Notices
RX-8 Media News Report the latest RX-8 related news stories here.

Renesis 2

 
Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 2, 2007 | 06:39 PM
  #326  
DOMINION's Avatar
I don't buy Kool-Aid
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,823
Likes: 2
From: Vegas Baby!
Originally Posted by dillsrotary
Mazda has been doing alot of "Full windshield/roof glass" concepts, I just waiting for them to put that into production.
The new Porsche has one. Sex on wheels. Oh and it comes in white Come on Mazda
Old Oct 2, 2007 | 07:12 PM
  #327  
Endgame's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by bulletproof21
^ It does, but that ship was bad *** so no complaints here.
Aman to that!
Old Oct 2, 2007 | 11:38 PM
  #328  
Rootski's Avatar
DGAF
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by Endgame
Is it just me or does this resemble the UFO from Flight of the Navigator??
"Kids, get away from the UFO, they don't have insurance in places like this."

I used to love that movie...
Old Oct 3, 2007 | 10:54 AM
  #329  
Design1stCode2nd's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Even at 300hp in the current RX8 assuming a similar weight of 2,900-3,000lbs its only going to be competitive for 2008/9. It will still be a good car, much better than the performance we have now but will not be class leading. It will have to contend with a new 370z, 135i, STI/Evo, Camaro, Challenger, new Mustang and so forth. Some of these will put out over 400hp or are highly tunable to produce more power.

If Mazda wants this to gain general acceptance it needs to be bulletproof. No chance of flooding, separate reservoir for oil with a real oil gauge, improved MPG and power/weight ratio that surpasses the competition or at least be increased as the design ages.

Even then it will take years of excellent reliability for people to begin to adopt it compared to proven piston technology.

Don’t get me wrong I think it’s great that they are continuing with the rotary. We need all the new thinking we can get.
Old Oct 5, 2007 | 11:57 PM
  #330  
Aipex8's Avatar
X e p i A
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 5
From: Vancouver, WA
A pic of the 16X:

http://www.mazda.com/motorshow/techn...sis/index.html

Old Oct 6, 2007 | 07:26 AM
  #331  
Spin9k's Avatar
Momentum Keeps Me Going
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 5
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by Aipex8
Is that some type of combustion chamber insert on the rotor face? ...or just a reflection? ...would an insert allow them to make a deeper cavity? ... higher strength material? ...and increased displacement?
Old Oct 6, 2007 | 08:04 AM
  #332  
rotary crazy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
From: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Need A Better Pic!!!
Old Oct 6, 2007 | 09:09 AM
  #333  
Endgame's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by Rootski
"Kids, get away from the UFO, they don't have insurance in places like this."

I used to love that movie...
LOL!!! I love that part. I will admit, I bought in on DVD for old times sake... In fact, I think i will use the excuse my daughters want to watch it and put it in now. See ya later Navigator!
Old Oct 6, 2007 | 10:49 AM
  #334  
mac11's Avatar
Rotary , eh?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,850
Likes: 1
From: Elkhart, IN
Originally Posted by Design1stCode2nd
Even at 300hp in the current RX8 assuming a similar weight of 2,900-3,000lbs its only going to be competitive for 2008/9. It will still be a good car, much better than the performance we have now but will not be class leading. It will have to contend with a new 370z, 135i, STI/Evo, Camaro, Challenger, new Mustang and so forth. Some of these will put out over 400hp or are highly tunable to produce more power.

and the 135i will be the only car within 500lbs of the weight, IF the weight stays the same in the car that the new motor goes into (doubtful). BTW, I wouldn't expect this motor in an 08/09 model.

Originally Posted by Design1stCode2nd
If Mazda wants this to gain general acceptance it needs to be bulletproof. No chance of flooding, separate reservoir for oil with a real oil gauge, improved MPG and power/weight ratio that surpasses the competition or at least be increased as the design ages.
how is the bolded point going to help it gain general acceptance and why do you think mazda wants it to?

