Notices
RX-8 Media News Report the latest RX-8 related news stories here.

Facelifted RX8 revealed!!!!

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-14-2008, 06:29 PM
  #826  
Registered
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
I personally think a 4.77:1 rear end is a huge mistake on Mazda's part. I feel taht way about the 4.44:1 though. The car needs a 4.10:1 or go back to a 5 speed tranny. It's already got too much. More isn't better.
rotarygod is offline  
Old 01-14-2008, 06:49 PM
  #827  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,528
Received 1,494 Likes on 842 Posts
Originally Posted by rotarygod
. It's already got too much.
Too much what RG ?
4.77 with an overdrive 6th would be perfect for my use
Brettus is offline  
Old 01-14-2008, 06:52 PM
  #828  
Registered
 
Decat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BeefyBen
Seat Warmers?
Yes probably and the Recaros in some Porsche and my Vehicross had an optional fan to increase flow through the seats great in Houston summers, maybe possible but I am not holding my breath.
Decat is offline  
Old 01-14-2008, 07:22 PM
  #829  
Registered
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by Brettus
Too much what RG ?
4.77 with an overdrive 6th would be perfect for my use
You like driving at redline on the freeway and hate gas mileage? I'm exagerrating of course but the engine already spins far too fast for the speed the car is traveling. If you only use it as a track car, then I could see it as being useful. 4:10 would have been better but they need to compensate for the fact the RX-8 is a fat heavy pig of a vehicle for it's power level.
rotarygod is offline  
Old 01-14-2008, 07:27 PM
  #830  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,528
Received 1,494 Likes on 842 Posts
Originally Posted by rotarygod
the RX-8 is a fat heavy pig of a vehicle .
my new sig
Brettus is offline  
Old 01-14-2008, 07:31 PM
  #831  
Registered User
 
Renesis_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
we don't know if it has a different 6th gear ratio.
________
hot girls Cam

Last edited by Renesis_8; 09-11-2011 at 02:25 PM.
Renesis_8 is offline  
Old 01-14-2008, 08:04 PM
  #832  
Go Texas Longhorns!
 
brillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There is alot we don't know at this point. It would appear Mazda made changes, rear end (hopefully tranny gearing), exhaust, prolly the cat and ECU, to get the car more average power. I bet when dyno'd the car is now slightly under rated, rather than over rated. Mazda likely didn't want to go through the brain damage and PR of re rating the car again, rather choose to get more average power and let the results speak for themselves in the magazine reviews. I bet the car dyno's around 203whp now.

Mazda prolly got another 10-12 peak whp out of the car, but from a marketing perspective, thats not going to make a HP junkie decide he doesn't want a Z anymore.

Mazda has to have changed the tranny ratios to compensate for the rear end, or the mileage is going to ****. If they didn't I'm going to be shocked....
brillo is offline  
Old 01-14-2008, 09:11 PM
  #833  
Registered
 
spooledUP7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Camarillo, Ca
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rotarygod
You like driving at redline on the freeway and hate gas mileage? I'm exagerrating of course but the engine already spins far too fast for the speed the car is traveling. If you only use it as a track car, then I could see it as being useful. 4:10 would have been better but they need to compensate for the fact the RX-8 is a fat heavy pig of a vehicle for it's power level.
I have been saying this since I picked up my 07. It needs a taller final drive, or rear diff. 4K @ 80 is retarded.
spooledUP7 is offline  
Old 01-14-2008, 09:17 PM
  #834  
The Prototype
 
DailyDriver2k5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by brillo
There is alot we don't know at this point. It would appear Mazda made changes, rear end (hopefully tranny gearing), exhaust, prolly the cat and ECU, to get the car more average power. I bet when dyno'd the car is now slightly under rated, rather than over rated. Mazda likely didn't want to go through the brain damage and PR of re rating the car again, rather choose to get more average power and let the results speak for themselves in the magazine reviews. I bet the car dyno's around 203whp now.

Mazda prolly got another 10-12 peak whp out of the car, but from a marketing perspective, thats not going to make a HP junkie decide he doesn't want a Z anymore.

Mazda has to have changed the tranny ratios to compensate for the rear end, or the mileage is going to ****. If they didn't I'm going to be shocked....
Very true.... i have a feeling Mazda underated the new RX-8, I read an article saying that it now scoots under 6 seconds without great effort. Our current RX-8 in order to get under 6 sec 0-60 you woud have to tach it higher 6k +rpms and let her rip.

