Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

New Dodge Challenger

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old May 3, 2009 | 04:42 PM
  #101  
Hornet's Avatar
Wut da F Y'all lookin' @!
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 414
Likes: 1
From: Germany
Originally Posted by cortcmc
Sorry if the original comment came across sharp... In the end there is enough blame to go around...
It's cool...I think a lot of us are car enthusiast here. In this case I know that I saw a lot of 300s and Chargers on the road so of course you've got to wonder what went wrong and whether the retro thing is hurting or helping in the case of the Challenger.

Regardless...
Reply
Old May 3, 2009 | 04:44 PM
  #102  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
The Challenger is too big of a car and 10k too high.

Retro has nothing to do with sales. Its the economy.
Reply
Old May 3, 2009 | 04:50 PM
  #103  
alnielsen's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,255
Likes: 8
From: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
The old Challengers & Chargers were big cars too, when compared to the cars of today. Back then they were mid-sized.
Reply
Old May 3, 2009 | 10:52 PM
  #104  
cortcmc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
The SE starts at 22K, the R/T at 30K and the SRT8 at 40K... You get what you pay for... As far as size, it is the perfect size...

Originally Posted by Razz1
The Challenger is too big of a car and 10k too high.

Retro has nothing to do with sales. Its the economy.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
yurcivicsux
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades
192
Sep 12, 2017 10:54 PM
sccarally
Gulf RX-8 Forum
1
Sep 27, 2015 03:47 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20 PM.