Notices
Series I Trouble Shooting This is the place to learn more about or discuss any issues you're having with your RX-8

Mazda Denies Engine Replacement

Old May 3, 2007 | 10:34 PM
  #101  
devildog1679's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
The warranty manual states that your warranty can be voided for racing, towing, or misuse and abuse. Racing is defined as a timed event, typically were one person is crowned a winner. Many variations to the definition but the concept is the same, more than one car and a timed event. Autocross can be classified as racing if it is timed. HPDE’s on the other hand are not timed and there is no winner so this can not be classified as racing. This is why I stick to HPDE’s, you just never know. As for the misuse and abuse part, this is were it gets tricky, but I doubt they can say your misusing a sports car by taking it on a track. I hope you resolve the situation, you should consult an attorney. Many will take the case if they think they can win and will only charge you 1/3 of the winnings. If you lose you don’t pay them much. My friend did this in NY for an accident. Ask around, who knows once Mazda realizes that you are pursuing with a lawyer they may cave in. It’s probably cheaper for them to replace your engine than pay the costs of a lawsuit even if they win. Good luck
Reply
Old May 3, 2007 | 10:38 PM
  #102  
Galen Darkmoon's Avatar
I don't remember
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
LMAO what lawsuit? he has no evidence of maintaing his car. Case is closed he will learn. Wait till ya try a divorce.
Reply
Old May 3, 2007 | 10:50 PM
  #103  
devildog1679's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Originally Posted by Galen Darkmoon
LMAO what lawsuit? he has no evidence of maintaing his car. Case is closed he will learn. Wait till ya try a divorce.
Didn't he say he had proof of buying some oil filters. Can't remember if I read that or not. Regardless, if he can get a lawyer to take his case only to get paid if he wins then why nto do it. Nothing to lose but some time. Plus I think a lawyer will know about this than any of us. If he takes the case he obviously thinks he could win. I agree this is a lesson to be learned. I actually got my bottle sof royal purple in to change my tranny and diff fluid. Those receipts are being put in a safe place.
Reply
Old May 3, 2007 | 10:51 PM
  #104  
devildog1679's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Originally Posted by AlexCisneros
It might, but having registered the car's VIN with Mazdaspeed would have done so sooner.

Again, if this was a singular event and there were NO OTHER cars having this problem. It would be a moot point. This is not the case.

...and if you really want to go there, an SCCA Solo event is barely considered a race. MetLife doesn't even risk you for life insurnce if you do "Sanctioned SCCA Solo events", most forms of car insurance still insure your car at these events, The Solo Rule book says that cars should not normally exceed 65 MPH, and don't even let me start with the Mazda Zoom-Zoom Autocross events. All the more reason as to why this car was kept in immaculate condition.

Again, there are people who have and have not raced, abused, kept service up to date, driven hard, drifted, etc this car and have had their engines replaced under warranty for symptoms similar to mine. And what they are latching on to is that I failed to change my oil?
Not sure if you did this already but do you remember if you paid cash or credit for these. If credit or debit was used the store may have a record of this. It's a long shot but worth a try.
Reply
Old May 3, 2007 | 10:53 PM
  #105  
AlexCisneros's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
LMAO what lawsuit? he has no evidence of maintaing his car. Case is closed he will learn. Wait till ya try a divorce.
they claim that I did not change my oil. They would need to prove it. I can't show them I have, but they can't prove I haven't and if I subpeona all the records of all the cars whose engines were replaced with similar symptoms not having to deal with oil changes and put them into public record for anyone else dupped by them to use I can prove that their engine breaks?

With a judge seeing broken engines and no proof care wasn't taken, I may have a lawsuit with a little less humor than what comes out of your rear. I'd rather not go that route. I just want them to honor the warranty like they have done with so many others.
Reply
Old May 3, 2007 | 10:53 PM
  #106  
Nubo's Avatar
Lubricious
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 4
From: SF Bay Area, California
Originally Posted by r0tor
Your beloved Moss-Magnuson act defends your right to use an aftermarket parts supplier instead of OEM and not void your warranty. Last time I checked his engine replacement was not being denied under warranty because he has an AEM CAI.

