Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

The Turblown Turbo System Differences

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-15-2011, 01:40 AM
  #51  
Registered
 
shr3da's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I agree V mount is the way to go, fresh air to the inter cooler and radiator.

That's an intresting set up TEAMRX8, seams like a lot of mucking around though with the radiator, getting new hoses that fit and such.

I would have thourght the intercooler would have sucked in some hot engine bay air being in that location.
Old 12-15-2011, 01:44 AM
  #52  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
Getting hoses is the easy part and intercoolers don't suck.
Old 12-15-2011, 09:21 AM
  #53  
Boostin'
Thread Starter
 
Turblown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
Do this and have it ready by the time I destroy this AMR turbo I'm not interested in a top mount, I love this idea though.


Oil-less turbo = awesome. I don't even want to know the price of one of those
Better get in line then. I am crazy busy...

I don't have an install shot, its been on a car running for a long time..
Old 12-15-2011, 09:29 AM
  #54  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,725
Received 2,009 Likes on 1,638 Posts
relocating the radiator allows you to reconfigure how air flows through and around the vehicle

Attached Thumbnails The Turblown Turbo System Differences-092109_fieldview122.jpg  
Old 12-15-2011, 02:49 PM
  #55  
Registered
 
jayscoobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Turblown making a low mount system. Seems like a done deal. Great for California and I always felt that it's pointless to buy greddys kit when more than half of it gets replaced.

On a sidenote, all of you with boosted rx8s, was it really worth the money you dumped in it for FI?
Old 12-15-2011, 02:57 PM
  #56  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
TX

Originally Posted by jayscoobs
Turblown making a low mount system. Seems like a done deal. Great for California and I always felt that it's pointless to buy greddys kit when more than half of it gets replaced.

On a sidenote, all of you with boosted rx8s, was it really worth the money you dumped in it for FI?
I am happy so far. What gets replaced in the Greddy kit? My turbo was upgraded but nothing was replaced. With any turbo kit there is always tweaks and room for improvement.
Old 12-15-2011, 03:10 PM
  #57  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by jayscoobs
I always felt that it's pointless to buy greddys kit when more than half of it gets replaced.
Depends what you pay for it - 2nd hand can be an excellent deal.

Originally Posted by jayscoobs
On a sidenote, all of you with boosted rx8s, was it really worth the money you dumped in it for FI?
Depends on the result you get - which in turn depends on the decisions you make and how you go about the whole thing .
Done poorly it is the worst nightmare you can possibly imagine .
Done properly and it transforms the car into something very special .
Old 12-15-2011, 03:15 PM
  #58  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
+1.
Old 12-15-2011, 04:44 PM
  #59  
Registered
 
jayscoobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The way I usually do things is do it right the first time so no headaches down the road. Yeah ungraded turbo, I also don't like how the manifold cracks easily. It'll be great to see a much better manifold made from turblown. Better couplers and lines. Garrett IC core and having to buy aem intake with greddy sucks, everything adds up =( lol. That would be my ideal kit. But with a fresh rebuilt motor I want to see 100k miles with a mix of street and track driving. But haven't seen it done so I'm just waiting to see if development ever achieves that
Old 12-15-2011, 04:45 PM
  #60  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,725
Received 2,009 Likes on 1,638 Posts
https://www.rx8club.com/showpost.php...43&postcount=1
Old 12-15-2011, 04:53 PM
  #61  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
TX

Originally Posted by Turblown
Better get in line then. I am crazy busy...

I don't have an install shot, its been on a car running for a long time..
I'm in line.

Originally Posted by jayscoobs
The way I usually do things is do it right the first time so no headaches down the road. Yeah ungraded turbo, I also don't like how the manifold cracks easily. It'll be great to see a much better manifold made from turblown. Better couplers and lines. Garrett IC core and having to buy aem intake with greddy sucks, everything adds up =( lol. That would be my ideal kit. But with a fresh rebuilt motor I want to see 100k miles with a mix of street and track driving. But haven't seen it done so I'm just waiting to see if development ever achieves that
Fast, Cheap, or Reliable, pick one.
Old 12-15-2011, 05:02 PM
  #62  
Official Post Whore
iTrader: (2)
 
pdxhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 10,462
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by jayscoobs
The way I usually do things is do it right the first time so no headaches down the road. Yeah ungraded turbo, I also don't like how the manifold cracks easily. It'll be great to see a much better manifold made from turblown. Better couplers and lines. Garrett IC core and having to buy aem intake with greddy sucks, everything adds up =( lol. That would be my ideal kit. But with a fresh rebuilt motor I want to see 100k miles with a mix of street and track driving. But haven't seen it done so I'm just waiting to see if development ever achieves that
Let me know when you find this fantasy kit
Old 12-15-2011, 07:51 PM
  #63  
Registered
 
jayscoobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pdxhak
Let me know when you find this fantasy kit
Uhmmm im pretty sure Elliot mentioned that hes building a manifold for a low mount kit. He also has a turbo that would fit it well. Just need braided steel lines/hard lines, better couplers and buy all the piping yourself. Garrett core that Elliot uses and make a intake that makes it a CAI like how all Greddy users been doing. Thats the definition of the "fantasy kit", So its been found?
Old 12-15-2011, 08:03 PM
  #64  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,725
Received 2,009 Likes on 1,638 Posts
He was referring to your "100k miles" statement
Old 12-16-2011, 03:25 PM
  #65  
Registered
 
jayscoobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ahhhhh. My bad. What's the most what anyone's gotten anyways?
Old 12-16-2011, 05:19 PM
  #66  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,725
Received 2,009 Likes on 1,638 Posts
a couple of dyno runs

no srsly, looks like some advances have been made but is still early to draw hard conclusions regarding your inquiry

IMO the side seals will still be the weak link eventually, but time will tell otherwise
Old 12-16-2011, 05:28 PM
  #67  
Official Post Whore
iTrader: (2)
 
pdxhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 10,462
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts
30k? 50k? Not sure the longest someone has gone with a FI Renesis.

Way too many variables to consider since this is not an OE setup. Every install is custom setup.
Old 12-18-2011, 03:06 PM
  #68  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
JoeMin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Turblown
Can someone say 400+rwhp low mount? Hmmmmmm turbos...


You can keep your OMP !
So will the low mount system be the better choice? I don't have an issue pre mixing as long as it provides as much longevity for the engine.

Also, can you use a top mount intercooler with your top mount turbo system?

Thanks,
Joe
Old 12-18-2011, 06:11 PM
  #69  
Registered
 
tofu_box's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
bit hard to fit a top mount intercooler with the turbo being there....
Old 12-18-2011, 06:24 PM
  #70  
Boostin'
Thread Starter
 
Turblown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by JoeMin
So will the low mount system be the better choice? I don't have an issue pre mixing as long as it provides as much longevity for the engine.

Also, can you use a top mount intercooler with your top mount turbo system?

Thanks,
Joe
If you want a Vmount, or top mount intercooler setup you need a low mount turbo system. I don't see any difference in reliability engine wise for top mount vs low mount. A top mount turbo system will definitely have a nicer flowing turbo manifold, and chances are might make more power up top...
Old 12-19-2011, 02:14 AM
  #71  
Registered
 
AAaF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Norway
Posts: 404
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
a couple of dyno runs
IMO the side seals will still be the weak link eventually, but time will tell otherwise
I think to have read that you could get some inconel springs for RX7 sideseal, is there any reason why RX8 shouldn't get the same opportunity? After what I've read(and are experiencing by my hot- start problems) spring weakening is the problem, not that the seal cracks?
Old 12-19-2011, 02:40 AM
  #72  
Lucky #33
iTrader: (4)
 
hoss -05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Antonio, SARX Garage
Posts: 2,851
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by AAaF
I think to have read that you could get some inconel springs for RX7 sideseal, is there any reason why RX8 shouldn't get the same opportunity? After what I've read(and are experiencing by my hot- start problems) spring weakening is the problem, not that the seal cracks?

You have a link to this spring manufacturer?
Old 12-19-2011, 03:07 AM
  #73  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,725
Received 2,009 Likes on 1,638 Posts
It's nearly impossible to get any metal spring regardless of material type to maintain a temper resilience above a certain temperature
Old 12-19-2011, 09:04 AM
  #74  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
team hit the nail on the head. When Mazda started the side exhaust port--the side seals became a target in the crosshairs. The on top of that they moved the side seals closer to the combustion face. That equals more heat.
Then FI is going to cause even more heat as more power always = more heat.
30k-50K would sound reasonable, BUT it all depends on many factors. The tune, the gas you run, the upkeep you do, the temperature controls you have, how often do you go in boost (tracking/street), etc etc.
If you could get 50K out of an engine street driving and doing 2-3 track w/e's a year--them imho that would be great.
Realistically, if you track this bugger and place high loads on it in the higher gears for any lenght of time, then it is a toss of the coin. 1st, 2nd, and even 3nd gears rev up so fast that they are usually not a weak area on a properly tuned/maintained 300hp engine. 4th and 5th gears however --again imho--is where the problems that I know off usually show themselves.
I have no idea how to fix that.
The bridgeport may help cool the side seals some? IDK for sure but it appears it could.
Old 12-19-2011, 12:42 PM
  #75  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
JoeMin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Turblown
If you want a Vmount, or top mount intercooler setup you need a low mount turbo system. I don't see any difference in reliability engine wise for top mount vs low mount. A top mount turbo system will definitely have a nicer flowing turbo manifold, and chances are might make more power up top...
I was referring to the premix vs omp. But what I have read before, premixing is better because the oil injectors cant cover the entire surface. But that discussion is for another thread.

On your site you have $6500 listed as the price for the kit. What is the cost of the "Tier 1" kit you mentioned? I am looking for a introductory level kit.

Thanks,
Joe


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: The Turblown Turbo System Differences



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:49 PM.