If the RX-8 gets 203whp in theroy, that meens the RX-8 would be producing close to 250HP. My 2002 Maxima Se 6 speed in stock form with 255HP 245/trq put out 210 WHP on the dyno, other Maxima drivers were in the range of 205-212whp depending on elevation, condition,etc. I say that to say this, if the next RX-8 produces close to that number of 203 WHP with less weight , the RX-8 is going to be a quick SOB! a stock 2002 Max as a refrence runs the 1/4 in 14. 5-14.7 with 3220 lbs, a quicker lighter RX-8 would definitely be knocking on the low 14 mark.... could Mazda have gotten it right finally?
DailyDriver2k5 is offline  
Old 01-14-2008, 09:24 PM
  #835  
w8nkel
 
BigRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 2,317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DailyDriver2k5
Very true.... i have a feeling Mazda underated the new RX-8, I read an article saying that it now scoots under 6 seconds without great effort. Our current RX-8 in order to get under 6 sec 0-60 you woud have to tach it higher 6k +rpms and let her rip.

If the RX-8 gets 203whp in theroy, that meens the RX-8 would be producing close to 250HP. My 2002 Maxima Se 6 speed in stock form with 255HP 245/trq put out 210 WHP on the dyno, other Maxima drivers were in the range of 205-212whp depending on elevation, condition,etc. I say that to say this, if the next RX-8 produces close to that number of 203 WHP with less weight , the RX-8 is going to be a quick SOB! a stock 2002 Max as a refrence runs the 1/4 in 14. 5-14.7 with 3220 lbs, a quicker lighter RX-8 would definitely be knocking on the low 14 mark.... could Mazda have gotten it right finally?
tbc... we shall know soon
BigRed is offline  
Old 01-14-2008, 09:33 PM
  #836  
Mulligan User
iTrader: (1)
 
ZoomZoomH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: caddyshack
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by BigRed
tbc... we shall know soon
I smell RX-8 horsepower scandal buyback plan part deux!!!
ZoomZoomH is offline  
Old 01-14-2008, 09:36 PM
  #837  
w8nkel
 
BigRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 2,317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ha rofl ^
BigRed is offline  
Old 01-14-2008, 10:48 PM
  #838  
T n C mEmBeR
 
CoNsRx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: cLiFtOn,Nj
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
anyone know what colors are going to be available??
CoNsRx7 is offline  
Old 01-14-2008, 11:20 PM
  #839  
Grand Chancellor
 
delhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Home of the NIMBYs
Posts: 2,730
Received 58 Likes on 47 Posts
Originally Posted by DailyDriver2k5
Very true.... i have a feeling Mazda underated the new RX-8, I read an article saying that it now scoots under 6 seconds without great effort. Our current RX-8 in order to get under 6 sec 0-60 you woud have to tach it higher 6k +rpms and let her rip.
this also applies to the S2k. Without revving it up, the s2k is a dog. There was a huge thing back in the day about it.
delhi is offline  
Old 01-14-2008, 11:53 PM
  #840  
Shifty Bastard.
 
Gomez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia.
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rotarygod
You like driving at redline on the freeway and hate gas mileage? I'm exagerrating of course but the engine already spins far too fast for the speed the car is traveling. If you only use it as a track car, then I could see it as being useful. 4:10 would have been better but they need to compensate for the fact the RX-8 is a fat heavy pig of a vehicle for it's power level.

Really, you ought to actually drive one before you make ridiculous comments like this.
Gomez is offline  
Old 01-14-2008, 11:56 PM
  #841  
Shifty Bastard.
 
Gomez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia.
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...and I'm talking about the 2003-2007 build cars, not the 2008 build ones.
Gomez is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 12:13 AM
  #842  
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Razz1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cali
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The bulge in the headlight is horrible.
I don't like the look of the front either. They are bigger, more like bug eyes.

Sure love those seats.

I wonder if I could get in and out of those?
Razz1 is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 12:23 AM
  #843  
Registered User
 
duga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did anybody happen to see or read if the gauges are going to go to regular backlight or keep the glowing gauges? electroluminescent

Last edited by duga; 01-15-2008 at 08:09 AM.
duga is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 12:34 AM
  #844  
Registered User
 
pianoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Aurora/Montgomery IL
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who cares anyhow...

