Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Used Oil Analysis - Post Them Here

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Aug 23, 2011 | 01:40 PM
  #476  
wankelbolt's Avatar
1% evil, 99% hot gas.
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 143
From: Forest Hill, MD
Originally Posted by maskedferret
That was what I put back in after trying to get as much oil out as possible by alternatively jacking up both sides while the oil was draining.
Er... you might want to drop Blackstone a note and let them know your make up oil was one qt and not 4.5. Ask them if that makes any difference on your analysis. (If it doesn't, why the hell do they ask?)
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2011 | 01:44 PM
  #477  
maskedferret's Avatar
Oooh, shiny!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 908
Likes: 2
From: St. Louis, MO
Originally Posted by wankelbolt
Er... you might want to drop Blackstone a note and let them know your make up oil was one qt and not 4.5. Ask them if that makes any difference on your analysis. (If it doesn't, why the hell do they ask?)
oooooooohhhh ...
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2011 | 03:12 PM
  #478  
REDRX3RX8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 716
Likes: 22
Originally Posted by maskedferret
My first UOA (Valvoline 5w30 conventional) with apparently high amounts of chrome. Would it be worthwhile to get another UOA on the next oil change, or is it better to wait a few?


This is a very good report, especially for 84k miles.

The insolubles of .2 (oxidized solids), and low 8ppm silicon ( 12ppm normal high limit), show that you could even run the oil longer and your filters are working good.

This Valvoline is working and you don't need another uoa for about 10-20k miles, but the high chromium might come down later if you thicken up to some xw40 oil.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2011 | 09:37 AM
  #479  
maskedferret's Avatar
Oooh, shiny!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 908
Likes: 2
From: St. Louis, MO
Updating the make up oil added had no change in the results ("doesn't really change things too much"). I guess it's just there to simply track oil consumption.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 05:01 PM
  #480  
paimon.soror's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,560
Likes: 27
From: Between Cones
Here are my results, one winter/spring run, one spring/summer run .... (yea ... i dont put too many miles on my baby hehe)

Not sure I am liking the viscosity numbers
Attached Thumbnails Used Oil Analysis - Post Them Here-report1.png   Used Oil Analysis - Post Them Here-report2.png  
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 05:16 PM
  #481  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
They are not dangerously low but they are low in comparison to other full synthetics. I have never bought into the hype that is RP. Heck those numbers are in line with a Castrol GTX 10W30. I would try something else and do a double oil change just to see what happens. Rotella T6 5W-40 is $25 a jug and tests well, I would give that a try.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 05:24 PM
  #482  
paimon.soror's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,560
Likes: 27
From: Between Cones
I was just gunna go to 0w40 redline at my next change, should be good enough no? or does this just prove that there is no point wasting an *** load of money on "premium" synthetics lol
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 05:29 PM
  #483  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
TX

Originally Posted by paimon.soror
I was just gunna go to 0w40 redline at my next change, should be good enough no? or does this just prove that there is no point wasting an *** load of money on "premium" synthetics lol

Redline is good stuff, at least it meets recomended specs and is certified. Try it, test it, and see how it does, if you don't like it you can always switch. That is what I did until I settled on Mobil1 0W-40. The Rotella T6 5W-40 actually tested very well in my car but for some reason I just feel better using the Mobil1 even though it costs much more.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 06:06 PM
  #484  
Iluvrevs's Avatar
I’m back
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 294
Likes: 25
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
Redline is good stuff, at least it meets recomended specs and is certified. Try it, test it, and see how it does, if you don't like it you can always switch. That is what I did until I settled on Mobil1 0W-40. The Rotella T6 5W-40 actually tested very well in my car but for some reason I just feel better using the Mobil1 even though it costs much more.
Last I heard Redline didnt get licensed for API SM nor have they gone SN. I think they declined as they would have had to reduce their ZDDP content. Been awhile since I read about it though. They easily pass specs with the exception of the ZDDP and the HTHS of the 5w20, 5w30, and 10w30 street oils.

FWIW I have the 10w60 in at the moment.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2011 | 01:36 AM
  #485  
REDRX3RX8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 716
Likes: 22
Originally Posted by paimon.soror
Here are my results, one winter/spring run, one spring/summer run .... (yea ... i dont put too many miles on my baby hehe)

Not sure I am liking the viscosity numbers
The 8 comes with like a 5w20 oil with lots of molybenum as do most cars now, and the 8 takes several changes to get up the viscosity since as most of us know here that you might only get half your oil out on a change.

Your second change has almost 11 cst @ 100 deg c , and the moly, and silicone from the new oil and build is lowering.

This uoa looks good, and your thickness is close enough or on the money depending on how hard you drive.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2011 | 05:57 AM
  #486  
paimon.soror's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,560
Likes: 27
From: Between Cones
Originally Posted by REDRX3RX8
The 8 comes with like a 5w20 oil with lots of molybenum as do most cars now, and the 8 takes several changes to get up the viscosity since as most of us know here that you might only get half your oil out on a change.

Your second change has almost 11 cst @ 100 deg c , and the moly, and silicone from the new oil and build is lowering.

