Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Lets look at expo1's over 100K renesis motor

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 08:25 AM
  #301  
r0tor's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 1
From: PA
Originally Posted by olddragger
just go with the castrol it will be fine---fi guys should be running 20w 50. most bearing wear is being caused by the dry start up anyway. usually on the front eccentric bearing. At 50K mine was to the and into the copper in the usual spot. I was using 10w 30 and 10w 40 the entire time. I had more carbon than i have ever seen.
olddragger
If your bearing wear was mostly caused by dry start up - a thinner oil which will get through the bearings quicker would have a significant advantage to running an even thicker oil
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 10:27 AM
  #302  
onefatsurfer's Avatar
White is purdy...
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
From: Jersey Shore
Originally Posted by r0tor
If your bearing wear was mostly caused by dry start up - a thinner oil which will get through the bearings quicker would have a significant advantage to running an even thicker oil
And the new pcm flash would significantly prevent wear, as it says they increased the amount of oil injected at start up...
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 10:31 AM
  #303  
alnielsen's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,255
Likes: 8
From: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
Originally Posted by onefatsurfer
And the new pcm flash would significantly prevent wear, as it says they increased the amount of oil injected at start up...
I'm not willing to trust a flash to correct the problem. I'm premixing. Plus the flash is only for oil injected into the rotor housing. That wouldn't prevent bearing wear.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 11:57 AM
  #304  
mysql's Avatar
Doppelgänger
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Originally Posted by ThecdnRX8
Now that I have wrapped by head around this I want to ask why a recommendation of a 10w40 grade and not grade 5w40 oil? Would this not be just as good as a 5w30 at start up and a 10w40 at running temp?
There are other considerations in play here. The wider the range, the quicker the additives in the oil can break down.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 02:21 PM
  #305  
Nubo's Avatar
Lubricious
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 4
From: SF Bay Area, California
Originally Posted by ThecdnRX8
Now that I have wrapped by head around this I want to ask why a recommendation of a 10w40 grade and not grade 5w40 oil? Would this not be just as good as a 5w30 at start up and a 10w40 at running temp?
All else being equal, a lower spread between the weights in a multigrade, will be a better oil.

In order to achieve a multi-grade, viscocity modifiers are added to the base oil that increase the viscocity at higher temps beyond what it would otherwise be. The larger the spread, the more of these modifiers that must be used. There are 2 drawbacks. First, the modifiers are replacing oil that would otherwise be used for lubrication. Second, the modifiers tend to "shear", that is their molecules break down under forces encountered during operation. So what starts as 5w40 will eventually become a 5w30, then 5w20 or even lighter as time goes by. The less modifier used, the less pronounced is this effect.

So, a 10w40 with a spread of 30, would have some advantages over an oil made from the same base, that was engineered to 5w40, with a spread of 35, by simply adding more modifiers.

In general, you're better off with the lowest spread that will cover the temperatures you expect to encounter. I.e., try to stay away from something crazy like 0w50, unless you're planning regular trips between Death Valley and the snowcapped Rockies.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 07:37 PM
  #306  
Mazmart's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,794
Likes: 67
A lot of great info folks.

A few things we should keep in mind with oil ratings: Although you do want to avoid excessive VI improvers, remember that a Winter rating is not a viscosity rating.

I wouldn't oppose a 0W50 FULL SYNTHETIC (For my purposes) .

Paul.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 08:05 PM
  #307  
LionZoo's Avatar
road warrior
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 3
From: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
Originally Posted by Nubo
All else being equal, a lower spread between the weights in a multigrade, will be a better oil.

In order to achieve a multi-grade, viscocity modifiers are added to the base oil that increase the viscocity at higher temps beyond what it would otherwise be. The larger the spread, the more of these modifiers that must be used. There are 2 drawbacks. First, the modifiers are replacing oil that would otherwise be used for lubrication. Second, the modifiers tend to "shear", that is their molecules break down under forces encountered during operation. So what starts as 5w40 will eventually become a 5w30, then 5w20 or even lighter as time goes by. The less modifier used, the less pronounced is this effect.

So, a 10w40 with a spread of 30, would have some advantages over an oil made from the same base, that was engineered to 5w40, with a spread of 35, by simply adding more modifiers.

