Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Coolant Boiling Question

Old 08-21-2007 | 06:25 PM
  #26  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
In that case, you'll find at your local walmart (among other stores) they sell tiny bottles of anti-freeze "refreshers", I forget the name of the product, but it's basically just the lubricants, no glycol.
Old 08-21-2007 | 06:32 PM
  #27  
Socket7's Avatar
ಠ_ಠ
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 6
From: Under the Dumbarton Bridge
Not much experience with car engines, but I have had experience with water cooled computers and the exact same arguments come up and discussed at great length.

Ultimately, this is what I've taken away from the whole thing.

Pure water with a surfacent such as water wetter will give you the greatest thermal efficiency, but gives you no corrosion protection. This is especially bad in systems where you have different types of metal such as copper and aluminum in contact with the coolant. You might be better off at first, but when your radiator rots out, you're in for some trouble.

50/50 antifreeze water mix cannot transfer heat quite as quickly, but will keep dissimilar metals from reacting with each other and corroding. It also prevents the coolant from freezing.

Pure antifreeze = you fail at life.

I'm a bit hazy on boiling points for things, as computer coolant cant reach that temp, but if you are thinking about changing your coolant to improve performance, you'd be better off upgrading your radiator, as the difference between coolants is a few percent difference, but an upgraded radiator could get much larger gains in cooling efficiency.

Last edited by Socket7; 08-21-2007 at 06:36 PM.
Old 08-21-2007 | 06:34 PM
  #28  
ms6ftw's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by mysql101
Yeah, we're serious. Do you even know what coolant does? It doesn't cool.

edit: coolant above should read anti-freeze. Either way, coolant doesn't cool as well as water.

are you high?

coolant/anti-freeze is designed to keep engine temps down, and to resist freezing. its an additive that raises the boiling point and lowers the freezing point...
Old 08-21-2007 | 06:36 PM
  #29  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
Originally Posted by Socket7
I'm a bit hazy on boiling points for things, as computer coolant cant reach that temp, but if you are thinking about changing your coolant to improve performance, you'd be better off upgrading your radiator, as the difference between coolants is a few percent difference, but an upgraded radiator could get much larger gains in cooling efficiency.
Computers are different. They aren't going to get as hot, and they're not pressurized.

So we're not as worried about bugs and crap growing in there. But yeah, if you need more cooling, a radiator upgrade would also help.


Originally Posted by ms6ftw
are you high?

coolant/anti-freeze is designed to keep engine temps down, and to resist freezing. its an additive that raises the boiling point and lowers the freezing point...
You haven't been paying attention. Your radiator is pressurized, Why would you care that your coolant can reach 300F? Your car would already be destroyed before that point. As long as your car is operating normally, you'll be fine with straight water. It's boiling point is higher than you seem to think.

Last edited by mysql101; 08-21-2007 at 06:40 PM.
Old 08-21-2007 | 06:42 PM
  #30  
Da1MoeD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Are we still talking about Kool-Aid????
Old 08-21-2007 | 06:43 PM
  #31  
DeViLbOi's Avatar
The devil made me do it
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 2
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Last I checked...coolant temps rise as heat is removed from the engine. Therefore lowering the point at which the water will boil and add oxygen to your engine is not a good idea.
Old 08-21-2007 | 06:44 PM
  #32  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
Originally Posted by DeViLbOi
Last I checked...coolant temps rise as heat is removed from the engine. Therefore lowering the point at which the water will boil and add oxygen to your engine is not a good idea.
Maybe you should check again, because you might notice something behind your radiator that helps suck that heat away from your coolant.



That's it folks, I'm tired of repeating myself!
Old 08-21-2007 | 06:45 PM
  #33  
ms6ftw's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by mysql101
I guess it doesn't make sense to you, because you have issues with reading comprehension.

Read my post again:

https://www.rx8club.com/showpost.php...86&postcount=2

Not only are the numbers you quoted different, but your conclusion is reversed.

They put a car on a dyno, ran it for 3 hours at 7,000 rpm, and calculated the resulting temp.

Regular 50/50 mix coolant came out to 228F. Water with water wetter came out to 202F (I consider the number with 100% just water invalid for real world use since you can't run your car that way).


Raising the boiling point of water is going to be useless for the most part. Your car shouldn't reach temps that high if it's functioning normally. Remember, the system is pressurized, so it's not like boiling a pot of water on the stove. 220F isn't going to boil it.
nevermind guys, we shouldn't bother....the numbers are different, therefore the world is wrong....guess i should just leave it alone
Old 08-21-2007 | 06:45 PM
  #34  
grey1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Has anyone here ever even taken a look at the back of an anti-freeze/coolant bottle? There have been some very valid points made here, but there is a reason why cars leave the factory with a water and antifreeze/coolant mix. It has been stated several times here that water mixed with antifreeze/coolant will provide a higher boiling point and lower freezing point than with water alone or antifreeze/coolant alone. I will also stand behind that. Antifreeze/coolant is not a substitute for water, only and additive that increases its maximum boiling point and loweres its freezing point. It isn't a hard thing to understand.

