Notices
RX-8 Media News Report the latest RX-8 related news stories here.

Renesis 2

 
Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 06:47 PM
  #501  
rotarygod's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 26
From: Houston
Originally Posted by Renesis_8
I think the trans bolt pattern will remain the same. They seem to have increased the displacement while keeping the exterior of the housings, plates the same. Only thing changed is the decreased width of the new aluminum housings.

By doing that, they don't have to retool to mold new housings and plates. Since the coolant passages are drilled in, they could just adjust the machine to make the changes.

The coolant passages aren't drilled. They are cast.
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 06:50 PM
  #502  
Renesis_8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
thanks for correcting, I must've confused with the tension studs.
________
Web shows

Last edited by Renesis_8; Sep 11, 2011 at 01:44 PM.
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 12:31 AM
  #503  
ASH8's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,880
Likes: 340
From: Australia
I guess the 3 x Aluminum side housings would be surfaced (area where rotors sides mate/spin) with flat machined steel facing inserts.
A similar practice to an all alloy banger block with steel piston sleeve inserts.. this would maintain the durability factor for the 16X.
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 07:01 AM
  #504  
rotary crazy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
From: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Originally Posted by ASH8
I guess the 3 x Aluminum side housings would be surfaced (area where rotors sides mate/spin) with flat machined steel facing inserts.
A similar practice to an all alloy banger block with steel piston sleeve inserts.. this would maintain the durability factor for the 16X.
Yes that would be the optimun way to do it

I cant belive that they claim this engine consumes less oil with 3 oil jets per rotor
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 09:08 AM
  #505  
rotarygod's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 26
From: Houston
That actually makes sense to me. The hottest part of the apex seal is the center. The Renesis has 2 oil injectors but they point towards the sides of the rotors. This means that more oil should be needed to get the center well lubricated. The RX-7's had 4 injectors but 2 of them were centered in the housings and 2 of them were in the primary intake port runners. Oil could mix well with incoming fuel and air and distribute over a wider area mroe easily. Since Mazda wanted to run less oil in the Renesis, I suspect the side firing created many of the issues that we see. It would seem to make sense as people have reported better mileage with premix than without. This would seem to reinforce the notion that the center of the apex seals aren't getting the lubrication they need and are therefore ever so slightly warping, creating less sealing ability. With 3 oil injectors, they can get even distribution which means they wouldn't need to use as much to get the job done.
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 09:45 AM
  #506  
rotary crazy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
From: Santiago, Dominican Republic
I use premix on my RX-8 so far all comprecion checks give about the same result and my car has 190+ rwhp so the problem with oil metering is obvious

I get what you are saying, but I personally would like more oil instead of less no matter how smart or well distributed mazda's new system is, and taking into acount the larger combustion chamber and larger side seals

I just hope they get it right this time

edit: I just though of something, maybe they are using this oil jets in diferent stages, like the center one in low revs and they come on on demant, just a though

Last edited by rotary crazy; Oct 25, 2007 at 09:48 AM.
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 10:13 AM
  #507  
eviltwinkie's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 2
From: everywherez...
I don't see why they simply don't use all this direct injection technology to premix the gas, air, oil into a fuel slurry and slam it all home at 5000psi...

Heh...stop wasting time and make the MEGAJECKTOR!!!!
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 11:53 AM
  #508  
rotary crazy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
From: Santiago, Dominican Republic
the best way to go would be like many have sujested, a seperate container of 2 stroke oil with a gauge in the car so you know how much you got
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 12:19 PM
  #509  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
http://blogs.motortrend.com/6219459/...ting-for-rx-7/
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 12:57 PM
  #510  
rotary crazy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
From: Santiago, Dominican Republic
good news and bad news

I did like the part about the rx-8 getting the 16x


Why would mazda pull back the engine??????

Last edited by rotary crazy; Oct 25, 2007 at 01:02 PM.
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 01:09 PM
  #511  
Ajax's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
From: Lewisville, TX
Originally Posted by rotary crazy
good news and bad news

I did like the part about the rx-8 getting the 16x


Why would mazda pull back the engine??????
If it really was hidden in plain sight, then that's typical for Mazda. They've been doing that every year at 7stock.
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 01:12 PM
  #512  
chiketkd's Avatar
Row faster, I hear banjos
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 2
From: Charlottesville, VA
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by rotary crazy
I did like the part about the rx-8 getting the 16x
+1 I really hope that happens as well!!!

