Mazdaedit
#351
weeeeeeeeee
iTrader: (12)
Ah... I'm used to seeing the cell value being representative of the actual VE value.... ie: 80% VE delivers less fuel than 90%.
I never dabbled in the fueling maps in ATR... The Select has clearly spoiled me. Now is probably a good time for me to reach out to my source to get hard copies of the MM sessions I attended a couple years ago.
I never dabbled in the fueling maps in ATR... The Select has clearly spoiled me. Now is probably a good time for me to reach out to my source to get hard copies of the MM sessions I attended a couple years ago.
#354
weeeeeeeeee
iTrader: (12)
So it's the OE map... well yeah... you know captain fxxxx obvious I started with a base post msp16 map so it better be OE.
If I knew WTF I was doing I wouldn't be asking about the scaling for the gawd damned fuel maps. That is one assumption we can also safely make.
#356
Registered
The VE map is a correction map, not a VE map in the traditional sense, simple. You can pretty much tune and ignore it.
Just ignore Team, he likes to make constant useless posts that lead nowhere.
thewird
Just ignore Team, he likes to make constant useless posts that lead nowhere.
thewird
#358
weeeeeeeeee
iTrader: (12)
Thanks Dan and thewird for pointing me in the right direction. I do have some documentation on these tables and will have to read up on them.
#360
weeeeeeeeee
iTrader: (12)
I'm not swapping... Fueling is 1000 times easier with the Adaptronic.
I yanked my AP though and moved all prior tweaks, plus a few extras I couldn't get to in ATR, over.
And decided I'd give MAF based tuning another once over... Hence my questions about those two tables.
And I also spoke with a local tuner (Speed1 / KDR) giving him a thumbs up on it. Dave will likely be offering mep based tuning as a result in the coming months.
And if between the two of us we can come to terms with the OE maps then perhaps I may sell my Adaptronic some day in the future. Until then it is still my preference for ease of use.
I yanked my AP though and moved all prior tweaks, plus a few extras I couldn't get to in ATR, over.
And decided I'd give MAF based tuning another once over... Hence my questions about those two tables.
And I also spoke with a local tuner (Speed1 / KDR) giving him a thumbs up on it. Dave will likely be offering mep based tuning as a result in the coming months.
And if between the two of us we can come to terms with the OE maps then perhaps I may sell my Adaptronic some day in the future. Until then it is still my preference for ease of use.
#361
weeeeeeeeee
iTrader: (12)
I figured out what the "DTC Disp?" table does today, somewhat.
If you do not update the corresponding row in it, then any CELs you suppress via table #1 and #2 will still show up as Pending, but will never be stored.
Here's what I've learned:
If you do not update the corresponding row in it, then any CELs you suppress via table #1 and #2 will still show up as Pending, but will never be stored.
Here's what I've learned:
Code:
0 = No pending 1 = Pending only if not enabled in #1 and #2 3 = Something to do with the Immobilzer (possibly do not start car) 5 = Guessing limp mode as the codes I looked up set with 5 are TPS related
#371
Rotary Evolution
#372
Great news brettus!!!
can't wait to see your logs/power and video's
on the knock sensor, does mazdaedit acually record if the car knocks?
(cobb, will log knock but it will never report knock, just pull timing)
can't wait to see your logs/power and video's
on the knock sensor, does mazdaedit acually record if the car knocks?
(cobb, will log knock but it will never report knock, just pull timing)
#375
Registered
iTrader: (3)
No, I mean the tables in ram that are modified as you drive. If you are maxing out retard in some cells then your timing is too advanced, if you have no retard in other cells then it's a good idea to add timing. Without knowing those values the knock control strategy is useless, you can easily max it out and remove knock control completely without even realizing it. It's like using LTFT and STFT to tune your maf, except there is no CEL when you max the values.