Notices
RX-8 Racing Want to discuss autocrossing, road-racing and drag racing the RX-8? Bring it here. This is NOT a kills/street racing forum.

First 1/4 mile time

Old Jun 1, 2008 | 07:24 AM
  #26  
wcs's Avatar
wcs
Thread Starter
no agenda
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,210
Likes: 66
From: Ontario
Looks like I'll be heading back to the track at the end of June early July.
This time I hope to get a least 3 runs in.

I guess we shall see how much a little practice helps, and a custom tune plus a new RP Cat.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2008 | 02:23 PM
  #27  
Mac81's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Oakville, Ontario Canada
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ecs_price.html
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2008 | 02:46 PM
  #28  
gregs's Avatar
Pull My Finger
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 19
From: So.Cal
turbo rx8 what boost where you running? that time with the nitrous doesnt seem to get much faster based on the mph
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2008 | 10:56 PM
  #29  
YaXMaNGTO's Avatar
It's a Cavalier
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 5
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by gregs
turbo rx8 what boost where you running? that time with the nitrous doesnt seem to get much faster based on the mph
I think this is your answer...
https://www.rx8club.com/showthread.p...35#post2488135

Not to go on a rant, but...
I still can't believe a 55 shot or a full turbo setup is netting a 97mph trap. For all the excuses and disappointments, there should be a balance of "factory freaks" and success stories that are difficult to replicate, but yield good quarter mile numbers. You can't find those. Nobody raises the BS flag to a quarter mile time around here, because nobody has to.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2008 | 11:40 PM
  #30  
gregs's Avatar
Pull My Finger
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 19
From: So.Cal
^^^thanks for the info....i hope 1/4 mile times get better with time even though most talk about 1/4 mile times dont matter....
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2008 | 01:01 PM
  #31  
Blackout04RX's Avatar
Need for Speed Satisfied
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Monroe, CT
the problem with the Turbo cars is probably, and this is a guess of course, traction. wcs even admitted he didnt even heat his tires up, and he started spraying in first gear, and his R/T was pretty slow off the ball. Those are obvious places to work on. Work on his R/T, DO PRE-HEAT the tires, and I have found that its best to wait till 2nd or 3rd to spray due to wheel spin. Wheels spinning looks cool, but isnt getting you there faster
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2008 | 03:23 PM
  #32  
SouthFL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Blackout04RX
the problem with the Turbo cars is probably, and this is a guess of course, traction. wcs even admitted he didnt even heat his tires up, and he started spraying in first gear, and his R/T was pretty slow off the ball. Those are obvious places to work on. Work on his R/T, DO PRE-HEAT the tires, and I have found that its best to wait till 2nd or 3rd to spray due to wheel spin. Wheels spinning looks cool, but isnt getting you there faster

R/T has nothing to do with a good Elapsed Time.
The timer does not begin to clock time until the wheels clear the beam.
Having a good R/T is important when you're running vs. an opponent, yet it has nothing to do with running against the clock.

As for the traction theory....
Even if the car was spinning off the line, 97mph trap speed is not a good indication of power being made (or lack thereof). Usually, even with poor traction, a healthy car will post a good mph trap speed at the end of the run. The dismal 60' time is probably an indication of a bog in this case. A bog will usually lower the mph at the trap.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2008 | 03:46 PM
  #33  
gregs's Avatar
Pull My Finger
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 19
From: So.Cal
those trap speed speeds seem like theres not much room for improvement
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2008 | 04:50 PM
  #34  
SouthFL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by gregs
those trap speed speeds seem like theres not much room for improvement
My guess is that the car was not tuned properly. FI + a small shot of nitrous should be in the 100+ mph trap speed range, easily.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2008 | 05:06 PM
  #35  
Blackout04RX's Avatar
Need for Speed Satisfied
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Monroe, CT
if you are running the MM turbo upgrade kit, with NO2, and at least decent setup on suspension you should be into the mid 13s easy. Stock 8's with a good driver net 14.8-14.5 depending on conditions...
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2008 | 05:14 PM
  #36  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
13's with nitrous alone on a pretty much stock car is possible.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2008 | 10:09 PM
  #37  
YaXMaNGTO's Avatar
It's a Cavalier
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 5
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by Blackout04RX
if you are running the MM turbo upgrade kit, with NO2, and at least decent setup on suspension you should be into the mid 13s easy. Stock 8's with a good driver net 14.8-14.5 depending on conditions...
Again, this has been said over, and over, and over, but where are the slips? Where are they? Everybody throws out these assumptions, and fails to prove it.

A decent setup with a turbo is yeilding a low 14. That's all I see.

Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
13's with nitrous alone on a pretty much stock car is possible.
Prove it.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Audio Concepts ATL
New Member Forum
21
Sep 26, 2021 01:59 PM
Skyl3r
New Member Forum
148
Dec 2, 2019 04:51 PM
Dokuji
Series I Trouble Shooting
8
Nov 1, 2016 02:51 PM
Solidtrance
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
22
Sep 4, 2015 12:47 PM
dbarber
Series I Trouble Shooting
14
Jul 25, 2015 01:34 PM


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:47 AM.