Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Aux port delete for FI discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-12-2010, 02:54 PM
  #101  
Boosted Kiwi
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
/\ what I don't know and can't find the info on is - what happens OUTSIDE the efficiency chart .....
Old 02-12-2010, 02:55 PM
  #102  
Illudium Q-36 Space Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: PCB
Posts: 6,364
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Open them just before they become a restriction to flow....

The best way to test it is start with stock and - do WOT pulls every 100 RPMs, and compare g/sec readings.... look for the best curve.
Old 02-12-2010, 02:59 PM
  #103  
I divide by zero
 
Mawnee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kane
Open them just before they become a restriction to flow....

The best way to test it is start with stock and - do WOT pulls every 100 RPMs, and compare g/sec readings.... look for the best curve.
Always with the more logs!

definetly moving that OB2 port this weekend...
Old 02-12-2010, 03:00 PM
  #104  
Boosted Kiwi
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
/\ agree with Kane . FWIW I've played with that a LOT and eventually came to the conclusion that anything below 6000 was too early and it was swings and roundabouts between 6000-7000 .
Old 02-12-2010, 03:02 PM
  #105  
Boosted Kiwi
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
The issue of the lean spike when they open needs to be discussed as well i think . I came to the conclusion that the spike is acceptable so long as it was not lean either side of the spike . Any advance on that ?
Old 02-12-2010, 03:30 PM
  #106  
Illudium Q-36 Space Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: PCB
Posts: 6,364
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Change the Fuel VE% Map to account for it.

The MAF is too slow to cover it - but the FUEL VE Map should modify that cell real nice.
Old 02-12-2010, 03:36 PM
  #107  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
I'll weigh in on this in a moment (in the middle of some shipping), but, formulas and thinking aside, leaving them closed yields the highest flow.

Logs to follow...
Old 02-12-2010, 03:46 PM
  #108  
Boosted Kiwi
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
but, formulas and thinking aside
heh - for some reason I find that quite funny in light of recent discussions .
Old 02-12-2010, 03:50 PM
  #109  
Illudium Q-36 Space Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: PCB
Posts: 6,364
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Cool, thanks Jeff - I'd like to get some info prior to my dyno day next week.
Old 02-12-2010, 03:51 PM
  #110  
Boosted Kiwi
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by Brettus
OK . Found the correct formula (i think) for calculating temp of compression :

(PR^0.28-1) x T absolute x 1/turbo efficiency x intercooler eficiency (say 50%)

So for my example we get
@10psi UIM and 14.5psi post turbo, 60% turbo efficiency and 20C ambient(=293Kelvin) :

(1.99^0.28-1) x 293K x 1/0.6 x 50/100 = 51.8C

So a rise in temp of 31.8C

@7.5psi UIM and 12psi post turbo , 55%turbo efficiency and 20C ambient:

(1.82^0.28-1) x 293K x 1/0.55 x 50/100 =48.6 C

Rise in temp of 28.6C


So for my setup I'm better off staying with ports open .

There would have to be a turbo efficiency increase of 12% to make NOT opening the ports worthwhile ...
Just quoting myself here because I realised i did the calcs at UIM pressure and not turbo pressure

Does change things a bit but does not change the concluision .....


As the boost pressure gets higher however -it becomes interesting because the %difference in boost is a lot less and the difference in turbo efficiency may be higher for the same flow .


Brain Exploding .................................................. .....................................























NOW !

Last edited by Brettus; 02-12-2010 at 05:38 PM.
Old 02-12-2010, 05:02 PM
  #111  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
well i am waiting for this one
This has to be compressor related?
OD
Old 02-13-2010, 12:01 PM
  #112  
I divide by zero
 
Mawnee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MOAR PLZ!

This was just starting to get good again
Old 03-01-2010, 08:12 PM
  #113  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
well just found out that my 334 g/sec at 6981 rpms was with the apv CLOSED.
The gear on the manifold side had come loose and the gear was just hanging there--i was getting apv obd 2 code also.
HMMMMM---since my redline is max at 7.5K maybe its best to leave them closed for me>.
Old 03-01-2010, 08:19 PM
  #114  
Boosted Kiwi
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by olddragger
well just found out that my 334 g/sec at 6981 rpms was with the apv CLOSED.
The gear on the manifold side had come loose and the gear was just hanging there--i was getting apv obd 2 code also.
HMMMMM---since my redline is max at 7.5K maybe its best to leave them closed for me>.
Would be really interesting for you to do a g/s log with them closed and then open back to back . Then post them on here .
You just need to pull the DC motor plug to stop them opening ....
I would think more flow with them open but till you do the log ..............

Last edited by Brettus; 03-01-2010 at 08:29 PM.
Old 03-01-2010, 08:39 PM
  #115  
Boosted Kiwi
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
leaving them closed yields the highest flow.

Logs to follow...
Please explain ....