In general, you're better off with the lowest spread that will cover the temperatures you expect to encounter. I.e., try to stay away from something crazy like 0w50, unless you're planning regular trips between Death Valley and the snowcapped Rockies.
Though synthetics will avoid the problem of VI modifiers to a point...
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 02:29 AM
  #308  
Cody Red's Avatar
always filling [the c]up
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 0
From: Alice, Texas
so is there a particular premix anyone should keep in mind?

i had given the um..protek-r a shot a couple months back. used a little more during a pca event. but i stopped buying it in december. my motor has only seen about.....60oz's?

anyways. in addition to my learning a few more things about the renny, i'd like to be sure on which premix is *best*.

and to think, i USED to run 10w40 just because i wanted to. now to switch back from the 5w30 i'm on now before another event.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 02:35 AM
  #309  
swoope's Avatar
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,603
Likes: 36
From: orlando, fl
Originally Posted by Cody Red
so is there a particular premix anyone should keep in mind?

i had given the um..protek-r a shot a couple months back. used a little more during a pca event. but i stopped buying it in december. my motor has only seen about.....60oz's?

anyways. in addition to my learning a few more things about the renny, i'd like to be sure on which premix is *best*.

and to think, i USED to run 10w40 just because i wanted to. now to switch back from the 5w30 i'm on now before another event.

send me an email.. swoo gmail. com

beers
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 07:08 AM
  #310  
Jax_RX8's Avatar
Got Another Rotary
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 608
Likes: 2
From: Fredericksburg, VA
Originally Posted by Cody Red
anyways. in addition to my learning a few more things about the renny, i'd like to be sure on which premix is *best*.
There is no one "best" premix just like there is not one best oil.

Depending on what you are trying to accomplish with your premix - additional lubrication and cleaning - and in what proportion - will determine your preferred product(s)

Here is a post that lists some to consider, with some basic details

https://www.rx8club.com/showpost.php...&postcount=968
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 10:38 AM
  #311  
Cody Red's Avatar
always filling [the c]up
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 0
From: Alice, Texas
Originally Posted by swoope
send me an email.. swoope gmail. com

beers
alrighty.
Originally Posted by Jax_RX8
There is no one "best" premix just like there is not one best oil.

Depending on what you are trying to accomplish with your premix - additional lubrication and cleaning - and in what proportion - will determine your preferred product(s)

Here is a post that lists some to consider, with some basic details

https://www.rx8club.com/showpost.php...&postcount=968
i guess i should have provided for lubrication and cleansing.

thanks for providing the link!
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2008 | 12:59 AM
  #312  
type59's Avatar
mrjackwong
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
im planning on using 10-30 in the summer and 5-30 in the winter. does that sound ok? other way around? or should i just stick to one?

planning on using mobil1 syn.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2008 | 08:21 AM
  #313  
ayrton012's Avatar
Ayrton Senna Forever
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 406
Likes: 1
From: Europe
I dont think that a xx-40 oil is the best choice for the Renesis. Lubrication is not just depend on, how thick is the oil.
With a xx-30 oil you will get more oil flow, at high rpm. More flow means better lubrication and better COOLING! Think about the oil spray inside the rotors.
With an xx-40 oil you reach the max flow rate about 7000rpm if the oil hot, because the oil by-pass valve will already open there (partly), because of the thicker oil's higher pressure. If the oil cooler than the by-pass open much earlier.

With a xx-30 oil you will get better flow above 7000 rpm, just there where that is the most important! More oil will spray on your rotors inside wall, and the engine's internal parts will get better cooling, and more oil will flow across the oil coolers in the same time vs. the thicker xx-40. So everything will be cooler. Maybe it's an important part when we are seeking the longer life's secret (engine).

I prefer 0w-30. 0w is the closest to perfect thickness at cold starting, but even 0w is too thick at cold starting!

Last edited by ayrton012; Apr 21, 2008 at 09:04 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2008 | 09:29 AM
  #314  
CnnmnSchnpps's Avatar
No means yes
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
From: Jersey City NJ
Just switched to 5W30 this weekend and the sky didn't fall on my head. Cool..
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2008 | 10:02 AM
  #315  
Mazmart's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,794
Likes: 67
Of course our rotary engine experience and dealings with oils used in high rpm endurance applications is so limited .

