Notices
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension

Alignment Specs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-03-2007, 08:56 AM
  #26  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,731
Received 2,015 Likes on 1,642 Posts
most of you are running too much rear camber
Old 06-03-2007, 11:00 AM
  #27  
Rotary , eh?
iTrader: (1)
 
mac11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 1,850
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
most of you are running too much rear camber


Isn't alignment mostly a driver preference thing? The numbers seem pretty generic for a car setup the way the RX8 is from the factory.
Old 06-03-2007, 01:27 PM
  #28  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
deamicls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CosmosMpower
If your car oversteers like crazy I would suggest just changing the front bar to bigger and leaving the rear stock, that should add some understeer. As far as alignment I would run about -1.3 to 1.5 front camber and -1.8 to -2.0 rear camber and run some toe in, maybe 3/8 total for the rear. Also soften up your rear shock settings with the Flex's and stiffen up the rear and you should be good.
I think that you want to be careful with using a stiffer front sway bar as your solution to oversteer. I used to have the RB front bar with Tokico D-Specs and it would work great but you want to be careful with snap oversteer which can be a bit of a problem during 'at the limit driving' or if you go into a turn too hot. Your back end will just whip out right after the car understeers a little. Just be careful.
Old 06-03-2007, 02:03 PM
  #29  
Modulated Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
dannobre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Smallville
Posts: 13,718
Received 334 Likes on 289 Posts
I've been running -2.7 front, and -2.0 rear...with zero toe front, and 1/16 toe in in the rear. This has consistantly given me the best tire temps on the tracks that I run. When I had more rear camber...the insides were too hot...

So far this works well for me with the tires that I use ( Azenis) That would all change with different tires and wheels....
Old 06-04-2007, 08:55 AM
  #30  
Registered User
 
Red Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dannobre
I've been running -2.7 front, and -2.0 rear...with zero toe front, and 1/16 toe in in the rear. This has consistantly given me the best tire temps on the tracks that I run. When I had more rear camber...the insides were too hot...

So far this works well for me with the tires that I use ( Azenis) That would all change with different tires and wheels....
Pretty aggressive camber. What roll bars are you using?
Old 06-04-2007, 04:05 PM
  #31  
Got Another Rotary
 
Jax_RX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by dannobre
I've been running -2.7 front, and -2.0 rear...with zero toe front, and 1/16 toe in in the rear. This has consistantly given me the best tire temps on the tracks that I run. When I had more rear camber...the insides were too hot...

So far this works well for me with the tires that I use ( Azenis) That would all change with different tires and wheels....
Sounds like a track-only setting. Without constant cornering, or with mostly street driving, this much camber is going to eat up the insides of the tires.

Mine is street driven only, with lowering springs, and my settings are as follows:
-.5 Front Camber (minimum I could obtain with my springs)
6 Front Caster
-.75 Rear Camber (minimum I could obtain with my springs)
0 toe F/R

I am very pleased with the handling at these settings - just a touch of understeer with great turn-in and no stability issues at speed. I also am seeing just a little inside tire wear, but nothing major.

If you want to even up some of the inside wear from high camber settings, some toe-in (1/32 to 1/16) at each end will help (wears the outside more to even up). Toe on the rear will add a little stability and may be beneficial, but toe on the front will hurt turn-in response, but it will even out the tire wear some.
Old 06-04-2007, 05:45 PM
  #32  
Registered
 
Targatheory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool, so would I be good giving those above specs to my shop? And could someone here give me a good description of caster? I've googled it, but I just can't picture it in my mind.
Old 06-04-2007, 06:42 PM
  #33  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,731
Received 2,015 Likes on 1,642 Posts
Originally Posted by dannobre
I've been running -2.7 front, and -2.0 rear...with zero toe front, and 1/16 toe in in the rear. This has consistantly given me the best tire temps on the tracks that I run. When I had more rear camber...the insides were too hot...

So far this works well for me with the tires that I use ( Azenis) That would all change with different tires and wheels....

Great spec for the track with an excellent split IMO, tone that down 1 deg front and rear for a great street spec
Old 06-04-2007, 08:07 PM
  #34  
Modulated Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
dannobre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Smallville
Posts: 13,718
Received 334 Likes on 289 Posts
^^^ All the love...I'm honored

I street drive it...but I'm willing to put up with the tire wear. I have track days every few weeks and changing it is even too much for me....

