.
Old 08-22-2007, 03:33 PM
  #63  
a/s/l/n00dz?
 
ProCharger GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mysql101

50% Glycol / 50% water - 228F

50/50 with water wetter - 220F

Water - 220F

Water with water wetter - 202F




Red Line WaterWetter® does not significantly
increase the boiling point of water; however, increas-
ing pressure will raise the boiling point. The boiling
point of water treated with Red Line using a 15 psi
cap is 250°F compared to 265°F at 15 psi for 50%
glycol. Increasing the pressure by 50% to 23 psi will
increase the boiling point of water to 265°F. Because
of the doubling of the ability of the radiator to transfer
heat, boilover using Red Line treated water is not a
problem as long as the engine is circulating coolant
through the head and the fan is circulating air.
Sudden shutdown after very hard driving may cause
boilover.
With what you said above, and what your buddy with the PhD in "Heat Transfer" says in his document:

"Water Wetter" is not designed to lower your car's bulk coolant temperature.

.....yet according to RedLine's testing of their own product, it does!!

Still waiting for those block and cylinder head temperatures too - apparently you can link to the PDF document that I already reviewed to be able to tell you that the testing was done by RedLine themselves, so you have still not given me anything new. Try again!
Old 08-22-2007, 03:44 PM
  #64  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,751
Received 2,025 Likes on 1,649 Posts
one temp reading doesn't mean squat

you have to know the coolant inlet temp, the coolant outlet temp, the coolant flowrate, the ambiemt air temp and dew point, etc., etc.

simply having a lower outlet temp could possibly mean that LESS heat transfer is taking place, you have to do a mass heat transfer balance to determine what is actually going on
Old 08-22-2007, 03:44 PM
  #65  
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
mysql101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 8,625
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
I really hope you're trying to act dumb here..

As he said, you shouldn't expect your coolant temp to drasticly drop. That's not what it does. For example, you shouldn't expect your coolant temps to go under 180F, because your radiator fans will turn off and the heat will climb till they're activated again. HOWEVER, if you were running your car at redline for a sustained amount of time (radiator on, of course), then repeated that test without the 50/50 mix, and just used plain water, you'd find your sustained temps lower because water is much better able to remove heat.

Common sense, right? Apparently not.


There is nothing up for debate here. It's a fact water is better than glycol for cooling. Having glycol in your radiator will lower the rate at which your radiator can cool.
Old 08-22-2007, 04:07 PM
  #66  
a/s/l/n00dz?
 
ProCharger GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't a 20 degree temperature drop a "drastic" drop?

Engine and cylinder head temperatures would be nice also, otherwise these results from the product manufacturer (otherwise known as a non-independent lab) mean nothing.
Old 08-22-2007, 05:57 PM
  #67  
a/s/l/n00dz?
 
ProCharger GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mysql101

So... I suggest emailing the guy with the Ph.D. in Heat Transfer and telling him he doesn't know squat

What college offers a Ph.D in "Heat Transfer"? What kind of classes are necessary for this said degree? I've never heard of that before!
Old 08-22-2007, 07:16 PM
  #68  
road warrior
Thread Starter
 
LionZoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
His Ph.D concentration is probably in heat transfer, in the Mechanical Engineering department. Ph.Ds are highly specialized and so one can get a Ph.D in Mechanical Engineering without knowing much at all about traditional mechanical subjects such as stresses and mechanisms. Therefore, it's much better to reveal what your Ph.D concentration (research) is about.
Old 08-22-2007, 07:21 PM
  #69  
暗闇立ち込めた。。
 
RotarySpirit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: A large pit.
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ProCharger GT
What college offers a Ph.D in "Heat Transfer"? What kind of classes are necessary for this said degree? I've never heard of that before!
Wow, you fail man. Give up already. What are you even arguing anymore?
Old 08-22-2007, 07:24 PM
  #70  
a/s/l/n00dz?
 
ProCharger GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RotarySpirit
Wow, you fail man. Give up already. What are you even arguing anymore?
Wow man, you've contributed nothing to the thread. Prove me wrong already!
Old 08-22-2007, 07:25 PM
  #71  
a/s/l/n00dz?
 
ProCharger GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LionZoo
His Ph.D concentration is probably in heat transfer, in the Mechanical Engineering department. Ph.Ds are highly specialized and so one can get a Ph.D in Mechanical Engineering without knowing much at all about traditional mechanical subjects such as stresses and mechanisms. Therefore, it's much better to reveal what your Ph.D concentration (research) is about.
Then it would be a Ph.D in Mechanical Engineering

I'm just being a ***** on that one

Doesn't change the fact that nobody can show me proof that the engine and/or cylinder head are cooler just because the temperature of the liquid is.
Old 08-22-2007, 07:45 PM
  #72  
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
mysql101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 8,625
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
ProCharger, I hope you never give up. Unfortunately, while it's been quite amusing, I can't waste my time trying to argue on a topic with you when facts are considered much like the Unicorn, magical mythical creatures that don't exist.

Keep up the good fight man! You would make your mother proud.



Originally Posted by ProCharger GT
Doesn't change the fact that nobody can show me proof that the engine and/or cylinder head are cooler just because the temperature of the liquid is.
Don't come in here with that straw man argument.
Old 08-22-2007, 07:46 PM
  #73  
Doggie Style :)
 
LabDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ProCharger GT
This is hilarious...what part of this doesn't make sense???????

Most of the antifreeze products on the market currently are ethylene glycol base material with additives to prevent corrosion, lubricate seals and water pumps and aid in heat transfer to the coolant from the metal of the engine. [/B]
Okay, this is getting stupid. ProCharger don't get your panties in a bunch over it but the bottom line is that pure water has a higher heat capacity than a water/antifreeze mix. If you think otherwise (and apparently you do based on the quote above) please educate yourself before posting more here.
Old 08-22-2007, 07:47 PM
  #74  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,751
Received 2,025 Likes on 1,649 Posts
ahem ....

Originally Posted by TeamRX8
one temp reading doesn't mean squat

you have to know the coolant inlet temp, the coolant outlet temp, the coolant flowrate, the ambiemt air temp and dew point, etc., etc.

simply having a lower outlet temp could possibly mean that LESS heat transfer is taking place, you have to do a mass heat transfer balance to determine what is actually going on
Old 08-22-2007, 07:52 PM
  #75  
暗闇立ち込めた。。
 
RotarySpirit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: A large pit.
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ProCharger GT
Wow man, you've contributed nothing to the thread. Prove me wrong already!
True, and neither have you.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Coolant Boiling Question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:51 AM.