There's nothing clearance-wise or material-wise about the renesis that would prevent someone from using a 20W50, I wouldn't personally run that in a cold climate. All the the research we've done and seen indicates that the thinner oils are used for improved gas mileage and tiny hp increase. Having seen more than 1000 street and racing rotaries apart and conducted tests with various oils I'd rather go a little toward the higher end of the viscosity scale than the other way.

Paul.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2008 | 10:04 AM
  #316  
Mazmart's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,794
Likes: 67
Originally Posted by CnnmnSchnpps
Just switched to 5W30 this weekend and the sky didn't fall on my head. Cool..
Good move. Your engine will love you for it.

Paul.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2008 | 10:10 AM
  #317  
expo1's Avatar
He's as bad as Can
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,309
Likes: 3
From: Manchester, NJ
Paul, just wanted to say I have 7,000 miles on your engine and all is well. It's using RP 5W-30 now. I however will not be racking up the miles on this one like my last motor. I picked up a 2000 Saturn SL beater just for commuting. Gets DBL the MPG and just driving it to work 3x a week will cut 12,000 miles a year off my 8.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2008 | 10:43 AM
  #318  
nycgps's Avatar
Thread Starter
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,881
Likes: 36
From: Planet Earth
Originally Posted by Mazmart
Of course our rotary engine experience and dealings with oils used in high rpm endurance applications is so limited .

There's nothing clearance-wise or material-wise about the renesis that would prevent someone from using a 20W50, I wouldn't personally run that in a cold climate. All the the research we've done and seen indicates that the thinner oils are used for improved gas mileage and tiny hp increase. Having seen more than 1000 street and racing rotaries apart and conducted tests with various oils I'd rather go a little toward the higher end of the viscosity scale than the other way.

Paul.
Have been using 5w30 for 30+K miles. still working like a charm

Originally Posted by expo1
Paul, just wanted to say I have 7,000 miles on your engine and all is well. It's using RP 5W-30 now. I however will not be racking up the miles on this one like my last motor. I picked up a 2000 Saturn SL beater just for commuting. Gets DBL the MPG and just driving it to work 3x a week will cut 12,000 miles a year off my 8.
YOU SELL OUT !!!!! ~~~~~

j/k :P

Hell Im getting a Yaris for DD ... Many ask *WTF A YARIS?*

Well, not like I cant take the gas price(3.83 Premium, but I use Medium for now which cost about 3.71 last night, it works so why not ?) I just want to keep my warranty a bit longer. My warranty should go out at June 2009, but I have 40K miles on the motor already, if I keep driving it Im gonna lose a whole yr of bumper to bumper warranty it sounds stupid but, Hey I tried the Yaris its actually NOT as bad as I thought it was ! (5 sp manual of course )

Last edited by nycgps; Apr 21, 2008 at 10:46 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2008 | 11:43 AM
  #319  
expo1's Avatar
He's as bad as Can
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,309
Likes: 3
From: Manchester, NJ
Originally Posted by nycgps
YOU SELL OUT !!!!! ~~~~~
I got over that when my last tank on the Saturn avg. 38 MPG. It will add about 4 more years to my 8, I also will not have to wash it as much. I am still going to put about 15,000 miles a year on the 8, I was doing 25,000 a year. With what gas is going for is just crazy to use the 8 to drive in parkway traffic 80 miles a day.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2008 | 07:45 PM
  #320  
nycgps's Avatar
Thread Starter
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,881
Likes: 36
From: Planet Earth
Originally Posted by expo1
I got over that when my last tank on the Saturn avg. 38 MPG. It will add about 4 more years to my 8, I also will not have to wash it as much. I am still going to put about 15,000 miles a year on the 8, I was doing 25,000 a year. With what gas is going for is just crazy to use the 8 to drive in parkway traffic 80 miles a day.
I know ...

If bush is outa the office we might be able to ZooM ZooM more ...
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2008 | 07:55 PM
  #321  
CnnmnSchnpps's Avatar
No means yes
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
From: Jersey City NJ
Hah.. Just wait til oil hits 200 bucks a barrel..
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2008 | 08:25 PM
  #322  
sosonic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 792
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Nubo
All else being equal, a lower spread between the weights in a multigrade, will be a better oil.