The act has absolutely no bearing on you OEM warranty regarding the end user breaching the contract by not keeping maintenance records. Its clear as day they want mileage written down and receipts. Nothing beyond that needs "proving". There is no "burden of proof" (the great Moss-Magnuson Act phrase) needed for Mazda refusing warranty coverage when maintenance documents were asked for and could not be furnished - automatically breaching the conditions of your warranty.
I'm not sure what receipts prove, other than I bought some oil. I could have used it in another car, or my lawn mower. Same thing hold for written mileage records. Based on comments from Mazda personnel to the OP, they also feel the same way. Since this puts the customer in an untenable position, it is Mazda who has breached the warranty.
Reply
Old May 3, 2007 | 10:59 PM
  #107  
AlexCisneros's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by devildog1679
Didn't he say he had proof of buying some oil filters. Can't remember if I read that or not. Regardless, if he can get a lawyer to take his case only to get paid if he wins then why nto do it. Nothing to lose but some time. Plus I think a lawyer will know about this than any of us. If he takes the case he obviously thinks he could win. I agree this is a lesson to be learned. I actually got my bottle sof royal purple in to change my tranny and diff fluid. Those receipts are being put in a safe place.
The most recent oil filter I bought was at Potamkin Mazda where I dropped off the car. They said they don't keep records for the parts I buy.

The rest were done at Dynamic Turbo and they also don't have record. The last time I bought oil was at Murrays and I haven't asked yet, but out of ~17 or so oil and filter purchases I'd say 90% came from Dynamic Turbo. It's their lift I would use to change the oil. They have since sold their location, lifts, etc. and are strictly mail order now with different record keeping systems, hence the recent purchase of oil from Murray's and oil filter from Mazda.

My only shot there is if they find hard copy receipts from their move.

:edit: come to think of it was way more than 17 as I would need to constantly add more between oil changes.
Reply
Old May 3, 2007 | 11:00 PM
  #108  
Galen Darkmoon's Avatar
I don't remember
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Make no mistake. I hope for nothing but the best for the OP, BUT, Abbid posted the truth and from what I've read here he know's better than most.
Reply
Old May 3, 2007 | 11:12 PM
  #109  
devildog1679's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Originally Posted by AlexCisneros
The most recent oil filter I bought was at Potamkin Mazda where I dropped off the car. They said they don't keep records for the parts I buy.

The rest were done at Dynamic Turbo and they also don't have record. The last time I bought oil was at Murrays and I haven't asked yet, but out of ~17 or so oil and filter purchases I'd say 90% came from Dynamic Turbo. It's their lift I would use to change the oil. They have since sold their location, lifts, etc. and are strictly mail order now with different record keeping systems, hence the recent purchase of oil from Murray's and oil filter from Mazda.

My only shot there is if they find hard copy receipts from their move.

:edit: come to think of it was way more than 17 as I would need to constantly add more between oil changes.
If you do go the lawyer rout you may be able to get some written statements from the place you used the lift. Go get them.
Reply
Old May 4, 2007 | 01:20 PM
  #110  
Nubo's Avatar
Lubricious
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 4
From: SF Bay Area, California
Originally Posted by AlexCisneros
They also warned me not to escalate this as anyone who can see the car would know it was being raced. When I asked why that was (as if it mattered) they stated "it has a racing harness, light weight wheels, and drifter tires".
Make no mistake, this is the sole basis of their refusal. Since they cannot legally deny warranty coverage on the basis of you having installed a better restraint system and fancy wheels, they resorted to the oil-change tactic. Of course it makes no sense whatsoever -- someone is going to spend thousands of dollars on upgrades but is going to turn around and never change their oil? Yeah, that's the ticket.

How do you dispose of the oil? Some places make you sign a form; if that was the case, that could be your proof.

If their claim is that the engine was run without sufficient oil, then oil changes in and of themselves are still not dispositive. In which case the lack of receipts is not relevant. The engine is designed to run out of oil between changes. I don't see how receipts are going to prove that you topped off the oil in between changes. And I don't think anyone expects an entry in a maintenance log for oil top-offs.
Reply
Old May 4, 2007 | 03:04 PM
  #111  
AlexCisneros's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
Thumbs up Update

Update!



I received a call today from the regional manager. He apologized for any inconvenience and informed me that the engine would be replaced under warranty.

