Turbo Efficiency Range for RX-8
#201
Turbocharger Guru
#202
C4 burns real good
iTrader: (4)
Turbonetics GT-K
Does anyone have any info on the GT-K series? I'm looking at going this route with my build. I want to have the best turbo for the job and right now I'm looking at the gtk350 or the gtk450. If I go with the 450 I'll have to do some modifications to the cold side pipes and maybe the hot side, havn't been able to find a whole lot of info. The PTP kit that I'm going with is set to mate up with a t4 60 trim stage 5 bb. Any advice you gurus have would be nice
#203
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^^
Do you have compressor and turbine maps? I asked a while ago when they were first being released and was told they were not yet available.
Do you have compressor and turbine maps? I asked a while ago when they were first being released and was told they were not yet available.
#204
Turbocharger Guru
wanted.
I am not familliar with all the new names of ball bearing turbochargers. I just do "bolt on" upgrades to existing cars with turbochargers.
Bryan@BNR
I am not familliar with all the new names of ball bearing turbochargers. I just do "bolt on" upgrades to existing cars with turbochargers.
Bryan@BNR
#207
Turbocharger Guru
I have refused to use Turbonettics stuff ever since the valve broke in my racegate after just 2 or 3K miles. I spoke to the parts manager at the time and they told me that the valves weren't for individual sale which that week they evidently decided not to sell the pieces which were in their parts catelog. He also said to me in these exact words.... "Well the bad thing for you is you have to buy another wastegate, but the good thing for us is we sell another one!" That was the end of that... They can keep their Garrett knock off stuff b/c thats all they sell.
#208
The GTK 450 has a 4" inlet. That's could present serious packaging problems. With a compressor inducer listed as 2.29" and presumably the 2.95" exducer, it appears to be the T04E 60 trim I mentioned way back earlier in this thread:
The stage 3 turbine wheel is still kind of small, considering most older rotaries making power are running the P-trim.
Trim Exducer Dia. Major Dia.
T3
Stage I / Std. 1.898 2.319
Stage II 2.122 2.559
Stage III 2.229 2.559
Stage V 2.437 2.795 (not positive about the stage 5 measurements)
T4
N 2.071 2.922
O 2.296 2.922
P 2.544 2.922
Q 2.693 3.111
We can also compare the GTK 350 to some of the other stuff that's out there. It is listed as a stage 2 turbine wheel. That is really small for this application--similar to the size of the turbine wheel on 2nd gen stock turbo, according to Bryan's measurements (which I very much appreciate!).
The GTK 350 is listed as .63 A/R on the hotside. That's small too--there is an FD running on the rx7 forums (Howard Coleman is his name, he's done a lot of experiments with alcohol injection) running custom twins with stage 5 turbine wheels and a .82 A/R hotside--two of them, one for each rotor (old style motor which have two exhaust ports). He is doing around 500 on pump + meth.
With that restictive hotside and turbine wheel you will get a lot of backpressure. More backpressure = higher exhaust temps and higher chance of detonating, but quick response. The turbine housing is probably equal or smaller in size to the 18G's, which is a 16 cm ^2 and I have been told that is equivalent to a .83 (not positive on that). a .63 A/R is like a 12 cm^2 turbine housing.
Here is a conversion chart I found (cannot 100% vouch for this)
9cm^2 - .48 A/R -- like a later Evo 16G hotside or a Holset HY35 on the automatic Cummins Rams
12cm^2 - .63 A/R -- Holset HX35 on manual tranny Rams
16cm^2 - .83 A/R -- Greddy turbine housing on Rx-8 18G and also I believe the 20G used on the FC Greddy kit
18cm^2 - 1.00 A/R -- Holset HX40/H1E housing
22cm^2 - 1.15 A/R -- Holset HX40/H13 housing
Getting back to the GTK-350,
With a compressor wheel inducer of 2.170" (about 55 mm) and probably an exducer around 3" (76mm), it seems to be the T04E 54 trim. See turbonetics catalog http://turbocharged.com/catalog/comp_wheels.html
With that kind of wheel, you might as well get Bryan to do a 50 trim wheel (same as GTK 325) in a modified Greddy 18G and save some hassle.
I have looked at a TON of catalogs and specifications on turbos, and I have come to the conclusion that most of turbos from smaller shops (GTK, Sound Performance, Precision Turbo, etc) just mix and match parts from that Turbonetics/Garrett catalog I posted if they are using T series. In this case, the size chart actually lists "E54" as in T04E 54 trim. Otherwise these resellers will just use straight up GT series stuff. I'm not some kind of turbo genius, and clearly looking at catalogs isn't rocket science. That's why I appreciate Bryan just coming out and telling us what he puts in his hybrids. HKS usually takes Garrett stuff and clips the turbine wheel or swaps out a housing with another off-the-shelf housing, then marks up the price.
The stage 3 turbine wheel is still kind of small, considering most older rotaries making power are running the P-trim.
Trim Exducer Dia. Major Dia.
T3
Stage I / Std. 1.898 2.319
Stage II 2.122 2.559
Stage III 2.229 2.559
Stage V 2.437 2.795 (not positive about the stage 5 measurements)
T4
N 2.071 2.922
O 2.296 2.922
P 2.544 2.922
Q 2.693 3.111
We can also compare the GTK 350 to some of the other stuff that's out there. It is listed as a stage 2 turbine wheel. That is really small for this application--similar to the size of the turbine wheel on 2nd gen stock turbo, according to Bryan's measurements (which I very much appreciate!).
