Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Gas/Oil Premix Thread

Old Dec 18, 2006 | 10:33 PM
  #251  
KimiFelipe's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
I hate to disagree with you, and I dont know what the feedstock is for these oils, but you are wrong on a couple things so you may be wrong on others, so I'll ask.

First, neither polyisobutylene nor isobutylene are long chain olefins. isobutylene contains 4 carbons and is an olefin. When an olefin is polymerized the product is referred to as a poly(olefin), meaning that it's an olefin which has been polymerized, and the double bonds are now gone, so the product is actually a parafin, it's saturated.

Secondly, I didn't think that PIB is such a good material for an oil - I'm going to have to look it up tomorrow but I thought this was a gummy substance not oily. Depends on molecular weight sure but isobutylene is not the nicest thing to polymerize to low molecular weight, which would give you the right viscosity for a motor oil.

Usually if you want something greasy you want something with a lot less branching in the backbone - PIB is very highly branched! Now, oil technology is VERY complex, and maybe PIB is a small component. If I have time I'll check Lucas' patents and see if I can add anything to the conversation. NO promises, tho.

I dont know what "too" biodegradable means, but there is no reason that biodegradability and combustability have anything at all to do with one another. In a very very broad sense, the more oxygen in a compound the less combustible it is, and for bugs to eat something generally it is nice if you have functional groups in them, which tend to contain oxygen. But from there, there is no connection whatever between biodegradability and combustability.

Example: Ethanol is biodegradable (drink beer??) and very combustible.

Originally Posted by StealthTL
Pre-mix oil is the one place that the term "synthetic" definitely belongs!

Synthetic two-stroke oil is mostly made from poly-isobutylene, a long chain olefin (PIB is not an "oil", hence synthetic) that has tremendous lubricity, yet burns like gasoline, with no smoke and leaving no deposits. Rumor has it (it's a secret) that this is the major component in Lucas Upper Cylinder Lubricant, and actually removes carbon deposits.

Castor oil based products would never say "synthetic" on the label, because they use natural old-school gummy veggie oil.

TCW-3 is pretty poor in most areas, (due to it's high emphasis on being bio-degradable when it is exhausted into a lake) modern synthetics can do much better - it is also renowned for building up slimy jello deposits in the jug or in your oil tank. Maybe a little TOO bio-degradable?

S
Old Dec 18, 2006 | 11:07 PM
  #252  
N10S's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 196
Likes: 1
Smile

Originally Posted by KimiFelipe
I spoke with my dealer's rotary guy when I picked up my car, and I asked him if I should premix, and his response was "absolutely not." He's been working on rotaries at least 15 years iirc.

Now I'm really confused, but I think I'll try it for a tank or two.
I have been pouring through a lot of info on different forums and have called a few vendors as well on the pre-mixing issue, and there are various positions on the matter some very contradictory to others. At the end of the day though folks working at a mazda dealership will be unlikely to support the idea of you premixing because it doesn't follow their "book" position.

Alternatively many folks with years of rotary engine tuning experience (not at a dealership) seem to support the idea as a supplemental way to provide more uniform lubrication than the OMP may be able to provide at all times. I personally ordered some Idemitsu synthetic pre-mix oil from the guys at Mazdatrix, and am going to start using it soon in small mix quantities with each tank of gas. The page with the Idemitsu info can be found here:

http://www.mazdatrix.com/q-supply.htm

Last edited by N10S; Dec 18, 2006 at 11:14 PM.
Old Dec 18, 2006 | 11:36 PM
  #253  
StealthTL's Avatar
Metatron
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,286
Likes: 184
From: A Pacific Island.
Cool Pib...

You are right, when we make it, it's an olefin, but as used, it would be reffered to as simply a polymer.

I wouldn't waste my time looking up the qualities of PIB, if you think it wouldn't make a good oil component - just try and find a modern ISO-EGD spec synthetic two-stroke that DOESN'T contain it. They would be rare.
"our company" uses 45% PIB, with a little PIB-succinimide as a dispersant.

I never said that TCW-3 is any more "deposit forming or smoking" just because it is bio-degradable, it is just more "jello and slime forming", due to it's vastly different priorities. In order to cut down on the metallic additives, they use hydrazine compounds as detergents, these contain a lot of nitrogen and slime-bugs just love nitrogen.