Originally Posted by Design1stCode2nd
Even then it will take years of excellent reliability for people to begin to adopt it compared to proven piston technology.
again, what makes you think Mazda is trying to make this more than a niche car?
Old Oct 6, 2007 | 10:50 AM
  #335  
mac11's Avatar
Rotary , eh?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,850
Likes: 1
From: Elkhart, IN
Originally Posted by rotary crazy
Need A Better Pic!!!
It sure doesn't have a turbo, does it?!? Good news for sure!

my notes:

Is that a single top mount injector?
still 2 spark plugs.
rotor shape looks very similar still but its a low res shot
no more Siamese port! That means the port configurations has changed, at least on the hot side, so porting may again be an easy power adder!
Looks like there are exhaust ports on the end plates AND the rotor housings.
Looks to me like a 6 port intake and 6port exhaust.


This thing is going to be very interesting when we start getting some real info about it.

Last edited by mac11; Oct 6, 2007 at 11:01 AM.
Old Oct 6, 2007 | 11:12 AM
  #336  
Mazmart's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,794
Likes: 67
Thanks Aipex8 for the first 16x pics that I've seen. I noticed a few things of interest including, only 2 spark plugs per chamber. I say "only" beccause some of us would have liked to see 3.

Paul.
Old Oct 6, 2007 | 11:14 AM
  #337  
Mazmart's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,794
Likes: 67
Mac11, you beat me to it!

Paul.
Old Oct 6, 2007 | 11:34 AM
  #338  
Endgame's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by Design1stCode2nd
Even at 300hp in the current RX8 assuming a similar weight of 2,900-3,000lbs its only going to be competitive for 2008/9. It will still be a good car, much better than the performance we have now but will not be class leading. It will have to contend with a new 370z, 135i, STI/Evo, Camaro, Challenger, new Mustang and so forth. Some of these will put out over 400hp or are highly tunable to produce more power.
Let's see:
135i - 3440
370z - 3400 at least, even with the shorter wheelbase
STI/Evo - 3400ish
Camaro - 3700
Challenger 3650
Mustang 3550 at least

We have to remember the RX cars are not straight line cars. Granted the competitors will have more HP and torque, that is a lot of weight to push around a track; although the 135i looks great on a road course! I am not conviced we will see another RX8. I think the 8 will be retired and we will see a two door coupe weighing in at 2700-2800 pounds. And, to some of the comments listed on another thread, it appears the design of this new engine will be more friendly for power adders. I would place my money on a 2700 pound, 350 HP RX car over a tuned Z, 135i, Maro, or Stang on the track. I would argue that the GTR's should not think they would own a RX car on the track with those numbers...
Old Oct 6, 2007 | 12:34 PM
  #339  
CERAMICSEAL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
From: atlanta ga
Originally Posted by Endgame
Let's see:
135i - 3440
370z - 3400 at least, even with the shorter wheelbase
STI/Evo - 3400ish
Camaro - 3700
Challenger 3650
Mustang 3550 at least

We have to remember the RX cars are not straight line cars. Granted the competitors will have more HP and torque, that is a lot of weight to push around a track; although the 135i looks great on a road course! I am not conviced we will see another RX8. I think the 8 will be retired and we will see a two door coupe weighing in at 2700-2800 pounds. And, to some of the comments listed on another thread, it appears the design of this new engine will be more friendly for power adders. I would place my money on a 2700 pound, 350 HP RX car over a tuned Z, 135i, Maro, or Stang on the track. I would argue that the GTR's should not think they would own a RX car on the track with those numbers...
I'll be the first on this site to make the prediction that we'll see 2 rotary cars, an RX-8 and an RX-7 using the 16X
Old Oct 6, 2007 | 12:53 PM
  #340  
Endgame's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
I hope you are right and I am wrong!
Old Oct 6, 2007 | 01:05 PM
  #341  
grnsharingan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: humble, tx
well they did say that the car would seat 5 adults in the rotorynews article...
Old Oct 6, 2007 | 01:10 PM
  #342  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
you mis read the article- read it again
Old Oct 6, 2007 | 01:11 PM
  #343  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon



