Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Turbo Oil Pressure Regulator

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 4, 2015 | 12:19 PM
  #126  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
I wonder what BW recommends as max OP. I have push lock hoses and fittings for oil cooler lines as well, they have been that way for years now. With Oiteker clamps they can handle a lot of pressure and so far they have held up to the test of time. With the Kool Tool they are pretty easy to make as well.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2015 | 01:14 PM
  #127  
AAaF's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 426
Likes: 29
From: Norway
I do not know the details around the BW turbos, but only a orifice is not exactly a regulator, even if the pressure drop is exponential when oil flow gets turbulent(not laminate). But it might be good enough for the application.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2015 | 01:19 PM
  #128  
AAaF's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 426
Likes: 29
From: Norway
And one thing, I'm not an expert fitting guy, but the quick connectors might be a source of instability and hassle. I've experienced that in my profession. I'd definitively recommend no quick connectors if possible. If you have already made it permanent, keep an VERY close eye after disconnects/connects. Extremely hazardous.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2015 | 11:45 PM
  #129  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
TX

Originally Posted by AAaF
I do not know the details around the BW turbos, but only a orifice is not exactly a regulator, even if the pressure drop is exponential when oil flow gets turbulent(not laminate). But it might be good enough for the application.

Yes, this is exactly why I have the flow control regulator and the adjustable pressure relief valve on the bypass line. My engine has increased oil pressure so even at pretty low RPM it is significantly more than the turbo should see. We shall see though how long my turbo lasts this time, that will be the real test.

Originally Posted by AAaF
And one thing, I'm not an expert fitting guy, but the quick connectors might be a source of instability and hassle. I've experienced that in my profession. I'd definitively recommend no quick connectors if possible. If you have already made it permanent, keep an VERY close eye after disconnects/connects. Extremely hazardous.
Yeah I prefer to have none of the fittings like what I used but the flow regulator and adjustable pressure valve are commercial products, so getting them all to fit together cleanly was kind of a pain. I may have to get something machined to make it work better and to make it easier to install.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2015 | 06:45 PM
  #130  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,140
You can't just take an apple and call it an orange ... well maybe the two of you can, but the rest of us know the difference between an apple and an orange when we see it.

They say absolutely don't do it on their turbo, but it's your wallet to decide what's best for yourself.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2015 | 08:06 PM
  #131  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
Yeah pretty much everything I have read from every turbo manufacturer has said to not use a restrictor of any type on journal bearing and ball bearing turbos. Max pressure limits seem to vary by manufacturer a bit but most state no more than 60PSI at the turbo.

From the Borg Warner EFR Technical Training Guide:

Additional oil restrictions should not be used. The required restriction
to throttle the oil flow to the ball bearings is already integrated into the
bearing housing. The oil supply line should be kept as short as possible.
If a line of unusual length is required, we recommend a -6AN line
especially for very cold climates. -3AN line is not recommended due to
excessive oil supply delay times during cold start. We recommend that
oil reaches the turbo in less that 4 seconds during a cold start cranking,
and in under 1 second during hot-start conditions.
We often get questions about oil selection. The simplest answer is that
turbos prefer warm (but not overly hot), high viscosity (e.g. 10W40),
synthetic oil. Non-synthetic oils may of course be used but the user can
expect a higher degree of laquering and coking. Users of thin oil (e.g.
5W20) can expect lesser bearing system robustness against harsh
conditions or abuse, especially if the oil is very hot. Inlet oil pressure
(gage) is recommended to be at least 1bar (15psi) and not more than
4bar (60psi) under all “fully warmed-up” conditions.

Any input on this stuff is welcomed.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2015 | 08:49 PM
  #132  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,140
Well there's this too:

Dual Row Ceramic Ball Bearings - lowest friction and fastest spool/response, most extreme durability, built-in oil control orifice - (aka oil restrictor) **no restrictor can be used with EFR turbos
I supposed you'd have to call and ask them. However, this is for the BW-EFR apple, not the orange on your car ....
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2015 | 09:28 PM
  #133  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
Yeah Greddy sucks at providing this type of information.

I did find this from Mitsubishi though. It leads me to believe that even my 60PSI max is too much. Mitsubishi makes the Greddy turbos. My center section is upgraded to a water cooled unit but it has the Mitsubishi logo cast into it.

1 kg/Cm2 =14.2 PSI

http://store.forcedperformance.net/m..._Oil_Specs.pdf

http://hondaswap.com/attachments/mit...ent-pdf.16265/

I have also read from a couple manufacturers that only ball bearing turbos come with the oil control orifice/restrictor built in.

