Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

RX8 turbo reliability

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-19-2010, 08:01 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Riaan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Klerksdorp, South Africa
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RX8 turbo reliability

Installing a GReddy turbo kit on a Renesis motor, (now the question) the original design of this motor, does it allow for a turbo without sacrificing reliability?

Old 01-19-2010, 08:06 AM
  #2  
Blue Bullet?
iTrader: (3)
 
mscamp02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: morehead, Ky
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
when you add FI to any N/A engine you will always lose some reliability because of the added strain on the engine, doesnt matter if its a rotary, big 8, or a small inline 4.
Old 01-19-2010, 09:04 AM
  #3  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
You might want to add an extra Dowel or 2 to 2 corners to strengthen the housing.
Old 01-19-2010, 09:26 AM
  #4  
Almost boosted
iTrader: (3)
 
czar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
not to sure about how necessary the greddy oil pan(besides being convient) is but things I'd make sure is both the bov and something to tune the car. I personally like the cobb that mm has.
Old 01-19-2010, 09:29 AM
  #5  
Registered Zoom Zoomer
iTrader: (2)
 
Huey52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 4,089
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
The added heat of operation with a FI system is the most detrimental item to engine reliability, therefore the larger capacity Greddy oil pan is a good thing.
Old 01-19-2010, 09:41 AM
  #6  
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
mysql101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 8,625
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
I seem to recall that the greddy oil pan has about a half quart more oil than stock.
Old 01-19-2010, 09:49 AM
  #7  
Registered Zoom Zoomer
iTrader: (2)
 
Huey52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 4,089
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
^ Exactly. Its larger capacity and thick walled [heat sink] construction effectively serves as a secondary oil cooler, promoting reliability in FI applications.
Old 01-19-2010, 11:49 AM
  #8  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
What sheds heat quicker, an aluminum engine block or an aluminum beer can?
Which one contains more beer?
Old 01-19-2010, 01:07 PM
  #9  
Almost boosted
iTrader: (3)
 
czar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
water temp and oil temp gauges for those hot days in summer are nice to ^_^
Old 01-19-2010, 01:38 PM
  #10  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Maybe outside the scope of your question but a good read nevertheless ....

https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-major-horsepower-upgrades-93/how-make-your-renesis-turbo-sc-engine-last-187240/
Old 01-20-2010, 01:36 AM
  #11  
hakuna matata!
iTrader: (41)
 
alz0rz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,002
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I can haz turbo?
Old 01-20-2010, 06:10 AM
  #12  
Registered Zoom Zoomer
iTrader: (2)
 
Huey52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 4,089
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
The thin walled beer can obviously doesn't have the thermal insulating mass of the aluminum engine block or Greddy oil pan, so its instantaneous heat transfer is more rapid. However (you knew there was going to be a however), the large mass of the block/pan has a far better sustained heat sink transfer rate, promoting reliability.

You can only rent beer. For the long haul oil is far better.

Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
What sheds heat quicker, an aluminum engine block or an aluminum beer can?
Old 01-20-2010, 07:41 AM
  #13  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by alz0rz
I can haz turbo?
compraaationZ t00 l0Wz ?
Old 01-20-2010, 10:17 AM
  #14  
hakuna matata!
iTrader: (41)
 
alz0rz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,002
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by nycgps
compraaationZ t00 l0Wz ?
i have reason to believe the tester was faulty even more now.. I won't know for sure until we try it on a known good motor.... like hmm.. YOURS!!!!? that you barely had on for 2-3months?!!!!
Old 01-20-2010, 11:26 AM
  #15  
Registered Zoom Zoomer
iTrader: (2)
 
Huey52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 4,089
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
^ Confusing beer can 'insulation' with thermal mass sink heat dissipation. Beer in a can in ambient air starts out cold ("instantaneous measurement") but is quickly a heat absorber. Heat moves to cold.

Example: old style heavy iron radiators in the home are still the best for efficient heat transfer; hot water or steam transferring that heat to room air.

Example 2: radiators in cars are not as heavy, but rather rely on their much larger multi-finned aggregate surface area.

The Greddy oil pan under discussion relies on dense thermal mass and larger volume to transfer this heat on a continuous basis. As we know it takes quite some time to heat the oil (thermal inertia), but once hot it needs to transfer that heat efficiently and for a prolonged period to protect the engine's components, and therefore provide best reliability.

Heat is the enemy and is exacerbated by FI applications.

