Pettit Super Charger Owners
Fire-Spewing Maniac
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
Hey guys,
Out of respect for the others on the forum, I would like to keep anything "mazsport scammed me" and related out of the Pettit Forum. I understand things happened and people are upset, but I would greatly appreciate it if we could leave the content of this thread on you guys and your Pettit kits, out of respect for others.
Thanks alot guys.
-Bryan
Out of respect for the others on the forum, I would like to keep anything "mazsport scammed me" and related out of the Pettit Forum. I understand things happened and people are upset, but I would greatly appreciate it if we could leave the content of this thread on you guys and your Pettit kits, out of respect for others.
Thanks alot guys.
-Bryan
Anji
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Dhaka, Bangladesh
Hey guys,
Out of respect for the others on the forum, I would like to keep anything "mazsport scammed me" and related out of the Pettit Forum. I understand things happened and people are upset, but I would greatly appreciate it if we could leave the content of this thread on you guys and your Pettit kits, out of respect for others.
Thanks alot guys.
-Bryan
Out of respect for the others on the forum, I would like to keep anything "mazsport scammed me" and related out of the Pettit Forum. I understand things happened and people are upset, but I would greatly appreciate it if we could leave the content of this thread on you guys and your Pettit kits, out of respect for others.
Thanks alot guys.
-Bryan
By the way I am not upset, as I mentioned earlier - "it was blessing in disguise".
whines all the way home
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,402
Likes: 2
From: Towson/Baltimore, MD
yeah Im not sure if Hymee is an actual vendor or not but if its a matter of permission he's got mine as sure as the other Pettit owners, since this is Phil's thread I would imagine it would be up to him to ok it with the mods
by the rules, it isnt your guys decision. since this thread is in Pettit's private forum, it's their decision.
yeah, its your guys thread, so i would think your call on that. only thing is then how often would the mods have to deal with complaints, cause you know how that would turn out lol
whines all the way home
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,402
Likes: 2
From: Towson/Baltimore, MD
Actually all the final straw 'complaints' didnt come from us it came from 'someone' bashing the Esmirl kit so much that the mods came laid the smackdown rule #7
but thats not what i mean
!!!!
Registered
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Put it this way guys, I dont see any Pettit owners going in other threads stirring chit. I now I havent. The same should apply to owners of turbo kits comming in here just to rustle things up. Shouldnt happen, if it does they must have issues im not getting into, its the job of the mods. If you have a turbo and post in here it should be pertaining to the SC kit or just general discusion. It also wouldnt hurt for for an owner to start another thread to show your mods and progress, it can be shown in here but it wouldnt hurt to have a section set aside for that alone to keep from having to go through the whole thread to get the info needed on the kit. If this works for you guys and gals, it works for me.
whines all the way home
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,402
Likes: 2
From: Towson/Baltimore, MD
yeah but as sited, that thread is already being scrutinized because some think that they should be put up on a higher pedastal because they have to go through an aruduous proccess of fabbing thier own parts when our kit comes out of the box with minimal assembly. They think that somehow that makes them more important. Thus having a longer build thread where they have to photo document every liitle custom part or work-around they think that they should be segregated into another thread when your initial purpose was a place for all FI to be posted and to create shortcuts or contacts where NA people to go to learn more about FI options
yeah but as sited, that thread is already being scrutinized because some think that they should be put up on a higher pedastal because they have to go through an aruduous proccess of fabbing thier own parts when our kit comes out of the box with minimal assembly. They think that somehow that makes them more important. Thus having a longer build thread where they have to photo document every liitle custom part or work-around they think that they should be segregated into another thread when your initial purpose was a place for all FI to be posted and to create shortcuts or contacts where NA people to go to learn more about FI options
all that was said over there between a few posts was: possibly divide it into categories like 1) genuine builds 2) kits instillations with a thread/feedback 3) kits installed via shop with no/less thread/feedback 4) ppl like me who are sitting on a pile of parts but have not "built/installed" yet
the more i look back on this whole constant mess, and then look at more current events, the more i think that although alot of it is simply **** - alot of it is a few of you guys needing to learn what constructive criticism is.
Last edited by paulmasoner; Jan 3, 2009 at 07:43 PM.
i dont know whats funny bastage? none of you have ever provided me with any? the best i've ever gotten is a list of stuff that applies to about 3% of all boosted Rennies(basically track dedicated builds and ~400whp cars), and some stuff about Jeff's turbos always breaking and us running to him with money to fix it(which has never happened)
Dongbag extrordinare
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 0
From: Away from the fruits of my labor
incorrect.
you forgot to mention SFR, PTP, and a couple other less known on this forum.
Congrats on your decision though. I'd bet a lot of the folks here would assume that i turn my nose at the SC, but even with some of the non ideal aspects of Pettit's FI system - i had my heart set on it for a few months.... the biggest reason i didnt end up staying the path was because i decided i wanted more area under the curve without having to rely on water/meth or anything else to do so.
FWIW i think that for a lot of people it is a good choice. Ease of install, equivalent to a top-mount in terms of bling factor, cost, decent bump in power. Basically i have nothing against it at all. It is what it is.
you forgot to mention SFR, PTP, and a couple other less known on this forum.
Congrats on your decision though. I'd bet a lot of the folks here would assume that i turn my nose at the SC, but even with some of the non ideal aspects of Pettit's FI system - i had my heart set on it for a few months.... the biggest reason i didnt end up staying the path was because i decided i wanted more area under the curve without having to rely on water/meth or anything else to do so.
FWIW i think that for a lot of people it is a good choice. Ease of install, equivalent to a top-mount in terms of bling factor, cost, decent bump in power. Basically i have nothing against it at all. It is what it is.
to be even MORE accurate, show me one that was or could do that 1-1.5 years ago when i made the decision that i wanted those power levels
not touchy, and i wasnt wrong... I'm pretty sure than when it comes to expressing a personal opinion/preference i dont understand how you're going to tell me i'm wrong?