While Mazda doesn't talk about future product, the company clearly sees the light, and would like to replace the four-door, rear-seat RX-8 with a two-seat RX-7. The Taiki two-seater features the new, more powerful 16X rotary, which wasn't unveiled at the Tokyo Motor Show, as expected, although presumably it's hiding in plain sight under the engine shroud of the Premacy hybrid hydrogen rotary that made its debut here. The engine will help Mazda sustain its miniscule RX-8 sales figures for the next few years.
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 01:25 PM
  #513  
eviltwinkie's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 2
From: everywherez...
FI your current 8...wait until the 2nd gen RX-9...sell off the 8 to some newb...get the 9...rinse and repeat...
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 02:16 PM
  #514  
rotary crazy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
From: Santiago, Dominican Republic
they did show it

https://www.rx8club.com/showthread.p...17#post2113717
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 02:17 PM
  #515  
Red Devil's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 1
From: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Originally Posted by eviltwinkie
FI your current 8...wait until the 2nd gen RX-9...sell off the 8 to some newb...get the 9...rinse and repeat...
My plans exactly!
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 02:28 PM
  #516  
eviltwinkie's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 2
From: everywherez...
Originally Posted by Red Devil
My plans exactly!
And this is why your my homie...

;p
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 02:54 PM
  #517  
shaunv74's Avatar
Power!!
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 3
From: Sunny See attle
To piggyback on top of this discussion more injection ports for oil will allow you to more accurately place oil where it is needed so you actually could use less because the system is more efficient at distributing oil.

If you think about it the amount of pre-mix one would use compared to the amount of oil being directly injected is much higher per rev. 1qt=~2Kmiles vs. pre-mix 1qt every 3-4 tanks ~750-1k miles depending on the amount you put in and mileage. (And that is on top of OMP). Less oil will be better for emissions.

Pre-mix is kinda the banging rocks together approach and oil injection is more of the using tools approach. Still not perfect yet but I suspect we'll see improvements based on knowledge gained from Renesis problems.
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 03:05 PM
  #518  
rotary crazy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
From: Santiago, Dominican Republic
I just hope they solve the problem

a little bird told me that the renesis 1.5 has more oil jets as well
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 03:07 PM
  #519  
eviltwinkie's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 2
From: everywherez...
5000psi Slurry Direct Injection FTMFW!!

Haa...

Till then...yeah I would imagine better distribution would lead to higher efficiency...
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 03:41 PM
  #520  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon


Old Oct 25, 2007 | 03:43 PM
  #521  
rotary crazy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
From: Santiago, Dominican Republic
love the diference in the 16x and 13b rotors
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 03:53 PM
  #522  
rotarygod's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 26
From: Houston
Oh sweet it is there!
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 06:04 PM
  #523  
LionZoo's Avatar
road warrior
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 3
From: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
I hope they show it at the LA Autoshow.
Old Oct 26, 2007 | 05:20 AM
  #524  
fmzambon's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 164
Likes: 3
From: Reggio Emilia - Italy
...The engine will help Mazda sustain its miniscule RX-8 sales figures for the next few years.
Wait wait wait: it doesn't say that the engine is going in the rx-8, it says that it will help in sustaining the rx-8 sales. There's a big difference. It could very well be that this help is purely a marketing help, something like:
"Hey, look at our new shiny engine; it's very powerful and fuel efficient and etc etc... But it's not yet available. If you want to see how it feels, you can always buy this Rx-8 with its Renesis rotary..."

Sad, but until I see official Mazda news reporting that the 16x will go in the 8, I won't believe it.
Old Oct 26, 2007 | 06:56 AM
  #525  
altspace's Avatar
Eccentric Shafting
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,649
Likes: 0
From: Cape Cod
Uh....ok? I'm not thinking they put all that R&D just to have a model piece.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:45 AM.