Old 08-21-2007 | 06:45 PM
  #35  
ProCharger GT's Avatar
a/s/l/n00dz?
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland
Originally Posted by dannobre
You are wrong....pure water cools better than coolant.....look at the data...there is lots of it around.

EG is used to keep the coolant from freezing..and the additives protect the engine from corrosion and lubricate the water pump

If your "friends" think this is funny they are as malinformed as you.......

spout off on something that you actually know about.............
Holy crap Batman we have a winner....

First, malinformed isn't even a word - I believe you are looking for the word misinformed.

Secondly, not once did I ever say running pure coolant was the way to go. Antifreeze + Water changes the chemical properties of the liquid, and it's typically called "Engine Coolant". Why do you people refuse to see this?

Coolant absorbs heat from the block, flows through a radiator which blows outside air over cooling fins, which in turn take heat away from the coolant inside the radiator, which is pumped by a water pump, to keep a constant flow of new coolant going to your engine. This is not new technology.
Old 08-21-2007 | 06:48 PM
  #36  
DeViLbOi's Avatar
The devil made me do it
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 2
From: Colorado Springs, CO
And what is the efficiency of said device? As my engine temps climb does it instantly bring my coolant temp back down? And I could probably dig around and find all sorts of information but I am lazy...but doesn't normal thermostats open around 180? Why would I want to only give myself 20 degrees to work with before producing oxygen? I may never hit 265+, but I like my odds of getting close to 265 better than 202.
Old 08-21-2007 | 06:49 PM
  #37  
grey1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ProCharger GT
Holy crap Batman we have a winner....

First, malinformed isn't even a word - I believe you are looking for the word misinformed.

Secondly, not once did I ever say running pure coolant was the way to go. Antifreeze + Water changes the chemical properties of the liquid, and it's typically called "Engine Coolant". Why do you people refuse to see this?

Coolant absorbs heat from the block, flows through a radiator which blows outside air over cooling fins, which in turn take heat away from the coolant inside the radiator, which is pumped by a water pump, to keep a constant flow of new coolant going to your engine. This is not new technology.
For a guy driving a ford, that's actually a fairly good explanation of a basic cooling system.
Old 08-21-2007 | 06:53 PM
  #38  
ProCharger GT's Avatar
a/s/l/n00dz?
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland
Originally Posted by grey1
For a guy driving a ford, that's actually a fairly good explanation of a basic cooling system.
Old 08-21-2007 | 06:54 PM
  #39  
DeViLbOi's Avatar
The devil made me do it
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 2
From: Colorado Springs, CO
That coming from the man that has coolant that crystallizes on him.
Old 08-21-2007 | 06:56 PM
  #40  
grey1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by DeViLbOi
That coming from the man that has coolant that crystallizes on him.
Hey, that's on the other engine not mine.

Old 08-21-2007 | 07:01 PM
  #41  
Da1MoeD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
All Mighty Wikipedia says, and I quote:

"The most common coolant is water. Its high heat capacity and low cost makes it a suitable heat-transfer medium. It is usually used with additives, like corrosion inhibitors and antifreezes. Antifreeze, a solution of a suitable organic chemical (most often ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, or propylene glycol) in water, is used when the water-based coolant has to withstand temperatures below 0 °C, or when its boiling point has to be raised."
Old 08-21-2007 | 07:12 PM
  #42  
DeViLbOi's Avatar
The devil made me do it
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 2
From: Colorado Springs, CO
We are not saying that water can not be used Moe. What we have been trying to say is that lowering the boiling point is not a good idea. Water Wetter according to mysql's post drops the boiling point from 220 to 202 making it more prone to boiling and or inefficient cooling.
Old 08-21-2007 | 07:20 PM
  #43  
Da1MoeD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by DeViLbOi
We are not saying that water can not be used Moe. .
John, read the bold text. I never said that you should only use water.

I'm all for engine coolant, I would never put just water in my car, and I definitely would never use any chemical that would lower my BP.
I need that extra protection, for when I race a grey Dodge Charger (wannabe Chrysler 300) on the highway when I leave work!

Last edited by Da1MoeD; 08-21-2007 at 07:25 PM.
Old 08-21-2007 | 07:33 PM
  #44  
LabDad's Avatar
Doggie Style :)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu, HI
Originally Posted by ProCharger GT
Coolant absorbs heat from the block, flows through a radiator which blows outside air over cooling fins, which in turn take heat away from the coolant inside the radiator, which is pumped by a water pump, to keep a constant flow of new coolant going to your engine. This is not new technology.
Everyone gets this. What you seem to be missing is that water alone has a very high heat capacity. Add antifreeze to it and the heat capacity is reduced.

