Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

RX8 and the New Civic

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old May 8, 2008 | 01:32 PM
  #176  
neXib's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 635
Likes: 1
From: Norway
Originally Posted by LionZoo
FWD's main disadvantage is on corner exit as the wheel doing the turning is suddenly also being asked to do the accelerating. You certainly don't need 300 hp to see the issues; my 180 hp Celica GT-S simply did not want to come out of a corner on the power. I had to play a waiting game with that car until it was pretty much all straightened out, or else I'd get bad inside wheelspin. By comparison, the RX-8 is absolutely rock solid on corner exit.
I haven't driven a RX-8 yet, am waiting for mine

Though I have seen that somewhat newer FWD cars have suspension designs that regulate the issue you talk about. I think I read that among others in the Mazda 3 MPS (Mazdaspeed) reviews. Celica probably doesn't have that though, but all cars aren't the same. Although in theory you are of course right.
Reply
Old May 8, 2008 | 01:39 PM
  #177  
RedefineRX8's Avatar
Super-impreza!
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
From: SoCal/NY
Originally Posted by F22C1
Oh silly me... I forgot that because RWD lost it must of have been that the particular RWD vehicle wasn't modified/setup to compete and win races Yes the team is obviously racing for it's 'health'. We should all think this way and pass on our rwd defeats as such excuses (as if the RWD layout isn't enough of "advantage" therefore it's ego needs an 'excuse').

The examples I cited it just to clearly dispel the perception in this thread that RWD guarantees you a victory. RWD is a double edge sword and it does have it's compromises.
You still don't get it. I wasn't saying any of that, more so pointing out that the comparisons you made make no valid point in this conversation. So just stop posting, you are just making yourself look more stupid. My last car was an Integra Type R, I'm not sitting here bashing on those cars, just that you are an idiot for comparing the cars that you did from that program and applying it to this conversation. just stop.
Reply
Old May 8, 2008 | 01:50 PM
  #178  
Eric1987's Avatar
Thread Starter
Wanna be 8 owner
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach, California
Originally Posted by LionZoo
Now here we have a bit of an issue. It seems the general consensus among those that have owned both cars is that the RX-8 is a better handling car than the Prelude SH. Granted "handling" is such a nebulous term, but overall people have given the edge to the RX-8 in terms of turn-in, balance, grip, breakaway, exit, and transient characteristics so I think the RX-8 has the Prelude SH pretty well covered.
Oh I'm not saying that isnt the truth. But the post I was referring to stated thats why the RX8 is faster. If thats the truth then the Type SH is faster than the Si and a lot of things. Suspension rarely makes a big difference in a drag.
Reply
Old May 8, 2008 | 02:37 PM
  #179  
krush7's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: socal
Originally Posted by Eric1987
Oh I'm not saying that isnt the truth. But the post I was referring to stated thats why the RX8 is faster. If thats the truth then the Type SH is faster than the Si and a lot of things. Suspension rarely makes a big difference in a drag.
softer rear = more traction
Reply
Old May 8, 2008 | 02:56 PM
  #180  
F22C1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by RedefineRX8
You still don't get it. I wasn't saying any of that, more so pointing out that the comparisons you made make no valid point in this conversation. So just stop posting, you are just making yourself look more stupid. My last car was an Integra Type R, I'm not sitting here bashing on those cars, just that you are an idiot for comparing the cars that you did from that program and applying it to this conversation. just stop.

Who said I was bashing cars?! If anything I am actually pointing out some merits that stand up for the FWD underdog.

and your apples to oranges argument doesn't work if RWD already has the upper hand towards ensuring victory and still loses... it just makes it all the worse.

And why would 2 modified cars going against each other to battle it out for drive train supremacy be invalidated? Oh right... people don't modify their cars anymore...
Reply
Old May 8, 2008 | 03:16 PM
  #181  
05rx8mazda's Avatar
B.I.G
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 1
From: AT---EIL
Originally Posted by Eric1987
Rofl a stock GS-T will NOT beat an RX8. That was the competition for the 5th Gen Prelude. And without SOME sort of mods there is no way in ******* hell a Civic SI got 14.1. Weight reduction or something but no way in **** COMPLETELY stock 14.1 The fastest I've seen was 14.8 with slicks. 14.9 Power shifting without slicks.
look it up man.. i think it dynoed at like 188 at the wheels and 133 TQ at the wheels completely stock!

But seriosuly a stock GST WILL beat a rx8 but wont crush it..

1st gear the 8 pulls
2nd 8 pulls
3rd even
4th eclipse begine to creep
and BARELY beats rx8 plus we didnt even Boost launch or W.e its called.. we had to wait for the turbo to spool but they are both quick!

the eclipse has 200HP and 214 TQ!

its a close run very close the 8 wins but in the long run the eclipse creeps right up the back of a rx8..

oh and BTW my car had CAI, Power pulleys and cat back exhaust..... the eclipse was stock it just had new air filter, new clutcha nd resurfaced flywheel and new coolant and a rebuilt motor along with a REBUILT head..