The GTK 350 is listed as .63 A/R on the hotside. That's small too--there is an FD running on the rx7 forums (Howard Coleman is his name, he's done a lot of experiments with alcohol injection) running custom twins with stage 5 turbine wheels and a .82 A/R hotside--two of them, one for each rotor (old style motor which have two exhaust ports). He is doing around 500 on pump + meth.
With that restictive hotside and turbine wheel you will get a lot of backpressure. More backpressure = higher exhaust temps and higher chance of detonating, but quick response. The turbine housing is probably equal or smaller in size to the 18G's, which is a 16 cm ^2 and I have been told that is equivalent to a .83 (not positive on that). a .63 A/R is like a 12 cm^2 turbine housing.
Here is a conversion chart I found (cannot 100% vouch for this)
9cm^2 - .48 A/R -- like a later Evo 16G hotside or a Holset HY35 on the automatic Cummins Rams
12cm^2 - .63 A/R -- Holset HX35 on manual tranny Rams
16cm^2 - .83 A/R -- Greddy turbine housing on Rx-8 18G and also I believe the 20G used on the FC Greddy kit
18cm^2 - 1.00 A/R -- Holset HX40/H1E housing
22cm^2 - 1.15 A/R -- Holset HX40/H13 housing
Getting back to the GTK-350,
With a compressor wheel inducer of 2.170" (about 55 mm) and probably an exducer around 3" (76mm), it seems to be the T04E 54 trim. See turbonetics catalog http://turbocharged.com/catalog/comp_wheels.html
With that kind of wheel, you might as well get Bryan to do a 50 trim wheel (same as GTK 325) in a modified Greddy 18G and save some hassle.
I have looked at a TON of catalogs and specifications on turbos, and I have come to the conclusion that most of turbos from smaller shops (GTK, Sound Performance, Precision Turbo, etc) just mix and match parts from that Turbonetics/Garrett catalog I posted if they are using T series. In this case, the size chart actually lists "E54" as in T04E 54 trim. Otherwise these resellers will just use straight up GT series stuff. I'm not some kind of turbo genius, and clearly looking at catalogs isn't rocket science. That's why I appreciate Bryan just coming out and telling us what he puts in his hybrids. HKS usually takes Garrett stuff and clips the turbine wheel or swaps out a housing with another off-the-shelf housing, then marks up the price.
Last edited by arghx7; 02-06-2009 at 02:44 AM.
#209
C4 burns real good
iTrader: (4)
I'm doing a top mount so packing isn't a problem at all. So from what you're saying, the 550 would be a better match with the stage 5 wheel? I supose the modifications would be the same from the 450 to the 550.
I understand that alot of people have the GReddy set up however some don't. Very little has been discused on just the best turbo, packing be damned. I'm personally very interested in this field.
I understand that alot of people have the GReddy set up however some don't. Very little has been discused on just the best turbo, packing be damned. I'm personally very interested in this field.
Last edited by WantedTwo; 02-06-2009 at 05:33 AM.
#210
I would stay away from that entire line of turbos. They seem to be designed for high horsepower 4 cylinder applications. The hotsides are too small in comparison to the family of compressor wheels it is using. The GTK 550 is a T61 compressor which is basically a GT35, but the stage 5 wheel is still on the smaller side for that. The closest journal bearing equivalent to GTK 550 which I would recommend is the Aspec GT3574 . (that's their name for it, there is no 3574 in the Garrett catalog). It is a GT35 journal bearing compressor wheel with a P trim turbine wheel and T4 inlet.
http://www.a-spectuning.com/html/products/gt3574.htm
call them up and they can probably sell you just the turbo and wastegate and you can source your own manifold. Tell them you need an undivided turbine housing.
Otherwise, look for turbos that are used on Supras.
http://www.a-spectuning.com/html/products/gt3574.htm
call them up and they can probably sell you just the turbo and wastegate and you can source your own manifold. Tell them you need an undivided turbine housing.
Otherwise, look for turbos that are used on Supras.
Last edited by arghx7; 02-06-2009 at 09:15 AM.
#211
C4 burns real good
iTrader: (4)
Well I have officially been talked out of the GT-K. The snail I'm going with is a 60-1, P-trim, .70AR T-4. I'm going to see if I can get the water cooled varity as I don't want the cooling load to be passed off to the oil coolers which we all know are lacking already.
#214
Turbocharger Guru
.70 a/r is fine for 330-350 RWHP. It will be a great spooling turbo. If you want more than 13 psi/350RWHP, I would suggest finding a bigger housing.
#215
Registered
The 60-1 is an awesome turbo. I loved it for street use as that's what I had years ago on an old RX-7. I ignored other recommendations and used it instead. No regrets. I had a 1.32 a/r divided housing with a clipped P trim wheel but that was on a 13B with my custom exhaust sleeves. Awesome setup with quick spool. The secret was the sleeves as without them spool would have been horrible.
#218
Registered
It's still better than those absolute piece of junk Greddy turbos for the RX-8! They're so pathetic that I wouldn't use one for a paperweight.
#220
C4 burns real good
iTrader: (4)
.86 it is then. See my problem is I had the GReddy back in the day, and really enjoyed the fast spool, I just didn't enjoy the problems I had with it. I suppose I should listen to you and get the turbo you recommend as I'm sure you’re going to get rather acquainted with it when I move to Phoenix You should check out my build thread to get the full scope of what I'm doing, if nothing else just look at the parts list.
#224
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
Set up right the Greddy is a great upgrade to a sock rx8 with power levels that most people will be happy with . I actually don't find any issue with just treating it like a 4 port and revving to 7600 ish .
99% of any hard driving i do ie windy roads etc I don't ever want for more power up top IEover 7500 because most of the fun is in the 4000 - 6500 range anyway . This range is where the greddy shines