I have faith in Mazda again, not so much in the dealer... but I can go to another

Reply
Old May 4, 2007 | 03:06 PM
  #112  
Galen Darkmoon's Avatar
I don't remember
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Excellent that is good news
Reply
Old May 4, 2007 | 03:16 PM
  #113  
eviltwinkie's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 2
From: everywherez...
Rawk...
Reply
Old May 4, 2007 | 03:21 PM
  #114  
Red Devil's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 1
From: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Awesome news!
Reply
Old May 4, 2007 | 03:31 PM
  #115  
Astral's Avatar
Purveyor of fine bass
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 2
From: Worcester, MA
congrats that things are turning out OK!

lesson learned anyway: keep those receipts and keep a little logbook

I keep an Excel spreadsheet for all major and minor maintenance (even when I check tire pressures and add oil)
Reply
Old May 4, 2007 | 03:31 PM
  #116  
TomAssBender's Avatar
Skeet skeet skeet
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
From: making my way to the ATL
Originally Posted by mac11
If they are not doing things under the emissions recal then your car is treated as a single case not a part of the group of cars that may be effected.
Maybe I just have a good dealer, but I took my car in to get the center console trim replaced and they took care of all my emissions problems and reflashes
Reply
Old May 4, 2007 | 03:39 PM
  #117  
mac11's Avatar
Rotary , eh?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,850
Likes: 1
From: Elkhart, IN
Originally Posted by AlexCisneros
Update!



I received a call today from the regional manager. He apologized for any inconvenience and informed me that the engine would be replaced under warranty.

I have faith in Mazda again, not so much in the dealer... but I can go to another


sounds like you should have faith in the dealership. its not their fault. they were only doing what they had to do to protect their ***. when the regional rep said he wasn't going to pay them under warranty coverage the dealership isnt going to do the work and pay for it out of their own pocket.

congrats on the resolution to your problem.
Reply
Old May 4, 2007 | 03:46 PM
  #118  
two rotors's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 431
Likes: 1
From: Whitby Ont
Originally Posted by mac11
sounds like you should have faith in the dealership. its not their fault. they were only doing what they had to do to protect their ***. when the regional rep said he wasn't going to pay them under warranty coverage the dealership isnt going to do the work and pay for it out of their own pocket.

congrats on the resolution to your problem.
+1
Reply
Old May 4, 2007 | 04:18 PM
  #119  
devildog1679's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Congratulations , glad everything turned out OK. Definitely need to see another dealer going forward not so much because of the whole oil deal but because of their idiotic comment about racing due to harness, wheels etc.. Score one for owners.
Reply
Old May 4, 2007 | 05:09 PM
  #120  
Nubo's Avatar
Lubricious
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 4
From: SF Bay Area, California
Originally Posted by mac11
sounds like you should have faith in the dealership. its not their fault. they were only doing what they had to do to protect their ***. when the regional rep said he wasn't going to pay them under warranty coverage the dealership isnt going to do the work and pay for it out of their own pocket.

congrats on the resolution to your problem.
That seems to be a recurring theme with Mazda. Dealer says their hands are tied because of corporate and then Corporate says it can't do anything because the dealer said "x". 'Round and round we go. Glad to see someone got off the merry-go-round before it got too nasty.
Reply
Old May 4, 2007 | 06:29 PM
  #121  
jeffe19007's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
From: Glendale, AZ
I would say the dealer was the issue here. They represent your claim to Mazda.

I would also say the noise you made on this forum may have helped. Presenting a clear and reasonable case didn't hurt.

Would be nice to know what really happened though.

Congrats on the warranty repair! Mazda has to take care of the legitimate enthusiasts. That is the business model they are selling.

I may keep a few receipts in the future though.

Last edited by jeffe19007; May 4, 2007 at 06:31 PM.
Reply
Old May 4, 2007 | 06:46 PM
  #122  
Nemesis8's Avatar
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
Originally Posted by AlexCisneros
I have faith in Mazda again
OK, I'm getting back in line for the 2010 rotary
Reply
Old May 4, 2007 | 07:18 PM
  #123  
shazbot28's Avatar
Om nom nom nom
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 437
Likes: 1
From: Mission Viejo, CA
Good to hear that Alex!
Reply
Old May 4, 2007 | 07:49 PM
  #124  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,140
congrats, now please delete this 'tarded thread ...
Reply
Old May 4, 2007 | 11:17 PM
  #125  
nycgps's Avatar
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,881
Likes: 36
From: Planet Earth
Congrats !

but I guess you should try another dealership.
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:06 AM.