In order to achieve a multi-grade, viscocity modifiers are added to the base oil that increase the viscocity at higher temps beyond what it would otherwise be. The larger the spread, the more of these modifiers that must be used. There are 2 drawbacks. First, the modifiers are replacing oil that would otherwise be used for lubrication. Second, the modifiers tend to "shear", that is their molecules break down under forces encountered during operation. So what starts as 5w40 will eventually become a 5w30, then 5w20 or even lighter as time goes by. The less modifier used, the less pronounced is this effect.

So, a 10w40 with a spread of 30, would have some advantages over an oil made from the same base, that was engineered to 5w40, with a spread of 35, by simply adding more modifiers.

In general, you're better off with the lowest spread that will cover the temperatures you expect to encounter. I.e., try to stay away from something crazy like 0w50, unless you're planning regular trips between Death Valley and the snowcapped Rockies.

This is why I went 0W30 synthetic and not 0w40 OR 10w40. For example, Motul or Redline ester based oils start out like a 0W20, so few modifiers are needed to make it 0W30. Unlike 0W40, 5W40, or others. Note- Ester based oils also perform better at startup.

For 0W40 to get to W40 they add in more modifiers. In many situations and scenarios, 0W30 is actually the better oil than 0W40. Motul had this situation with their own 0W30 versus their 0W40.

0W30 is also the better oil during startup than 10W40. Also a synthetic 0W30 will compare very well against any dino 10W40. It will also compare well against synthetic 10W40 too. It would come down more to which particular traits you wanted in the oil.

A good 0W30 synthetic should hold up very well between oil changes, resist wear, for cooling, and still do well with MPG.

To be on the safe side even more, I add Lucas UCL and cleaner (you have to address the carbon build up issue too), by itself, as my pre-mix. I'm looking to try Lube Control FP Plus, again by itself and NOT with any 2 cycle oil, but the Lucas UCL is easy for me to get and is working well.

Note- Keep in mind if you are all out racing your car and in warm weather, than you are looking at a different scenario. You would look at 5W40, 10W40, or 20w50 to provide max protection in extreme and sustained stress on your engine. However, for 20W50, I wonder about the cooling effect (or lack of) of the oil. But for daily driving, my opinion, is go with a 0W30 synthetic as startup will be a wear maker, MPG is a concern, short trips become issues, and you are stressing the engine at the high end for shorter periods of time.

just go with the castrol it will be fine---fi guys should be running 20w 50. most bearing wear is being caused by the dry start up anyway. usually on the front eccentric bearing. At 50K mine was to the and into the copper in the usual spot. I was using 10w 30 and 10w 40 the entire time. I had more carbon than i have ever seen.
olddragger
That is where I think Lucas UCL or Lube Control FP Plus, would be helpful. They are lubricous cleaners that tackle the carbon build up and deposit problem. Startup wear would = using 0W_ oils and/or Pre-mix. Sustained and continuous high rev stress (or racing for long periods) = _W40, _W50 (in my opinion), and again looking at pre-mix or lubricous cleaner on our engines.

Last edited by sosonic; Apr 21, 2008 at 08:58 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 07:03 AM
  #323  
savedsol's Avatar
Carbonormous
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by sosonic
For 0W40 to get to W40 they add in more modifiers. In many situations and scenarios, 0W30 is actually the better oil than 0W40. Motul had this situation with their own 0W30 versus their 0W40.
Wrong! The 0 (zero) is the part that needed the additives. The first number is the W. 0W-40 not 0-W40.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 07:06 AM
  #324  
savedsol's Avatar
Carbonormous
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by nycgps
If bush is outa the office we might be able to ZooM ZooM more ...

Yes, because I'm sure next Jan when he leaves the oval office Osama, the Iranians, and all of the terrorist factions will just stop their atrocities that they've been performing for 30 years regardless of which party has run the White House.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 07:16 AM
  #325  
r0tor's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 1
From: PA
when we bail out of Iraq and either Iran or AQ take it over, i'll be laughing my *** of when oil hits $300 a barrel... then i'll be crying and have to bike 15 miles to work -sigh-

I always noticed how much worse my car sounds in the winter on a cold start running 5W20 vs summer 5W20... 0W30 might be a nice option actually
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:33 AM.