Notices
Series I Engine Tuning Forum EMS (Flash Tuning, Interceptor, Piggy Back, Stand Alone)

Hymee Pro Tuner Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-10-2009 | 09:54 PM
  #126  
Brettus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,599
Likes: 1,533
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Hymee has a noticeboard for just such things .
My 8 is fully tuned on Protuner running a turbo . Happy to help .
Good idea to start off by tuning an NA car IMO .
Old 06-10-2009 | 10:14 PM
  #127  
Macius8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: chicago
yes that's my plan, just trying to learn about it as much as possible before I commit to buy. Not so much info on the pro tuner as there is on other ems's
Old 06-11-2009 | 06:07 AM
  #128  
rotarenvy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,802
Likes: 10
From: QLD .au
Originally Posted by Macius8
Great. Another question. I'm a total newb when it comes to tuning. May know how a few things work but never tuned anything in my life. How's the difficulty of learning all the basics, adjusting you own maps, etc. Have any of you started on the pro tuner? Anyone I can constantly bug for help when it comes to the pro tuner? LOL
the cobb access port and protuner are just different tools to do the same thing. whatever people claim the maps are the same. the discussion about the cobb access port is just as applicable to the protuner and vice versa.

I believe for the kit petitt use the same flashing hardware as protuner - they just don't give you the software.
Old 06-11-2009 | 06:14 AM
  #129  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by rotarenvy
the cobb access port and protuner are just different tools to do the same thing. whatever people claim the maps are the same. the discussion about the cobb access port is just as applicable to the protuner and vice versa.

I believe for the kit petitt use the same flashing hardware as protuner - they just don't give you the software.
No and no.

All flash tuning devices/software are based on the same principles, but the available tools and how they accomplish what they do is different from one system to the other.

The available maps and DTC functions between the AP and ProTuner are different (or absent) and the tuning regimen is a bit different.
You can achieve some of the same essential functions with both, but you will go about it in an entirely different way with each.

Pettit uses something entirely different.
Last I checked, they were still using the EFI Dude stuff.
Old 06-11-2009 | 06:26 AM
  #130  
rotarenvy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,802
Likes: 10
From: QLD .au
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
No and no.

All flash tuning devices/software are based on the same principles, but the available tools and how they accomplish what they do is different from one system to the other.

The available maps and DTC functions between the AP and ProTuner are different (or absent) and the tuning regimen is a bit different.
You can achieve some of the same essential functions with both, but you will go about it in an entirely different way with each.

Pettit uses something entirely different.
Last I checked, they were still using the EFI Dude stuff.
your talking ****.
I have both acesstuner and protuner and they have exactly the same maps and values.
Old 06-11-2009 | 12:13 PM
  #131  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
What are you talking about? The Hymee ProTuner stuff doesn't even mask DTCs. How is that the same?
Old 06-11-2009 | 03:38 PM
  #132  
rotarenvy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,802
Likes: 10
From: QLD .au
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
What are you talking about? The Hymee ProTuner stuff doesn't even mask DTCs. How is that the same?
your not talking about tuning differences you are talking about minor functionality. they use the same engine managment and they are just different ways to tune the same maps. each give you slightly different focus. however they are tuned the same way.

I'm confident hymee has the ability to work the DTC's out he just hasn't see it as a high priority. I don't need that functionality so they don't worry me either. if you do a search the access port has a few issues with DTC's, so it's not without fault in this regard.
Old 06-11-2009 | 03:51 PM
  #133  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
I loves me an apologist.
Old 06-11-2009 | 04:02 PM
  #134  
Brettus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,599
Likes: 1,533
From: Y-cat-o NZ
On another matter
I've been trying to resolve an issue over the last few days .
I have my maf/injector scaling to a point where target vs actual is perfect at a particular boost level - say 9psi .
If I then run at 5psi i noitce it runs about 2% richer across the board than it should. Also notice that at part throttle acceleration it runs way richer than target maybe 7-8% .

I don't see anyway I can rectify this with the maps I have been using . Wonder if the Ve maps would affect this ?
Old 06-11-2009 | 04:11 PM
  #135  
Kane's Avatar
Illudium Q-36 Space Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,364
Likes: 43
From: PCB
Temp Maybe?

Corrections for IAT may be dumping more fuel as the lower charge air is cooler...
Old 06-11-2009 | 04:24 PM
  #136  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Such is the result of using injector scaling to resolve a MAF scaling issue.

Pull some MAF in those ranges and then look at the Ve table.

