Notices
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension

Progress swaybar+RB endlinks+stance coilover= rubbing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-05-2009, 03:21 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
trustbuddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: California
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Progress swaybar+RB endlinks+stance coilover= rubbing



just found our yesterday.
not sure if the same will happen with stock endlinks, but the RB ones are more beefy... if there was even a 1cm of clearance, it would not have rubbed.

I usually go around in the middle setting for the front sway bar, but tried the hardest setting when I was out in the track- just to try different settings and was lazy to change it back.

I believe this is only an issue for the front.

The rubbing can be avoided by adjusting the progress swaybar to the middle or the soft(est) setting.

black arrow= area where it rubs
red arrow= middle setting
blue arrow= soft setting
Old 11-05-2009, 07:17 PM
  #2  
TNC
iTrader: (1)
 
HockeyRX-8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Shaolin, NY
Posts: 3,858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would say put it back to the middle hole....the front progress bar on full stiff is too stiff anyway
Old 11-05-2009, 09:04 PM
  #3  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,727
Received 2,011 Likes on 1,639 Posts
Originally Posted by HockeyRX-8
I would say put it back to the middle hole....the front progress bar on full stiff is too stiff anyway
that depends on the overall setup, some race teams run stiffer still

but the oversize RB endlink is the issue. How many times do you guys have to be told that the OE endlinks are fine with these bars?
Old 11-06-2009, 10:22 AM
  #4  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
elysium19's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Long Island, NY.
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm PRETTY sure that you have it backwards - your photo shows it on the SOFTEST setting.
Greater distance from the point of rotation = hole closest towards the end = greatest rotational force = "stiffest" setting
Old 11-06-2009, 10:47 AM
  #5  
went back to srsly broke
iTrader: (2)
 
JinDesu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Flushing, NY
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by elysium19
I'm PRETTY sure that you have it backwards - your photo shows it on the SOFTEST setting.
Greater distance from the point of rotation = hole closest towards the end = greatest rotational force = "stiffest" setting
Are you sure? I helped to install my friend's rear sway, and the manual stated the outer holes are softer, while the inner ones are stiffer.

And doesn't a stiff setting mean it has less ability to rotate?
Old 11-06-2009, 10:50 AM
  #6  
Trust me, you're wrong
iTrader: (1)
 
tiresmoker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Youngstown, Oh
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by elysium19
I'm PRETTY sure that you have it backwards - your photo shows it on the SOFTEST setting.
Greater distance from the point of rotation = hole closest towards the end = greatest rotational force = "stiffest" setting
Not really...

Closest to the meat of the bar is the stiffest.

Farthest from the meat of the bar (at the end) is the softest.

The further you move out the "arm" of the bar, the more the bar will be allowed to twist, thus making the resistance to flexing less. AKA softer.

The closer to the meat of the bar you move the link the stiffer it will get because you are decreasing the length of the arm and using more of the bar to resists the forces of the suspension.


Think of it like this....

The fulcrum point (where the bar mounts to the frame) is a bolt head.

The arm (where you mount the endlink) is a breaker bar.

The further out you move on the arm the less force it will take to turn the bar, much like how the longer the breaker bar on a bolt head, the less force you have to exert to spin the head. The closer you get to the fulcrum point the more force is required to flex the bar.
Old 11-06-2009, 01:28 PM
  #7  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
trustbuddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: California
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by elysium19
I'm PRETTY sure that you have it backwards - your photo shows it on the SOFTEST setting.
Greater distance from the point of rotation = hole closest towards the end = greatest rotational force = "stiffest" setting
I'm VERY sure the picture shows it in the STRONGEST setting.
Old 11-06-2009, 02:16 PM
  #8  
Modulated Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
dannobre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Smallville
Posts: 13,718
Received 334 Likes on 289 Posts
The end-links that are stock length are designed for a stock height car....

Lower it a lot and you need shorter endlinks.......should be a no-brainer
Old 11-06-2009, 02:19 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Salamanth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's definitely the stiffest setting, if you need confirmation from someone other than us, trust Whiteline's technical docs - http://www.whiteline.com.au/instruct...ar_general.pdf see fig. 5
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Carbon8
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
42
02-27-2020 08:39 AM
fourwhls
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
02-20-2019 05:16 PM
SBGarage
Sakebomb Garage
3
10-22-2015 04:28 PM
Trekk
Series I Tech Garage
12
09-25-2015 03:08 PM
SBGarage
Group Buy Center
1
09-12-2015 08:18 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Progress swaybar+RB endlinks+stance coilover= rubbing



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:23 PM.