WTF, I'm supporting BHR's recommendations.

Last edited by Huey52; 01-20-2010 at 11:28 AM.
Old 01-20-2010, 12:37 PM
  #16  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
Removing that clamp and hose every time you change your oil is a hassle .
pales to insignificance when you have pulled the engine a few times which many turbo owners will end up doing LOL .....
Old 01-20-2010, 01:13 PM
  #17  
I divide by zero
 
Mawnee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Which one contains more beer?
hmmm..so adding a can and a half of beer to my oil will keep it cool? sweet!


Actually, I've had no problems with heat on my setup. So no need to waste beer!
Old 01-20-2010, 01:58 PM
  #18  
Registered Zoom Zoomer
iTrader: (2)
 
Huey52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 4,089
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
I was responding to this BHR recommendation, with which I agree.

Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
The GReddy Turbo Kit will work fine with the Renesis provided it is tuned properly and your potential reliability is improved if you get a few add-ons, such as the GReddy Oil Pan and a BOV (both of which should have been included in the kit anyway). Should you decide to get some sort of "upgraded" turbo you will then want to consider further ancillaries.
Old 01-21-2010, 11:38 PM
  #19  
RX8club group buy vendor
iTrader: (5)
 
Lebren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 525
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If I could make a comment without stepping on anyone's toes, race roots has a beautifully designed oil pan. added oil capacity without the depth of greddy's george foreman grill.... secondly, the drain bung is in the rear

seems worth the extra loot for the race roots pan.

and per op's question, FI is only as good as the tune, say bye to "9000 rpm" revs you're used to with NA.
Old 01-22-2010, 07:04 AM
  #20  
Registered Zoom Zoomer
iTrader: (2)
 
Huey52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 4,089
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
I don't care anymore either, and I thought it was a discussion.

Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
That was why I didn't bother with continuing the argument, Huey.
Old 01-22-2010, 07:59 AM
  #21  
Registered Zoom Zoomer
iTrader: (2)
 
Huey52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 4,089
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Yes, that Race Roots oil pan is very nice:

http://raceroots.com/index.php/produ...y-oil-pan.html

Almost double the capacity, yet only 1/4" lower. Nice baffles too, to help prevent G-loaded oil starvation. Only thing better is a dry sump system.

Originally Posted by Lebren
If I could make a comment without stepping on anyone's toes, race roots has a beautifully designed oil pan. added oil capacity without the depth of greddy's george foreman grill.... secondly, the drain bung is in the rear

seems worth the extra loot for the race roots pan.

and per op's question, FI is only as good as the tune, say bye to "9000 rpm" revs you're used to with NA.
Old 01-22-2010, 11:34 AM
  #22  
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Razz1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cali
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
It's a high compression motor and not designed for a turbo.

Check around you will find that a lower compression motor is best.

You will also generate alot more heat which is a problem.

I think the longest I have seen a turbo last is 50k miles and I'm not sure about that.

I have never seen anyone post.... Here's my turbo RX8 that lasted 100k miles after the install.
Old 01-22-2010, 07:22 PM
  #23  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by Huey52
Yes, that Race Roots oil pan ...
Almost double the capacity,
And you want to lug around an extra 9 pounds of oil for what reason, exactly?

Originally Posted by Huey52
yet only 1/4" lower.
Which would put it squarely into just about every speed bump in Phoenix and Vegas.

Originally Posted by Huey52
Nice baffles too, to help prevent G-loaded oil starvation.
We don't have "g-loaded" oil starvation on the rotary.

Originally Posted by Razz1
It's a high compression motor and not designed for a turbo.
Wrong.

Originally Posted by Razz1
Check around you will find that a lower compression motor is best.
Wrong.

Originally Posted by Razz1
You will also generate alot more heat which is a problem.
Still wrong.

Originally Posted by Razz1
I think the longest I have seen a turbo last is 50k miles and I'm not sure about that.
Indeed, still completely wrong.
Old 01-22-2010, 07:25 PM
  #24  
sold the 8... :(
iTrader: (7)
 
05rex8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^ahahaha win
Old 01-22-2010, 07:28 PM
  #25  
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Razz1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cali
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
MAn are u funny MM

Doesn't generate more heat.
And still no proof of a turbo over 50k on the forum.
Lower compression is better.

He must be high on his Avitar today.

Mu ha ha.............


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: RX8 turbo reliability



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:51 AM.