Mazda 6 2014 now in US- Diesel delayed, again!
#176
some of the older Rx4s had piston engine variants I know.
#177
Paul.
#178
Registered
#180
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Roselle, NJ
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll have no interest in this car if it's slow. Mazda, being a sporty car division needs to up the ante performance wise on their cars to really distance themselves from the other brands. In every segment Mazda needs to do this.
#182
Wheels, not rims!!
iTrader: (8)
Not to mention that this will be strictly a daily driver as the 8 or 7 will be the garage queen. I want something that is practical, efficient, yet great to look at and drive. Not to mention that I want a change from the typical American SUV/CUV. The CX-5 does it for me, but the Mazda6 wagon will do it even more.
#183
I know there are many differences between US and Euro Motorists..but....
soccer moms cars here are mainly SUVs (every size) and small cars (a.k.a Mazda2)...
Wagons are used by males into 30-40's as daily driver
soccer moms cars here are mainly SUVs (every size) and small cars (a.k.a Mazda2)...
Wagons are used by males into 30-40's as daily driver
#184
Rockie Mountain Newbie
#185
#186
Wheels, not rims!!
iTrader: (8)
No, but Mazda is not financially capable and won't have the brand identity of Porsche any time soon. Not to mention, Porsche has the economical power house (VW) to back them up in engineering R&D.
I was responding to the performance and success relevance of TALAN7's post.
I was responding to the performance and success relevance of TALAN7's post.
#187
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Roselle, NJ
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No, but Mazda is not financially capable and won't have the brand identity of Porsche any time soon. Not to mention, Porsche has the economical power house (VW) to back them up in engineering R&D.
I was responding to the performance and success relevance of TALAN7's post.
I was responding to the performance and success relevance of TALAN7's post.
Ford Escape vs. Honda CR-V vs. Kia Sportage vs. Mazda CX-5 vs. Volkswagen Tiguan - 2012/2013 Compact Crossover SUV Comparison - Motor Trend
#188
I drove different KIA sportage of different trims, own a 2.0 tdi tiguan as of last month and test drove a diesel cx5.
So i can fairly say that...Motor Trend's article is full of bullshit.
So i can fairly say that...Motor Trend's article is full of bullshit.
#189
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
US does not have the CX-5 Diesel YET..then we will see.
I get bored about the same $hit in the US..POWER...POWER...POWER.
================================================== ==
YOU JUST Don't Get it!
The 2.0l SA CX-5 is TUNE for Ecomomy..so get used to it..the world is sick of the US guzzling all the worlds Oil.......lol.....JK!
Duck for cover...incoming!
I get bored about the same $hit in the US..POWER...POWER...POWER.
================================================== ==
YOU JUST Don't Get it!
The 2.0l SA CX-5 is TUNE for Ecomomy..so get used to it..the world is sick of the US guzzling all the worlds Oil.......lol.....JK!
Duck for cover...incoming!
#190
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
I'd buy it if it had more power.
#192
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Roselle, NJ
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
US does not have the CX-5 Diesel YET..then we will see.
I get bored about the same $hit in the US..POWER...POWER...POWER.
================================================== ==
YOU JUST Don't Get it!
The 2.0l SA CX-5 is TUNE for Ecomomy..so get used to it..the world is sick of the US guzzling all the worlds Oil.......lol.....JK!
Duck for cover...incoming!
I get bored about the same $hit in the US..POWER...POWER...POWER.
================================================== ==
YOU JUST Don't Get it!
The 2.0l SA CX-5 is TUNE for Ecomomy..so get used to it..the world is sick of the US guzzling all the worlds Oil.......lol.....JK!
Duck for cover...incoming!
#195
Rockie Mountain Newbie
You just want more power, yet the same fuel economy.
Or, maybe you're choosing to make passes that aren't really the best time to make passes, if you really need that much more power.
BC.
#196
Momentum Keeps Me Going
If 0-60 mph in 9.4 sec (Motor Trend comparison) is fast enough for you all, you live in a VERY different world then we in the US of A, at least on the East Coast! That type of get up and nogo is bog slow, painfully slow, almost barge like slow. A Prius does 0-60 mph in ~10.4 sec - so it does beat that - but not by much. The eventual diesel may give better numbers, not really sure, but a diesel is never going to sell in the numbers Mazda needs to be a class leader in this country, and if they don't make big numbers in the SUV segment, they're in a heap of trouble here as that's what every Tom, Dick, and Jane seem to want.
Mazda needs to strike a balance between economy and general motive utility... and those numbers just ain't it.
Mazda needs to strike a balance between economy and general motive utility... and those numbers just ain't it.
#197
Registered
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 240 Likes
on
110 Posts
>70% of cars on the road have acceleration rates about in that range, if not slower. And people USE 0-60 in more like the 20 second range.
I'm sure you probably yell at them plenty as they clog up the on ramps and don't let you get up to speed.
The diesel will have markedly quicker times, because it's 20hp and 150ftlb more torque.... But still, MOST people don't buy their cars for power. They really don't. Even in the US. They don't buy cars for power. A very tiny segment does.
If you want some proof that the acceleration of the CX-5 is sufficient, take a look at the sales rates vs expectations. Take a look at Mazda having to double production capacity of the engine because of demand. Magazines that love to feature interesting cars, high performing cars, etc... are GOING to have a bias towards power. That doesn't make them even a significant portion of the consumer market, and as such you can't be influenced by what magazine's say about something as subjective as "enough" power.