I miss my DSM!!!!!!!

anyways I like MR2's the 93's 94's i think they look soo nice especialy the white ones witht he T top
Reply
Old May 8, 2008 | 03:19 PM
  #182  
LionZoo's Avatar
road warrior
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 3
From: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
Originally Posted by neXib
I haven't driven a RX-8 yet, am waiting for mine

Though I have seen that somewhat newer FWD cars have suspension designs that regulate the issue you talk about. I think I read that among others in the Mazda 3 MPS (Mazdaspeed) reviews. Celica probably doesn't have that though, but all cars aren't the same. Although in theory you are of course right.
The MPS' "feature" is bleeding off boost pressure in the lower gears so that the torque doesn't overwhelm the front tires. A limited slip diff also helps a FWD car out of corners. While the Celica didn't have either of those features, it didn't change the physics of FWD cars, which is that the front wheels are asked to do too much and as you accelerate out of a corner you transfer weight rearward, which in a FWD is exactly what you don't want to do.
Reply
Old May 8, 2008 | 03:20 PM
  #183  
05rx8mazda's Avatar
B.I.G
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 1
From: AT---EIL
HERES THE LINK if you dont believe.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=fhWttLZ0EmU
Reply
Old May 8, 2008 | 03:42 PM
  #184  
Eric1987's Avatar
Thread Starter
Wanna be 8 owner
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach, California
Originally Posted by 05rx8mazda
look it up man.. i think it dynoed at like 188 at the wheels and 133 TQ at the wheels completely stock!

But seriosuly a stock GST WILL beat a rx8 but wont crush it..

1st gear the 8 pulls
2nd 8 pulls
3rd even
4th eclipse begine to creep
and BARELY beats rx8 plus we didnt even Boost launch or W.e its called.. we had to wait for the turbo to spool but they are both quick!

the eclipse has 200HP and 214 TQ!

its a close run very close the 8 wins but in the long run the eclipse creeps right up the back of a rx8..

oh and BTW my car had CAI, Power pulleys and cat back exhaust..... the eclipse was stock it just had new air filter, new clutcha nd resurfaced flywheel and new coolant and a rebuilt motor along with a REBUILT head..

I miss my DSM!!!!!!!

anyways I like MR2's the 93's 94's i think they look soo nice especialy the white ones witht he T top
No they will not. Go compare times and come back to me. And to the person who posted that video I dont believe it. If I posted a video of an RX8 doing that would you believe it?
Reply
Old May 8, 2008 | 03:52 PM
  #185  
RojoOcho's Avatar
Greensboro's Finest
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
From: Greensboro, NC
Awesome driver.
Reply
Old May 8, 2008 | 05:08 PM
  #186  
neXib's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 635
Likes: 1
From: Norway
Originally Posted by LionZoo
The MPS' "feature" is bleeding off boost pressure in the lower gears so that the torque doesn't overwhelm the front tires. A limited slip diff also helps a FWD car out of corners. While the Celica didn't have either of those features, it didn't change the physics of FWD cars, which is that the front wheels are asked to do too much and as you accelerate out of a corner you transfer weight rearward, which in a FWD is exactly what you don't want to do.
Thanks for the insight. Yeah, I knew it couldn't change the law of physics
Reply
Old May 8, 2008 | 10:03 PM
  #187  
CarAndDriver's Avatar
2005 Black RX-8 GT 6M
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,350
Likes: 0
From: San Jose Area
Lets go for 9 useless pages.
Reply
Old May 9, 2008 | 02:23 AM
  #188  
TrochoidMagic's Avatar
is adjusting valve lash
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 0
From: hollywooood!
Originally Posted by LionZoo
Because a Civic Si is more practical (bigger interior, bigger trunk, MUCH bigger trunk opening <- key) and gets better gas mileage. Not to mention a Si is actually better equipped than a base RX-8. I mean you might as well apply to your argument to be "the RX-8 outhandles a Camry for a similar price, why would you ever want to buy a Camry?" All of these cars are at different points of the practicality/fun trade-off curve.

The Integra Type R, stock for stock, is faster than a RX-8 on track.

