How does engine layout change power output?
#1
Cap'n Limekitten says arr
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How does engine layout change power output?
For the sake of simplicity, assume these are 6 cylinder engines with identical bore, stroke, cams, etc etc etc.
If you have an I6 and a V6 and maybe even a VR6, is any one of them a "superior" design in terms of power output? Disregarding the physical size and weight differences and focusing just on their power, and assuming fuel delivery and all that junk is equal.
If you have an I6 and a V6 and maybe even a VR6, is any one of them a "superior" design in terms of power output? Disregarding the physical size and weight differences and focusing just on their power, and assuming fuel delivery and all that junk is equal.
#2
He's as bad as Can
Ever drive a BMW with the I6? SMOOTH
All things being equal I would prefer a straight Six. But “V” configurations gives the automaker more options / cost savings.
All things being equal I would prefer a straight Six. But “V” configurations gives the automaker more options / cost savings.
#3
IIRC, the differences in cylinder configuration are mostly made for space (V's being the most compact), but the resulting factor that ends up affecting power output are the relative vibrations of each configuration.
I think straight-sixes are a sort of gold standard... they're vibrationally near perfect and I would guess would therefore be able to rev higher, and so volume for volume, stroke for stroke, be able to generate more power.
This is why BMW, the R32-R34 Skyline GTR's, Supras???, and TVR have all used them, and probably is not coincidental with the fact that they are some of the greatest cars on the road.
V6's I think on the other hand have inherent vibration deficiencies (IIRC, they create 2nd order vibrations, although Im not sure if its 2nd order or even what 2nd order vibrations means... someone please explain). They therefore incorporate counterbalances which reduce vibration but add inertia, which probably limits power compared to straight 6's
www.autozine.org has a good explanation
I think straight-sixes are a sort of gold standard... they're vibrationally near perfect and I would guess would therefore be able to rev higher, and so volume for volume, stroke for stroke, be able to generate more power.
This is why BMW, the R32-R34 Skyline GTR's, Supras???, and TVR have all used them, and probably is not coincidental with the fact that they are some of the greatest cars on the road.
V6's I think on the other hand have inherent vibration deficiencies (IIRC, they create 2nd order vibrations, although Im not sure if its 2nd order or even what 2nd order vibrations means... someone please explain). They therefore incorporate counterbalances which reduce vibration but add inertia, which probably limits power compared to straight 6's
www.autozine.org has a good explanation
#5
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by draco067
Well ok, but what if you ignore the whole vibration thing? Assuming same red line and all that as well.
I would say that the I6 and V6 have an advantage over the VR6 because the cylinder head port routing is simpler and thus likely more efficient. Maybe this gives these engines a 5% advantage at the power peak?
Hey, you forgot to throw in the Flat Opposed 6 cylinder engine into the mix! I'd say this one is equal to the I6 and V6.
#6
He's as bad as Can
Originally Posted by draco067
Well ok, but what if you ignore the whole vibration thing? Assuming same red line and all that as well.
Here are the specs on the I6 in the BMW M3
333 HP SAE @ 7,900 rpm; 262 ft lb , 4,900 rpm.
Is there a N/A V-6 that does that and doesn’t feel like a riding lawn mower?
#7
Go Texas Longhorns!
I for one like the I6 becuase its also a simpler design, has only one set of headers instead of two, which saves weight, VVT is easier since you only have one bank of cylinders to cover.
The VR6 is an interesting engine cuz its almost a I6, it only has one set of exhaust headers rather than two, and is still compact.
with newer alloy tech., I would think you could built a I6 block thats no much longer than a V6 block, because, at the end of the day, the real issue with an I6 is space constraints.
The VR6 is an interesting engine cuz its almost a I6, it only has one set of exhaust headers rather than two, and is still compact.
with newer alloy tech., I would think you could built a I6 block thats no much longer than a V6 block, because, at the end of the day, the real issue with an I6 is space constraints.
#8
Bah! Who needs a redline?
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Flooriduh
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by expo1
How can you ignore Vibration & Drivability?
Here are the specs on the I6 in the BMW M3
333 HP SAE @ 7,900 rpm; 262 ft lb , 4,900 rpm.
Is there a N/A V-6 that does that and doesn’t feel like a riding lawn mower?
Here are the specs on the I6 in the BMW M3
333 HP SAE @ 7,900 rpm; 262 ft lb , 4,900 rpm.
Is there a N/A V-6 that does that and doesn’t feel like a riding lawn mower?
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by expo1
How can you ignore Vibration & Drivability?
Here are the specs on the I6 in the BMW M3
333 HP SAE @ 7,900 rpm; 262 ft lb , 4,900 rpm.
Is there a N/A V-6 that does that and doesn’t feel like a riding lawn mower?
Here are the specs on the I6 in the BMW M3
333 HP SAE @ 7,900 rpm; 262 ft lb , 4,900 rpm.
Is there a N/A V-6 that does that and doesn’t feel like a riding lawn mower?
#10
Cap'n Limekitten says arr
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ok no one is taking my question seriously. I said, assuming EVERYTHING is equal (flow characteristics, porting, WHATEVER, does one engine have the potential to make more power? I'm just asking theoretical, so I can ignore vibration and driveability.
Or is it that ANY 6-cylinder (or 8, or 16, I don't care) engine with IDENTICAL characteristics will make the same power as any other?
Or is it that ANY 6-cylinder (or 8, or 16, I don't care) engine with IDENTICAL characteristics will make the same power as any other?
#11
I understand your question, but fail to see its purpose. Any answer you get assuming everything is identical, when in reality it is not, is meaningless. I would liken it to a 1st year physics course where you ignore friction, sure it makes life easy, but its answer has no meaning in reality.
