Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Log Manifold (SFR/Esmeril) Vs Tubular (turboblown) Turbo Manifolds, and setups

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 5 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old 03-09-2011, 02:34 PM
  #76  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,529
Received 1,494 Likes on 842 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Pretty decent result

340 hp, 260 tq. (+/- 3 or 4)
very nice - deserves a spot in the highest whp thread . What boost at peak whp ?
Old 03-09-2011, 04:18 PM
  #77  
Official Post Whore
iTrader: (2)
 
pdxhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 10,462
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts
Is that the dyno of the SFR kit?
Old 03-09-2011, 04:28 PM
  #78  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,529
Received 1,494 Likes on 842 Posts
/\ although he didn't say , the previous post seems to point to it being the SFR belonging to Wanted Two
Old 03-09-2011, 04:30 PM
  #79  
Official Post Whore
iTrader: (2)
 
pdxhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 10,462
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts
That is what I was thinking. Love the numbers! Makes me want more
Old 03-09-2011, 10:46 PM
  #80  
C4 burns real good
iTrader: (4)
 
WantedTwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Brettus
very nice - deserves a spot in the highest whp thread . What boost at peak whp ?
12 from what I was told, and yes, that is my car
Old 03-10-2011, 12:25 AM
  #81  
Boostin'
 
Turblown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Got a scan of the boost curve?

I know its not the exact turbo, however it is a lot closer comparison as a 1.06 GT35R is very close to a .84 turbine P trim housing( even so this one is a .70 according to the build thread). Compressor wheels are also very similar. I have attached a photo of the difference between the turbine wheels.

Results again are tipping in favor of the tubular manifold design, boost comes on sooner, and higher rpms carry more power, and this is still at lower boost pressure.

Not down playing your results, just staying on topic.
Attached Thumbnails Log Manifold (SFR/Esmeril) Vs Tubular (turboblown) Turbo Manifolds, and setups-gt35rvsptrim.jpg   Log Manifold (SFR/Esmeril) Vs Tubular (turboblown) Turbo Manifolds, and setups-auxportsopen.jpg  
Old 03-10-2011, 12:39 AM
  #82  
C4 burns real good
iTrader: (4)
 
WantedTwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm afraid I don't. Either Ray or Jeff might as they were with the car, I'm still in Afghan-o-land. You can read exactly what Ray told me in my build thread about what the boost was doing.
Old 03-10-2011, 12:41 AM
  #83  
C4 burns real good
iTrader: (4)
 
WantedTwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Also, I am very curious about the idea of adapting one of your manifolds to my kit, PM me if you would be willing to take a look at it and possible cost involved. The results would quell this entire discussion!
Old 03-10-2011, 12:44 AM
  #84  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Cfm > psi......
Old 03-10-2011, 12:48 AM
  #85  
Boostin'
 
Turblown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by WantedTwo
I'm afraid I don't. Either Ray or Jeff might as they were with the car, I'm still in Afghan-o-land. You can read exactly what Ray told me in my build thread about what the boost was doing.
I would love to do that, however we are moving into a new shop location out of State in a few weeks and we are over booked currently. I highly doubt you are interested in shipping the car for just this.

Go enjoy your car before you even think of doing more mods. Stay safe out there!
Old 03-10-2011, 12:52 AM
  #86  
C4 burns real good
iTrader: (4)
 
WantedTwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Where is the new shop going to be? I should be home at the end of this month... hopefully.
Old 03-10-2011, 12:54 AM
  #87  
Boostin'
 
Turblown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by WantedTwo
Where is the new shop going to be? I should be home at the end of this month... hopefully.
Out side of the twin cities in Minnesota.
Old 03-10-2011, 12:55 AM
  #88  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
wanted, its only a 60hp difference, and I am still incline to believe this is due to the turbo selection, what you should do is match Turblown 426whp turbo for yours then go back the dyno..
Old 03-10-2011, 01:08 AM
  #89  
C4 burns real good
iTrader: (4)
 
WantedTwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Turblown
Out side of the twin cities in Minnesota.
****, yeah, I'm not driving that far, nor shipping her.

