Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Turbo Efficiency Range for RX-8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-09-2009, 05:00 PM
  #226  
C4 burns real good
iTrader: (4)
 
WantedTwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts


Read the thread....

90% of this thread is dedicated to that turbo, for the GReddy kit the problem is packing. There are far better choices for the 8 as far as efficiency is concerned but those turbos just won’t fit down there. The 3071 is one of the "best" choices out there besides some hybrid frankinturbo for the GReddy kit and only the GReddy kit. For those of us who are doing, or have done a top mount, we don't have to use a turbo chosen because it was the best that could be shoved into a small hole. Just actually read the thread, then read it again and if you’re slow like me, read it a third time.

Last edited by WantedTwo; 02-09-2009 at 05:05 PM.
Old 02-09-2009, 07:30 PM
  #227  
Registered
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
A better choice than the Greddy turbo is to leave it completely stock. Either that or get another car. Yes the Greddy turbo sucks that bad!!! You couldn't pay me to use it. In fact you couldn't pay me to use the manifold it's mounted on. That thing is a piece of junk too.
Old 02-09-2009, 07:40 PM
  #228  
sold the 8... :(
iTrader: (7)
 
05rex8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that was rather a pointless contribution to this thread
Old 02-09-2009, 07:54 PM
  #229  
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
swoope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 14,602
Received 35 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by 05rex8
that was rather a pointless contribution to this thread
somehow i think you might lose that argument.. rg, does not post comments lightly.

odd that that the comment was so brief.

i bet he is typing now, why the exhaust manifold sucks, and how to fix it! at least i hope he is!

beers
Old 02-09-2009, 07:56 PM
  #230  
sold the 8... :(
iTrader: (7)
 
05rex8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not looking for an arguement, lol....we all know the down falls of the greddy kit...but for some, its all they need power wise. With the talks of current upgrades to the greddy unit itself like what Bryan at BNR is doing, looks promising IMO. More added reliability and plenty of power for the street. Especially if it's not a daily driver, the reliability is really not an issue to much. To each their own though, right?

Last edited by 05rex8; 02-09-2009 at 07:59 PM.
Old 02-09-2009, 08:04 PM
  #231  
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
swoope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 14,602
Received 35 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by 05rex8
not looking for an arguement, lol....we all know the down falls of the greddy kit...but for some, its all they need power wise. With the talks of current upgrades to the greddy unit itself like what Bryan at BNR is doing, looks promising IMO. More added reliability and plenty of power for the street. Especially if it's not a daily driver, the reliability is really not an issue to much. To each their own though, right?
sure,

but for the most part if you read the last 3 pages. rg agrees with what you say now..

but i would not discredit anything rg says. learn from it..

always ways to do something better. read learn, search, learn.

beers
Old 02-09-2009, 08:06 PM
  #232  
sold the 8... :(
iTrader: (7)
 
05rex8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by swoope
sure,

but for the most part if you read the last 3 pages. rg agrees with what you say now..

but i would not discredit anything rg says. learn from it..

always ways to do something better. read learn, search, learn.

beers
I certainly wouldn't discredit RG, I have more respect than that I believe.
I have met him in person actually at Granite City....a local Brew pub here in Des Moines...and we all know how fond of them he is
Old 02-09-2009, 09:37 PM
  #233  
Turbocharger Guru
 
Bryan@BNR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Birmingham, AL USA
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Ultimately I would like to convert the RX8 turbochargers from non water cooled centers to water cooled centers. This would cure the coaking problems they continuously have. It will take some work and maybe production of a custom bearing housing, but if there is enough of a market out there, I am willing to invest time and money developing a cure for the limited Greddy unit.

Bryan@BNR
205 640 1193
Old 02-09-2009, 10:09 PM
  #234  
sold the 8... :(
iTrader: (7)
 
05rex8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bryan@BNR
Ultimately I would like to convert the RX8 turbochargers from non water cooled centers to water cooled centers. This would cure the coaking problems they continuously have. It will take some work and maybe production of a custom bearing housing, but if there is enough of a market out there, I am willing to invest time and money developing a cure for the limited Greddy unit.