S
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 05:06 AM
  #254  
RX8Maine's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 558
Likes: 3
From: Richland, WA
Originally Posted by Brettus
Just a thought - if premix really helped that much , your engine had/has a problem .
If that is the ony way you can interpret the results, then I suggest you NOT try it.

Recall done with no probs . . . 8600 miles on the car.

Read the threads. There are a lot of reasons why this would help, even on a healthy engine. Better lubrication helps any engie, and this engine's two biggest moving parts are only lubricated well by finding ways to consistently get adequate lubrication into the combustion chamber.

Last edited by RX8Maine; Dec 19, 2006 at 05:12 AM.
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 05:10 AM
  #255  
RX8Maine's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 558
Likes: 3
From: Richland, WA
Originally Posted by StealthTL
Rumor has it (it's a secret) that this is the major component in Lucas Upper Cylinder Lubricant, and actually removes carbon deposits.
S
That's interesting. I briefly considered using only the Lucas UCL but then decided to do both. The synthetic JASO-FC oil I bought was much darker and thicker than the lucas UCL. There is an auto parts store right near me that also carries MMO, so I may give that a try.
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 05:54 AM
  #256  
nycgps's Avatar
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,881
Likes: 36
From: Planet Earth
Idemitsu for almost 10K miles no problems ! Pass Recall and everything. Engine is happy !

I dont know what others are thinking, but I think Premix are cool and will continue to do so.

I use Royal Purple Full Synthetic Engine Oil too ! Does that help also ? :P (I dont want to start another Synth vs Dino war!)
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 06:12 AM
  #257  
KimiFelipe's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by StealthTL
You are right, when we make it, it's an olefin, but as used, it would be reffered to as simply a polymer.

I wouldn't waste my time looking up the qualities of PIB, if you think it wouldn't make a good oil component - just try and find a modern ISO-EGD spec synthetic two-stroke that DOESN'T contain it. They would be rare.
"our company" uses 45% PIB, with a little PIB-succinimide as a dispersant.

I never said that TCW-3 is any more "deposit forming or smoking" just because it is bio-degradable, it is just more "jello and slime forming", due to it's vastly different priorities. In order to cut down on the metallic additives, they use hydrazine compounds as detergents, these contain a lot of nitrogen and slime-bugs just love nitrogen.

S
So you work for Infineum International Ltd. then? (US 6455477) Here it calls for a butene or isobutene feedstock, so the branching must not be very important. The molecular weights in these patents are very small, less than 1000, average number of monomers 13-22? Its been a while since I did polyolefins, but this is pretty interesting. Thanks for mentioning the succinimide dispersant.
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 10:13 AM
  #258  
Rhythmic's Avatar
Laid back in the pocket
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
From: Blacksburg, VA
Never too late to start pre-mixing? I've got 34k mi. now, but am wanting to give it a try.

>side note: I was the first at my dealer to get the recall. I've recently lost some trust in the mechanics at this dealer. Would it be overkill to have my ECU software version verified? Is there a possiblity that they didn't flash the correct version? (sorry for the hijack)
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 10:21 AM
  #259  
expo1's Avatar
He's as bad as Can
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,309
Likes: 3
From: Manchester, NJ
Originally Posted by Rhythmic
Never too late to start pre-mixing? I've got 34k mi. now, but am wanting to give it a try.
I started around 70,000 I now have over 81,000 miles.
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 10:21 AM
  #260  
Brettus's Avatar
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,844
Likes: 1,798
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Originally Posted by RX8Maine
If that is the ony way you can interpret the results, then I suggest you NOT try it.

Recall done with no probs . . . 8600 miles on the car.

Read the threads. There are a lot of reasons why this would help, even on a healthy engine. Better lubrication helps any engie, and this engine's two biggest moving parts are only lubricated well by finding ways to consistently get adequate lubrication into the combustion chamber.
I have read the threads & I have tried it . I also did some actual testing with scanalyser which showed no performance gain whatsoever. As far as whether it increases the life of the engine - no one has really proved that but it certainly is more likely to do more good than harm.
My comment was just suggesting that premix can improve the performance if you have other issues . If your engine is fine - it will not .
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 11:01 AM
  #261  
dynamho's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 7
From: Norwood, NJ
How does one use a premix -- just pour the measured amount into the gas tank before filling up so it gets mixed by the filling action?
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 11:07 AM
  #262  
RX8Maine's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 558
Likes: 3
From: Richland, WA
"If your engine is fine - it will not."