And Richard, the S2000 engines have oil consumption rates about similar to that of a typical Renesis engine.
^^ lion, funny how i wanted to use the type R as a example compare. but it seems like you beat me to it. and i agree with all that you said.

someone asked, "does civic even have double wish-bone?".
why wouldn't it??? rx-8 is only double in the front and multi-link in the rear!
seems like the very negative comments only come from those who don't even do their homework...

and i hate to agree with you about your comment. but how can i not??? though i don't really like integra's too much. maybe for the same reasons as other forum members on here does, but i'm not in denial.
Reply
Old May 9, 2008 | 02:25 AM
  #189  
Eric1987's Avatar
Thread Starter
Wanna be 8 owner
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach, California
Originally Posted by TrochoidMagic
^^ lion, funny how i wanted to use the type R as a example compare. but it seems like you beat me to it. and i agree with all that you said.

someone asked, "does civic even have double wish-bone?".
why wouldn't it??? rx-8 is only double in the front and multi-link in the rear!
seems like the very negative comments only come from those who don't even do their homework...

and i hate to agree with you about your comment. but how can i not??? though i don't really like integra's too much. maybe for the same reasons as other forum members on here does, but i'm not in denial.
The prelude has double wishbone suspension sucka!
Reply
Old May 9, 2008 | 02:50 AM
  #190  
TrochoidMagic's Avatar
is adjusting valve lash
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 0
From: hollywooood!
Originally Posted by F22C1
Oh silly me... I forgot that because RWD lost it must of have been that the particular RWD vehicle wasn't modified/setup to compete and win races Yes the team is obviously racing for it's 'health'. We should all think this way and pass on our rwd defeats as such excuses (as if the RWD layout isn't enough of "advantage" therefore it's ego needs an 'excuse').

The examples I cited it just to clearly dispel the perception in this thread that RWD guarantees you a victory. RWD is a double edge sword and it does have it's compromises.
^^HAHA! nice one f22c! i like how you artfully use your sarcasm.
and don't for one second think that there aren't full of ricers in another sports car purest club forum, right?

i sense only the close minded ones are the ricers that are uneducated and "afraid" to try others and believe whatever platform/car/rx8 vs. X is always better.

and just to let you know F22C, H22A is ur daddy.
Reply
Old May 9, 2008 | 02:57 AM
  #191  
TrochoidMagic's Avatar
is adjusting valve lash
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 0
From: hollywooood!
Originally Posted by Eric1987
The prelude has double wishbone suspension sucka!
had 2 of them myself. and although the rear wishbone are of a funny shape, it still is. and even accords have them.

ouch... EVEN ACCORDS!

just playin tho guys. the RX-8 is great. i don't care if its got multi-link rears and that the miata have front AND rear wishbone... it just has natural good handling and yaw characteristics.

but with the RWD is a double edge sword thing... yeah, agreed. it sucks to be the lesser driver of a RWD in a hydroplane-induced spin out.
Reply
Old May 9, 2008 | 03:33 AM
  #192  
Eight's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
wow, cant believe everybody's so worked up on this thread...
I heard the new fd1 civic type r handles like a rwd, if that has to do anything thing that somebody might of posted here...(didnt' feel like reading)
Reply
Old May 9, 2008 | 05:30 AM
  #193  
Eric1987's Avatar
Thread Starter
Wanna be 8 owner
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach, California
The new civic doesnt out handle the prelude.
Reply
Old May 9, 2008 | 11:32 AM
  #194  
CarAndDriver's Avatar
2005 Black RX-8 GT 6M
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,350
Likes: 0
From: San Jose Area
The Prelude and RSX had double wishbone. The Civic had its front wishbone axed the last generation. Cost cutting--it was too bad.
Reply
Old May 9, 2008 | 12:51 PM
  #195  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by CarAndDriver
Lets go for 9 useless pages.
Agreed, maybe we can talk some more about the incredibly boring Prelude! Wait, I mean the fast and great handling Prelude
Reply
Old May 9, 2008 | 01:26 PM
  #196  
CyberPitz's Avatar
Huge hole is huge
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,191
Likes: 1
From: Joplin, MO
This thread hurts my head....
Reply
Old May 9, 2008 | 01:27 PM
  #197  
RojoOcho's Avatar
Greensboro's Finest
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
From: Greensboro, NC
Ok, we get it. Civic threads are annoying. Damn, if you don't wanna to read it then stop clicking it. Its not like the thread title is deceiving.
Reply
Old May 9, 2008 | 07:14 PM
  #198  
neXib's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 635
Likes: 1
From: Norway
Seems to me that going from an RX-8 to a Civic is going from the 25 year old woman to her granny :P Maybe a somewhat fit granny... but still
Reply
Old May 9, 2008 | 08:19 PM
  #199  
CarAndDriver's Avatar
2005 Black RX-8 GT 6M
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,350
Likes: 0
From: San Jose Area
Might as well mention the Honda del Sol!
Reply
Old May 10, 2008 | 05:50 PM
  #200  
RX26b's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 444
Likes: 6
From: Chicago
Except for the NSX, when Honda utilizes double wishbones on their cars they're made of either steel or cast iron. The RX-8's arms are largely forged aluminum (as on the NSX).

The RSX uses the same cheap strut design the Civic's had since the '01 model year.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33 AM.