Rotary Rotation Ratio DEMONSTRATION
08-06-2007, 08:11 PM
#1
Rotary Rotation Ratio DEMONSTRATION
There seems to still be some confusion about the relationship between the inside and outside of the Renesis.
Though it is explained often on this site and elsewhere that there is a 3:1 relationship between the eccentric (crank) shaft and the rotors, I still get people coming up with strange math and odd ideas about how many combustion cycles a rotary motor has per rev and what the rotors are doing compared to the "crank"
Here is a video that should explain this in a way the various animations available on the Internet haven't been able to get across.
Hopefully, someone will find this useful.
Rotary Rotational Ratio Demonstration
Though it is explained often on this site and elsewhere that there is a 3:1 relationship between the eccentric (crank) shaft and the rotors, I still get people coming up with strange math and odd ideas about how many combustion cycles a rotary motor has per rev and what the rotors are doing compared to the "crank"
Here is a video that should explain this in a way the various animations available on the Internet haven't been able to get across.
Hopefully, someone will find this useful.
Rotary Rotational Ratio Demonstration
Last edited by MazdaManiac; 04-18-2008 at 05:25 PM. Reason: ©® 2008 MazdaManiac
....
08-06-2007, 08:35 PM
#6
Asshole for hire
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Colfontaine, Belgium
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
wow!!!! thats amazing someone could say something like that.... even before MM broke it down barney style, there have been animations and gifs on the web forever that showed that...
08-06-2007, 08:42 PM
#7
It will be interesting to see the back-pedaling that will ensue in that thread...
08-06-2007, 11:56 PM
#11
Doggie Style :)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, that guy actually tried to reference those animations as "proof" of his concept. He claims to have built more than 50 13b motors. He should get together with RotaryResurection and compare notes.
It will be interesting to see the back-pedaling that will ensue in that thread...
It will be interesting to see the back-pedaling that will ensue in that thread...
crap, I missed something. Linkey to that thread?
08-07-2007, 12:27 PM
#17
Registered
Nice clip MM! I too thought I heard some low mumbling.
Must be a mental thing.
Yeah combustion is a chemical process. Having it work at 9,000 RPM rotor, would be amazing. Now, how much heat would that generate?
Must be a mental thing.
Yeah combustion is a chemical process. Having it work at 9,000 RPM rotor, would be amazing. Now, how much heat would that generate?
08-07-2007, 01:59 PM
#23
if you click on "odd ideas" in MM's original post, it links to the specific post, then above it will say "Thread: <whatever the title is>". just click on that and you get directed to the thread
too bad mod ruined the fun by banning him... would have been more interesting to see how long it takes him to admit defeat... though I guess it's good that kane's thread didnt get taken over.
Not saying the guy didnt deserve a ban of some sort... but even if he is a mod of another forum, he wasnt really trolling (from the looks of his other posts). Didnt look like he had any other posts that were pointless/wrong. Oh well, too late now lol
too bad mod ruined the fun by banning him... would have been more interesting to see how long it takes him to admit defeat... though I guess it's good that kane's thread didnt get taken over.
Not saying the guy didnt deserve a ban of some sort... but even if he is a mod of another forum, he wasnt really trolling (from the looks of his other posts). Didnt look like he had any other posts that were pointless/wrong. Oh well, too late now lol
Last edited by 8 Maniac; 08-07-2007 at 02:36 PM.
08-07-2007, 02:47 PM
#24
He was intentionally wrong! Didn't you read his post! He was trying to trick me. He is such a tricky trickster! He got me good.
He was correct on one thing, though - I am spinning that assembly backwards.
Of course, that keeps the rotor coming towards the camera, which is more presentable, but it is still wrong, wrong, wrong!
I should be banned for such trolling!
He was correct on one thing, though - I am spinning that assembly backwards.
Of course, that keeps the rotor coming towards the camera, which is more presentable, but it is still wrong, wrong, wrong!
I should be banned for such trolling!