I get a bit of inside tire wear on the street...but with the low toe..it isn't really that bad
Old 06-05-2007, 08:02 PM
  #35  
Got Another Rotary
 
Jax_RX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Targatheory
Cool, so would I be good giving those above specs to my shop? And could someone here give me a good description of caster? I've googled it, but I just can't picture it in my mind.
Here you go - some suspension basics

http://www.ozebiz.com.au/racetech/theory/align.html
Old 06-06-2007, 08:59 AM
  #36  
Registered User
 
92tsiawd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am running rb sways front and rears and tein s tech springs. My alignment is set to -1.0 camber in the front (seized camber bolt) and -1.9 in the rear. I forgot what my toe figures were but my car plows on the track, playing with tire pressure still wasn't enough to remove all of it, anymore suggestions before I yank the front sway out?
Old 06-06-2007, 10:09 AM
  #37  
Registered
 
More_Revs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NE Wisconsin
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With your camber spec, it won't surprise anyone that you paw though turns.
Old 06-06-2007, 10:25 AM
  #38  
Registered Tracker
 
BlueRenesis82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 92tsiawd
I am running rb sways front and rears and tein s tech springs. My alignment is set to -1.0 camber in the front (seized camber bolt) and -1.9 in the rear. I forgot what my toe figures were but my car plows on the track, playing with tire pressure still wasn't enough to remove all of it, anymore suggestions before I yank the front sway out?
uhh, fix the problem?
Old 06-07-2007, 11:34 AM
  #39  
Got Another Rotary
 
Jax_RX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by 92tsiawd
I am running rb sways front and rears and tein s tech springs. My alignment is set to -1.0 camber in the front (seized camber bolt) and -1.9 in the rear. I forgot what my toe figures were but my car plows on the track, playing with tire pressure still wasn't enough to remove all of it, anymore suggestions before I yank the front sway out?
First you need to check the toe - IMHO it need to be 0 F/R. 0 Toe-in in the front helps create good turn-in. Toe-out will improve turn-in even more at the expense of heavy inside tire wear.

On the camber, you need to bring the relationship between the front/rear more in line. Setting them both to the same setting will create a pretty neutral car (depending on other factors), but most add .25 to .5 degree more camber in the rear to create just a little push (which is a little safer at the limit) and to compensate for the camber increases you get in the front when the wheels are turned due to Caster.

Front Caster needs set as high as possible after you have set your front Camber. This will vary depending on springs and camber, but usually is around 5.5-6.5 degrees. Caster provides a good "on-center" feel (tendency for wheels to straighten and stay that way) and will make the front camber increase at a greater rate when the wheels are turned for better front end grip on cornering.
Old 06-08-2007, 06:12 PM
  #40  
road warrior
 
LionZoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I notice my settings are a bit different from most people's. I'm running 1.1/1.5 F/R negative camber with 6.6 caster and zero toe at the rear. However my fronts are toed in about .09 degrees each. I was a bit skeptical of running front toe in instead of rear, but the speed shop I was at suggested it would be better. So far it has worked out really well, despite my misgivings.
Old 06-08-2007, 06:52 PM
  #41  
road warrior
 
LionZoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
By the way, I notice when toe is given in fractions, the units is in inches. If it's in decimals it's in degrees. That makes no sense to me.
Old 06-08-2007, 07:59 PM
  #42  
Got Another Rotary
 
Jax_RX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by LionZoo
By the way, I notice when toe is given in fractions, the units is in inches. If it's in decimals it's in degrees. That makes no sense to me.
When toe is provided in inches, they measure the distance at the back of the front wheels and the distance at the front of the wheels - a 1/16" toe-in means it is 1/16" shorter distance in the front of the wheels - as simple as that.

Last edited by Jax_RX8; 06-09-2007 at 10:21 AM.
Old 06-08-2007, 08:19 PM
  #43  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,731
Received 2,015 Likes on 1,642 Posts
as a rough rule of thumb

degrees/2 = inches

example

1/4 deg = 1/8"

please don't try to start an arguement on accuracy, it's a rough rule of thumb that get's more inaccurate as the angle increases, it's good enough for typical alignment purposes though and toe does not require precision accuracy on our cars, being in the ballpark is good enough
Old 06-09-2007, 12:52 AM
  #44  
road warrior
 
LionZoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
as a rough rule of thumb

degrees/2 = inches

example

1/4 deg = 1/8"

please don't try to start an arguement on accuracy, it's a rough rule of thumb that get's more inaccurate as the angle increases, it's good enough for typical alignment purposes though and toe does not require precision accuracy on our cars, being in the ballpark is good enough
Thanks. Should be a good rule of thumb.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gwailo
New Member Forum
30
06-07-2020 12:21 PM
Quiggs321
New Member Forum
19
09-30-2015 05:34 PM
1.3_LittersOfFurry
Series I Trouble Shooting
9
09-22-2015 01:54 AM
djp6783
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
0
09-19-2015 12:12 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Alignment Specs



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:40 AM.