Originally Posted by FazdaRX_8
wanted, its only a 60hp difference, and I am still incline to believe this is due to the turbo selection, what you should do is match Turblown 426whp turbo for yours then go back the dyno..
Possibly, but unless I'm mistaken, and I very well could be, I think our turbos are pretty similar. Here is mine

60-1 , P-trim, .70AR, BB T-4 water cooled
Old 03-10-2011, 01:51 AM
  #90  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by FazdaRX_8
Cfm > psi......
Uh, whut? CFM is almost as useless as PSI.

Originally Posted by olddragger
apvs closed?
Normal 6250 opening point.

Originally Posted by WantedTwo
60-1 , P-trim, .70AR, BB T-4 water cooled
.70 A/R? I presume that is for the compressor. What is the A/R of the turbine?

Originally Posted by Brettus
What boost at peak whp ?
About 11 PSI.
Wanted has one of those "Gizmo" boost controllers that I knew absolutely nothing about. Tony from UMS and I spent a good 20 minutes trying to decipher the instructions. In all, it seems like a good controller, but it wasn't intuitive at all.
We basically got it to hit 12 PSI as a sort of "spike" (you can see it in the dyno plot) which immediately settled down to 11.5 PSI, trailing down to about 10.8 PSI at the redline.
Old 03-10-2011, 02:00 AM
  #91  
C4 burns real good
iTrader: (4)
 
WantedTwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm afraid that is all the info I have reguarding the Turbo, but I seem to remember .96 in there somewhere...

I thought I had left the instructions sitting on the seat just incase, if I forgot, my apologies. Also let me know what I owe you and how you would like to be paid. Thanks for all the work Jeff!!
Old 03-10-2011, 02:28 AM
  #92  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by WantedTwo
I'm afraid that is all the info I have reguarding the Turbo, but I seem to remember .96 in there somewhere...
.96 sounds right for the turbine.

Originally Posted by WantedTwo
I thought I had left the instructions sitting on the seat just incase, if I forgot, my apologies.
No worries. That is why there is teh InterWebZ.
The printed instructions would have been no less cryptic than the online PDF, anyway.


Originally Posted by WantedTwo
Also let me know what I owe you and how you would like to be paid. Thanks for all the work Jeff!!
Ray will work that out for you.
Old 03-10-2011, 08:15 AM
  #93  
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by FazdaRX_8
Cfm > psi......
CFM presumes air is moving.
PSI presumes it is not.
Old 03-10-2011, 09:39 AM
  #94  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
Pstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Turblown
Out side of the twin cities in Minnesota.
Sorry to go off topic but HELL YEA!! I may have to start spending more than I was expecting to.
Old 03-10-2011, 10:20 AM
  #95  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Uh, whut? CFM is almost as useless as PSI.
Mostly true, I suppose the best picture is the MAF sensor readings? g/sec?
I am pretty sure turblowns turbo has a higher g/sec then SFR's kit, can you confirm?

Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
CFM presumes air is moving.
PSI presumes it is not.
an engine is moving air, cfm, the PSI is how much resistance the engine is providing, so I always thought that if one engine can make x power at 10psi with a curtain turbo while the same engine makes more power with the same 10psi but a different turbo, what is the change? I thought CFM is what makes the change, an I wrong?
Old 03-10-2011, 10:26 AM
  #96  
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by FazdaRX_8
an engine is moving air, cfm, the PSI is how much resistance the engine is providing, so I always thought that if one engine can make x power at 10psi with a curtain turbo while the same engine makes more power with the same 10psi but a different turbo, what is the change? I thought CFM is what makes the change, an I wrong?
You are discussing many variables at the same time, Fazda.
Old 03-10-2011, 10:56 AM
  #97  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
CFM presumes air is moving.
PSI presumes it is not.
And neither represents mass without temperature.
Old 03-10-2011, 11:25 AM
  #98  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I am stating they are the same with the exception of the turbo
Old 03-10-2011, 11:45 AM
  #99  
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
And neither represents mass without temperature.
I was going to mention charge temperature when Fazda wanted to make compressor comparisons, but haven't been all over this already with Brettus, anyway?
Old 03-10-2011, 11:53 AM
  #100  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Yeah, I just feel compelled to scream out "Temperature!" whenever someone says "Pressure!".

It's like a sick game of Marco Polo.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 5 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: Log Manifold (SFR/Esmeril) Vs Tubular (turboblown) Turbo Manifolds, and setups



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:45 PM.