This car will only be around for a short while unless Mazda can pull 30mpg out of it...

Handling and good brakes will only go so far..Driving at Laguna Seca with the rev's up and cutting through the corners like hot **** in snow is great except that I-90 isn't a track....Maybe its because I don't live in the mountain's and I live in flat corn land..But why does a Sti still handles great,(you can even get steering racks with 12-10.5:1 ratios..) with power, and their owners can get 26-28mpg's on the highway? ..I read it in their gas mileage threads...The 8 is light, nimble, looks great and has the gas mileage of my brothers Titan. I'm so tired of seeing 8's getting there *** handed to them from RSX's and Srt-4's and 350's and my grandma sitting in a chair....sleeping....I know I know, its not a straight line car..I get it..BUT Neither is my prelude...

Before you yell at me for stating facts and tell me to go buy an Sti...or tell me to go buy something else if I want to go fast in a straight line...Just know that I can appreciate a good handling car, hence why I have a 1991 Honda prelude with 4WS.. Why does my Honda have more torque then the 8? How come I can get 30+mpg's on the highway... I'm just pissed at Mazda...This car company, who made what I feel is a replacement for the FC not the FD, is trying to cover up the 13b with less weight and different gearing...The 13b is a great motor, it spins very smoothly and has quite a linear power curve.... but Mazda really needs to ante up... Not like they really care anyhow...seeing how they treat their customers by throwing away the customer dealer report cards, and having their motors rebuilt and fail agian....

Mazda FTL

Last edited by pianoman; 01-15-2008 at 12:40 AM.
pianoman is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 01:08 AM
  #845  
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Razz1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cali
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
^ You been drinkn that corn alcohol agin?

Or did you send some to Mazda R&D?
Razz1 is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 01:53 AM
  #846  
Registered User
 
pianoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Aurora/Montgomery IL
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More just zoom zoom disgruntled...
pianoman is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 02:43 AM
  #847  
Registered User
 
R Magic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone know what this new button on the door handle is?

R Magic is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 02:50 AM
  #848  
Illudium Q-36 Space Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: PCB
Posts: 6,364
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Unlocks the door - the 2007 have them too.

You have a credit card key thing and prox sensor - so when you walk up to your car and push the button it will unlock; the trunk has one too.

And I have mine programmed to auto lock whenever I walk away too.

Last edited by Kane; 01-15-2008 at 02:53 AM.
Kane is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 02:54 AM
  #849  
Registered User
 
R Magic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Kane, I didn't know that since I've never seen it on any RX-8.
R Magic is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 02:55 AM
  #850  
Registered User
 
enforcer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
QUOTE...Rotarygod..."You like driving at redline on the freeway and hate gas mileage? I'm exagerrating of course but the engine already spins far too fast for the speed the car is traveling. If you only use it as a track car, then I could see it as being useful. 4:10 would have been better but they need to compensate for the fact the RX-8 is a fat heavy pig of a vehicle for it's power level."

Originally Posted by Gomez
Really, you ought to actually drive one before you make ridiculous comments like this.
I concur with you on that Gomez....the Renesis is only 13" (45 cm) tall and and pound for pound you won't find many piston engines that can match it. When you also consider the changes over the years, this new model has got some signficant developments....(stats from RX8Club.com.au site)

2004
Sump Changed
Windscreen washer water bottle changed from black to clear (Late 04)
Green indicator arrows changed from green to yellow/green colour within dash

2005
Starter Motor Changed
Sunroof model added
Lightning Yellow removed
Flick key provided as standard
Limited Edition RX-8s available in Ebony Black (ie. Cherry/Coca-Cola colour) and Titanium Gr

2006
Changes to leather seats
Snowflake White Pearl added
Galaxy Grey replaces Titanium Grey
Stormy Blue added
Phantom Blue replaces Nordic Green?

2007
Reduction of Power by 7kw
3rd Oil Seal added*
change to side seals*
Lightning Yellow removed

2008
A longer list which is growing by the day...

Last edited by enforcer; 01-15-2008 at 03:02 AM. Reason: List updated
enforcer is offline  


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Facelifted RX8 revealed!!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 PM.