Bryan@BNR
205 640 1193
nice
Old 02-09-2009, 10:12 PM
  #235  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,528
Received 1,494 Likes on 842 Posts
/\ if you could upgrade the greddy to be reliable and produce 300-320 whp for around $1000 I think you have a market ......
Old 02-09-2009, 10:15 PM
  #236  
1st RX8 BNR Turbo Owner..
iTrader: (1)
 
J.Cab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Brettus
/\ if you could upgrade the greddy to be reliable and produce 300-320 whp for around $1000 I think you have a market ......
Well here shortly I will be able to show you guys what Bryan can do with the Greddy turbo. I am going to send it off here in the about 1-2 weeks. Then about a 2 week turn around.
Old 02-09-2009, 10:15 PM
  #237  
sold the 8... :(
iTrader: (7)
 
05rex8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with Brettus....I just spent a grand on my rebuild/upgrade....
Old 02-09-2009, 10:17 PM
  #238  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,528
Received 1,494 Likes on 842 Posts
/\ so when is it going in ? huh ? huh ?
Old 02-09-2009, 10:24 PM
  #239  
sold the 8... :(
iTrader: (7)
 
05rex8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just sent it out today....should reach destination in 3 days, then it's a week turnaround time, then ship back. It's going to be a long wait for me!
Old 02-09-2009, 11:31 PM
  #240  
Registered
 
arghx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
whoever said a .70 A/R 60-1... I thought you meant the compressor housing, which is a standard size and has a 4" inlet usually. You can't get a .70 A/R T4 turbine housing normally. It is usually .63, .82, or .96 (larger ones are available though) if undivided. I ran the .96 undivided on my car.

Last edited by arghx7; 02-09-2009 at 11:33 PM.
Old 02-10-2009, 01:35 PM
  #241  
Registered
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by 05rex8
I certainly wouldn't discredit RG, I have more respect than that I believe.
I have met him in person actually at Granite City....a local Brew pub here in Des Moines...and we all know how fond of them he is
I take no offense whatsoever. I think by now you know I'm pretty opinionated! I have such a deep seeded hatred for the cheap poorly designed crap that Greddy builds and markets on poor souls that if a small gain is all you want, I'd rather find another way to get it. A large sail and a nice tailwind come to mind. Anything but to have to associate Greddy with the car. Greddy is a company that really needs to go under as their usefullness on this planet has run out.

I take that back. The Profec B boost controller and their turbo timer are useful. Everything else in their entire line needs to be scrapped and written off.
Old 02-10-2009, 02:03 PM
  #242  
C4 burns real good
iTrader: (4)
 
WantedTwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Ok, I got clarification on the turbo, and this is what I'm looking at in it's entirety.

60-1 compressor wheel, .60AR compressor housing, P-trim turbine, .70AR turbine housing, water cooled, ball bearing

Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but aren’t all 60-1 series a .60AR compressor? So, in which case from what Jeff has said, the .7 is too small on the hot side. From the .68 it goes to .81 and then to a .96. I'm thinking the .96 isn't what I'm looking for so I'm eyeballing the .81. Please advise.

Last edited by WantedTwo; 02-10-2009 at 02:10 PM.
Old 02-10-2009, 02:56 PM
  #243  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,528
Received 1,494 Likes on 842 Posts
Originally Posted by rotarygod
I take no offense whatsoever. I think by now you know I'm pretty opinionated! I have such a deep seeded hatred for the cheap poorly designed crap that Greddy builds and markets on poor souls that if a small gain is all you want, I'd rather find another way to get it. A large sail and a nice tailwind come to mind. Anything but to have to associate Greddy with the car. Greddy is a company that really needs to go under as their usefullness on this planet has run out.

I take that back. The Profec B boost controller and their turbo timer are useful. Everything else in their entire line needs to be scrapped and written off.
As an owner of said equipment i'm struggling to see why you hate it that much .
Perhaps one of their staff shot your mother or something ?
Old 02-10-2009, 03:56 PM
  #244  
C4 burns real good
iTrader: (4)
 
WantedTwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
.I can help answer that, the initial kit that was released is lacking in so many areas, that you spend so much time trying to make it drivable. Here is a list just off the top of my head

Turbo - Nuff said
manifold - Known to crack
BOV - oh that’s right it doesn't have one nor has a spot for one
Waste Gate - ineffective at high RPM
Emanage - pure garbage especially the blue
couplers - known to tear, crack, and pop
air filter - well, it will keep rocks out

The way I look at it, if I have to replace or fix 90% of something it qualifies as a POS. I'm not talking out of my *** either, I was one of the early Greddy owners and I paid the price just like so many others. The biggest problem with the kit is it's up front cost is cheap enough to blind people from seeing its flaws.