That's a pretty empirical statement.

Why would Mazda use it in racing applications?

I haven't driven anyone else's 8, but I don't have any reason to believe mine was troubled before doing this. Even the "rough idle" is probably a non-issue. The car idles more smoothly than any other car I have owned, but it seems like everyone else claims they can't tell theirs is running without looking at the tach.

What we need is for someone with a brand new 8 to do this as soon as they complete their break-in, possibly even with pre- and post- dyno runs. I'd be willing to contribute toward the cost. I think a lot of people are curious about this.
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 11:12 AM
  #263  
expo1's Avatar
He's as bad as Can
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,309
Likes: 3
From: Manchester, NJ
Originally Posted by dynamho
How does one use a premix -- just pour the measured amount into the gas tank before filling up so it gets mixed by the filling action?
I carry around some Idemitsu Premix in bottles and add it after it's full. Some add it before. In New Jersey you can't pump your own gas so after works out for me.
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 11:13 AM
  #264  
StealthTL's Avatar
Metatron
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,286
Likes: 184
From: A Pacific Island.
Cool Pre.....

Yeah, that's what I do, just pour my little bottle in, but I usually wait until I have two gallons in - then dump it in. The reason I do it that way, is that twice I put the oil in and there was a pump problem (once it was out of gas, once the computer that ran the pumps was broken) so I had a really rich mixture in there as I drove to another gas station.

So now I make sure the gas is actually going IN before I add, probably just another little bit of paranoia....

S
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 11:25 AM
  #265  
nycgps's Avatar
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,881
Likes: 36
From: Planet Earth
Originally Posted by StealthTL
Yeah, that's what I do, just pour my little bottle in, but I usually wait until I have two gallons in - then dump it in. The reason I do it that way, is that twice I put the oil in and there was a pump problem (once it was out of gas, once the computer that ran the pumps was broken) so I had a really rich mixture in there as I drove to another gas station.

So now I make sure the gas is actually going IN before I add, probably just another little bit of paranoia....

S
That Happened to me once. The pump I was on was broken, the screen shows everything fine but nothing happens when I click .... I went in try to pay cash but the dude said that pump is broken (Great, is it that hard to put a fuxking Out of Order sign?) I dump the premix in already .... I tried to push the car in Neutral but I dont think I can move a 3000 lbs car even its on wheels so I drove it to the second pump and it works.

Too much premix wouldnt hurt the engine, Its just gonna waste your money. (Im not asking you to dump JUST premix into the tank !)
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 12:07 PM
  #266  
dynamho's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 7
From: Norwood, NJ
Thanks for that little advice about making sure that gas is coming in before using premix -- much appreciated. This is what forums are for.
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 12:31 PM
  #267  
KimiFelipe's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by RX8Maine
"If your engine is fine - it will not."

That's a pretty empirical statement.

Why would Mazda use it in racing applications?

I haven't driven anyone else's 8, but I don't have any reason to believe mine was troubled before doing this. Even the "rough idle" is probably a non-issue. The car idles more smoothly than any other car I have owned, but it seems like everyone else claims they can't tell theirs is running without looking at the tach.

What we need is for someone with a brand new 8 to do this as soon as they complete their break-in, possibly even with pre- and post- dyno runs. I'd be willing to contribute toward the cost. I think a lot of people are curious about this.
I'm almost finished breaking mine in - I have just under 1400 mi and am revving as high as 7500, say once per 50 mi on average.