#12
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by draco067
ok no one is taking my question seriously. I said, assuming EVERYTHING is equal (flow characteristics, porting, WHATEVER, does one engine have the potential to make more power? I'm just asking theoretical, so I can ignore vibration and driveability.
Or is it that ANY 6-cylinder (or 8, or 16, I don't care) engine with IDENTICAL characteristics will make the same power as any other?
Or is it that ANY 6-cylinder (or 8, or 16, I don't care) engine with IDENTICAL characteristics will make the same power as any other?
Originally Posted by babylou
I would say that the I6 and V6 have an advantage over the VR6 because the cylinder head port routing is simpler and thus likely more efficient. Maybe this gives these engines a 5% advantage at the power peak?
Hey, you forgot to throw in the Flat Opposed 6 cylinder engine into the mix! I'd say this one is equal to the I6 and V6.
Hey, you forgot to throw in the Flat Opposed 6 cylinder engine into the mix! I'd say this one is equal to the I6 and V6.
#13
Bummed, but bring on OU!
I've always thought that an inline configuration generates more torque and at lower revs (given equal flow, etc etc etc). But that may be true for 'old school' and not current engine technology.
#14
He's as bad as Can
To quote an often used source http://auto.howstuffworks.com/question366.htm
“If you built all three of these six cylinder engines to the exact same specifications -- same displacement, same valves, same intake and exhaust systems, etc. -- they would likely perform nearly identically. Displacement is displacement.”
So to pick the better car you would have to base it on other factors.
“If you built all three of these six cylinder engines to the exact same specifications -- same displacement, same valves, same intake and exhaust systems, etc. -- they would likely perform nearly identically. Displacement is displacement.”
So to pick the better car you would have to base it on other factors.
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by brillo
with newer alloy tech., I would think you could built a I6 block thats no much longer than a V6 block, because, at the end of the day, the real issue with an I6 is space constraints.
ooo
.ooo vs oooooo
The I6 is clearly longer, no matter how thin you can make the cylinder walls using advanced materials. The V6, on the other hand, is clearly wider, but occupies a more space-efficient squarish shape than the I6's long, thin rectangle. This, along with the fact that most V6s are shorter than an I6 of similar displacement, is why V6s are more compact than I6s, making them layout of choice for transverse engined 6 cylinder cars where engine size is an important design parameter.
#16
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've thought about this before (like if I were to build a sports car, what engine layout would I use?).
Quick question...I thought the VR6 was a V6??? Or, a V layout??? Please explain???
So, we have now:
F
I
V
W
R-Rotary...lol
Layouts right? But, I hear the W-8 is one vibration loving monster. Please explain the VR6...thanks...
Quick question...I thought the VR6 was a V6??? Or, a V layout??? Please explain???
So, we have now:
F
I
V
W
R-Rotary...lol
Layouts right? But, I hear the W-8 is one vibration loving monster. Please explain the VR6...thanks...
#17
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rx8wannahave
I've thought about this before (like if I were to build a sports car, what engine layout would I use?).
Quick question...I thought the VR6 was a V6??? Or, a V layout??? Please explain???
So, we have now:
F
I
V
W
R-Rotary...lol
Layouts right? But, I hear the W-8 is one vibration loving monster. Please explain the VR6...thanks...
Quick question...I thought the VR6 was a V6??? Or, a V layout??? Please explain???
So, we have now:
F
I
V
W
R-Rotary...lol
Layouts right? But, I hear the W-8 is one vibration loving monster. Please explain the VR6...thanks...
#18
Cap'n Limekitten says arr
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by expo1
To quote an often used source http://auto.howstuffworks.com/question366.htm
“If you built all three of these six cylinder engines to the exact same specifications -- same displacement, same valves, same intake and exhaust systems, etc. -- they would likely perform nearly identically. Displacement is displacement.”
So to pick the better car you would have to base it on other factors.
“If you built all three of these six cylinder engines to the exact same specifications -- same displacement, same valves, same intake and exhaust systems, etc. -- they would likely perform nearly identically. Displacement is displacement.”
So to pick the better car you would have to base it on other factors.
#19
the autozine quote doesnt take into account maximum rpm as limited by vibration (assuming we're talking equal NVH here... for purposes of the comparison I'm assuming end-result vibration as well as driveability are equal for the V6, I6, etc that we are comparing.) So I still think that because I6's have less inherent vibration, they have less rotating inertia, can rev higher, and therefore make more power.
Although maybe the answer lies with HP/liter and we should make a list. The acura NSX (though very old, I'm sure Acura can do better with the upcoming if they decide for some reason to keep the same displacement and configuration) is I think V6 300hp and 3.2 liters (I guess even though it revs pretty high). The I6 M3 S54? engine is 343hp and 3.2 liters.
So
93.75 hp/L for V6's
107.19 hp/L for I6's
feel free to add calculations/results for road/sport cars, but I think a new list should be created if you want to consider all-out race cars.
Although maybe the answer lies with HP/liter and we should make a list. The acura NSX (though very old, I'm sure Acura can do better with the upcoming if they decide for some reason to keep the same displacement and configuration) is I think V6 300hp and 3.2 liters (I guess even though it revs pretty high). The I6 M3 S54? engine is 343hp and 3.2 liters.
So
93.75 hp/L for V6's
107.19 hp/L for I6's
feel free to add calculations/results for road/sport cars, but I think a new list should be created if you want to consider all-out race cars.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Audio Concepts ATL
New Member Forum
21
09-26-2021 01:59 PM
jay_tibo
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications
22
09-13-2016 08:10 PM
akagc
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
08-11-2015 07:07 PM