Last edited by WantedTwo; 02-10-2009 at 03:58 PM.
Old 02-10-2009, 04:01 PM
  #245  
Registered
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
A piece of junk is a piece of junk regardless of how well it sells or whose name is on it. Just holding the individual components in your hand and looking at them should tell you that they don't belong on an engine. At least not on a rotary. Maybe something small like a Honda motor. I don't need to justify my opinion on it to anyone. Not even Greddy. As far as I'm concerned Greddy needs to justify this crap to everyone else because for the life of me I can't find more than about 10 minutes worth of actual engineering in their kit. It was as if someone said let's throw these things that we already have into a kit, put a price on it, and sell it. Oh yeah lets quickly cast up a little manifold to improvise this **** into place. Viola! A Greddy turbo kit!
Old 02-10-2009, 04:24 PM
  #246  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,528
Received 1,494 Likes on 842 Posts
I don't need to justify my opinion either - but i will cuz it's fun on the internetz .

Ok - it has most of those flaws that all and sundry have noted . Fix those and you still have a cheap kit that does a lot for the renesis . The only real issue i have with the (upgraded in my case) turbo is that i don't expect it to last more than 20,000 miles . I'm actually ok with that as i knew it going in .
Old 02-10-2009, 04:24 PM
  #247  
Reginald P. Billingsly
iTrader: (5)
 
bose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Taylorsville, UT
Posts: 1,915
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What kind of manifold is a good design? I want to go FI, I definitely don't want to put any garbage on my car. Is a tubular manifold more suitable? Is it the location, would a top mount location be better. Sorry for the newbish questions, I just don't know where to learn more.
Old 02-10-2009, 04:42 PM
  #248  
C4 burns real good
iTrader: (4)
 
WantedTwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
It is opinion based really, Mazsport made a good kit, PTP makes a good kit, but my opinion is SFR makes the best kit. They use 321SS for the mani and all of the parts are quality, however the cost is considerably more but you get what you pay for. Go with a top mount, there just isn't enough room down below for the properly sized turbo, which is what this thread is about.
Old 02-10-2009, 05:04 PM
  #249  
Reginald P. Billingsly
iTrader: (5)
 
bose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Taylorsville, UT
Posts: 1,915
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I understand, I want a top mount kit more than the Greddy simply cause I don't much like the iwg design, it doesn't seem to control boost as well as ewg, and the fact that I can put whatever I want/need in there without worry of packaging. I don't know for sure though, that why I've been reading this thread.

/back to reading.
Old 02-10-2009, 05:38 PM
  #250  
sold the 8... :(
iTrader: (7)
 
05rex8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by WantedTwo
.I can help answer that, the initial kit that was released is lacking in so many areas, that you spend so much time trying to make it drivable. Here is a list just off the top of my head

Turbo - Nuff said
manifold - Known to crack
BOV - oh that’s right it doesn't have one nor has a spot for one
Waste Gate - ineffective at high RPM
Emanage - pure garbage especially the blue
couplers - known to tear, crack, and pop
air filter - well, it will keep rocks out

The way I look at it, if I have to replace or fix 90% of something it qualifies as a POS. I'm not talking out of my *** either, I was one of the early Greddy owners and I paid the price just like so many others. The biggest problem with the kit is it's up front cost is cheap enough to blind people from seeing its flaws.
I agree with what was said here, but that only proves true to the people who buy the kits brand new. I bought mine with all the stuff you needed to make it a better kit, minus the couplers and clamps, which is no big deal...and got an accessport instead of the emanage, and a better CAI. Now, it still is not perfect, but sure puts a smile on my face when I drive it.

Now if I paid full price for this kit, I suppose I wouldn't be too happy right now....but I knew better not to do that, lol.

So in conclusion, if you can find this kit used, it as a decent, cheap way to go FI. Sure you will need to upgrade a few parts, but that's the fun of it, right?


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: Turbo Efficiency Range for RX-8



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:27 PM.