Best bet is to get the idle MAF scale correct with the correct injector scaling and then work "out" from there.

Also, the closed loop fueling tables with "fix" the part throttle, <5000 RPM ranges, but they are very sensitive and prone to interaction.

On a boosted application, the IAT table needs to be completely reworked as does the BARO table.
Old 06-11-2009 | 04:47 PM
  #137  
Brettus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,599
Likes: 1,533
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Such is the result of using injector scaling to resolve a MAF scaling issue.

Pull some MAF in those ranges and then look at the Ve table.

Best bet is to get the idle MAF scale correct with the correct injector scaling and then work "out" from there.

Also, the closed loop fueling tables with "fix" the part throttle, <5000 RPM ranges, but they are very sensitive and prone to interaction.

On a boosted application, the IAT table needs to be completely reworked as does the BARO table.
This problem is with the injectors correctly scaled BTW (not the way I had it last week).
Hmmm - have not touched any of those other maps you mentioned
Old 06-11-2009 | 05:00 PM
  #138  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
How do you know the injectors are properly scaled?
Old 06-11-2009 | 05:10 PM
  #139  
Brettus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,599
Likes: 1,533
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
How do you know the injectors are properly scaled?
If they weren't I would not be able to get target vs actual lambda to match up ....
Old 06-11-2009 | 05:16 PM
  #140  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by Brettus
If they weren't I would not be able to get target vs actual lambda to match up ....
Not true.
The MAF calibration would mask this and then the injector staging comes into play.
Old 06-11-2009 | 05:52 PM
  #141  
Brettus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,599
Likes: 1,533
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Well when I scaled the injectors the change in lambda i had to make , exactly matched the % change in overall fueling . That is to say the changes to the fueling were as predicted .
Old 06-11-2009 | 06:03 PM
  #142  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by Brettus
Well when I scaled the injectors the change in lambda i had to make , exactly matched the % change in overall fueling . That is to say the changes to the fueling were as predicted .
Well, obviously not if it is over-fueling at lower loads.
You just matched the end-points.
Old 06-11-2009 | 06:09 PM
  #143  
Brettus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,599
Likes: 1,533
From: Y-cat-o NZ
How about this then - I had exactly the same issue before the injectors were scaled , when they were scaled at 1/2 way between the two settings and now that they are fully scaled .

Its only now that I have it running close to perfect under WOT that I'm looking at improving the part throttle fueling
Old 06-11-2009 | 06:15 PM
  #144  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Well, then since you've decided you have it right, adjust the things you can.
MAF scaling at 40g/sec to 100 g/sec and CL fueling A and B.
Old 06-11-2009 | 06:16 PM
  #145  
Kane's Avatar
Illudium Q-36 Space Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,364
Likes: 43
From: PCB
Brettus - have you tried the MAF tool in my software? It may help you find these kind of "holes".
Old 06-11-2009 | 06:30 PM
  #146  
Brettus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,599
Likes: 1,533
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Originally Posted by Kane
Brettus - have you tried the MAF tool in my software? It may help you find these kind of "holes".
It's more than a "hole" .
With all the playing around i've done with the maf and noting the effects - I can't see it being maf related .

Its worst at low rpm and over 100% load BTW - 3000-5000 rpm
Old 06-11-2009 | 06:37 PM
  #147  
Kane's Avatar
Illudium Q-36 Space Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,364
Likes: 43
From: PCB
Use the % to add or remove map in my software..... at least that will mark the cells where your jacked up.
Old 06-11-2009 | 06:44 PM
  #148  
Brettus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,599
Likes: 1,533
From: Y-cat-o NZ
I haven't looked at your software -sorry . Mainly because i thought i had it pretty right before you got it finished.
But I have done charts of actual vs target and they are damn near perfect at wot and 9-10 psi from 2000-8500
Old 06-11-2009 | 06:50 PM
  #149  
Kane's Avatar
Illudium Q-36 Space Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,364
Likes: 43
From: PCB
PM-ing.

Remember - my software takes in a LOT of data - not just WOT BS; so it will find areas in your map that are off.
Old 06-11-2009 | 07:50 PM
  #150  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Getting the fueling at WOT across the board means nothing about the proper calibration of either the MAF or injector scaling.
It just means you got the two related to each other enough so that the pretty little numbers in the fuel tables are equal to the output AFR.

By "100%" I assume you mean calculated load. Work in absolute.
The range you are losing it in is controlled by the CL tables.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Hymee Pro Tuner Discussion



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52 PM.