Last edited by 9krpmrx8; Apr 5, 2015 at 09:58 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2015 | 08:51 PM
  #134  
Brettus's Avatar
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,845
Likes: 1,799
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8



Just flow tested mine ...........0.08 USgallons/min at idle . Was luke warm not hot so might be a little more . But my turbo has lasted well so this may be a good guide .
Edit :orifice size = 1.5mm

Last edited by Brettus; Jun 28, 2015 at 11:21 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2015 | 06:31 PM
  #135  
Brettus's Avatar
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,845
Likes: 1,799
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Oil Inlet Restrictor - .065" hole size 1/8" NPT (for Journal bearing and larger GT BB) : atpturbo.com
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2015 | 12:01 AM
  #136  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
^ That is the one I had on my previous turbo.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2015 | 12:06 AM
  #137  
JimmyBlack's Avatar
Hybrid Greddy Boosted
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 475
Likes: 30
From: New Zealand
Can you refresh us on how that affected your previous turbo - was it the cause of a CHRA rebuild? Too much/little oil?
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2015 | 01:29 AM
  #138  
logalinipoo's Avatar
Driving my unreliable rx8
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 7
From: Alvarado, Tx
After running this for a while and getting it adjusted right I'm very happy with the results. My pressure is a little high from a cold start, and runs great once things start warming up. If I was going to do it again I think I'd skip the flow control and just go with a larger restriction then standard with the bypass. It gives the best of both worlds, plenty of flow with a set pressure.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2015 | 09:24 AM
  #139  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
TX

Originally Posted by JimmyBlack
Can you refresh us on how that affected your previous turbo - was it the cause of a CHRA rebuild? Too much/little oil?
Yes the previous turbo saw too much oil pressure and that was believed to be the cause of the failure. But also Turdblown "rebuilt" it (sent it to Comp Turbo) and the last builder did not believe it was even rebuilt, he just think they slapped the new compressor wheel on it and that was it.

Originally Posted by logalinipoo
After running this for a while and getting it adjusted right I'm very happy with the results. My pressure is a little high from a cold start, and runs great once things start warming up. If I was going to do it again I think I'd skip the flow control and just go with a larger restriction then standard with the bypass. It gives the best of both worlds, plenty of flow with a set pressure.

Yeah I am happy with mine thus far. I do plan on moving it and setting it up so that it is more universal should anyone else want one.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2015 | 10:57 AM
  #140  
05rx8mazda's Avatar
B.I.G
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 1
From: AT---EIL
My baby may end up wanting one should you end up making a kit Scott.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2015 | 11:15 AM
  #141  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
I can hook you up bruh.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2015 | 02:50 PM
  #142  
05rx8mazda's Avatar
B.I.G
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 1
From: AT---EIL
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
I can hook you up bruh.
LET ME KNOW BRUUUHHH.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2017 | 01:36 PM
  #143  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
My setup is still working great.

A friend also shared this today:

Turbosmart Breathes Longer Life Into Your Turbo | Turbosmart
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2017 | 08:04 PM
  #144  
Reoze's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 448
Likes: 50
From: Austin, TX
I still don't know a whole lot about oil pressure and turbos, but you were targeting 60 PSI. They only sell those at 40PSI. Do you think that's sufficient for your average greddy sized turbo?
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2017 | 10:58 PM
  #145  
slash128's Avatar
n3rd
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,133
Likes: 49
From: in my mind
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
Yeah pretty much everything I have read from every turbo manufacturer has said to not use a restrictor of any type on journal bearing and ball bearing turbos. Max pressure limits seem to vary by manufacturer a bit but most state no more than 60PSI at the turbo.

From the Borg Warner EFR Technical Training Guide:




Any input on this stuff is welcomed.
I know I am responding to an old post but since this was revived I figured I would add... CompTurbo explicitly told me I must use a restrictor with the ball bearing turbo I got. IIRC it is somewhere around 0.018". I think it just depends on whether one is built in or not.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2017 | 09:12 AM
  #146  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
TX

Originally Posted by Reoze
I still don't know a whole lot about oil pressure and turbos, but you were targeting 60 PSI. They only sell those at 40PSI. Do you think that's sufficient for your average greddy sized turbo?

Most turbos would be fine around the 40psi mark, 60psi is on the higher end of the scale.

Just read what the actual turbo manufacturers recommend and you will get an idea.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2017 | 07:23 PM
  #147  
Reoze's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 448
Likes: 50
From: Austin, TX
I've got a Greddy turbo that was modified by BNR. I'd hate to bother Bryan over the same issue you already spoke to him about. He said 10PSI per 1k RPM max, but did he give any minimum recommended pressures? If not I can always try hitting him up.

On a side note, did you ever put together any of those kits you were talking about? I'd grab one in a heartbeat. I know if I pieced it together myself it probably wouldn't end too well.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2017 | 09:50 AM
  #148  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
This would apply to the Greddy (mitsubishi)

https://www.forcedperformance.net/me..._Oil_Specs.pdf
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2017 | 07:53 PM
  #149  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,140
not to say it won't work, but they didn't intend it for that application to begin with ...

Turbosmart’s new patent pending OPR T40 is an oil pressure regulation system for your ball bearing turbocharger. It helps prevent compressor or turbine stage oil leaking or smoking, and takes the guesswork out of oil restrictor sizing for more efficient and effective oil delivery.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2017 | 10:53 PM
  #150  
Reoze's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 448
Likes: 50
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
This would apply to the Greddy (mitsubishi)

https://www.forcedperformance.net/me..._Oil_Specs.pdf

I definitely appreciate it. Does having a water cooled bearing housing not affect it at all? I can't fathom how it would.

For anyone who doesn't feel like doing the math.

Idle - 11-12 PSI
Recommended at full load - 42-50 PSI

So while that pressure regulator might work, it's definitely on the low end of what's acceptable.

Originally Posted by TeamRX8
not to say it won't work, but they didn't intend it for that application to begin with ...
Good point, I'm still trying to learn the nuances about my turbo and how it relates to others. I've mostly taken it for granted and focused elsewhere.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:53 PM.