If there is enough interest from the board to fund the testing, I'd be willing to submit my car as a test mule, as long as this is just dino runs. Know a shop in the area? Maybe KTR performance in Ayer?
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 04:02 PM
  #268  
danielk015's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
From: Aliso Viejo, ca
i started pre mixing a few months ago and bought the castrol non synthetic 2 stroke oil as that was the only thing i could find at the time. I thought it worked good for me, smoother idle and seems like better throttle response.. got through a bottle of that and located a motorcycle parts store near me and bought 2 bottles of red line synthetic 2 stroke oil.. works evern better and smoother... I can definitely recommend the red line... there, it sold normally for 6.50, but got it for 5 bucks on sale
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 04:28 PM
  #269  
RX8Maine's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 558
Likes: 3
From: Richland, WA
Originally Posted by StealthTL
probably just another little bit of paranoia....
But a good idea. I hadn't thought of that, but I have stopped at non-functional gas stations a couple times.
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 04:32 PM
  #270  
Butch Brown's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: Pillow, PA
I got rid of my KX250 4 years ago, I ain't premixin no mo!
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 05:13 PM
  #271  
encorez's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
So can good premix do any harm? any harm ????????

Thanks.
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 05:43 PM
  #272  
New Yorker's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 58
From: NYC
Threads like this drive me crazy…

Originally Posted by KimiFelipe
I hate to disagree with you, and I dont know what the feedstock is for these oils, but you are wrong on a couple things so you may be wrong on others, so I'll ask.

First, neither polyisobutylene nor isobutylene are long chain olefins. isobutylene contains 4 carbons and is an olefin. When an olefin is polymerized the product is referred to as a poly(olefin), meaning that it's an olefin which has been polymerized, and the double bonds are now gone, so the product is actually a parafin, it's saturated.

Secondly, I didn't think that PIB is such a good material for an oil - I'm going to have to look it up tomorrow but I thought this was a gummy substance not oily. Depends on molecular weight sure but isobutylene is not the nicest thing to polymerize to low molecular weight, which would give you the right viscosity for a motor oil.

Usually if you want something greasy you want something with a lot less branching in the backbone - PIB is very highly branched! Now, oil technology is VERY complex, and maybe PIB is a small component. If I have time I'll check Lucas' patents and see if I can add anything to the conversation. NO promises, tho.

I dont know what "too" biodegradable means, but there is no reason that biodegradability and combustability have anything at all to do with one another. In a very very broad sense, the more oxygen in a compound the less combustible it is, and for bugs to eat something generally it is nice if you have functional groups in them, which tend to contain oxygen. But from there, there is no connection whatever between biodegradability and combustability.

Example: Ethanol is biodegradable (drink beer??) and very combustible.
Hey, I appreciate the wealth of information—like this—available on forums like this one. That's one of the good things about the internet.

But… make believe, for a second, that I'm just an average Joe who doesn't happen to be a petrochemical engineer. You guys make it amazingly difficult to get an answer to a simple question: should I premix… or not? Especially when we have "dueling" petrochemical engineers. Even if I could understand it—which I can't—who the hell am I supposed to believe??
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 06:00 PM
  #273  
swoope's Avatar
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,603
Likes: 36
From: orlando, fl
Originally Posted by Brettus
Just a thought - if premix really helped that much , your engine had/has a problem .
this is very correct,, as i used premix to mask my motor problems for 25k miles..

beers
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 06:09 PM
  #274  
Brettus's Avatar
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,844
Likes: 1,798
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Originally Posted by RX8Maine
"If your engine is fine - it will not."

That's a pretty empirical statement.

Why would Mazda use it in racing applications?

I haven't driven anyone else's 8, but I don't have any reason to believe mine was troubled before doing this. Even the "rough idle" is probably a non-issue. The car idles more smoothly than any other car I have owned, but it seems like everyone else claims they can't tell theirs is running without looking at the tach.

What we need is for someone with a brand new 8 to do this as soon as they complete their break-in, possibly even with pre- and post- dyno runs. I'd be willing to contribute toward the cost. I think a lot of people are curious about this.
I would be curious to see what a dyno would show also but if I was a betting man I'd certainly take the "no difference" side.
I have done mods to my car that the dyno shows as a 10hp + improvement but really struggle to feel a difference on the road .
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 06:26 PM
  #275  
KimiFelipe's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by New Yorker
Hey, I appreciate the wealth of information—like this—available on forums like this one. That's one of the good things about the internet.

But… make believe, for a second, that I'm just an average Joe who doesn't happen to be a petrochemical engineer. You guys make it amazingly difficult to get an answer to a simple question: should I premix… or not? Especially when we have "dueling" petrochemical engineers. Even if I could understand it—which I can't—who the hell am I supposed to believe??
Neither one of us were addressing the question you are asking, so just ignore us.


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 6 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 PM.