- did you manage to do any logs ?
Old 03-04-2010, 09:01 AM
  #116  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
May do that with my efi dude.
Old 05-13-2010, 11:37 PM
  #117  
Boosted Kiwi
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by Brettus
IAT from just before throttle plate
some readings from first test
3000 rpm in 2nd gear through 3rd and to 8000rpm in 4th -( if any one has a better test that is easy to do on public roads i'm all ears)

Aux ports closed
Max MAF : 300g/s (sits at 295 from 6800 right through to 8000rpm)
Boost pressure : 9.5psi constant
ambient temp : 25C
Start IAT temp : 40C
end IAT temp : 43C

What I was going to compare was the speed of temp change hopefully at same maf , ambient and start temp ......
Finally have ability to log IAT again so did a comparison run

Aux ports open
Max MAF 320 (sitting around 315 for same range as above)
Boost pressure : 10psi to 6300 dropping away to 7psi approx. from there)
ambient temp : 21C
Start IAT temp : 35C
End IAT temp : 38.5C

So - not exactly an equal comparison test but interesting to see that even though MAF is 5% higher for the 2nd test , temp rise is only slightly more.
Too little data to make a conclusion but it leans towards aux port open as being the better way to go .

Last edited by Brettus; 05-14-2010 at 12:02 AM.
Old 05-14-2010, 12:13 AM
  #118  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Coupla things:

1) @ 21°C ambient you are seeing charge temps of 38.5°C ?!?!? What is going on there? AT 21°C, my charge temps wont go above 30°C MAXIMUM.
2) How do you draw a conclusion about the AUX ports with that data? g/sec max? At what RPM does that happen? You state that your manifold pressure drops by 30%, but your flow goes up, yet your intake charge temps are >15°C delta?
Old 05-14-2010, 03:50 PM
  #119  
Boosted Kiwi
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac

1) @ 21°C ambient you are seeing charge temps of 38.5°C ?!?!? What is going on there? AT 21°C, my charge temps wont go above 30°C MAXIMUM.
My charge temps at cruise with no boosting at all are 12-15C above ambient so I guess my IC and turbo are inferior to yours

Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
2) How do you draw a conclusion about the AUX ports with that data?
Well , I did say "not enough data to draw a conclusion" . So I didn't really draw one - just speculated from the inconclusive data that I do have I really didn't have the inclination to test this further as I can see that either way - there is not a lot in it .

Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
You state that your manifold pressure drops by 30%, but your flow goes up, yet your intake charge temps are >15°C delta?
My flow does not go up - it stays approx. level at 315ish g/s from 7000 onwards . See chart below for example .I'm just reporting what I see . Not sure what point you are making ?
Attached Thumbnails Aux port delete for FI discussion-maf.jpg  

Last edited by Brettus; 05-14-2010 at 04:07 PM.
Old 05-15-2010, 11:53 PM
  #120  
Registered
 
halimsteven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
this is interesting,,...i have had the turbo for more than 20 K, and my APV was always openned....LOL....we kept it openned, so my turbo can get in, LOL....
it's tru and low RPM is ****, until it hits 4K.....LOL...
now i know how it works....
good job
steven
Old 08-26-2010, 08:39 AM
  #121  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
reviving old thread.
I will be doing some caveman data collection with my apvs open this w/e ( i have the Pettit kit)
I have 8.5# of boost available at 2.5--2.7K. and i have modified the lim to maximize as best I could smoother flow. I removed all internal casting marks, thrumpheted the runners as best I could, port matched, and premently removed and sealed the vdi /area. I also have a drilled TB.
We shall see.
I have already just cranked it up and my a/f's were ok in closed loop.
OD
Old 08-26-2010, 09:03 AM
  #122  
I divide by zero
 
Mawnee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool. Looking forward to your results
Old 08-26-2010, 10:03 AM
  #123  
Gold Wheels FTW
iTrader: (1)
 
reddozen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,116
Received 49 Likes on 35 Posts
It would be nice to finally get some absolute resolution to this debate...
Not sure what you would have to really do to accomplish that though...
Old 08-26-2010, 10:53 AM
  #124  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
i dont know if I will clear anything up or not?
My goal for my set up seems to be a little different from many others.
For instance--i have never though this engine was stout/balanced enough for a 9K+ redline and to have a 75K life expectancy. So I self lowered mine to 7.5K and I never exceed (if i can help it) 8K. I have been told by multiple established and reputable people--including Cam /Pettit, Paul, Rick E/Mazmart etc that a standard build na engine would probably be good to 8.2K
So if 7.5 is my most used redline what good is an intake valve that opens at over 6K? Not much.

As said I have over 8 lbs boost just off idle ( we idle at 1.2K). I have good maf readings (365 g/sec) below 8K. So what I am looking for is to expand the power available "under the curve" so to speak. I would like to increase that area from 3.5 to7K.
Bret did some good work exploring this and he found the best solution for his car. My car and goals are different from his.
Heck I may even play with consistant partial openings of the apv. Say 75% versus 100%--you get the idea.
My gut thinks that the apv can be more utilized in fine tuning the car. I may be wrong, but in the least I will probably learn first hand what NOT to do!
OD
Old 08-26-2010, 12:07 PM
  #125  
SPOOLN8
iTrader: (1)
 
RotaryMachineRx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,225
Received 208 Likes on 156 Posts
subbed


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Aux port delete for FI discussion



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:36 AM.