im just giddy about all that aluminum. cant wait for more pics. i need to get me a press kit. ill work on that monday.
Old Oct 6, 2007 | 01:21 PM
  #344  
rotary crazy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
From: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Originally Posted by CERAMICSEAL
I'll be the first on this site to make the prediction that we'll see 2 rotary cars, an RX-8 and an RX-7 using the 16X
Againg we are on the same line of thoug, I think the rx-8 its too succesfull to retire, and a rx-7 type car is a too good of a thing to just ignore
Old Oct 6, 2007 | 01:25 PM
  #345  
rotary crazy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
From: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Originally Posted by mac11
It sure doesn't have a turbo, does it?!? Good news for sure!

my notes:

Is that a single top mount injector?
still 2 spark plugs.
rotor shape looks very similar still but its a low res shot
no more Siamese port! That means the port configurations has changed, at least on the hot side, so porting may again be an easy power adder!
Looks like there are exhaust ports on the end plates AND the rotor housings.
Looks to me like a 6 port intake and 6port exhaust.


This thing is going to be very interesting when we start getting some real info about it.
Any prediction on weight? I think it may be even lightter than the renesis
Old Oct 6, 2007 | 01:34 PM
  #346  
Renesis_8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
it should be lighter than the renesis, the size isnt all that bigger. Iron weights a lot! My prediction is that this will be around 40lbs lighter than 13B-MSP.

Oh, how is it no more siamese ports? you can tell from the picture?

Also I think they changed the shape of the rotor dishes, to suit the DI injector more. If its not reflection, I think the top of the rotor dish is shaped to guide the fuel onto the dish.


Its 6 port intake and 3 port exhaust, same as Renesis. The "holes" on the rotor housings arent exhaust ports, they cut the "holes" to shave unnecessary weight off.
________
Web Shows

Last edited by Renesis_8; Sep 11, 2011 at 01:23 PM.
Old Oct 6, 2007 | 01:40 PM
  #347  
Renesis_8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by rotary crazy
Againg we are on the same line of thoug, I think the rx-8 its too succesfull to retire, and a rx-7 type car is a too good of a thing to just ignore
same here, since they're retooling so much for the 16X, it has got to go into more than 1 car.

Also, have any of you thought of flooding yet? With DI I don't think we'll ever flood again.

And are they going to retire the 13B forever after the introduction of 16X. What about racing engines? Sideports are not as good as PP no matter how they improve it. Will we ever see a 16X periperal port race engine? R16X? R21X? R32X!!!!! (Monster with 1000hp...)
________
Bubbler

Last edited by Renesis_8; Sep 11, 2011 at 01:23 PM.
Old Oct 6, 2007 | 01:54 PM
  #348  
rotary crazy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
From: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Originally Posted by Renesis_8
same here, since they're retooling so much for the 16X, it has got to go into more than 1 car.

Also, have any of you thought of flooding yet? With DI I don't think we'll ever flood again.

And are they going to retire the 13B forever after the introduction of 16X. What about racing engines? Sideports are not as good as PP no matter how they improve it. Will we ever see a 16X periperal port race engine? R16X? R21X? R32X!!!!! (Monster with 1000hp...)
800cc x 2 = 1600cc
800cc x 3 = 2400cc
800cc x 4 = 3200cc

Old Oct 6, 2007 | 02:02 PM
  #349  
Renesis_8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada


________
LIVE SEX

Last edited by Renesis_8; Sep 11, 2011 at 01:23 PM.
Old Oct 6, 2007 | 03:14 PM
  #350  
robrecht's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,932
Likes: 0
From: Hunterdon County
Originally Posted by CERAMICSEAL
I'll be the first on this site to make the prediction that we'll see 2 rotary cars, an RX-8 and an RX-7 using the 16X
I'm sure there must have been others before me.

But as my college roommate used to say, "If wishes and buts were candy and nuts, then everyday would be Christmas."


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:14 AM.