No, you are one of the few, not one of the many here. Doesn't mean your desires are less valid, it just means that your opinions aren't held in the majority.
And besides, increase the power of the gas CX-5 and you drop the mileage AND increase the price. Two things Mazda can not afford to do. Mileage and price is what sells vehicles vs their competition for the normal public consumer, not power. NOT power. Power is tertiary at best.
I'm sure you probably yell at them plenty as they clog up the on ramps and don't let you get up to speed.
The diesel will have markedly quicker times, because it's 20hp and 150ftlb more torque.... But still, MOST people don't buy their cars for power. They really don't. Even in the US. They don't buy cars for power. A very tiny segment does.
If you want some proof that the acceleration of the CX-5 is sufficient, take a look at the sales rates vs expectations. Take a look at Mazda having to double production capacity of the engine because of demand. Magazines that love to feature interesting cars, high performing cars, etc... are GOING to have a bias towards power. That doesn't make them even a significant portion of the consumer market, and as such you can't be influenced by what magazine's say about something as subjective as "enough" power.
No, you are one of the few, not one of the many here. Doesn't mean your desires are less valid, it just means that your opinions aren't held in the majority.
And besides, increase the power of the gas CX-5 and you drop the mileage AND increase the price. Two things Mazda can not afford to do. Mileage and price is what sells vehicles vs their competition for the normal public consumer, not power. NOT power. Power is tertiary at best.
#198
Momentum Keeps Me Going
#199
Registered
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 240 Likes
on
110 Posts
Eyeballs?
Take a look at the cars on the road when you drive. How many are older than 10 years old? 20 years old?
Next time you are at a light with another car, accelerate at a rate of ~10 sec 0-60, pretty good chance that you will be accelerating noticeably faster than the car next to you. Even you in the 8, don't do 0-60 in 6 seconds at every light. More like ~10-15 seconds.
Max performance numbers are NOT used on the road more than a fraction of the time, and even that fraction gets decried as being retarded, unsafe, reckless, crazy, nuts, etc...
Just pay attention to cars around you and what they are doing and it gets pretty obvious.
Take a look at the cars on the road when you drive. How many are older than 10 years old? 20 years old?
Next time you are at a light with another car, accelerate at a rate of ~10 sec 0-60, pretty good chance that you will be accelerating noticeably faster than the car next to you. Even you in the 8, don't do 0-60 in 6 seconds at every light. More like ~10-15 seconds.
Max performance numbers are NOT used on the road more than a fraction of the time, and even that fraction gets decried as being retarded, unsafe, reckless, crazy, nuts, etc...
Just pay attention to cars around you and what they are doing and it gets pretty obvious.
#200
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
This is what BUGS me about so called 'EXPERTS' in their field...in the USA.
Guys like Peter De Lorenzo an ex-GM Design guy who contributes on Autoline Daily (USA),
now the guys are well respected, but, like here in Australia ALL they talk about is GM products and how good it now is...I would call it Better, NOT BEST or Good.
Autoline talks about other Makes/Models/Brands, and when it comes to Mazda and SKYACTIV he says it is stupid, nonsensical, does not make any sense, but when compared to Fords Ecoboost, everyone understands what it means...REALLY...Do they? understand ECO-Boost?...no more nonsensical then Skyactiv.
How did the SA name happen?, well Mazda management said to it's head technicians, all 298 of them to think "the sky is the limit" when designing, experimenting, prototyping what we know of today.
So Mazda are reaping rewards with doubled planed production, some people do GET it Mr De-Lorenzo.
Perhaps YOU should read up a little on what it actually IS and MEANs, it is not nonsense it IS REAL ALL New Real life ENGINEERING.
You have to laugh when Bob Lutz says GM must be congratulated on "how" they have reduced so much weight on the all new ATS..BIG Deal.
Mazda ARE the kings of loosing weight.
Rants - Autoextremist.com ~ the bare-knuckled, unvarnished, high octane truth...
Guys like Peter De Lorenzo an ex-GM Design guy who contributes on Autoline Daily (USA),
now the guys are well respected, but, like here in Australia ALL they talk about is GM products and how good it now is...I would call it Better, NOT BEST or Good.
Autoline talks about other Makes/Models/Brands, and when it comes to Mazda and SKYACTIV he says it is stupid, nonsensical, does not make any sense, but when compared to Fords Ecoboost, everyone understands what it means...REALLY...Do they? understand ECO-Boost?...no more nonsensical then Skyactiv.
How did the SA name happen?, well Mazda management said to it's head technicians, all 298 of them to think "the sky is the limit" when designing, experimenting, prototyping what we know of today.
So Mazda are reaping rewards with doubled planed production, some people do GET it Mr De-Lorenzo.
Perhaps YOU should read up a little on what it actually IS and MEANs, it is not nonsense it IS REAL ALL New Real life ENGINEERING.
You have to laugh when Bob Lutz says GM must be congratulated on "how" they have reduced so much weight on the all new ATS..BIG Deal.
Mazda ARE the kings of loosing weight.
Rants - Autoextremist.com ~ the bare-knuckled, unvarnished, high octane truth...