This uoa looks good, and your thickness is close enough or on the money depending on how hard you drive.
Thanks for the response. And FYI, not sure if it makes any difference, but I use a pump to extract my oil as opposed to draining it from the plug. I get 5qt's out that way every time.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2011 | 07:46 AM
  #487  
Nadrealista's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 673
Likes: 33
From: Here
not bad report but I would go with redline oil..it is in the same price range as royal purple but it has much more stable viscosity since it is ester based oil. their 5w30 provides protection of 5w-40 wight oil due to its high HTHS numbers.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2011 | 09:44 AM
  #488  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
TX

Originally Posted by Iluvrevs
Last I heard Redline didnt get licensed for API SM nor have they gone SN. I think they declined as they would have had to reduce their ZDDP content. Been awhile since I read about it though. They easily pass specs with the exception of the ZDDP and the HTHS of the 5w20, 5w30, and 10w30 street oils.

FWIW I have the 10w60 in at the moment.
You are right, I think I am thinking of Amsoil.

Originally Posted by paimon.soror
Thanks for the response. And FYI, not sure if it makes any difference, but I use a pump to extract my oil as opposed to draining it from the plug. I get 5qt's out that way every time.
It shouldn't make a difference, I use a pump as well.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2011 | 09:46 AM
  #489  
paimon.soror's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,560
Likes: 27
From: Between Cones
Good thing is at least it isn't showing the use of FP+ contaminating the engine ... now if only we could prove that it's use actually beneficial lol.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2011 | 10:38 AM
  #490  
Iluvrevs's Avatar
I’m back
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 294
Likes: 25
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by paimon.soror
Good thing is at least it isn't showing the use of FP+ contaminating the engine ... now if only we could prove that it's use actually beneficial lol.
\

Ive got it on fairly expert opinion that it does.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2011 | 10:55 AM
  #491  
paimon.soror's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,560
Likes: 27
From: Between Cones
aw you know that i just can't take an opinion over cracking open an engine that has been using FP+ :D
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2011 | 05:21 PM
  #492  
paimon.soror's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,560
Likes: 27
From: Between Cones
So after I got my results I actually sent them over to RP because I wanted to gauge their reaction, here is their reply:

Good Afternoon,

At first I was a little perplexed by the lower than spec viscosity at 100°C, and variation in additive elementals reported vs. what the oil should have. The most recent report mentions that residual oil from the previous oil change (5W-30) could easily explain that, and I agree. Residual oil could also account for the unexpected additive elementals. When you switched to RP SAE 5W-30, was this from the factory/dealer installed oil, or some other 5W-20? The change in viscosity (and therefore formulation) at each change is likely contributing to the anomalous reported values. If you have decided on a particular oil brand and viscosity, try sticking with it for a couple of oil changes and samples and the values (visc. and additives) will likely stabilize. To summarize, I do not see any compelling reason that the oil could not have continued service, but I would like to see the values stabilize in the next sample. Again, it is important to use the same oil, otherwise a large amount of variability will be introduced.

I would like to see a sample on the next change. Let me know a couple of days before you change the oil and I will send a kit out to you. We won’t charge anything, as I am interested in if my theory is correct. If you are curious, you can send another sample to Blackstone at the same time and see how well we correlate.


Thanks for choosing Royal Purple and have a great day!


Best Regards,

Christopher Barker
Technical Services
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2011 | 05:26 PM
  #493  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
Seems like a good response, at least they are interested in helping. I would take them up on the offer so we can see what their test results show.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2011 | 05:30 PM
  #494  
paimon.soror's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,560
Likes: 27
From: Between Cones
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
Seems like a good response, at least they are interested in helping. I would take them up on the offer so we can see what their test results show.
Most def, it was a fast response too, I sent them an email late last night. They surely get a point in my book for good CS.

And yea I surely will, I will get one from BSL as well to compare just as he mentioned. I responded and let him know that I am running their 5w3 for winter, I was gunna run a 0w4 after i finished this interval but based on his reply I may run another interval or two on the 5w3 just to make sure my results aren't skewed due to residuals.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2011 | 11:51 PM
  #495  
Iluvrevs's Avatar
I’m back
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 294
Likes: 25
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by paimon.soror
aw you know that i just can't take an opinion over cracking open an engine that has been using FP+ :D
At that point wouldn’t it make it kind of irrelevant what you use?
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2011 | 11:37 AM
  #496  
vX-2's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln, Nebraska
Has anyone tried, Mobil 1 High Milage?
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2011 | 07:37 PM
  #497  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
I have not seen any info on that particular oil being used in a rotary.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2011 | 02:29 PM
  #498  
vX-2's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln, Nebraska
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
I have not seen any info on that particular oil being used in a rotary.
I see.. it's this one here:
http://www.mobil.com/USA-English-LCW...eage-5w30.aspx

Just a quick one... will using synthetic be ok? or in your opinion you'll still opt to use closest to conventional oil as much as possible? and what's the double ester from motul 300v means?

Last edited by vX-2; Nov 20, 2011 at 02:31 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 04:03 PM
  #499  
Iluvrevs's Avatar
I’m back
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 294
Likes: 25
From: Colorado
UOA Study

Here's a quick and dirty analysis of the UOAs from this thread FWIW. I didn’t discriminate between synthetic/mineral, premix/no premix, or S1/S2. I can if there is interest update as we get more data and will fish the net for other reports as well. Any keying errors will only result in immaterial variances. Id ignore the viscosities of the 5w20 and 5w30 as there are 0 values that are unduly influencing those averages. I didnt see where Id be able to upload the actual Excel file, sorry.
Attached Thumbnails Used Oil Analysis - Post Them Here-rx-uoa-study.jpg  
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 04:48 PM
  #500  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
Cool, I just sent you my last one.

Fixed

Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:04 PM.