Are you still with me?

Okay so antifreeze is added to do two things. Most obvious is to lower the freezing point of the mixture. What it does in general is to expand the liquid range so in addition to the freezing point being lowered, the boiling point is raised. The second thing is to provide lubrication and corrosion protection to the cooling system.

Summarizing the above. Adding antifreeze:
Positive:
1) Lower freezing/higher boing point
2) Water pump lubrication and corrosion protection

Negative:
1) Lower heat capacity that pure water

Are you still with me?

Okay so now suppose you live somewhere where it never gets cold enough for freezing to be a problem. Then the lower freezing point is worthless.

Secondly the coolant system is sufficiantly pressurized to prevent boiling. Thus the higher boiling point of water/antifreeze mixture also becomes a non issue. So the only thing to be gained from adding antifreeze is the pump lubrication and corrosion protection. Both of these can be satisfied with a bottle of WaterWetter added to pure water.
Old 08-21-2007 | 07:36 PM
  #45  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
Originally Posted by DeViLbOi
We are not saying that water can not be used Moe. What we have been trying to say is that lowering the boiling point is not a good idea. Water Wetter according to mysql's post drops the boiling point from 220 to 202 making it more prone to boiling and or inefficient cooling.
I wasn't going to post anymore here, but I can't leave this without an answer.

If you read my post, it never said anything about boiling point. Hell, logic says 50/50 coolant doesn't boil at 220, and pure water isn't going to boil in your radiator at 202.

What the test showed, was a comparison of 50/50 vs water + additive. The same car, the same drive (3 hours at 7000 rpm), and the coolant temp was almost 20F cooler. TEMP OF THE LIQUID, not it's boiling point.

As I said before, unless your radiator fans are broken, running with just water is fine since you're not going to hit the boiling point. Furthermore, because water is more efficient, your radiator will be able to extract the heat from the radiator far quicker than you would be able to with 50/50 of coolant. So that brings me back to what I said before - the higher boiling point of 50/50 doesn't mean squat since you're not going to be hitting it.



This is simple stuff people. What's so difficult to understand?
Old 08-21-2007 | 07:46 PM
  #46  
REDRX3RX8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 715
Likes: 22
mysql101 clearly showed a test where water and wetter take more heat out for a specific run, so your car wil run cooler at that instant. Make sense.
Old 08-21-2007 | 07:55 PM
  #47  
lurch519's Avatar
www.evoperform.com
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 1
From: tax free delaware
haha, this thread cracks me up too. i cant believe so many people have reading comprehension issues. how many times did you repeat yourself mysql?
Old 08-21-2007 | 07:58 PM
  #48  
Brettus's Avatar
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,599
Likes: 1,533
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Think we need MM to come in here with another one of his videos .... to make this pwning complete
Old 08-21-2007 | 08:03 PM
  #49  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
Originally Posted by REDRX3RX8
mysql101 clearly showed a test where water and wetter take more heat out for a specific run, so your car wil run cooler at that instant. Make sense.
All things being equal, that test showed under high load, 50/50 mix was running 18F hotter.

They also showed that with a 15 PSI radiator cap, the 50/50 mix only had a 15F higher boiling temp.

So your choice is to either heat soak your engine, and have a higher boiling temp (only marginally so), or run with water where you can be almost 20F cooler to begin with, AND be able to pull the heat out of the radiator quicker ... so in stop and go traffic, your temps will drop faster.

It's a no brainer! (Assuming you live where it doesn't freeze - or you can change coolant with the seasons).
Old 08-21-2007 | 08:07 PM
  #50  
DeViLbOi's Avatar
The devil made me do it
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,708
Likes: 2
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Originally Posted by mysql101
I wasn't going to post anymore here, but I can't leave this without an answer.

If you read my post, it never said anything about boiling point. Hell, logic says 50/50 coolant doesn't boil at 220, and pure water isn't going to boil in your radiator at 202.

What the test showed, was a comparison of 50/50 vs water + additive. The same car, the same drive (3 hours at 7000 rpm), and the coolant temp was almost 20F cooler. TEMP OF THE LIQUID, not it's boiling point.
Point taken...I misread what you had said.

Originally Posted by mysql101
As I said before, unless your radiator fans are broken, running with just water is fine since you're not going to hit the boiling point. Furthermore, because water is more efficient, your radiator will be able to extract the heat from the radiator far quicker than you would be able to with 50/50 of coolant. So that brings me back to what I said before - the higher boiling point of 50/50 doesn't mean squat since you're not going to be hitting it.

This is simple stuff people. What's so difficult to understand?
As a person that has boiled an engine...I can not take this risk. Personally...the difference between distilled water and 50/50 is negligible. Living where we do...Water Wetter or even water are not options. My understanding still is that Coolant is similarly efficient at cooling an engine as distilled water without any of the benefits of the coolant.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Coolant Boiling Question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:43 PM.